Literature DB >> 21333357

Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population.

Arun Narayanaswamy1, Ronald S Chung, Ren-Yi Wu, Judy Park, Wan-Ling Wong, Seang-Mei Saw, Tien Y Wong, Tin Aung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate variations in corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) and their ocular and systemic associations in Chinese adults.
DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: We included 1136 subjects of Chinese origin from an ongoing population-based study.
METHODS: All subjects in this population-based study underwent a standardized ocular examination including keratometry (corneal radius of curvature), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length (AL) assessments. The CH and CRF were measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Participants underwent a detailed interview and laboratory investigations that included estimation of nonfasting serum glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and lipid profile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed CH, CRF, and their associations with demographic, ocular, and systemic factors.
RESULTS: The mean age of study subjects was 55.3±8.4 years and 51.2% were females. The mean CH and CRF were 10.6±1.5 and 10.1±1.6 mmHg, respectively. Women had higher mean CH (10.8 vs 10.4 mmHg; P<0.001) and CRF (10.4 vs. 9.8 mmHg; P<0.001) than men. After adjusting for age, gender, IOP, CCT, keratometry, AL, and diabetes, CH was negatively associated with age (β = -0.034; P<0.001), IOP (β = -0.037; P = 0.01), corneal radius of curvature (β = -0.963; P<0.001), and AL (β = -0.106; P = 0.001); and positively associated with female gender (β = 0.308; P<0.001) and CCT (β = 0.020; P<0.001). The CRF showed a negative association with age (β = -0.023; P<0.001) and corneal radius of curvature (β = -0.771; P<0.001), and was positively associated with female gender (β = 0.368; P<0.001), IOP (β = 0.134; P<0.001) and CCT (β = 0.024; P<0.001). Subjects with diabetes had a higher CH (β = 0.324; P<0.001) and CRF (β = 0.396; P = 0.002) compared with those without diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: With advancing age, the CH and CRF in adult Chinese decreased. Women and subjects with diabetes had greater CH and CRF. Corneal biomechanical properties of hysteresis and resistance factor are significantly influenced by IOP, CCT, corneal radius of curvature, and AL.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21333357     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  25 in total

1.  Corneal biomechanical data and biometric parameters measured with Scheimpflug-based devices on normal corneas.

Authors:  Gabor Nemeth; Eszter Szalai; Ziad Hassan; Agnes Lipecz; Zsuzsa Flasko; Laszlo Modis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Combining corneal hysteresis with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for glaucoma risk assessment.

Authors:  D Pensyl; M Sullivan-Mee; M Torres-Monte; K Halverson; C Qualls
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure and their associated factors in the geriatric population, a population-based study.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shokrollahzadeh; Hassan Hashemi; Abbasali Yekta; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children.

Authors:  Ramin Salouti; Ali Agha Alishiri; Reza Gharebaghi; Mostafa Naderi; Khosrow Jadidi; Ahmad Shojaei-Baghini; Mohammadreza Talebnejad; Zahra Nasiri; Seyedmorteza Hosseini; Fatemeh Heidary
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Diabetic keratopathy: Insights and challenges.

Authors:  S Priyadarsini; A Whelchel; S Nicholas; R Sharif; K Riaz; D Karamichos
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Baseline risk factors that predict the development of open-angle glaucoma in a population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Xuejuan Jiang; Rohit Varma; Shuang Wu; Mina Torres; Stanley P Azen; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra; Betsy Bao-Thu Nguyen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Wang; Guihua Xu; Wei Wang; Juanjuan Wang; Lili Chen; Mingguang He; Zilin Chen
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 4.280

8.  Corneal biomechanical assessment using corneal visualization scheimpflug technology in keratoconic and normal eyes.

Authors:  Lei Tian; Yi-Fei Huang; Li-Qiang Wang; Hua Bai; Qun Wang; Jing-Jing Jiang; Ying Wu; Min Gao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Biomechanical parameters of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal eyes.

Authors:  Aachal Kotecha; Richard A Russell; Angelos Sinapis; Sayeh Pourjavan; Dimitros Sinapis; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  The biomechanical properties of the cornea and anterior segment parameters.

Authors:  Ho Sik Hwang; Seh Kwang Park; Man Soo Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.