Literature DB >> 23296083

Fibrosis and pancreatic lesions: counterintuitive behavior of the diffusion imaging-derived structural diffusion coefficient d.

Miriam Klauss1, Matthias M Gaida, Andreas Lemke, Katharina Grünberg, Dirk Simon, Moritz N Wente, Stefan Delorme, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Lars Grenacher, Bram Stieltjes.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Stroma reaction leading to fibrosis is the most characteristic histopathological feature of both pancreatic carcinoma and chronic pancreatitis with increased fibrosis compared with healthy pancreatic tissue and further increased fibrosis during radiochemotherapy. Recent studies using intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters did not show differences for structural diffusion constant D between these 2 diseases. The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that D correlates with the histopathological grade of fibrosis in pancreatic lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 15 patients with histopathologically proven pancreatic carcinoma and 9 patients with histopathologically proven focal chronic pancreatitis. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed using 10 b values between 25 and 800 s/mm² before surgery. We calculated the apparent diffusion coefficient and the intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters D and f within tumors and focal chronic pancreatitis. The resected tissue was evaluated with regard to the grade of fibrosis.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients were found to have moderate fibrosis and 10 patients had severe fibrosis. The difference between the D values for the moderate and severe fibrosis was significant with mean (SD) D value of 1.02 × 10⁻³ (0.48 × 10⁻³ mm/s) and mean (SD) D of 1.22 × 10⁻³ (0.76 × 10⁻³) mm²/s. There were no significant differences for the f and ADC values.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, D rises from moderate to severe fibrosis. It seems that cellular complexes surrounded by fibrosis provide more structural limitations than does fibrosis alone. Our data suggest that D is not intuitively related to the degree of fibrosis. Compared with healthy tissue, D is reduced in moderate fibrosis but increases when severe fibrosis is present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23296083     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827ac0f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  17 in total

1.  IVIM DW-MRI of autoimmune pancreatitis: therapy monitoring and differentiation from pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Miriam Klauß; Klaus Maier-Hein; Christine Tjaden; Thilo Hackert; Lars Grenacher; Bram Stieltjes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Flavia Dal Corso; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28

Review 3.  Various diffusion magnetic resonance imaging techniques for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Meng-Yue Tang; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Tian-Wu Chen; Xiao-Hua Huang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

4.  Comparison of fitting methods and b-value sampling strategies for intravoxel incoherent motion in breast cancer.

Authors:  Gene Young Cho; Linda Moy; Jeff L Zhang; Steven Baete; Riccardo Lattanzi; Melanie Moccaldi; James S Babb; Sungheon Kim; Daniel K Sodickson; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Anatomical, Physiological, and Molecular Imaging for Pancreatic Cancer: Current Clinical Use and Future Implications.

Authors:  John Chang; Donald Schomer; Tomislav Dragovich
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Caveat of measuring perfusion indexes using intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in the human brain.

Authors:  Wen-Chau Wu; Ya-Fang Chen; Han-Min Tseng; Shun-Chung Yang; Pei-Chi My
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas.

Authors:  Noam Nissan; Talia Golan; Edna Furman-Haran; Sara Apter; Yael Inbar; Arie Ariche; Barak Bar-Zakay; Yuri Goldes; Michael Schvimer; Dov Grobgeld; Hadassa Degani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quantitative parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI): potential application in predicting pathological grades of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wanling Ma; Guangwen Zhang; Jing Ren; Qi Pan; Didi Wen; Jinman Zhong; Zhuoli Zhang; Yi Huan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-04

9.  Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts: associations with tumor differentiation and collagen content.

Authors:  Catherine S Wegner; Jon-Vidar Gaustad; Lise Mari K Andersen; Trude G Simonsen; Einar K Rofstad
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Jinggang Zhang; Man Jiang; Yue Zhang; Tongbing Chen; Jilei Zhang; Bei Li; Jie Chen; Wei Xing
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.