| Literature DB >> 35036895 |
Panchanathan Manivasagan1,2, Ara Joe2, Hyo-Won Han2, Thavasyappan Thambi3, Manickam Selvaraj4, Kumarappan Chidambaram5, Jungbae Kim1,6, Eue-Soon Jang2.
Abstract
Photothermal (PT)-enhanced Fenton-based chemodynamic therapy (CDT) has attracted a significant amount of research attention over the last five years as a highly effective, safe, and tumor-specific nanomedicine-based therapy. CDT is a new emerging nanocatalyst-based therapeutic strategy for the in situ treatment of tumors via the Fenton reaction or Fenton-like reaction, which has got fast progress in recent years because of its high specificity and activation by endogenous substances. A variety of multifunctional nanomaterials such as metal-, metal oxide-, and metal-sulfide-based nanocatalysts have been designed and constructed to trigger the in situ Fenton or Fenton-like reaction within the tumor microenvironment (TME) to generate highly cytotoxic hydroxyl radicals (•OH), which is highly efficient for the killing of tumor cells. However, research is still required to enhance the curative outcomes and minimize its side effects. Specifically, the therapeutic efficiency of certain CDTs is still hindered by the TME, including low levels of endogenous hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), overexpression of reduced glutathione (GSH), and low catalytic efficacy of Fenton or Fenton-like reactions (pH 5.6-6.8), which makes it difficult to completely cure cancer using monotherapy. For this reason, photothermal therapy (PTT) has been utilized in combination with CDT to enhance therapeutic efficacy. More interestingly, tumor heating during PTT not only causes damage to the tumor cells but can also accelerate the generation of •OH via the Fenton and Fenton-like reactions, thus enhancing the CDT efficacy, providing more effective cancer treatment when compared with monotherapy. Currently, synergistic PT-enhanced CDT using multifunctional nanomaterials with both PT and chemodynamic properties has made enormous progress in cancer theranostics. However, there has been no comprehensive review on this subject published to date. In this review, we first summarize the recent progress in PT-enhanced Fenton-based CDT for cancer treatment. We then discuss the potential and challenges in the future development of PT-enhanced Fenton-based nanocatalytic tumor therapy for clinical application.Entities:
Keywords: Chemodynamic therapy; Combination therapy; Fenton reaction; Nanomaterials; Photothermal therapy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35036895 PMCID: PMC8753377 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Bio ISSN: 2590-0064
Summary of multifunctional nanomaterials for PT-enhanced CDT.
| Nanomaterials | Composition | Size (nm) | % PCE ( | Irradiation conditions | Temp (°C) | Cell line/animal model | Treatment/imaging | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe-based nanomaterials | FeS2-PEG | 180–200 nm | 28.6% | 808 nm, 1.5 W/cm2, 5 min | 50 | MCF-7, and 4T1 cells; 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse | [ | |
| Fe3O4@PPy@GOD NCs | 163.5 nm | 35.1 and 66.4% | 808 nm or 1064, 1.0 W/cm2, 15 min | 59 | L929, 4T1, HeLa, and HUVEC cell lines; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| PSAF NCs | 69.5 nm | 19.21% | 808 nm, 2.0 W/cm2, 10 min | 45 | 4T1 cell line; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| BSA-CuFeS2 NPs | 4.9 ± 0.9 nm | 38.8% | 808 nm, 1.5 W/cm2, 5 min | 63 | 4T1 cell line; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| PMFG | 12–20 nm | – | 808 nm, 0.8 W/cm2, 5 min | 45 | MCF-7 cell line | [ | ||
| Nb2C-IO-CaO2 | 150 nm | 32.1% | 1064 nm, 1.5 W/cm2, 10 min | 54.4 | HUVEC and 4T1 cell lines; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| AFP NPs | 242.3 nm | – | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 10 min | 47.7 | 4T1 cell line; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| γ-Fe2O3-GOx-DMSN NCs | 130 nm | 49.8% | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min | 50 | HeLa and U14 cell lines; U14 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| FP NRs | 180 nm | 56.6% | 1064 nm, 0.5 W/cm2, 10 min | 55.7 | HeLa, L929, and U14 cell lines; U14 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| EA-Fe@BSA NPs | 13.84 ± 2.53 | 31.9% | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 15 min | 41 | HCT116 and HUCEC cell lines; HCT116 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| BSO–FeS2 NPs | 7.27 ± 1.43 nm | 49.5% | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min | 45 | 4T1 cell line; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| RLR NPs | 200 nm | 26.8%, | 808 nm, 1.5 W/cm2, 5 min | 49 | MDA-MB-231 cell line; MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| FeS2@RBCs | 185.2 nm | 30.2% | 1064 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min | 25.3 | 4T1 cell line; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Fe-POM | 12.9 nm | 51.4% | 1060 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 10 min | 50 | HUVEC and HeLa cell lines; HeLa tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| PB@FePt-HA- | 150 nm | 28.14% | 808 nm, 1.5 W/cm2, 10 min | 68.3 | L02 and MCF-7 cell lines; MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| FMO | 450 nm | 48.5% | 808 nm, 0.7 W/cm2, 5 min | 50 | HeLa, and L929 cell lines; HeLa tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| CFMG hydrogel | – | – | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min | 49.5 | A375 and C2C12 cell lines; A375 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| FeO/MoS2-BSA | 150 nm | 56% | 1064 nm, 0.75 W/cm2, 5 min | 52 | HeLa and U14 cell lines; U14 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| F-BS NCs | 80 nm | 23.46% | 808 nm, 1.2 W/cm2, 5 min | 59.1 | L929 and HeLa cell lines; HeLa tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Fe(III)-GA/GOx@ZIF-Azo | 3 nm | 65.3% | 808 nm, 1.54 W/cm2, 10 min | 46 | MCF-7 cell line; MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Cu-based nanomaterials | CP NCS | 22 nm | 27% | 1064 nm, 0.75 W/cm2, 5 min | 51 | L929, HeLa, and U14 cell lines; U14-tumor-bearing mice | [ | |
| PEG-Cu2Se HNCs | 86.89 ± 19.93 nm | 50.89% | 1064 nm, 0.75 W/cm2, 5 min | 58.4 | HUVEC and 4T1 cell lines; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| SC@G NSs | 60.94 nm | 46.3% | 1064 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min | 47.5 | 293T and 4T1 cell lines; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| PDA@Cu/ZIF-8 NPs | 50 nm | – | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 10 min | 70 | MCF-7, A549, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines; MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| CuO@AuCu-TPP | 255 nm | 37.9% | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min | 51.6 | HeLa cell line; HeLa tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Cu9S8 NPs | ∼18.05 nm | – | 808 nm, 0.5 W/cm2, 5 min | 43 | 4T1 and HUVEC cell lines; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| CuO@CNSs-DOX | 15 nm | 10.14% | 808 nm, 2.0 W/cm2, 10 min | 60.3 | 4T1 cell line; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| MCBR | 130 nm | 24.6% | 808 nm, 1.5 W/cm2, 5 min | 75 | CT26 cell line; CT26 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| PEG-CMS@GOx | 5.88 nm | 63.27% | 1064 nm, 0.48 W/cm2, 5 min | 52 | HeLa, L929, and U14 cell lines; U14 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| PFN | 22 nm | 30.17% | 1064 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min | 55 | Panc02 cell line; Panc02 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Gold-based nanomaterials | CAANSs | 52 nm | – | 808 nm, 2.4 W/cm2, 10 min | 68.4 | HeLa cell line | [ | |
| Au@HCNs | 275 ± 0.355 nm | 26.8% | 808 nm, 2.0 W/cm2, 10 min | 52.9 | CT26 cell line; CT26 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Au@MnO2 | 25 nm | 23.6% | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 15 min | 42 | 4T1 cell line; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Au2Pt-PEG-Ce6 | 42 ± 3 nm | 31.5 | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min; 650 nm, 0.259 W/cm2, 5 min | 58.7 | HeLa, L929, and U14 cell lines; U14 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Metal oxide-based nanomaterials | WO3−x | 5.73 ± 0.93 nm | 25.8% | 1064 nm, 0.5 W/cm2, 5 min | 46 | HUVEC and 4T1 cell lines; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ | |
| DCDMs | 123 nm | 51.5% | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 10 min | 58.7 | L929, HeLa, and U14 cell lines; U14 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| HMCMs | 80 nm | 23.5% | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 8 min | 54 | MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MGC-803 cell lines; MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice | [ | ||
| Metal sulfide-based nanomaterials | CoS2 NCs | 19.79 ± 5.2 nm | 60.4% | 808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 10 min | 55.4 | 4T1 and HUEVC cell lines; 4T1 tumor-bearing mice | [ |
Fig. 1(a) A schematic illustration of the preparation of FeS2-PEG for self-enhanced MRI and PT-enhanced CDT. (b) In vivo T-and T-weighted MR images of tumor-bearing mice after intratumoral injection with FeS2-PEG (the red dotted circles). Reprinted with permission of Ref. [27]. Copyright 2017 Wiley.
Fig. 2(a) A schematic illustration of the preparation of FeS2@RBCs for PT-enhanced CDT. In vivo T-weighted MR images of tumor-bearing mice at various time points before and after intratumoral (b) and intravenous (c) injection of FeS2@RBCs. (d) In vivo FLI of tumor-bearing mice at various time points before and after intravenous injection of Cy5-modified FeS2@RBCs and ex vivo FLI images of the tumors and main organs collected from the treated mice 6 h post-injection. (e) Confocal images of tumor tissues 6 h post-injection. DAPI and Cy5 are shown in blue and red, respectively. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [122]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 3A schematic representation of the fabrication of BSA-CuFeS2 NPs for PT-enhanced CDT. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [109]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 4(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of EA-Fe@BSA NPs for PT-enhanced CDT. In vivo MR images of the tumor and liver (b), and kidney (c) after intravenous injection of EA-Fe@BSA NPs. The corresponding MR signal intensities of the tumor (d), liver (e), and kidney (f) images. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [110]. Copyright 2020 IVYSPRING International Publisher.
Fig. 5A schematic illustration of (a) the preparation of Nb2C-IO-CaO2 nanosheets and (b) PT-enhanced CDT utilizing Nb2C-IO-CaO2 nanosheets. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [117]. Copyright 2019 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 6(a) A schematic illustration of the fabrication of FeO/MoS2-BSA for PT-enhanced CDT. (b) IR thermal images of tumor-bearing mice upon intravenous injection of normal saline and FeO/MoS2-BSA, followed by 1064 nm laser irradiation at 0.75 W/cm2 for 10 min. (c) In vivo MR imaging of tumor-bearing mice at various time points after intravenous injection of FeO/MoS2-BSA. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [127]. Copyright 2020 Springer.
Fig. 7(a) A schematic illustration of the preparation of PSAF NCs for PT-enhanced CDT. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [116]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (b) A schematic illustration of the synthesis procedure for AFP NPs. (c) Proposed mechanism for AFP NPs in the PT-enhanced Fenton-based CDT of tumor and normal tissues. (d) In vivo PA signals of the tumor area at various time points after intravenous injection of AFP NPs. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [118]. Copyright 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 8A schematic illustration of the synthesis of Fe-POM (a) and (b) the synergistic mechanism of as-prepared Fe-POM applied in combination therapy. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [123]. Copyright 2020 Wiley.
Fig. 9(a) A schematic illustration of the synthetic process used to construct PB@FePt-HA-g-PEG for PT-enhanced CDT. (b) In vivo MR images of tumor-bearing mice at various time points post-injection of PB@FePt-HA-g-PEG. (c) CT image of tumor-bearing mice injected with PB@FePt-HA-g-PEG. (d) IR thermal image of tumor-bearing mice injected with PB@FePt-HA-g-PEG. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [124]. Copyright 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 10(a) A schematic illustration of the synthesis of CP NCs and their application in synergistic combination therapy. In vivo T-MR (b) and PA (c) imaging of tumor-bearing mice. (d) In vivo IR thermal images of tumor-bearing mice. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [130]. Copyright 2019 Wiley.
Fig. 11(a) A schematic illustration of the preparation of PEG-Cu2Se HNCs. (b) Proposed mechanism of PEG-Cu2Se HNCs for PT-enhanced CDT in the NIR-II window. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [41]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. A schematic illustration of the synthesis of PDA@Cu/ZIF-8 NPs (c) and its application in combination therapy (d). Reprinted with permission of Ref. [72]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 12(a) A schematic illustration of the synthesis of CuO@AuCu-TPP and the therapeutic mechanism of CuO@AuCu-TPP. (b) IR thermal images of mice. In vivo PA (c) and CT (d) images post-injection of CuO@AuCu-TPP. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [132]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 13(a) A schematic illustration of the fabrication of hollow Cu9S8 NPs for PT-enhanced CDT. In vivo PA images (b) and PA signal (c) of tumor-bearing mice before and after intravenous injection of hollow Cu9S8 NPs. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [64]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd. (d) A schematic illustration of PFN for PT-enhanced CDT. (e) In vivo T-weight MR images at different time points. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [135]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 14(a) A schematic illustration of the synthesis of WO3−x@γ-PGA NPs for PT-enhanced CDT. (b) In vivo PA imaging of tumor-bearing mice before and post-injection of WO3−x@γ-PGA NPs. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [24]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (c) A schematic illustration of the synthesis of DCDMs for PT-enhanced CDT. In vivo CT (d) and MR (e) images of tumor-bearing mice before and post-injection of DCDMs. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [139]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 15(a) A schematic illustration of the synthesis and working mechanisms of HMCMs. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [46]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (b) A schematic illustration of the fabrication of CoS2 NCs for PT-enhanced CDT. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [42]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 16(a) A schematic illustration of the fabrication of RLR NPs for chemo-PT-enhanced CDT. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [121]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier Ltd. (b) A schematic illustration of the synthesis of CuO@CNSs-DOX for chemo-PTT/CDT. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [133]. Copyright 2020 Springer.
Fig. 17(a) A schematic illustration of the synthesis of FP NRs for US/PT-enhanced CDT. In vivo MR (b) and PA (c) images of tumor-bearing mice. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [48]. Copyright 2019 Wiley.
Fig. 18(a) A schematic illustration of the fabrication of BSO–FeS2 NPs for PT-enhanced PDT/CDT. (b) IR thermal images of tumor-bearing mice. (c) In vivo PA images tumor-bearing mice after intratumoral injection of BSO–FeS2 NPs. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [120]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 19(a) A schematic illustration of the synthesis of MoS2–CuO@BSA/R837 (MCBR) for PTT/CDT/IMT. In vivo MR (b), CT (c), and IR thermal (d) images of a tumor after intratumoral injection with MCBR. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [47]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 20(a) A schematic illustration of the synthesis procedure of Au2Pt-PEG-Ce6 for collaborative phototherapy/CDT. (b) In vivo IR thermal images of tumor-bearing mice injected with saline and Au2Pt-PEG-Ce6. (c) In vivo CT images of tumor-bearing mice pre- and post-intratumoral injection of Au2Pt-PEG-Ce6. (d) In vivo PA images of tumor-bearing mice injected with saline and Au2Pt-PEG-Ce6. (e) In vivo PA images of hemoglobin (HB) and oxyhemoglobin (HBO2) in the tumor area post-injection of Au2Pt-PEG-Ce6. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [138]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 21A schematic illustration of the synthesis of Fe3O4@PPy@GOD NCs (a) and PT-enhanced CDT (b). (c) Proposed mechanism of Fe3O4@PPy@GOD NCs for PT-enhanced Fenton-based CDT. In vivo PAI and PA signals of the tumor area at various time points post-injection of Fe3O4@PPy@GOD NCs at 808 nm (d) and 1280 nm (e). (f) In vivo T-weighted MR images of tumor-bearing mice before and after intratumoral and intravenous injection of Fe3O4@PPy@GOD NCs (the red dotted circles indicate the tumor areas). Reprinted with permission of Ref. [59]. Copyright 2018 Wiley.
Fig. 22A schematic illustration of the synthesis and working mechanisms of PEG-CMS@GOx. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [134]. Copyright 2019 Wiley.
Fig. 23A schematic illustration of the (a) preparation of γ-Fe2O3-GOx-DMSN NCs and (b) PT-enhanced CDT using γ-Fe2O3-GOx-DMSN NCs. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [119]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 24The summative scheme of the present status/development and future directions/prospects of PT-enhanced CDT.