| Literature DB >> 35046474 |
Luis V Herrera-Marcos1,2, Roberto Martínez-Beamonte1,2,3, Manuel Macías-Herranz1, Carmen Arnal2,4,3, Cristina Barranquero1,2,3, Juan J Puente-Lanzarote5, Sonia Gascón6,3, Tania Herrero-Continente1, Gonzalo Gonzalo-Romeo7, Víctor Alastrué-Vera8, Dolores Gutiérrez-Blázquez9, José M Lou-Bonafonte2,6,3, Joaquín C Surra2,10,3, María J Rodríguez-Yoldi2,6,3, Agustín García-Gil11, Antonio Güemes11, Jesús Osada12,13,14.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently a growing epidemic disease that can lead to cirrhosis and hepatic cancer when it evolves into non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a gap not well understood. To characterize this disease, pigs, considered to be one of the most similar to human experimental animal models, were used. To date, all swine-based settings have been carried out using rare predisposed breeds or long-term experiments. Herein, we fully describe a new experimental swine model for initial and reversible NASH using cross-bred animals fed on a high saturated fat, fructose, cholesterol, cholate, choline and methionine-deficient diet. To gain insight into the hepatic transcriptome that undergoes steatosis and steatohepatitis, we used RNA sequencing. This process significantly up-regulated 976 and down-regulated 209 genes mainly involved in cellular processes. Gene expression changes of 22 selected transcripts were verified by RT-qPCR. Lipid droplet area was positively associated with CD68, GPNMB, LGALS3, SLC51B and SPP1, and negatively with SQLE expressions. When these genes were tested in a second experiment of NASH reversion, LGALS3, SLC51B and SPP1 significantly decreased their expression. However, only LGALS3 was associated with lipid droplet areas. Our results suggest a role for LGALS3 in the transition of NAFLD to NASH.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35046474 PMCID: PMC8770509 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-04971-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of liver in a porcine model of dietary NAFLD development. Representative liver micrographs, stained with haematoxylin–eosin, from commercial bred swine before (A) and after (B) consuming the steatotic diet for 2 months. Morphometric changes in lipid droplet area expressed as percentage of total liver section (C). Representative liver micrographs before consuming (D) and after consuming the steatotic diet for 2 months (E) using Masson’s trichrome staining. Morphometric changes in fibre area (F), expressed as percentage of total liver section. Representative CD68 immunostaining from liver sections coming from pigs before consuming (G) and after consuming the steatotic diet for 2 months (H). Morphometric changes in CD68 positive areas (I), expressed as percentage of total liver section. Hepatic triglyceride (J) and cholesterol (K) contents before and after consuming the steatotic diet for 2 months. Individual values, means and SD are represented for each group. Statistical analyses were carried out using Mann–Whitney U test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 2Differentially expressed genes according to RNAseq from livers in a porcine model of dietary NAFLD development. (A), Venn diagram analysis showing the transcripts expressed in control (initial state) and steatotic groups (the same animals on the steatotic diet for 2 months) with fold change > 2 and false discovery rate < 0.01. (B), Pathway enrichment of differentially expressed genes expressed as the log [–P] analysed by KEGG pathway enrichment. (C), Volcano plot representing initial vs. steatotic state differentially expressed genes. Red and blue squares represent the selected genes shown in Supplementary Table S5.
Selected hepatic transcripts differentially upregulated in male pigs fed the steatotic diet according to RNAseq at the level of FDR < 0.001 and FPKM ≥ 0.3.
| Gene ID | Symbol | Initial state (FPKM) | Steatosis (FPKM) | Log2 FC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apoptosis, cell adhesion | 100,038,033 | Galectin-3 | 4.3 ± 1.8 | 274.9 ± 81.9 | 6.0 | |
| Growth delay and reduction of metastatic potential | 100,049,669 | Glycoprotein NMB | 24 ± 6 | 776 ± 303 | 5.0 | |
| Activation of macrophages | 100,520,753 | Macrosialin | 1 ± 0.5 | 16 ± 9 | 4.9 | |
| Transport of bile acids | 100,525,144 | Solute carrier family 51 subunit beta | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 8.0 ± 4.8 | 4.8 | |
| Production of interferon-gamma and interleukin-12 | 397,087 | Osteopontin | 6.1 ± 2.5 | 151 ± 73 | 4.6 | |
| Cu and Zn transport | 397,123 | Metallothionein-3 | 8.6 ± 1.6 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | − 4.3 | |
| Protein folding | 100,514,482 | Anterior gradient protein 2 | 8 ± 13 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | − 3.7 | |
| Resistance to TNF-induced apoptosis | 100,302,365 | Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 4 | 2.6 ± 0.8 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | − 3.0 | |
| Nucleotide import | 100,156,347 | Calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein | 64 ± 71 | 8.3 ± 1.3 | − 2.9 | |
| Breakdown of phosphoethanolamine | 100,519,324 | Ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase | 23 ± 16 | 3.2 ± 1.8 | − 2.9 | |
| Copper transport | 100,037,920 | Metallothionein-1E | 9491 ± 1350 | 1318 ± 775 | − 2.8 | |
| Oxidation of squalene | 100,113,409 | Squalene epoxidase | 34.6 ± 7 | 5.1 ± 8.2 | − 2.8 | |
| Binding of divalent heavy metal ions | 102,166,944 | Metallothionein-1A | 4311 ± 913 | 644 ± 325 | − 2.7 | |
| Copper ion binding | 100,151,998 | Monooxygenase, DBH-like 1 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | − 2.7 | |
| Post-transcriptional repressor | 100,157,783 | Nanos C2HC-type zinc finger 1 | 1.3 ± 1.1 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | − 2.6 | |
Data are means ± SD. FPKM, fragments per kilo base per million mapped reads; Log2 FC, log2 fold change steatosis/ initial state. Only genes with counts in more than 75% of samples have been taken into consideration.
Biological function obtained from https://www.genecards.org/.
Figure 3Validation and biological meaning of RNAseq data in a porcine model of dietary NAFLD development. Verification by RT-qPCR of the changes in differentially expressed genes according to RNAseq analysis (A). Data (mean ± SD) represent arbitrary units normalized to UBA52 expression. Statistical analyses were carried out by Mann–Whitney’s U test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.005. Correlation analysis between RNAseq and RT-qPCR data (B). Log2 of steatosis/initial state ratio of RNAseq values of selected genes were plotted against the steatosis/non-steatosis ratio of mean expression values of the same genes by RT-qPCR (see Table S6). Significant (P < 0.001) associations among hepatic lipid droplet content and several gene expressions (C), hepatic cholesterol and gene expression (D), hepatic triglycerides and gene expressions (E) and hepatic inflammation (CD68 immunostaining) and gene expressions (F). Red text boxes denote positive associations while blues negative ones. Correlations were calculated according to the Spearman’s rho test.
Figure 4Scheme displaying the used experimental approaches. NAFLD progression study design (A) and NAFLD regression experimental setting (B).
Figure 5Characterization of NAFLD regression in the porcine model. Representative liver micrographs, stained with hematoxylin–eosin, from swine fed the steatotic diet for two months (A) and from the same pigs switched to the control diet for 1 month (B). Bar denotes 50 μm. Morphometric changes in hepatic lipid droplet expressed as percentage of area of total liver section (C). Representative liver micrographs using Masson’s trichrome staining from swine fed the steatotic diet for two months (D) and from the same pigs switched to the control diet for 1 month (E). Bar denotes 100 μm. Morphometric changes in fibre extent (F) of livers, expressed as percentage of fibre area of total liver section. Representative hepatic CD68 immunostaining from pigs consuming the steatotic diet for two months (G) and from the same pigs switched to the control diet for 1 month (H). Bar denotes 50 μm. Morphometric changes in CD68 positive areas (I), expressed as percentage of total liver section. Hepatic triglyceride (J) and cholesterol (K) contents from swine fed the steatotic diet for two months and after consuming the control diet for one month. Data are expressed as individual data with means ± SD for each group. Statistical analyses were carried out using Mann–Whitney’s U test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6Confirmation of mRNA gene expression changes in the regression experiment using the porcine model of dietary NAFLD development. Analyses by RT-qPCR of previously observed differentially expressed genes (A). Data (mean ± SD) represent arbitrary units normalized to UBA52 expression. Statistical analyses were carried out by Mann–Whitney U test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.005. Venn diagram analysis showing the transcripts displaying increased expression in the steatotic condition (yellow area) of progression and regression experiments (B). Significant (P < 0.001) association between hepatic lipid droplet content and LGALS3 expression (C), hepatic triglycerides and gene expressions (D) and hepatic inflammation (CD68 immunostaining) and gene expressions (E). Red colour denotes a positive association while blue a negative one. Correlations were calculated according to the Spearman’s rho test.
Figure 7Confirmation of selected protein expression changes in the regression experiment using the porcine model of dietary NAFLD development. Representative Western blots (extracted from original, Supplemental Fig. S2) of proteins and quantification of their expressions normalized to the ACTIN (40 kDa) as loading control (A). Parallel reaction monitoring detection of proteotypic peptides and quantification of detectable proteins in targeted proteomics (B). Representative chromatograms of proteotypic peptide (VAVNDAHLLQYNHR for LGALS3). PSMs mascot values were divided by their protein molecular weight and the number of detected proteins of each sample. Data are expressed as mean ± SD for each group. Statistical analyses were carried out using Mann–Whitney U test. *p < 0.05. Representative micrographs of immunohistochemical localization of LGALS3 in the liver (C). Positive signals of immune labelling are shown in brown. Bar denotes 50 μm.
Figure 8Significant association of plasma parameters and lipid droplet area in both experimental settings. Red colour denotes a positive significant association while blue a negative one. Correlations were calculated according to the Spearman’s rho test.
Figure 9Proposed networks of LGALS3. Human (A) and porcine (B) LGALS3 networks generated using String (https://string-db.org/). Porcine LGALS3 gene networks in the progression (C) and regression (D) experiments. Red colour edges indicate positive significant associations while grey negative ones. Correlations were calculated according to the Spearman’s rho test and Cytoscape 9.0 was used to represent the networks.