| Literature DB >> 36234842 |
Amgad I M Khedr1, Marwa S Goda2,3, Abdelaziz F S Farrag1, Ali M Nasr4, Shady A Swidan5,6, Mohamed S Nafie7, Maged S Abdel-Kader8,9, Jihan M Badr2, Reda F A Abdelhameed2,3.
Abstract
Cynara scolymus L. (Family: Compositae) or artichoke is a nutritious edible plant widely used for its hepatoprotective effect. Crude extracts of flower, bract, and stem were prepared and evaluated for their in vitro antioxidant activity and phenolic content. The flower crude extract exhibited the highest phenolic content (74.29 mg GAE/gm) as well as the best in vitro antioxidant activity using total antioxidant capacity (TAC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FEAP), and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhyazyl (DPPH) scavenging assays compared with ascorbic acid. Phenolic fractions of the crude extracts of different parts were separated and identified using high-performance liquid chromatography HPLC-DAD analysis. The silver nanoparticles of these phenolic fractions were established and tested for their cytotoxicity and apoptotic activity. Results showed that silver nanoparticles of a polyphenolic fraction of flower extract (Nano-TP/Flowers) exhibited potent cytotoxicity against prostate (PC-3) and lung (A549) cancer cell lines with IC50 values of 0.85 μg/mL and 0.94 μg/mL, respectively, compared with doxorubicin as a standard. For apoptosis-induction, Nano-TP/Flowers exhibited apoptosis in PC-3 with a higher ratio than in A549 cells. It induced total prostate apoptotic cell death by 227-fold change while it induced apoptosis in A549 cells by 15.6-fold change. Nano-TP/Flowers upregulated both pro-apoptotic markers and downregulated the antiapoptotic genes using RT-PCR. Hence, this extract may serve as a promising source for anti-prostate cancer candidates.Entities:
Keywords: A549; Cynara scolymus L.; HPLC-DAD; PC-3; antioxidant activity; bract; flower; silver nanoparticles; stem; total phenolic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234842 PMCID: PMC9572662 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Total antioxidant capacity, ferric reducing antioxidants power, and DPPH radical scavenging assays of flower, bract, and stem of C. scolymus L.
| Sample | TAC Assay | IC50 of FRAP Assay (µg/mL) | IC50 of DPPH Scavenging Activity (µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract of Flower part | 34.07 a ± 3.15 | 77.12 c ± 4.23 | 45.91 c ± 2.97 |
| Crude extract of Bract part | 32.13 a ± 2.49 | 91.11 b ± 6.17 | 64.39 b ± 3.45 |
| Crude extract of Stem part | 28.16 a ± 2.34 | 604.13 a ± 17.85 | 514.02 a ± 9.86 |
| Ascorbic acid | 2.49 b ± 3.91 | 17.11 d ± 0.90 | 10.65 d ± 0.83 |
| ANOVA ( | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** | ANOVA ( |
TAC: total antioxidant capacity; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power; DPPH: 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl; GAE: gallic acid equivalent. *** Significant at p < 0.001. Means followed by different letters (a, b, c, d) are significantly different according to One-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism software.
Total phenolics and total flavonoids in flower, bract, and stem of C. scolymus L.
| Sample | Total Phenolic | Total Flavonoids |
|---|---|---|
| Crude extract of Flower part | 74.29 a ± 3.85 | 46.03 a ± 1.99 |
| Crude extract of Bract part | 60.94 b ± 3.28 | 21.89 b ± 1.07 |
| Crude extract of Stem part | 26.59 c ± 1.37 | 8.26 c ± 0.92 |
| ANOVA ( | <0.001 *** | <0.001 *** |
GAE: gallic acid equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent. *** Significant at p < 0.001. Means followed by different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different according to One-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism software.
Figure 1HPLC-DAD chromatograms: (A) Chromatogram of ten reference standards of polyphenols; (B) Chromatogram of polyphenols in flower crude extract; (C) Chromatogram of polyphenols in bract crude extract; (D) Chromatogram of polyphenols in stem crude extract.
Figure 2(A) The UV-visible spectrum of prepared AgNPs from the phenolic extract of flower part ethanolic extract; (B) AgNPs.
Figure 3(A) TEM micrograph of total phenolics AgNPs of the flower. Mag. 120,000×; (B) TEM analysis using Nano Measurer software.
Particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (ZP) of the synthesized AgNPs.
| Formula | PS (nm) | PDI | ZP (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AgNPs of total phenolics of flower (Nano-TP/Flower) | 21.31 ± 0.431 | 0.109 ± 0.014 | −34.0 ± 4.45 |
| AgNPs of total phenolics of bract (Nano-TP/Bract) | 22.05 ± 0.912 | 0.101 ± 0.017 | −35.5 ± 2.69 |
| AgNPs of total phenolics of stem (Nano-TP/Stem) | 26.42 ± 1.082 | 0.112 ± 0.020 | −31.9 ± 2.22 |
IC50 values of different fractions of total phenolics and their AgNPs forms of different parts.
| Samples | Working | IC50 * [μg/mL] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC-3 | A549 | ||
| TP/Flower | 0.1, 1, 10, 50, 100 | 16.35 ± 0.76 | 17.38 ± 0.75 |
| TP/Bract | 19.65 ± 0.97 | 21.04 ± 0.96 | |
| TP/Stem | 43.2 ± 1.51 | 56.3 ± 2.12 | |
| Nano-TP/Bract | 1.01 ± 0.1 | 1.34 ± 0.23 | |
| Nano-TP/Flowers | 0.85 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.02 | |
| Nano-TP/Stem | 14.3 ± 0.43 | 13.6 ± 0.34 | |
| Doxorubicin | 5.13 ± 0.64 | 6.19 ± 0.58 | |
* IC50 were calculated by non-linear regression curve fir using GraphPad prism; TP: total phenolic fraction.
Figure 4Percentage of cell viability vs. log [con. µM], R square ≈1 using the GraphPad prism software: (A) cytotoxicity of Nano-TP/Flowers against PC-3 cells; (B) cytotoxicity of Nano-TP/Flowers against A549 cells.
Figure 5Cytograms and bar representation for apoptosis-necrosis assessment using flow cytometry: (A) Annexin V/PI staining of untreated and treated PC-3 cancer cells with Nano-TP/Flowers (IC50 = 0.94 µM, 48 h); (B) Annexin V/PI staining of untreated and treated A549 cancer cells with Nano-TP/Flowers (IC50 = 0.85 µM, 48 h). Q1: Necrosis, Q2: Late apoptosis, Q4: Early apoptosis. Lower panel. * (p ≤ 0.05) and ** (p ≤ 0.001) are significantly different using the unpaired test in GraphPad Prism.
Figure 6Gene expression analysis of untreated and treated PC-3 cells with Nano-TP/Flowers (IC50 = 0.85 µM, 48 h). β-actin was used as a housekeeping gene. Fold of change is calculated by 2−ΔΔCT, where ΔΔCT is the difference between mean values of genes CT values in the treated and control groups. Blue dashed line represents fold of change of untreated control = 1.
Sequences of forward and reverse primers.
| Gene | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| P53 | 5′-CCCCTCCTGGCCCCTGTCATCTTC-3′ | 5′-GCAGCGCCTCACAACCTCCGTCAT-3′ |
| Bax | 5′-GTTTCATCCAGGATCGAGCAG-3′ | 5′-CATCTTCTTCCAGATGGTGA-3′ |
| CASP-3 | 5′-TGGCCCTGAAATACGAAGTC-3′ | 5′-GGCAGTAGTCGACTCTGAAG-3′ |
| CASP-8 | 5′-AATGTTGGAGGAAAGCAAT-3′ | 5′-CATAGTCGTTGATTATCTTCAGC-3′ |
| CASP-9 | 5′-CGAACTAACAGGCAAGCAGC-3′ | 5′-ACCTCACCAAATCCTCCAGAAC-3′ |
| Bcl-2 | 5′-CCTGTGGATGACTGAGTACC-3′ | 5′-GAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATCA-3′ |
| β-actin | 5′-GTGACATCCACACCCAGAGG-3′ | 5′-ACAGGATGTCAAAACTGCCC-3′ |