Literature DB >> 17114546

ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique.

Takeshi Yoshikawa1, Hideaki Kawamitsu, Donald G Mitchell, Yoshiharu Ohno, Yonson Ku, Yasushi Seo, Masahiko Fujii, Kazuro Sugimura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the reliability and usefulness of parallel imaging for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement of abdominal organs and lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI (TE = 66, b = 0, 600 s/mm2) was performed in phantom and clinical studies. The b value was set to minimize the effects of perfusion in tissue and to maintain signal-to-noise ratio. Bottle phantoms were scanned with and without parallel imaging and with various parallel imaging factors and at various positions to evaluate the effects of parallel imaging on ADCs. In 200 consecutive clinical patients (122 men and 78 women: mean age, 61.9 years), ADCs were calculated for liver (four segments), spleen, pancreas (head, body, tail), gallbladder, renal parenchyma, and back muscle, and then compared to evaluate the reliability of clinical ADC measurements with parallel imaging. ADCs were also calculated for diffuse diseases and focal lesions (94 malignant and 93 benign) of abdominal organs to evaluate the clinical usefulness of ADC.
RESULTS: Location-dependent changes in water ADCs were minimal with parallel imaging factors first of 3, then of 4, and were small except for measurements at the image periphery. Acetone ADCs were saturated at 4.00 x 10(-3) mm2/s. Degraded image quality prevented ADC measurement of the left hepatic lobe and pancreas in 7-18 patients. There was no significant difference among ADCs of four liver segments (1.50 +/- 0.24 [SD] x 10(-3) mm2/s - 1.56 +/- 0.31 x 10(-3) mm2/s) and between ADCs of the right and left kidneys (2.65 +/- 0.30 x 10(-3) mm2/s, 2.59 +/- 0.33 x 10(-3) mm2/s). ADC of the pancreas tail (1.65 +/- 0.37 x 10(-3) mm2/s) was significantly lower than those of the head (1.81 +/- 0.40 x 10(-3) mm2/s) and body (1.81 +/- 0.41 x 10(-3) mm2/s) (p < 0.005). Renal ADCs were significantly lower in patients with renal failure (right: 2.15 +/- 0.30 x 10(-3) mm2/s; left: 2.11 +/- 0.25 x 10(-3) mm2/s) than in those without disease (right: 2.67 +/- 0.29 x 10(-3) mm2/s; left: 2.60 +/- 0.32 x 10(-3) mm2/s) (p < 0.005). ADC of pancreatic cancer was significantly higher than that of healthy pancreas (p < 0.05). ADC of renal angiomyolipoma was significantly lower than those of renal cell carcinoma and healthy renal parenchyma (p < 0.0005).
CONCLUSION: Clinical ADC measurements of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging appear to be reliable and useful, and the effect of parallel imaging on calculated values is considered to be minimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17114546     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  67 in total

1.  Optimising diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: comparison of image quality between monopolar and bipolar single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences.

Authors:  Stavroula Kyriazi; Matthew Blackledge; David J Collins; Nandita M Desouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Applications of molecular imaging.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Stefanie Galbán; Marcian E Van Dort; Gary D Luker; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

3.  Effect of imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient and optimization strategies.

Authors:  Azim Celik
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Estimation of dynamic metabolic activity in micro-tissue cultures from sensor recordings with an FEM model.

Authors:  Cornelia Pfister; Christian Forstmeier; Johannes Biedermann; Julia Schermuly; Franz Demmel; Peter Wolf; Bernd Kaspers; Martin Brischwein
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique.

Authors:  Melanie Bruegel; Konstantin Holzapfel; Jochen Gaa; Klaus Woertler; Simone Waldt; Berthold Kiefer; Alto Stemmer; Carl Ganter; Ernst J Rummeny
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  High b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting gallbladder carcinoma: preliminary study and results.

Authors:  Reiji Sugita; Tetsuro Yamazaki; Akemi Furuta; Kei Itoh; Naotaka Fujita; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) without ADC values in assessment of small focal nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Mai-Lin Chen; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Li-Ping Qi; Qing-Lei Shi; Bin Chen; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Diagnostic value of diffusion weighted MRI and ADC in differential diagnosis of cavernous hemangioma of the liver.

Authors:  Ozlem Tokgoz; Ebru Unlu; Ilker Unal; Ismail Serifoglu; Ilker Oz; Elif Aktas; Emrah Caglar
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.927

9.  Respiratory gated diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Nickolas Papanikolaou; Spyros Yarmenitis; Thomas Maris; Apostolos Karantanas; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Autoimmune pancreatitis: Multimodality non-invasive imaging diagnosis.

Authors:  Stefano Crosara; Mirko D'Onofrio; Riccardo De Robertis; Emanuele Demozzi; Stefano Canestrini; Giulia Zamboni; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.