| Literature DB >> 24086269 |
Marinus F W te Pas1, Sietse-Jan Koopmans, Leo Kruijt, Mario P L Calus, Mari A Smits.
Abstract
Obesity and related diabetes are important health threatening multifactorial metabolic diseases and it has been suggested that 25% of all diabetic patients are unaware of their patho-physiological condition. Biomarkers for monitoring and control are available, but early stage predictive biomarkers enabling prevention of these diseases are still lacking. We used the pig as a model to study metabolic disease because humans and pigs share a multitude of metabolic similarities. Diabetes was chemically induced and control and diabetic pigs were either fed a high unsaturated fat (Mediterranean) diet or a high saturated fat/cholesterol/sugar (cafeteria) diet. Physiological parameters related to fat metabolism and diabetes were measured. Diabetic pigs' plasma proteome profiles differed more between the two diets than control pigs plasma proteome profiles. The expression levels of several proteins correlated well with (patho)physiological parameters related to the fat metabolism (cholesterol, VLDL, LDL, NEFA) and diabetes (Glucose) and to the diet fed to the animals. Studying only the control pigs as a model for metabolic syndrome when fed the two diets showed correlations to the same parameters but now more focused on insulin, glucose and abdominal fat depot parameters. We conclude that proteomic profiles can be used as a biomarker to identify pigs with developing metabolic syndrome (prediabetes) and diabetes when fed a cafeteria diet. It could be developed into a potential biomarkers for the early recognition of metabolic diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24086269 PMCID: PMC3781149 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of the high unsaturated fat (Mediterranean) diet and the high saturated fat (cafeteria) diet.
| Feed components | Mediterranean Diet | Cafeteria Diet |
| Soy beans, extracted | 51.3 | 51.3 |
| Potato protein | 50 | 50 |
| Wheat gluten meal | 118.3 | 118.3 |
| Cellulose | 100 | 100 |
| Sucrose | 100 | 100 |
| Fructose | 150 | 150 |
| Native Pea starch | 150 | 150 |
| Animal fat (lard) | 0 | 250 |
| Trisun 80, high oleic sunflower oil | 55.9 | 0 |
| Canola | 142.5 | 0 |
| Cornoil | 45 | 0 |
| Fishoil | 6.6 | 0 |
| Cholesterol (extra) | 0 | 10 |
| Chalk marl | 11 | 11 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Sodium chloride | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Mineral/vitamin premixa | 2 | 2 |
| L-Lysine hydrochloride | 2.8 | 2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a: This vitamin and trace mineral premix contained per kg diet: vitamin A (retinol) - 1750 IU; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) - 200 IU; vitamin E (tocopherol) - 11 IU; vit. K1 (phylloquinone) - 0.5 mg; vitamin B1 (thiamin) - 1.0 mg; vitamin B2 (riboflavin) - 4 mg; d-pantothenic acid - 9 mg; niacin (vitamin B3, nicotinic acid) - 12.5 mg (available); biotin (vitamin H) - 50 µg; vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) - 15 µg; folic acid (folacin) - 0.3 mg; vit. B6 (pyridoxin) - 1.5 mg; choline - 400 mg; Fe - 80 mg; Zn - 54 mg; Mn - 30 mg; Co - 0.15 mg; I - 0.14 mg; Se - 0.25 mg; antioxidants (E310,320,321) - 50 mg; with maize starch as carrier.
Plasma parameters after 16
| Treatment group | Control | Diabetic | diet | F-prob | |||||||
| Diet | Mediterranean | Cafeteria | Mediterranean | Cafeteria | |||||||
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | lsd | diet | diab | |
| Plasma glucose (mM) | 5.8 | 0.1 | 5.7 | 0.2 | 13.5 | 1.4 | 17.2 | 1.2 | 2 | 0.06 | <0.001 |
| Plasma Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.08 | 0.016 | 0.101 | 0.024 | 0.053 | 0.01 | 0.073 | 0.018 | 0.031 | 0.2 | 0.08 |
| Plasma triglyceride (mM) | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.42 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.2 | 0.72 | 0.04 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 16 | 5 | 16 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 5.4 | 0.24 | 0.65 |
| NEFA (mM) | 0.38 | 0.05 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.5 | 0.14 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.04 |
| Cholesterol (mM) | 2.3a | 0.4 | 4.8a | 0.7 | 2.2a | 0.2 | 15.0b | 3.7 | 3.6 | <0.001 | 0.01 |
| LDL (mM) | 1.2a | 0.3 | 2.2a | 0.2 | 1.0a | 0.1 | 5.4b | 0.9 | 1 | 0.01 | <0.001 |
| HDL (mM) | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| VLDL (mM) | 0.5a | 0.1 | 1.8a | 0.4 | 0.4a | 0 | 8.3b | 2.6 | 2.8 | 0.001 | 0.03 |
| HDL/LDL (%) | 0.53 | 0.13 | 0.41 | 0.08 | 0.85 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.005 | 0.36 |
| HDL/Cholesterol (%) | 26bc | 4 | 19ab | 4 | 36c | 4 | 11a | 3 | 12 | <0.001 | 0.69 |
The standard errors of the means (SEM), the least square differences (lsd) and p-value (F-prob) are tabulated. tabulated. Different letters a, b or c in the same row differ statistically at p<0.05. Nb. interactions for cholesterol, LDL, VDL and HDL/Cholesterol (lsd is here diet*diabetes); F prob HDL/LDL = 0.07; lsd = 0.35.
Plasma proteome profiles comparisons.
| CM10, pH 7 | CM10, pH 4 | H50 | IMAC | |
| Fraction 1 | 7 | 11 | 22 | 6 |
| Fraction 2 | 11 | 20 | 17 | 13 |
| Fraction 3 | 29 | 25 | 11 | 18 |
| Fraction 4 | 9 | 12 | 6 | 14 |
| Total | 56 | 58 | 56 | 51 |
Number of protein peaks for each of the protein arrays showing differential expression between the four groups of pigs. It should be noted that some of the peaks may be similar in subsequent fractions.
Correlations between plasma proteome profiles and physiological parameters.
| Parameter | N peak correlation | Residuals | Peak sharing |
| >0.85 (>0.9) | |||
|
| 60 (25) | 26 (18) | all >0.9; most 0.85–0.9 |
|
| 50 (27) | 29 (21) | all >0.9; most 0.85–0.9 |
|
| 55 (26) | 23 (7) | all >0.9; most 0.85–0.9 |
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | NEFA postprandial | |
|
| 1 | Glucose | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | TG | |
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 2 | TG postprandial |
Number of peaks showing correlation >0.85 (>0.9) between protein peak expression levels and physiological parameters in control and diabetic animals fed with the Mediterranean or cafeteria diets. The parameters were measured either 3 hours postprandial or after 16 hours fasting, where indicated. For information on the peak m/z values see file S3. The information after calculating the residuals using a model including effects of diabetes and feed is included. Information about peak similarities is given where appropriate. a: Very Low Density Lipoproteins; b: Low Density Lipoproteins; c: Triglycerides; d: Non Esterified Fatty Acids.
Figure 1Example of proteome profile differences between control and diabetic pigs fed two diets.
Control and diabetic pigs were either fed a healthy Mediterranean diet or a cafeteria diet differing mainly in fatty acid composition. Plasma protein profiles were determined with a SELDI-TOF equipment and analyzed in relation to physiological parameters. Expression levels of peak M/Z 28537, CM10 pH 7, fraction 3. Each dot represent the expression level found in a pig. The horizontal bar represents the mean. ▴: Control Mediterranean diet, ♦: Control Cafeteria diet, •: Diabetes Mediterranean diet, ▪: Diabetes cafeteria diet.
Figure 2Principal component analysis.
Control and diabetic pigs were either fed a healthy Mediterranean diet or a cafeteria diet differing mainly in fatty acid composition. Plasma protein profiles were determined with a SELDI-TOF equipment and analyzed in relation to physiological parameters. Example of the principal component analysis of peaks showing differential expression between the groups of animals: peak M/Z 6623, CM10, pH 7, fraction 3; ▴: Control Mediterranean diet, ♦: Control Cafeteria diet, •: Diabetes Mediterranean diet, ▪: Diabetes cafeteria diet.
Correlations between plasma proteome profiles and physiological parameters in control pigs fed the two diets.
| Parameter | Number of peaks | Residuals |
| Body weight at slaughter | 4 | 2 |
| Insulin postprandial | 4 | |
| Glucose postprandial | 3 | 6 |
| Glucose during fasting | 1 | 1 |
| NEFAa postprandial | 2 | |
| NEFA during fasting | 17 | |
| Cholesterol during fasting (includes VLDL and LDL) | 1 | 15 |
| VLDLb | 2 | 21 |
| LDLc | 3 | 9 |
| HDLd | 1 | |
| TGe postprandial | 6 | |
| TG during fasting | 1 | |
| Retroperitoneal fat (g) | 1 | |
| Abdominal fat depot (i.e. Omental fat) (g) | 2 | |
| Retroperitoneal fat depot per kg body weight | 1 | |
| Omental fat depot per kg body fat | 2 |
Number of peaks showing correlation >0.9 between protein peak expression levels and physiological parameters in control animals fed with the Mediterranean or cafeteria diets.a: Non Esterified Fatty Acids; b: Very Low Density Lipoproteins; c: Low Density Lipoproteins; d: High Density Lipoproteins; e: Triglycerides.