| Literature DB >> 35052522 |
Marwa S Goda1, Mohamed S Nafie2, Basma M Awad3, Maged S Abdel-Kader4,5, Amany K Ibrahim1, Jihan M Badr1, Enas E Eltamany1.
Abstract
Artemisia judaica L. (Family: Asteraceae) exhibited antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic effects. The in vitro cytotoxic activity of A. judaica ethanolic extract was screened against a panel of cancer cell lines. The results revealed its cytotoxic activity against a lung cancer (A549) cell line with a promising IC50 of 14.2 μg/mL compared to doxorubicin as a standard. This was confirmed through the downregulation of antiapoptotic genes, the upregulation of proapoptotic genes, and the cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase. Further in vivo study showed that a solid tumor mass was significantly reduced, with a tumor inhibition ratio of 54% relative to doxorubicin therapy in a Xenograft model. From a chemical point of view, various classes of natural products have been identified by liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The docking study of the detected metabolites approved their cytotoxic activity through their virtual binding affinity towards the cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) active sites. Finally, A. judaica is a fruitful source of polyphenols that are well-known for their antioxidant and cytotoxic activities. As such, the previously reported polyphenols with anti-lung cancer activity were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a diode array detector (HPLC-DAD). Rutin, quercetin, kaempferol, and apigenin were detected at concentrations of 6 mg/gm, 0.4 mg/gm, 0.36 mg/gm, and 3.9 mg/gm of plant dry extract, respectively. It is worth noting that kaempferol and rutin are reported for the first time. Herein, A. judaica L. may serve as an adjuvant therapy or a promising source of leading structures in drug discovery for lung cancer treatment.Entities:
Keywords: A549 cell line; Artemisia judaica; CDK-2; EGFR; HPLC-DAD; LC-MS/MS; apoptosis; xenograft model
Year: 2021 PMID: 35052522 PMCID: PMC8773337 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11010017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
List of sequences in forward and reverse of tested genes.
| Gene | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| P53 | 5′-CCCCTCCTGGCCCCTGTCATCTTC-3′ | 5′-GCAGCGCCTCACAACCTCCGTCAT-3′ |
| BAX | 5′-GTTTCATCCAGGATCGAGCAG-3′ | 5′-CATCTTCTTCCAGATGGTGA-3′ |
| CASP-3 | 5′-TGGCCCTGAAATACGAAGTC-3′ | 5′-GGCAGTAGTCGACTCTGAAG-3′ |
| CASP-8 | 5′-AATGTTGGAGGAAAGCAAT-3′ | 5′-CATAGTCGTTGATTATCTTCAGC-3′ |
| CASP-9 | 5′-CGAACTAACAGGCAAGCAGC-3′ | 5′-ACCTCACCAAATCCTCCAGAAC-3′ |
| BCL2 | 5′-CCTGTGGATGACTGAGTACC-3′ | 5′-GAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATCA-3′ |
| β-actin | 5′-GTGACATCCACACCCAGAGG-3′ | 5′-ACAGGATGTCAAAACTGCCC-3′ |
Cytotoxic activity of ethanolic crude extract of A. udaica L. against prostate, breast, ovarian, and lung cancer cell lines using the MTT assay.
| Sample | IC50 (μg/mL) * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate | Breast | Ovarian | Lung | |
| 59.8 ± 3.25 | 98.6 ± 4.65 | NA | 14.2 ± 0.84 | |
| Doxorubicin | 9.36 ± 1.52 | 7.26 ± 0.98 | 2.36 ± 0.65 | 9.98 ± 0.97 |
* Values are expressed as mean ± SD of 3 independent trials (n = 3). NA = Not active. IC50 (μg/mL) values were calculated using GraphPad Prism 7 software.
Figure 1Dose–response nonlinear regression curve fitting the percentage of cell viability vs. log [con. µg/mL], R square ≈ 1 using the GraphPad prism software. (A): cytotoxicity against lung cancer A549 cells, and (B): cytotoxicity against normal lung WI38 cells.
Figure 2(A): FITC/annexin-V-FITC/PI differential apoptosis/necrosis of untreated and treated A549 cells with A. judaica L. ethanolic extract (IC50 of 14.07 µg/mL, 48 h). Quadrant charts show Q-1 (necrosis, AV–/PI+), Q-2 (late apoptotic cells, AV+/PI+), Q-3 (normal cells, AV–/PI–), and Q-4 (early apoptotic cells, AV+/PI–). (B): Cell cycle analysis of untreated and treated A549 cells.
Figure 3mRNA gene expression analysis of untreated and treated A549 cells with A. judaica ethanolic extract (IC50 of 14.07 µg/mL, 48 h). Fold of change of untreated control = 1.
Figure 4Anticancer activity of A. judaica L. and doxorubicin in the A549 group (Xenograft model) compared to in the control group. (A): Solid tumor mass (mg) during the experimental duration (4 weeks); (B): antitumor potentiality of tumor volume (mm3) and tumor inhibition ratio (TIR%); (C): biochemical measurements of liver enzymes (Alt and AST). Values are expressed as Mean ± SD values of mice in each group (n = 6). Sign (*) is significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), while sign (**) is highly significantly different (p ≤ 0.001) between the A549 control group and those treated using un-the paired test GraphPad prism. Sign (#) is significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) between the normal control group and the A549 control group.
Figure 5Histopathology of liver sections in differently treated groups. PA: portal area, HD: hydropic degeneration, N: necrosis, Black arrow: Pyknotic nucleus. (A) Normal control group that shows liver tissues with a normal architecture. (B) A549 group (untreated group) that shows hydropic degeneration of hepatocytes, loss of cell boundaries, pyknosis, and focal necrosis. (C) A549 group treated with A. judaica (100 mg/Kg BW) that shows improvement in liver tissues compared to the untreated A549 group. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain, magnification ×200).
LC-MS/MS metabolomic analysis of the ethanolic crude extract of A. judaica L.
| Polarity Mode | MZmine ID | Ret. Time (min) | Measured | Calculated | Mass Error (ppm) | Adduct | Molecular Formula | MS/MS Spectrum | Deduced Compound | Ref | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coumarins and their glycosides | |||||||||||
| 1 | Negative | 801 | 4.07 | 339.0659 | 339.0716 | −16.81 | [M − H]− | C15H16O9 | 339.1 > 177 | Esculin | [ |
| 2 | Positive | 1717 | 7.45 | 193.0517 | 193.0501 | 8.29 | [M + H]+ | C10H8O4 | 193 > 178 > 133 > 122 | Scopoletin | [ |
| Flavonoids and their glycosides | |||||||||||
| 3 | Negative | 1480 | 6.59 | 431.0977 | 431.0978 | −0.23 | [M − H]− | C21H20O10 | 431.1 > 311.1 | Vitexin | [ |
| 4 | Positive | 1434 | 6.73 | 611.1583 | 611.1612 | −4.75 | [M + H]+ | C27H30O16 | 611.1 > 303.1 | Rutin | [ |
| 5 | Negative | 1631 | 6.92 | 447.0922 | 447.0927 | −1.12 | [M − H]− | C21H20O11 | 447.1 > 327.1 | Orientin | [ |
| 6 | Positive | 1566 | 7.13 | 303.0507 | 303.0505 | 0.66 | [M + H]+ | C15H10O7 | 303 > 257 > 229 > 183 > 165 > 153 > 137 | Quercetin | [ |
| 7 | Positive | 1579 | 7.16 | 287.0554 | 287.0556 | −0.7 | [M + H]+ | C15H10O6 | 287 > 269 > 241 > 213 >149 >137 | Fisetin | [ |
| 8 | Negative | 1793 | 7.42 | 577.1612 | 577.1557 | 9.53 | [M − H]− | C27H30O14 | 577.1 > 269.1 | Rhoifolin | [ |
| 9 | Positive | 1869 | 7.76 | 287.0525 | 287.0536 | −3.83 | [M + H]+ | C15H10O6 | 287.2 > 231 > 165.1 > 121.0 | Kaempferol | [ |
| 10 | Negative | 2065 | 8.59 | 285.0405 | 285.0399 | 2.10 | [M − H]− | C15H10O6 | 285.2 > 133.0 | Luteolin | [ |
| 11 | Negative | 2068 | 8.65 | 315.0505 | 315.0505 | zero | [M − H]− | C16H12O7 | 315.1 > 300.1 | Isorhamnetin | [ |
| 12 | Negative | 2171 | 9.23 | 271.0601 | 271.0606 | −1.84 | [M − H]− | C15H12O5 | 271 > 177 > 151 | Naringenin | [ |
| 13 | Negative | 2324 | 10.08 | 269.0453 | 269.0450 | 1.12 | [M − H]− | C15H10O5 | 269.2 > 116.8 | Apigenin | [ |
| 14 | Positive | 2739 | 10.34 | 301.0680 | 301.0701 | −6.98 | [M + H]+ | C16H12O6 | 301.1 > 286 > 258.0 | Diosmetin | [ |
| 15 | Positive | 3059 | 11.52 | 285.0761 | 285.0763 | −0.7 | [M + H]+ | C16H12O5 | 285.0 > 267.9 > 242.1 | Acacetin | [ |
| Phenolic acids | |||||||||||
| 16 | Negative | 590 | 1.62 | 163.0394 | 163.0395 | −0.61 | [M − H]− | C9H8O4 | 163 > 119 | [ | |
| 17 | Negative | 725 | 2.43 | 193.0514 | 193.0501 | 6.73 | [M − H]− | C10H10O4 | 193 > 178> 149 > 134 | Ferulic acid | [ |
| 18 | Negative | 751 | 3.30 | 137.0222 | 137.0231 | −6.6 | [M − H]− | C7H6O3 | 137 > 93 > 65 | [ | |
| 19 | Negative | 991 | 4.97 | 153.0166 | 153.0178 | −7.8 | [M − H]− | C7H6O4 | 153 > 109 | Protocatechuic acid | [ |
| 20 | Negative | 1163 | 5.55 | 179.0336 | 179.0344 | −4.47 | [M − H]− | C9H8O4 | 179 > 135 > 134 | Caffeic acid | [ |
| Sterols | |||||||||||
| 21 | Positive | 5376 | 21.9 | 380.3320 | 380.3343 | −6.05 | [M + H − H20]+ | C28H44O | 380 > 69 | Ergosterol | [ |
| 22 | Negative | 3245 | 22.84 | 455.3567 | 455.3525 | 9.22 | [M − H]− | C30H48O3 | 455 | Betulinic acid | [ |
| 23 | Positive | 5641 | 23.74 | 413.3615 | 413.3633 | −4.35 | [M + H]+ | C29H48O | 413 > 395.3 > 81.1 | Stigmasterol | [ |
| Terpenes | |||||||||||
| 24 | Negative | 1071 | 5.29 | 163.0754 | 163.0759 | −3.07 | [M − H]− | C10H12O2 | 163 > 146 > 119 | Hinokitiol/ | [ |
| 25 | Positive | 2327 | 8.83 | 121.1004 | 121.1017 | −10.73 | [M + H]+ | C9H12 | 121 > 119 > 105 > 91 > 77 | Mesitylene | [ |
| 26 | Positive | 3393 | 12.85 | 165.0897 | 165.0916 | −11.5 | [M + H]+ | C10H12O2 | 165 > 149 > 103 | Eugenol | [ |
| 27 | Negative | 3245 | 22.84 | 455.3567 | 455.3525 | 9.22 | [M − H]− | C30H48O3 | 455 | Ursolic acid | [ |
| Terpenoid bitter principles | |||||||||||
| 28 | Positive | 5246 | 21.18 | 283.1499 | 283.1545 | −16.25 | [M + H]+ | C15H22O5 | 283 > 265 > 247 > 237 > 209 | Artemisinin | [ |
| Other classes | |||||||||||
| 29 | Positive | 64 | 1.22 | 123.0553 | 123.0558 | −4.06 | [M + H]+ | C6H6N2O | 123 > 80 | Nicotinamide | [ |
| 30 | Positive | 3829 | 15.21 | 286.1450 | 286.1443 | 2.45 | [M + H]+ | C17H19NO3 | 286.1 > 201 > 171 > 143 > 135 | Piperine | [ |
Figure 6Chemical structures of the detected metabolites listed in Table 3.
The anti-lung cancer activity of some detected metabolites.
| No. | Detected | Type of Study | Mechanism of Action | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vitexin | -Animal study with acute lung injury | Vitexin upregulated nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor2 (Nrf2) and activated heme oxygenase (HO)-1. | [ |
| 2 | Rutin | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Rutin downregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic gene (Bcl-2) and decreased the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF- | [ |
| 3 | Quercetin | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Quercetin downregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic gene (Bcl-2) and upregulated the expression of the proapoptotic gene (Bax). | [ |
| 4 | Fisetin | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Fisetin induced cell cycle arrest at G2 phase and upregulated the expression of the apoptosis-regulating gene (Caspases 3 and 9). | [ |
| 5 | Kaempeferol | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Kaempeferol upregulated the expression of proapoptotic gene (Bax) and downregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic genes (Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL). | [ |
| 6 | Luteolin | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Luteolin suppressed migration and invasion of lung cancer cells. | [ |
| 7 | Isorhamnetin | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Isorhamnetin upregulated the expression of proapoptotic genes (Bax, P53 and Caspase-3) and downregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic genes (Bcl-2, cyclinD1). | [ |
| 8 | Naringenin | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Naringenin suppressed migration of lung cancer cells, upregulated the expression of proapoptotic genes (Bax and Caspase-3) and downregulated the expression of matrixmetallo proteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9). | [ |
| 9 | Apigenin | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Apigenin suppressed migration of lung cancer cells and downregulated the expression of MMP-9. | [ |
| 10 | Diosmetin | -Human lung cancer cell lines, A549, H1299, H460, SPC-A1, H441, H1650 and Calu-3. | Diosmetin induced apoptosis and enhanced the efficacy of paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent. | [ |
| 11 | Acacetin | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Acacetin suppressed migration of lung cancer cells and downregulated the expression of MMP-2 and 9. | [ |
| 12 | Ferulic acid | -Human lung cancer cell line, H1299 | Ferulic acid suppressed migration of lung cancer cells and downregulated the expression of MMP-2 and 9. | [ |
| 13 | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | [ | ||
| 14 | Protocatechuic acid | -Human lung cancer cell lines, A549, H3255, and Calu-6 | Protocatechuic acid upregulated the expression of proapoptotic genes (Bax and Caspase-3) and downregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic genes (Bcl-2) and matrixmetallo proteinases. | [ |
| 15 | Caffeic acid | -Human lung cancer cell line, H1299 | Caffeic acid enhanced the efficacy of paclitaxel and upregulated the expression of Caspases-3 and 9. | [ |
| 16 | Ergosterol | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Ergosterol suppressed the proliferation of lung cancer cells. | [ |
| 17 | Eugenol | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Eugenol suppressed migration of lung cancer cells and downregulated the expression of MMP-2. | [ |
| 18 | Hinokitiol | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Hinokitiol suppressed migration of lung cancer cells, downregulated the expression of MMP-2 and upregulated the expression of proapoptotic genes (Bax, P53 and Caspase-3). | [ |
| 19 | Ursolic acid | -Human lung cancer cell line, A549 | Ursolic acid suppressed migration of lung cancer cells and downregulated miR-21 that is correlated with a tumor growth. | [ |
| 20 | Piperine | -Human fibrosarcoma cell, HT-1080 | Piperine suppressed metastasise and migration of lung cancer cells. | [ |
Summary of ligand–receptor interactions of the identified docked compounds towards cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK2) and Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) binding sites. * p ≤ 0.05; #, p ≤ 0.05.
| Co-Crystallized Ligands | Ligand-Receptor Interactions towards | Ligand-Receptor Interactions towards EGFR (PDB = 1M17) # |
|---|---|---|
| 2 HB with Leu 83 + 1 Arene-Cation Interaction with Lys 89 | 1 HB with Met 769 | |
| Metabolite 1 | 1 HB with Lys 89 | 1 HB with 769 |
| Metabolite 2 | - | - |
| Metabolite 3 | 1 HB with Lys 89 | - |
| Metabolite 4 | 1 HB with Lys 89 | - |
| Metabolite 5 | 1 HB with Lys 89 + 1 arene-cation interaction with Lys 89 | 1 HB with 769 |
| Metabolite 6 | 1 HB with Leu 83 | 1 HB with 769 |
| Metabolite 7 | 1 HB with Lys 89 + 1 arene-cation interaction with Lys 89 | 1 HB with 769 |
| Metabolite 8 | 1 arene-cation interaction with Lys 89 | - |
| Metabolite 9 | 1 HB with Leu 83 + 1 arene-cation interaction with Lys 89 | - |
| Metabolite 10 | 1 HB with Leu 83 | 1 HB with 769 |
| Metabolite 11 | 1 HB with Leu 83 | - |
| Metabolite 12 | 1 HB with Lys 89 | 1 HB with 769 |
| Metabolite 13 | - | - |
| Metabolite 14 | 2 HB with Leu 83 and Lys 89 | 1 HB with Met 769 |
| Metabolite 15 | 1 arene-cation interaction with Lys 89 | - |
| Metabolite 16 | - | - |
| Metabolite 17 | - | - |
| Metabolite 18 | - | - |
| Metabolite 19 | - | |
| Metabolite 20 | 1 arene-cation interaction with Lys 89 | 1 HB with 769 |
| Metabolite 21 | ||
| Metabolite 22 | 1 HB with Lys 89 | - |
| Metabolite 23 | 1 HB with Leu 83 | |
| Metabolite 24 | - | - |
| Metabolite 25 | - | - |
| Metabolite 26 | - | - |
| Metabolite 27 | 1 HB with Leu 83 + 1 arene-cation interaction with Lys 89 | 1 HB with Met 769 |
| Metabolite 28 | - | - |
| Metabolite 29 | - | - |
| Metabolite 30 | 1 HB with Leu 83 | - |
Figure 7Binding disposition and ligand–receptor interactions of compound 14 inside the CDK-2 protein (A) and the EGFR protein (B). Left panel indicates surface representation, while the right panel indicates interactive mode. Three dimensional images were made using Chimera software.
Figure 8UV–vis absorbing spectrograms of rutin (A), quercetin (B), kaempferol (C), and apigenin (D).
Figure 9HPLC chromatogram of nine polyphenol reference standards at 280 nm.
Figure 10HPLC chromatogram of the ethanolic extract of Artemesia judaica L. (200 mg/mL) at 280 nm.
Validation parameters of the HPLC method for the simultaneous quantification of rutin, quercetin, kaempferol, and apigenin scanned at λ = 280 nm.
| Validation Parameters | Rutin | Quercetin | Kaempferol | Apigenin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression equation | y = 13,199x − 787,148 | y = 15,764.37x − 40,216.27 | y = 71,227x − 46,571 | y = 8938.8x + 357,854 |
| Correlation coefficient (R2) | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.993 |
| Linearity range (µg/mL) | 10–200 | 5–100 | 10–150 | 5–100 |
| Limit of detection (µg/mL) | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Limit of quantification (µg/mL) | 2.5 | 1.61 | 1.4 | 1.53 |
| System precision (%RSD) | 3.16 | 2.25 | 1.59 | 2.26 |
| Method precision (%RSD) | 1.93 | 2.78 | 2.19 | 1.31 |
| Concentration (mg/gm) | 6 ±0.019 | 0.413 ± 0.00007 | 0.3603 ± 0.0033 | 3.9 ± 0.007 |
RSD: relative standard deviation.