Literature DB >> 34981293

Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure and their associated factors in the geriatric population, a population-based study.

Fereshteh Shokrollahzadeh1, Hassan Hashemi2, Abbasali Yekta3, Hadi Ostadimoghaddam4, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour5, Mehdi Khabazkhoob6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and their associated factors in a geriatric population.
METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was performed in individuals above 60 years of age in Tehran, the capital of Iran. The sampling was performed using multi-stage random cluster sampling method. All participants underwent preliminary ocular examinations, and then imaging by Pentacam HR and IOL master 500. Measurement of IOPg, IOPcc, and corneal biomechanical indices including corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistant factor (CRF) was performed in a random sub-sample using ocular response analyzer (ORA).
RESULTS: The mean IOPg and IOPcc were 16.76 ± 4.71 mmHg and 19.05 ± 4.67 mmHg, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in both IOPg (p = 0.891) and IOPcc (p = 0.248) between males and females. Based on the multiple linear regression models, both IOPg and IOPcc showed a statistically significant direct relationship with CRF (P < 0.001) and a significant inverse relationship with CH (P < 0.001 for IOPg and IOPcc), anterior chamber angle (ACA) (p = 0.006 for IOPg and p = 0.017 for IOPcc), and spherical equivalent refractive error (p = 0.032 for IOPg and p = 0.046 for IOPcc).
CONCLUSION: Mean IOPg and IOPcc in the present study were higher compared to most previous studies. Corneal biomechanical indices including CH and CRF, refractive error and anterior chamber angle were independent associated factors of IOPg and IOPcc in the present study. There was no significant relationship between ORA-derived IOP values and CCT.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal hysteresis; Corneal resistant factor; Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure; Geriatric; Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure; Population-based study

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34981293     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-02207-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.029


  47 in total

1.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Nilgün Yildirim; Afsun Şahin; Ertuğrul Çolak
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.

Authors:  Etsuo Chihara
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population.

Authors:  Arun Narayanaswamy; Ronald S Chung; Ren-Yi Wu; Judy Park; Wan-Ling Wong; Seang-Mei Saw; Tien Y Wong; Tin Aung
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans.

Authors:  Mitsugu Shimmyo; Anna J Ross; Anna Moy; Ramin Mostafavi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu; Fumiko Ohmoto
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Young H Kwon; John H Fingert; Markus H Kuehn; Wallace L M Alward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Corneal hysteresis measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Olivia Abitbol; Jihène Bouden; Serge Doan; Thanh Hoang-Xuan; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Relationship among corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length.

Authors:  Inmaculada Bueno-Gimeno; Enrique España-Gregori; Andres Gene-Sampedro; Aitor Lanzagorta-Aresti; David P Piñero-Llorens
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  The biomechanical properties of the cornea and anterior segment parameters.

Authors:  Ho Sik Hwang; Seh Kwang Park; Man Soo Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.