Literature DB >> 22907893

Amide proton transfer imaging of the breast at 3 T: establishing reproducibility and possible feasibility assessing chemotherapy response.

Adrienne N Dula1, Lori R Arlinghaus, Richard D Dortch, Blake E Dewey, Jennifer G Whisenant, Gregory D Ayers, Thomas E Yankeelov, Seth A Smith.   

Abstract

Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging can generate contrast that is sensitive to amide protons associated with proteins and peptides (termed amide proton transfer, APT). In breast cancer, APT contrast may report on underlying changes in microstructural tissue composition. However, to date, there have been no developments or applications of APT chemical exchange saturation transfer to breast cancer. As a result, the aims of this study were to (i) experimentally explore optimal scan parameters for breast chemical exchange saturation transfer near the amide resonance at 3 T, (ii) establish the reliability of APT imaging of healthy fibroglandular tissue, and (iii) demonstrate preliminary results on APT changes in locally advanced breast cancer observed during the course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chemical exchange saturation transfer measurements were experimentally optimized on cross-linked bovine serum albumin phantoms, and the reliability of APT imaging was assessed in 10 women with no history of breast disease. The mean difference between test-retest APT values was not significantly different from zero, and the individual difference values were not dependent on the average APT value. The 95% confidence interval limits were ±0.70% (α = 0.05), and the repeatability was 1.91. APT measurements were also performed in three women before and after one cycle of chemotherapy. Following therapy, APT increased in the one patient with progressive disease and decreased in the two patients with a partial or complete response. Together, these results suggest that APT imaging may report on treatment response in these patients.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22907893      PMCID: PMC3505231          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  37 in total

1.  Multiple sclerosis normal-appearing white matter: pathology-imaging correlations.

Authors:  Natalia M Moll; Anna M Rietsch; Smitha Thomas; Amy J Ransohoff; Jar-Chi Lee; Robert Fox; Ansi Chang; Richard M Ransohoff; Elizabeth Fisher
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging in human brain at 3 T via selective inversion recovery.

Authors:  Richard D Dortch; Ke Li; Daniel F Gochberg; E Brian Welch; Adrienne N Dula; Ashish A Tamhane; John C Gore; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3T.

Authors:  Craig K Jones; Michael J Schlosser; Peter C M van Zijl; Martin G Pomper; Xavier Golay; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  MRI evidence for multiple sclerosis as a diffuse disease of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Massimo Filippi; Maria Assunta Rocca
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  MR imaging of high-grade brain tumors using endogenous protein and peptide-based contrast.

Authors:  Zhibo Wen; Shuguang Hu; Fanheng Huang; Xianlong Wang; Linglang Guo; Xianyue Quan; Silun Wang; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Longitudinal and multi-echo transverse relaxation times of normal breast tissue at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Richard A E Edden; Seth A Smith; Peter B Barker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?

Authors:  Peter C M van Zijl; Nirbhay N Yadav
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Susan M Galbraith; Martin A Lodge; N Jane Taylor; Gordon J S Rustin; Søren Bentzen; J James Stirling; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Reproducibility and changes in the apparent diffusion coefficients of solid tumours treated with combretastatin A4 phosphate and bevacizumab in a two-centre phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  Dow-Mu Koh; Matthew Blackledge; David J Collins; Anwar R Padhani; Toni Wallace; Benjamin Wilton; N Jane Taylor; J James Stirling; Rajesh Sinha; Pat Walicke; Martin O Leach; Ian Judson; Paul Nathan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance studies of abnormalities in the normal appearing white matter and grey matter in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D H Miller; A J Thompson; M Filippi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  75 in total

1.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI using intermolecular double-quantum coherences with multiple refocusing pulses.

Authors:  Jianhua Lu; Congbo Cai; Shuhui Cai; Zhong Chen; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Predicting IDH mutation status in grade II gliomas using amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI.

Authors:  Shanshan Jiang; Tianyu Zou; Charles G Eberhart; Maria A V Villalobos; Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Yu Wang; Xianlong Wang; Hao Yu; Yongxing Du; Peter C M van Zijl; Zhibo Wen; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for spillover-, MT-, and T1 -corrected steady-state pulsed CEST-MRI--application to pH-weighted MRI of acute stroke.

Authors:  Moritz Zaiss; Junzhong Xu; Steffen Goerke; Imad S Khan; Robert J Singer; John C Gore; Daniel F Gochberg; Peter Bachert
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  A review of optimization and quantification techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI toward sensitive in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Jinsuh Kim; Yin Wu; Yingkun Guo; Hairong Zheng; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Sequence design and evaluation of the reproducibility of water-selective diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast at 3 T.

Authors:  He Zhu; Lori R Arlinghaus; Jennifer G Whisenant; Ming Li; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Z-spectrum appearance and interpretation in the presence of fat: Influence of acquisition parameters.

Authors:  Shu Zhang; Jochen Keupp; Xinzeng Wang; Ivan Dimitrov; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Robert E Lenkinski; Elena Vinogradov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Observation of true and pseudo NOE signals using CEST-MRI and CEST-MRS sequences with and without lipid suppression.

Authors:  Jianhua Lu; Jinyuan Zhou; Congbo Cai; Shuhui Cai; Zhong Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Accelerating chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI with parallel blind compressed sensing.

Authors:  Huajun She; Joshua S Greer; Shu Zhang; Bian Li; Jochen Keupp; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Ivan E Dimitrov; Robert E Lenkinski; Elena Vinogradov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Multiparametric MR Imaging of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.