Literature DB >> 16313696

Selenium in cancer prevention: a review of the evidence and mechanism of action.

Margaret P Rayman1.   

Abstract

Se is an unusual trace element in having its own codon in mRNA that specifies its insertion into selenoproteins as selenocysteine (SeCys), by means of a mechanism requiring a large SeCys-insertion complex. This exacting insertion machinery for selenoprotein production has implications for the Se requirements for cancer prevention. If Se may protect against cancer, an adequate intake of Se is desirable. However, the level of intake in Europe and some parts of the world is not adequate for full expression of protective selenoproteins. The evidence for Se as a cancer preventive agent includes that from geographic, animal, prospective and intervention studies. Newly-published prospective studies on oesophageal, gastric-cardia and lung cancer have reinforced previous evidence, which is particularly strong for prostate cancer. Interventions with Se have shown benefit in reducing the risk of cancer incidence and mortality in all cancers combined, and specifically in liver, prostate, colo-rectal and lung cancers. The effect seems to be strongest in those individuals with the lowest Se status. As the level of Se that appears to be required for optimal effect is higher than that previously understood to be required to maximise the activity of selenoenzymes, the question has been raised as to whether selenoproteins are involved in the anti-cancer process. However, recent evidence showing an association between Se, reduction of DNA damage and oxidative stress together with data showing an effect of selenoprotein genotype on cancer risk implies that selenoproteins are indeed implicated. The likelihood of simultaneous and consecutive effects at different cancer stages still allows an important role for anti-cancer Se metabolites such as methyl selenol formed from gamma-glutamyl-selenomethyl-SeCys and selenomethyl-SeCys, components identified in certain plants and Se-enriched yeast that have anti-cancer effects. There is some evidence that Se may affect not only cancer risk but also progression and metastasis. Current primary and secondary prevention trials of Se are underway in the USA, including the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) relating to prostate cancer, although a large European trial is still desirable given the likelihood of a stronger effect in populations of lower Se status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16313696     DOI: 10.1079/pns2005467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc        ISSN: 0029-6651            Impact factor:   6.297


  171 in total

1.  Toenail trace element status and risk of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the FINBAR study.

Authors:  Michael A O'Rorke; Marie M Cantwell; Christian C Abnet; And John D Brockman; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Methylseleninic acid promotes antitumour effects via nuclear FOXO3a translocation through Akt inhibition.

Authors:  Míriam Tarrado-Castellarnau; Roldán Cortés; Miriam Zanuy; Josep Tarragó-Celada; Ibrahim H Polat; Richard Hill; Teresa W M Fan; Wolfgang Link; Marta Cascante
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 7.658

3.  Thioredoxin reductase 1 deficiency enhances selenite toxicity in cancer cells via a thioredoxin-independent mechanism.

Authors:  Ryuta Tobe; Min-Hyuk Yoo; Noelia Fradejas; Bradley A Carlson; Soledad Calvo; Vadim N Gladyshev; Dolph L Hatfield
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Nrf2 target genes are induced under marginal selenium-deficiency.

Authors:  Mike Müller; Antje Banning; Regina Brigelius-Flohé; Anna Kipp
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 5.523

5.  Interaction between single nucleotide polymorphisms in selenoprotein P and mitochondrial superoxide dismutase determines prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Matthew L Cooper; Hans-Olov Adami; Henrik Grönberg; Fredrik Wiklund; Fiona R Green; Margaret P Rayman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy.

Authors:  Chiara Gorrini; Isaac S Harris; Tak W Mak
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Differential effects of selenium on benign and malignant prostate epithelial cells: stimulation of LNCaP cell growth by noncytotoxic, low selenite concentrations.

Authors:  Nur Ozten Kandaş; Carla Randolph; Maarten C Bosland
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.900

8.  Influence of domestic processing on the bioaccessibility of selenium from selected food grains and composite meals.

Authors:  Anjum Khanam; Kalpana Platel
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.701

9.  Evidence that a polymorphism within the 3'UTR of glutathione peroxidase 4 is functional and is associated with susceptibility to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Bermano; V Pagmantidis; N Holloway; S Kadri; N A G Mowat; R S Shiel; J R Arthur; J C Mathers; A K Daly; J Broom; J E Hesketh
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 5.523

10.  Comparative effects of two different forms of selenium on oxidative stress biomarkers in healthy men: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  John P Richie; Arun Das; Ana M Calcagnotto; Raghu Sinha; Wanda Neidig; Jiangang Liao; Eugene J Lengerich; Arthur Berg; Terryl J Hartman; Amy Ciccarella; Aaron Baker; Matthew G Kaag; Susan Goodin; Robert S DiPaola; Karam El-Bayoumy
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.