| Literature DB >> 35205746 |
Ravneet Vohra1, Yak-Nam Wang2, Helena Son3, Stephanie Totten3, Akshit Arora4, Adam Maxwell5, Donghoon Lee1.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are characterized by a complex and robust tumor microenvironment (TME) consisting of fibrotic tissue, excessive levels of hyaluronan (HA), and immune cells. We utilized quantitative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) methods at 14 Tesla in a genetically engineered KPC (KrasLSL-G12D/+, Trp53LSL-R172H/+, Cre) mouse model to assess the complex TME in advanced stages of tumor development. The whole tumor, excluding cystic areas, was selected as the region of interest for data analysis and subsequent statistical analysis. Pearson correlation was used for statistical inference. There was a significant correlation between tumor volume and T2 (r = -0.66), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) (r = 0.60), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (r = 0.48), and Glycosaminoglycan-chemical exchange saturation transfer (GagCEST) (r = 0.51). A subset of mice was randomly selected for histological analysis. There were positive correlations between tumor volume and fibrosis (0.92), and HA (r = 0.76); GagCEST and HA (r = 0.81); and MTR and CD31 (r = 0.48). We found a negative correlation between ADC low-b (perfusion) and Ki67 (r = -0.82). Strong correlations between mp-MRI and histology results suggest that mp-MRI can be used as a non-invasive tool to monitor the tumor microenvironment.Entities:
Keywords: amide proton transfer (APT); apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST); glycosaminoglycan (Gag); multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI); pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205746 PMCID: PMC8870395 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Relationship between Tumor volume and MR parameters in advanced stages of PDAC. (A) showing relationship between Tumor volume and T1 (ms); (B) showing relationship between Tumor Volume and T2 (ms); (C) showing relationship between Tumor volume and MTR (%).
Figure 2Relationship between Tumor volume and ADC in advanced stages of PDAC. (A) showing relationship between Tumor volume and ADC (mm2/s); (B) showing relationship between Tumor Volume and ADC low b values (pseudo-diffusion); (C) showing relationship between Tumor volume and ADC (high b values).
Figure 3Relationship between Tumor volume and CEST parameters in the advanced stages of PDAC. (A) showing relationship between Tumor volume and Amide proton transfer (APT%); (B) showing relationship between Tumor Volume and Glycosaminoglycans (GagCEST).
Figure 4Relationship between MR and histological parameters in the advanced stages of PDAC. (A) showing relationship between Tumor volume (mm3) and Fibrosis (%); (B) showing relationship between T2 (ms) and Fibrosis (%); (C) relationship between MTR (%) and Fibrosis (%); (D) ADC low b (×10−3 mm2/s) and Fibrosis (%); (E,F) Representative images of Masson’s Trichrome and H&E stained tumor.
Figure 5Relationship between MR and histological parameters in the advanced stages of PDAC. (A) showing relationship between Tumor volume and Hyaluronan (HA%); (B) showing relationship between GagCEST and HA (%); (C) relationship between MTR (%) and CD31; (D) ADC low b and Ki67. (E–G) Representative images of HA, CD31 and Ki67 stained slides.