| Literature DB >> 35154569 |
Mohammed M Alshehri1, Cristina Quispe2, Jesús Herrera-Bravo3,4, Javad Sharifi-Rad5, Sena Tutuncu6, Elif Feyza Aydar6, Cansu Topkaya7, Zehra Mertdinc6, Beraat Ozcelik6,8, Mahima Aital9, N V Anil Kumar9, Natallia Lapava10, Jovana Rajkovic11, Andrea Ertani12, Silvana Nicola12, Prabhakar Semwal13,14, Sakshi Painuli13,15, Carlos González-Contreras16, Miquel Martorell16,17, Monica Butnariu18, Iulia Cristina Bagiu19,20, Radu Vasile Bagiu19,21, Mrunal D Barbhai22, Manoj Kumar22, Sevgi Durna Daştan23,24, Daniela Calina25, William C Cho26.
Abstract
The use of phytochemicals is gaining interest for the treatment of metabolic syndromes over the synthetic formulation of drugs. Senna is evolving as one of the important plants which have been vastly studied for its beneficial effects. Various parts of Senna species including the root, stem, leaves, and flower are found rich in numerous phytochemicals. In vitro, in vivo, and clinical experiments established that extracts from Senna plants have diverse beneficial effects by acting as a strong antioxidant and antimicrobial agent. In this review, Senna genus is comprehensively discussed in terms of its botanical characteristics, traditional use, geographic presence, and phytochemical profile. The bioactive compound richness contributes to the biological activity of Senna plant extracts. The review emphasizes on the in vivo and in vitro antioxidant and anti-infectious properties of the Senna plant. Preclinical studies confirmed the beneficial effects of the Senna plant extracts and its bioactive components in regard to the health-promoting activities. The safety, side effects, and therapeutic limitations of the Senna plant are also discussed in this review. Additional research is necessary to utilize the phenolic compounds towards its use as an alternative to pharmacological treatments and even as an ingredient in functional foods.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154569 PMCID: PMC8837466 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6025900
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Geographical distribution of Senna species. All the regions where Senna plants are most common are highlighted in red
Traditional and folk medical usage of Senna species.
|
| Country/culture | Part of plant | Internal usage | External usage | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bangladesh | Leaves | Helminthiasis | Ringworm, eczema | [ |
| Benin Republic | Whole plant | Diabetes | — | [ | |
| Bolivia | Root, leaves | Malaria, salmonella, fever, cold | Bath | [ | |
| Brazil | Root, whole plant, flower, leaves | Flu, cough, malaria | Ringworms, scabies, blotch, eczema, tinea infections | [ | |
| Cameroon | Stem, bark, leaves | Gastroenteritis, hepatitis | Ringworm, dermal infections | [ | |
| China | Stem, bark, leaves seed, root, leaves, flower, whole plant | Intestinal parasitosis, helminthiasis, diabetes, uterus disorder, asthma, constipation, fungal infections, poor eyesight diabetes | — | [ | |
| Cuba | Whole plant | Diabetes | — | [ | |
| Egypt | Leaves | Constipation | — | [ | |
| Ghana | Whole plant | Diabetes | — | [ | |
| Guatemala | Whole plant flower, leaves | Flu, malaria | Ringworms, tinea infections scabies, eczema, blotch | [ | |
| Guinea | Whole plant flower, leaves | Flu, malaria | Ringworms, scabies, blotch, eczema, tine infections | [ | |
| India | Stem, bark, leaves, seed, root leaves, flower the whole plant, leaves | Diabetes, hemorrhoids, inguinal hernia, intestinal parasitosis, syphilis, uterus disorder, helminthiasis constipation, fungal infection diabetes | Skin diseases, ringworm | [ | |
| Nigeria | Stem, leaves, root whole plant | Constipation, diarrhoea, respiratory tract infection, body and abdominal pain, stress, convulsion, diabetes | Wound, skin diseases, burns, toothache, dermal infections | [ | |
| Philippines | Stem, bark, leaves seed, root leaves, flower leaves | Hemorrhoids, inguinal hernia, syphilis, intestinal parasitosis, diabetes, uterus disorder, helminthiasis, constipation, fungal infections | Skin diseases, wound | [ | |
| Sierra Leone | Leaves | Abortion pain, facilitate delivery | — | [ | |
| Thailand | Leaves | Constipation, flatulence, inflammation | Abscesses, wounds, ringworm, itching | [ | |
| Togo | Whole plant | Diabetes | — | [ | |
|
| |||||
|
| Cyprus | Fruit | Constipation | — | [ |
| Djibouti | Leaves | Constipation, injuries | Skin diseases | [ | |
| Egypt | Leaves | Constipation | — | [ | |
| Pakistan | Leaves, pod | Constipation, rheumatism, backache, asthma, anaemia typhoid fever, jaundice, pneumonia, leprosy | Wound, pimples | [ | |
| Qatar | Leaves | Constipation, stomach cramps | — | [ | |
| Sudan | Leaves, fruits | Constipation, git-disorders | — | [ | |
| Thailand | Leaf pod | Constipation stomach pain | — | [ | |
| UAE | Leaves | Constipation, stomach cramps | — | [ | |
|
| |||||
|
| India | Flower leaves | Diabetes | — | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| South Africa | Leaves | Blood coagulation | — | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| Panama | Stem, leaves | — | Body ache | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| Thailand | Heartwood | Constipation, cough, emmenagogue | — | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| Thailand | Debarked stem | Fever, muscle spasm, poisoning, drunkenness | — | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| Bahrain | Leaves, seed | Constipation, stomach cramps | — | [ |
| Djibouti | Leaves | Constipation | — | [ | |
| Egypt | Leaves | Constipation, bacterial infection, tumors | — | [ | |
| Iran | Leaves | Constipation, obesity, hemorrhoids | — | [ | |
| Pakistan | Leaves | Backache joints pain, headache, migraine | — | [ | |
| Qatar | Leaves, seed | Constipation, stomach cramps | — | [ | |
| Saudi Arabia | Leaves, seed | Constipation, stomach cramps | — | [ | |
| UAE | Leaves, seed | Constipation, stomach cramps | — | [ | |
|
| |||||
|
| Peru | Not specified | — | Wound disinfectant agent | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| Bolivia | Root, seed | Dysentery | Bath, ringworm | [ |
| Cuba | Not specified | Liver pain, rheumatism, arthrosis, catarrh, muscular pain, hemorrhoids, pneumonia, venereal diseases, impotence | — | [ | |
| Guatemala | Leaves, aerial part | Fever, measles, chickenpox | — | [ | |
| India | Leaves, root seed | Respiratory diseases, cough, constipation, malaria, diabetes, indigestion, urinary disorder | Skin problems, skin disorders, pimples | [ | |
| Tanzania | Root | Spasms, malaria, helminthiasis | — | [ | |
| Thailand | Leaves, fruit | Diarrhoea | — | [ | |
| Uganda | Leaves | Malaria | — | [ | |
|
| |||||
|
| Eastern Africa | Not specified | Flatulence | — | [ |
| Tropical Africa | Not specified | Constipation, gonorrhoea | — | [ | |
| South Africa | Seed | Venereal diseases, infertility constipation, gonorrhoea | — | [ | |
|
| |||||
|
| Thailand | Leaves, flower | Constipation, insomnia hypertension | — | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| Sudan | Root | Constipation | — | [ |
| Tanzania | Root | Diabetes | — | [ | |
|
| |||||
|
| Bangladesh | Leaves root | Dyspepsia, asthma, bronchitis, hiccup, gonorrhoea dyspepsia | — | [ |
| India | Bark | Respiratory disorders | — | [ | |
|
| |||||
|
| Thailand | Heartwood | Stimulate menstruation | — | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| China | Not specified | Stomach disorders, liver diseases, poor eyesight, weakness, diuretic | — | [ |
| Thailand | Seed leaves | Constipation, urethral stones, diuretic, constipation, insomnia | — | [ | |
| India | Seed leaves | Rheumatic swelling and pain, skin diseases | [ | ||
|
| |||||
|
| Cuba | Not specified | Bleeding, rheumatism, arthrosis | — | [ |
Figure 2Chemical structures of mostly identified phytochemical compounds in Senna plants.
Figure 3Antioxidant activity of bioactive compounds of Senna plants. The antioxidant bioactive molecules contained in Senna species neutralize free radicals by releasing electrons.
Summary of several in vitro studies about the antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of genus Senna.
|
| Part of plant—solvent—procedure (if any) | Method | Result | References | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Root, leaves—ethanol | DPPH, ABTS—Folin-Ciocalteu | DPPH (IC50 mg/mL) | ABTS (TEAC) | TPC (mg GAE/100 g) | [ | |||
| Root = Sg | 0,396 | 57,13 | 214,25 | ||||||
| Sm | 0,534 | 53,72 | 122,09 | ||||||
| Ss | 0,502 | 36,02 | 146,60 | ||||||
| St | 0,253 | 64,47 | 1277,34 | ||||||
| Leaves = Sg | 0,089 | 47,91 | 338,76 | ||||||
| Sm | 0,424 | 26,72 | 207,71 | ||||||
| Ss | 0,286 | 29,63 | 148,24 | ||||||
| St | 0,401 | 30,71 | 322,09 | ||||||
|
| Leaves—ethanol | DPPH | [ | ||||||
|
| Aerial parts—Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)/methanol (90 : 10) | DPPH, ORAC-Folin-Ciocalteu | DPPH (𝜇g/mL) | ORAC (mmol TE/mg extract) | TPC (mg GAE/g) | [ | |||
| 72.90 | 2.68 | 79.3 | |||||||
|
| Roots—acetone, ethanol, water | DPPH, ABTS (IC50) | DPPH (𝜇g/mL) | ABTS (mmol TE/mg extract) | TPC (mg GAE/g) | [ | |||
| Acetone | 82.42 | 64,93 | 21,42 | ||||||
| Ethanol | 45,18 | 39,14 | 78,21 | ||||||
| Water | 61,15 | 48,3 | 46,3 | ||||||
|
| Flowers—ethanol, water | DPPH, FRAP—Folin-Ciocalteu | % DPPH inhibition | FRAP (𝜇moles Fe(II)/100 g). | TPC (mg GAE/100 g) | [ | |||
| Ethanol | 99,51 | 2403.15 | 26223.78 | ||||||
| Water | 96,51 | 1966.30 | 9468.18 | ||||||
|
| Aerial parts—ethyl acetate, n-butanol | ABTS | % Inhibition | [ | |||||
| Ethyl acetate | 82,9 | ||||||||
| n-Butanol | 85,7 | ||||||||
|
| Leaves—ethanol (49%)—ultrasound-assisted (UA) | DPPH, FRAP—Folin-Ciocalteu | %DPPH inhibition. | FRAP (mM FeSO4/g) | TPC (mg GAE/g) | [ | |||
| Ethanol | 80,49 | 8,08 | 455,42 | ||||||
| UA | 91,83 | 11,41 | 575,23 | ||||||
|
| Flowers, leaves—ethanol (70%)—microwave, Soxhlet, marination, reflux and sonication | DPPH—HPLC-ESI-MS/MS | %Inhibition (IC50) = microwave | Soxhlet | Marination | Reflux | Sonication | [ | |
| Flowers | 3,1 | 3,4 | 3,5 | 6,5 | 5,9 | ||||
| Leaves | 3,6 | 4,2 | 5,6 | 6,2 | 7,4 | ||||
|
| Leaves—ethanol | Chemiluminescence measurement | [ | ||||||
|
| Root, stem, seed, leaves and flower—methanol/water (80%) | FRAP-Folin-Ciocalteu | FRAP (g/100 g) | TPC (g/100 g) | [ | ||||
| Root | 0,255 | 1,69 | |||||||
| Stem | 0,457 | 2,27 | |||||||
| Seed | 0,345 | 2,59 | |||||||
| Leave | 0,560 | 2,33 | |||||||
| Flower | 0,565 | 1,36 | |||||||
Anti-infectious activity of genus Senna.
| Effect | Microorganism | Antimicrobial assay |
| Plant part-solvent | Result-solvent | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antiprotozoal |
| Effective dose determination for ED50 |
| Crude plant-aqueous extract | 0.13 mg/mL | [ |
|
| Effective dose determination for ED50 |
| Crude plant-hydroalcoholic extract | 0.17 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Effective dose determination for ED50 |
| Flower-ethanol extract | 495.4 | [ | |
|
| ||||||
| Antibacterial |
| Diameter of the inhibition zone |
| Leaves-methanol | 11.0 mm | [ |
|
| Diameter of the inhibition zone |
| Leaves-infusion | 10.0 mm | [ | |
|
| Diameter of the inhibition zone |
| Leaves-decoction | ND | [ | |
|
| Diameter of the inhibition zone |
| Leaves-hydrosol | ND | [ | |
|
| Agar disk diffusion method, zone of inhibition |
| Flower-ethanol extract | 7 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar disk diffusion method, zone of inhibition |
| Flower-distilled water | 8 mm | [ | |
|
| Paper disk diffusion method, MIC |
| Leaf ethanol/water mixture extract | 300 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-n-butanol extract | 9.3 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-ethyl acetate extract | 14 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-n-butanol extract | 12 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-ethyl acetate extract | 6 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-n-butanol extract | 12.4 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-ethyl acetate extract | 9 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-n-butanol extract | 10 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-ethyl acetate extract | 8 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 12.00 ± 1.70 | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 9.70 ± 0.60 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Stem-dichloromethane | 9.30 ± 1.20 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-ethanol | 17.2 ± 0.3 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-water | 10.2 ± 0.2 mm | [ | |
|
| Inhibition zone (filter paper disc diffusion method) |
| Whole plant ethanol extract | 7-8 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-n-butanol extract | 19 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-ethyl acetate extract | 16 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 3 mm/4 mm/3 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 4 mm/4 mm/3 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 8 mg/mL/6 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 8 mg/mL/6 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Inhibition zone (filter paper disc diffusion method) |
| Whole plant ethanol extract | ND | [ | |
|
| Agar disk diffusion method, zone of inhibition |
| Flower-ethanol extract | 7 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar disk diffusion method, zone of inhibition |
| Flower-distilled water | 9 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar disk diffusion method, zone of inhibition |
| Flower-ethanol extract | ND | [ | |
|
| Agar disk diffusion method, zone of inhibition |
| Flower-distilled water | ND | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Root hydroethanol extract | 100 to 400 mg/L | [ | |
|
| Disc diffusion assay, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Crude plant extract | 0.625 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Disc diffusion assay, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Crude plant extract | 2.5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Disc diffusion assay, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Crude plant extract | 1.25 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 2 mm/3 mm/2 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 3 mm/3 mm/2 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 10 mg/mL/8 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 10 mg/mL/6 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Inhibition zone (filter paper disc diffusion method) |
| Whole plant ethanol extract | 7-10 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 3 mm/3 mm/3 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 3 mm/3 mm/3 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 10 mg/mL/8 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 10 mg/mL/8 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Paper disk diffusion method, MIC |
| Leaf ethanol/water mixture extract | 300 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Diameter of the inhibition zone |
| Leaves-methanol | 9.0 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-ethanol | 12.1 ± 0.1 | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-water | 10.1 ± 0.1 | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 3 mm/4 mm/4 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 3 mm/4 mm/4 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 8 mg/mL/6 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 6 mg/mL/8 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Paper disk diffusion method, MIC |
| Leaf ethanol/water mixture extract | 300 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-n-butanol extract | 7.8 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-ethyl acetate extract | 8.6 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 4 mm/4 mm/4 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 3 mm/4 mm/3 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 8 mg/mL/5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 6 mg/mL/5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Inhibition zone (filter paper disc diffusion method) |
| Whole plant ethanol extract | 8-9 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar disk diffusion method, zone of inhibition |
| Flower-ethanol extract | ND | [ | |
|
| Agar disk diffusion method, zone of inhibition |
| Flower-distilled water | 7 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-ethanol | 20.1 ± 0.1 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-water | 18.2 ± 0.3 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-n-butanol extract | 11 mm | [ | |
|
| Disc agar technique, inhibition zone |
| Aerial part-ethyl acetate extract | 6 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 5 mm/5 mm/5 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 4 mm/4 mm/4 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 6 mg/mL/5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 6 mg/mL/5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Disc diffusion assay, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Crude plant extract | 2.5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Disc diffusion assay, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Crude plant extract | >5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Disc diffusion assay, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Crude plant extract | >5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 6 mm/6 mm/5 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 5 mm/6 mm/5 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 6 mg/mL/3 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 6 mg/mL/3 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-dichloromethane leaf-methanol | 9.70 ± 0.60 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Flower-dichloromethane flower-methanol | 11.00 ± 1.20 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Stem-dichloromethane stem-methanol | 12.00 ± 2.60 mm | [ | |
|
| ||||||
| Antifungal |
| Inhibition zone (filter paper disc diffusion method) |
| Whole plant ethanol extr80t | 12-30 mm | [ |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-ethanol | 22.1 ± 0.1 | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-water | 20.1 ± 0.1 | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 2 mm/3 mm/2 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 2 mm/3 mm/2 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 50 mg/mL/50 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 50 mg/mL/50 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Inhibition zone (filter paper disc diffusion method) |
| Whole plant ethanol extract | 14-22 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-ethanol | 25.2 ± 0.3 | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-water | 27.2 ± 0.2 | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Ethanolic leaf extract | 17.6-25.8 mm | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Aqueous leaf extracts | 10.5-33.8 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 2 mm/3 mm/2 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 2 mm/3 mm/3 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 50 mg/mL/50 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 50 mg/mL/50 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-ethanol | 18.2 ± 0.2 | [ | |
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Leaf-water | 14.1 ± 0.1 | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Ethanolic leaf extract | 19.8-36 mm | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Aqueous leaf extracts | 20.2-30.0 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar cup method, clearing zone |
| Leaf-chloroform extract | ND | [ | |
|
| Agar cup method, clearing zone |
| Leaf-ethyl acetate extract | 15-20 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 2 mm/4 mm/3 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 3 mm/4 mm/4 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 35 mg/mL/25 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 25 mg/mL/25 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Agar cup method, clearing zone |
| Leaf-hexane extract | 12 mm | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 0.00 ± 0.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 17.78 ± 1.73 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | 1.48 ± 1.15 | [ | |
|
| Inhibition zone (filter paper disc diffusion method) |
| Whole plant ethanol extract | 16-26 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Leaf hot water/leaf-methanol/leaf-acetone | 3 mm/4 mm/3 mm | [ | |
|
| The cup plate agar diffusion method |
| Root hot water/root-methanol/root-acetone | 3 mm/4 mm/4 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 13 mg/mL/6 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum microbicidal concentration |
| Leaf-methanol/root-methanol | 13 mg/mL/6 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion and broth dilution method, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-crude ethanol extract | 3.75 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion method |
| Ethanolic steam bark 5.00 mg/mL & 10 mg/mL | 15.50 mm/20.05 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Steam bark-ethanol | 5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum fungicidal concentration |
| Steam bark-ethanol | 10 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Inhibition zone (filter paper disc diffusion method) |
| Whole plant ethanol extract | 12-36 mm | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 4.81 ± 1.115 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 17.78 ± 1.73 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | 5.19 ± 0.58 | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Aqueous flower extracts | 15 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Aqueous flower extracts | 15 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Ethanolic leaf extract | 14.4-30 mm | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Aqueous leaf extracts | 17.20-32.0 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion method |
| Ethanolic steam bark 5.00 mg/mL & 10 mg/mL | 12 mm/13.5 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Steam bark-ethanol | 5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum fungicidal concentration |
| Steam bark-ethanol | 5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion and broth dilution method, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-crude ethanol extract | 10.42 mm | [ | |
|
| Hyphal growth inhibition concentration (IC50) |
| Leaf-methanol | 1.8 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Hyphal growth inhibition concentration (IC50) |
| Leaf-methanol | 0.8 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion and broth dilution method, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-crude ethanol extract | 10.42 mm | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Ethanolic leaf extract | 19.4-30 mm | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Aqueous leaf extracts | 15.20-22.0 mm | [ | |
|
| Hyphal growth inhibition concentration (IC50) |
| Leaf-methanol | 1.8 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Hyphal growth inhibition concentration (IC50) |
| Leaf-methanol | 6.6 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | −28.57 ± 0.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | −27.14 ± 1.99 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane stem-methanol | −17.62 ± 2.08 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 0.00 ± 0.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 47.04 ± 2.52 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition at 1,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | 37.78 ± 1.00 | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Aqueous leaf extracts | 20.20-35.0 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion and broth dilution method, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-crude ethanol extract | 19.64 mm | [ | |
|
| Cup-plate method, mean zone of inhibition |
| Ethanolic leaf extract | 16.4-30 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar cup method, clearing zone |
| Leaf-hexane extract | 14-18 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar cup method, clearing zone |
| Leaf-chloroform extract | 22-26 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar cup method, clearing zone |
| Leaf-ethyl acetate extract | 16-18 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion method |
| Ethanolic steam bark 5.00 mg/mL & 10 mg/mL | 17 mm/19 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Steam bark-ethanol | 5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum fungicidal concentration |
| Steam bark-ethanol | 5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Hyphal growth inhibition concentration (IC50) |
| Leaf-methanol | 1.2 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Hyphal growth inhibition concentration (IC50) |
| Leaf-methanol | 0.5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion and broth dilution method, minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Leaf-crude ethanol extract | 18.75 mm | [ | |
|
| Agar diffusion method |
| Ethanolic steam bark 5.00 mg/mL & 10 mg/mL | 15 mm/21 mm | [ | |
|
| Minimum inhibitory concentration |
| Steam bark-ethanol | 5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Minimum fungicidal concentration |
| Steam bark-ethanol | 5 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| ||||||
| Antiviral activity |
| Plaque-inhibition method, reduction factor was measured |
| Whole plant-ethanolic extract | 1 0 | [ |
|
| HIV-1 RT inhibitory assay, % inhibition ratio |
| Aerial part-ethanolic extract | 35.86 | [ | |
|
| HIV-1 RT inhibitory assay, % inhibition ratio |
| Aerial part-water extracts | 37 | [ | |
|
| Plaque-inhibition method, reduction factor was measured |
| Whole plant-ethanolic extract | 1 | [ | |
|
| Plaque-inhibition method, reduction factor was measured |
| Whole plant-ethanolic extract | 1 | [ | |
|
| Plaque-inhibition method, reduction factor was measured |
| Whole plant-ethanolic extract | 1 | [ | |
|
| Plaque-inhibition method, reduction factor was measured |
| Whole plant-ethanolic extract | 1 | [ | |
|
| Plaque-inhibition method, reduction factor was measured |
| Whole plant-ethanolic extract | 1 | [ | |
|
| ||||||
| Herbicidal activity |
| Percent inhibition germination at 10,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 12.66 ± 2.89 | [ |
|
| Percent inhibition germination at 10,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 71.38 ± 3.06 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition germination at 10,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | 6.90 ± 1.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition hypocotyl at 10,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 68.09 ± 4.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition hypocotyl at 10,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 99.67 ± 0.58 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition hypocotyl at 10,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | −42.94 ± 5.18 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition radical 10,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 84.48 ± 2.63 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition radical 10,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 100.00 ± 0.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition radical 10,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | −46.94 ± 7.82 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition germination at 10,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 72.71 ± 0.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition germination at 10,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 100.00 ± 0.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition germination at 10,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | 4.50 ± 1.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition shoot at 10,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 85.31 ± 7.45 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition shoot at 10,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 100.00 ± 0.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition shoot at 10,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | 38.82 ± 3.19 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition root at 10,000 ppm |
| Leaf-dichloromethane | 88.18 ± 8.75 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition root at 10,000 ppm |
| Flower-dichloromethane | 100.00 ± 0.00 | [ | |
|
| Percent inhibition root at 10,000 ppm |
| Stem-dichloromethane | 25.56 ± 2.55 | [ | |
↓: inhibition; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; RT: reverse transcriptase.
Figure 4Anti-infectious properties of the most representative bioactive compounds of Senna plants. Botanical molecules such us alkaloids, sennoides, anthraquinones, phenolics, terpenoids, alkaloids, and triterpenoids have anti-infectious activity against bacteria, fungus, protozoa, and viruses (HIV, Coxsackie, and Herpes simplex).
Summary of some clinical trials conducted on Senna spp.
| Samples | Type of study/findings/results | Country | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Randomized controlled trial | Thailand | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Randomized controlled and crossover study | Mexico | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Comparative study | Philadelphia | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Control single-blinded randomized study | Turkey | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized study | Philadelphia | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Case study | Portugal | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Single-blinded randomized study | Thailand | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Experimental study | Korea | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Controlled randomized single-blinded study | — | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Controlled study | Netherlands | [ |
|
| |||
|
| A double-blinded, double-dummy, randomized, and controlled trial | China | [ |
|
| |||
|
| A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, and controlled trial | China | [ |
Figure 5Summarized scheme with side effects and clinical therapeutic limitations of Senna plant.