PURPOSE: To compare the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of pancreatic adenocarcinomas that appear hyperintense with clearly defined borders (clear hyperintense) with those that do not show clear hyperintense borders on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent was waived. Eighty patients with histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mean tumor size, 32 mm) underwent fat-suppressed single-shot echo-planar 3.0-T diffusion-weighted MR imaging with diffusion gradients (b = 1000 sec/mm(2)). ADC values of the pancreatic adenocarcinomas (n = 80) and proximal (n = 51) and distal (n = 70) pancreas were compared by using the Friedman test, followed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the difference in serum amylase levels between pancreatic adenocarcinomas with and without clear hyperintensity was evaluated by using the x(2) test. RESULTS: In 38 of 80 patients, pancreatic adenocarcinomas showed clear hyperintensity relative to the surrounding pancreas; 26 were hyperintense with unclear distal borders; 12, isointense; and four, hypointense. In all patients, the mean ADC (± standard deviation) of the tumors (1.16 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.22) was significantly lower than those of the proximal pancreas (1.33 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.16, P < .001) and the distal pancreatic parenchyma (1.24 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.23, P = .004). No significant difference in ADC was seen between the pancreatic adenocarcinomas without clear hyperintensity and the distal pancreas. The frequency of serum amylase levels greater than 120 U/L (2.00 μkat/L) was significantly higher than in those with clear hyperintense pancreatic adenocarcinomas (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was not useful for delineating 47% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas, because of hyperintensity of the pancreatic parenchyma distal to the cancer.
PURPOSE: To compare the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of pancreatic adenocarcinomas that appear hyperintense with clearly defined borders (clear hyperintense) with those that do not show clear hyperintense borders on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent was waived. Eighty patients with histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mean tumor size, 32 mm) underwent fat-suppressed single-shot echo-planar 3.0-T diffusion-weighted MR imaging with diffusion gradients (b = 1000 sec/mm(2)). ADC values of the pancreatic adenocarcinomas (n = 80) and proximal (n = 51) and distal (n = 70) pancreas were compared by using the Friedman test, followed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the difference in serum amylase levels between pancreatic adenocarcinomas with and without clear hyperintensity was evaluated by using the x(2) test. RESULTS: In 38 of 80 patients, pancreatic adenocarcinomas showed clear hyperintensity relative to the surrounding pancreas; 26 were hyperintense with unclear distal borders; 12, isointense; and four, hypointense. In all patients, the mean ADC (± standard deviation) of the tumors (1.16 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.22) was significantly lower than those of the proximal pancreas (1.33 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.16, P < .001) and the distal pancreatic parenchyma (1.24 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.23, P = .004). No significant difference in ADC was seen between the pancreatic adenocarcinomas without clear hyperintensity and the distal pancreas. The frequency of serum amylase levels greater than 120 U/L (2.00 μkat/L) was significantly higher than in those with clear hyperintense pancreatic adenocarcinomas (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was not useful for delineating 47% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas, because of hyperintensity of the pancreatic parenchyma distal to the cancer.
Authors: Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Flavia Dal Corso; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2015-10-28
Authors: William A Moore; Gaurav Khatri; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Robert D Sims; Ivan Pedrosa Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.959