Wang Li1, Juan Zhou1, Nicolò Maccaferri2,3, Roman Krahne4, Kang Wang1, Denis Garoli4. 1. State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, P. R. China. 2. Department of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg, Luxembourg. 3. Department of Physics, Umeå University, Linnaeus väg 20, SE-90736 Umeå, Sweden. 4. Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Optoelectronics Research Line, Morego 30, I-16163 Genova, Italy.
Plasmonics
is the discipline
that investigates the use of collective oscillations of conductive
electrons in metallic nanostructures, called surface plasmons (SPs),
to realize a large set of devices to be applied in sensing, nanomedicine,
metamaterials, energy harvesting, and many others.[1] During the past decade, several examples of plasmonic platforms
have been proposed for single-molecule studies.[2−5] Among others, plasmonic nanopores,
i.e., sub-100 nm apertures connecting two compartments, are finding
more and more interest as a specific family of solid-state nanopores
with multiple functionalities. While the reader can find exhaustive
details on working principles, fabrication, and applications of plasmonic
nanopores for biosensing in recent reviews,[6,7] here
we focus on the applications of plasmonic nanopores as a platform
for enhanced spectroscopy of single DNA and protein molecules, discussing
in detail which limitations must be overcome to enable large scale
multiplexing sequencing.DNA single molecule sequencing is an
established technology with
two main approaches strongly present in the market, such as those
by Pacific Biosciences[8] and Oxford Nanopore
Technologies.[9] On the contrary, the effort
needed to achieve single molecule protein sequencing still appears
enormous, even if recent existing works have demonstrated that this
idea could become a reality.[10−14] The two major limitations in protein sequencing are the large number
(20) of different amino acids to be discriminated and the unique nature
of every polypeptide that cannot be replicated as in the case of DNA.
The nanopore-sequencing technologies are nowadays the most intensively
investigated single molecule sequencing approach. It is based on threading
of single molecules of DNA or protein through a nanopore, where k-mers of polymer elements (k = 4–5)
are detected as they are translocated through the pore in single element
steps. Ion channels and bacterial toxin channels, e.g., α-hemolysin,
MspA, and CsgG when embedded in a lipid bilayer membrane, serve as
nanopore sensors with outstanding signal reproducibility and good
sensitivity.[13,15] Some engineered (i.e., mutated
amino-acid sequence) versions of these channels have the right performance
to allow DNA sequencing with single-pass accuracy close to 90%, and
higher accuracy (up to 99.9%) can be achieved with multiple pass reads.
Additionally, very recently, some proofs of concept of single protein
sequencing using a biological nanopore with proper unfoldase to enable
controlled polypeptide unfolding and translocation have been reported.[10,12,16] Unfortunately, even with these
outstanding advances, biological nanopores still present severe limitations,
such as their bad stability and the complex procedures to perform
their engineering. Moreover, their use in simultaneous multiplexed
readout from many thousands of nanopores, without compromising the
temporal bandwidth and sensitivity, is currently a huge challenge.
In contrast, solid-state nanopores are actually extensively explored
due to the potential of tuning both their physical and chemical properties.[17,18,27−36,19,37−40,20−26] Sequencing by means of solid-state nanopores is not yet possible
due to some major limitations such as time and space resolution and
not an easy control of the translocation mechanism as in the case
of biological nanopores with integrated molecular motors.[41−43] In this context, plasmonic nanopores are the most interesting case
of solid-state nanopores to realize complemented sensing with multiple
measuring modalities beyond the mostly used electrical recording.
Plasmonic nanopores offer improvements in sensitivity, specificity,
observation rate, dwell time, and scalable parallelized detection.
In a plasmonic nanopore, it is easy to confine and enhance the electromagnetic
(EM) radiation to a nanoscale volume (hotspot), in which biomolecules
can be “scanned” as they translocate through the pore
with a significant improvement in signal-to-noise ratio due to enhanced
optical detection.[7] The implementation
of an optical read-out scheme in a plasmonic nanopore enables one
to perform measurements in the far-field, which provide a signal independent
from the electrical one. Even more importantly, different techniques
can be implemented within a nanopore sensor based on optical readout,
such as single-molecule fluorescence,[44] Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET),[45] and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS).[46] In particular, fluorescence is extensively used in sequencing
applications, but it presents a limitation that is impossible to be
overcome related to the maximum number of colors that can be detected
(up to six) without spectral overlap. This strongly limits multiplexing
detection such as in the case of protein sequencing[12] where up to 20 different signals should be decoded. On
the contrary, both FRET and SERS enable additional multiplexing. Lifetime
and intensity multiplexing are demonstrated methods to increase the
number of color channels in FRET spectroscopy,[47,48] and a number of different channels up to 10 is technologically feasible.
On the contrary, SERS has less limitations in terms of multiplexing.
In fact, every molecule has its own Raman fingerprint, and the use
of SERS to discriminate among the 4 nucleotides and the 20 amino-acids
has been reported and demonstrated.[49,50] Another key
advantage related to the optical readout is the intrinsic fast nature
of the excitation/emission of photons, compatible with the short duration
(typically below the microsecond range) of interaction between the
single molecule and the nanopore. The fast translocation of the molecule
through the pore makes the electrical measurements very noisy. However,
if a fast optical detection can be implemented, the optical readout
can be intrinsically less noisy. Thanks to plasmonics, the fast translocation
of the molecule can be modified by exploiting some control mechanisms,
such as optical and thermal forces, whose related phenomena are known
as trapping and thermophoresis, respectively. These have shown great
potential, and new methods in this field can significantly impact
the commercial use of these technologies.In this critical review,
we discuss the current advantages and
limitations of plasmonic nanopores as solid-state platforms for single
molecule sequencing applications. We first highlight recent experiments
on single-molecule detection in plasmonic platforms where the engineered
EM field boosts the sensitivity and, at the same time, generates thermo-mechanical
effects for controlling the molecule translocations through the nanopores.
Furthermore, we discuss the three major optical readout techniques
that can be implemented in a plasmonic nanopore (Figure ), i.e., fluorescence, FRET,
and SERS, and we will try to give some prospects on how optimization
of these methods can facilitate real sequencing applications.
Figure 1
Schematic illustration
of the principle of the plasmonic nanopore
and its application of enhanced optical spectroscopy for multiplexed
DNA and protein sequencing. Inset (bottom panel): reproduced from
Yang, J. M.; Jin, L.; Pan, Z. Q.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H. L.; Ji, L. N.;
Xia, X. H.; Wang, K. Anal. Chem.2019, 91 (9), 6275–6280 (ref (51)). Copyright 2019 American
Chemical Society.
Schematic illustration
of the principle of the plasmonic nanopore
and its application of enhanced optical spectroscopy for multiplexed
DNA and protein sequencing. Inset (bottom panel): reproduced from
Yang, J. M.; Jin, L.; Pan, Z. Q.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H. L.; Ji, L. N.;
Xia, X. H.; Wang, K. Anal. Chem.2019, 91 (9), 6275–6280 (ref (51)). Copyright 2019 American
Chemical Society.
Advanced Functionalities
Offered by Plasmonic Nanopores
The research and development
works performed during the past decade
have enabled single molecule DNA sequencing both on solid-state photonic
platforms and on biological nanopore platforms.[52,53] While in the most used solid-state platforms, the DNA sequencing
is obtained by reading the nucleobase sequence via the duplication
of ssDNA with fluorescent (four colors) complementary nucleic acids,
in platforms based on nanopore, the sequencing is typically done by
measuring current blockage during the translocation of single elongated
molecule through the pore.[52−55] A huge advancement in resolution is the major requirement
to apply the current single-molecule methods to the new field of protein
sequencing.[10] A protein can be made of
20 different amino-acids, and distinguishing 20 different signal levels
in optical or electrical read-outs is less than trivial. Combining
electro-optical detection based on solid-state nanopores[56−59] could be the way to improve the sensitivity and to enable low error-rate
nanopore sequencing of both DNA and protein. Electro-optical single
molecule detection has been recently discussed by other authors.[59] This approach offers important advantages with
respect to standard electrical read-out measurements performed in
solid-state nanopores, but to date it has not been possible to demonstrate
it in sequencing applications. Probably the unique example of solid-state
nanopore sequencing is the recent paper reported by Wanunu and colleagues
in collaboration with Pacific Bioscience on the use of a zero mode
waveguide (ZMW) modified with nanopores to demonstrate the improved
loading of long DNA molecule (Figure a).[60,61] There, the sequencing has been
possible thanks to the sequencing by synthesis of Pacific Bioscience
(where a polymerase is bonded to the surface of the ZMW and used to
duplicate the diffusing ssDNA molecule by four color fluorescent complementary
nucleic acids).[52]
Figure 2
(a) SEM images of a nanopore
zero-mode waveguides array and its
setup for SMRT sequencing. Reproduced with permission from Larkin,
J.; Foquet, M.; Turner, S. W.; Korlach, J.; Wanunu, M. Reversible
Positioning of Single Molecule inside Zero-Mode Waveguide. Nano Lett.2014, 14, 6023–6029
(ref (61)). Copyright
2014 American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic illustration of the
DNA translocation through a plasmonic nanopore, in which the ionic
current flowing through the nanopore and the fluorescence emissions
are probed in a synchronous manner. Reproduced from Light-Enhancing
Plasmonic-Nanopore Biosensor for Superior Single-Molecule Detection,
Assad, O. N.; Gilboa, T.; Spitzberg, J.; Juhasz, M.; Weinhold, E.;
Meller, A. Adv. Mater. Vol. 29,
Issue 9 (ref (44)).
Copyright 2017 Wiley. (c) Schematic of a solid-state nanopore with
an integrated bowtie-antenna structure and the simulated electromagnetic
field intensity. Reproduced from Integrating Sub-3 nm Plasmonic Gaps
into Solid-State Nanopores, Shi, X.; Verschueren, D.; Pud, S.; Dekker,
C. Small, Vol. 14, Issue 18 (ref (64)). Copyright 2018 Wiley.
(d) Electromagnetic field distribution with a disk with a MoS2 monolayer on top of the pillar. Reproduced from Garoli, D.;
Mosconi, D.; Miele, E.; Maccaferri, N.; Ardini, M.; Giovannini, G.;
Dipalo, M.; Agnoli, S.; De Angelis, F. Nanoscale2018, 10 (36), 17105–17111 (ref (67)), with permission of The
Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) Optical trapping and stepwise movement
of DNA segment in a plasmonic nanopore. Reproduced from Belkin, M.;
Chao, S.; Jonsson, M. P.; Dekker, C.; Aksimentiev, A. ACS
Nano2015, 9 (11), 10598–10611
(ref (68)). Copyright
2015 American Chemical Society.
(a) SEM images of a nanopore
zero-mode waveguides array and its
setup for SMRT sequencing. Reproduced with permission from Larkin,
J.; Foquet, M.; Turner, S. W.; Korlach, J.; Wanunu, M. Reversible
Positioning of Single Molecule inside Zero-Mode Waveguide. Nano Lett.2014, 14, 6023–6029
(ref (61)). Copyright
2014 American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic illustration of the
DNA translocation through a plasmonic nanopore, in which the ionic
current flowing through the nanopore and the fluorescence emissions
are probed in a synchronous manner. Reproduced from Light-Enhancing
Plasmonic-Nanopore Biosensor for Superior Single-Molecule Detection,
Assad, O. N.; Gilboa, T.; Spitzberg, J.; Juhasz, M.; Weinhold, E.;
Meller, A. Adv. Mater. Vol. 29,
Issue 9 (ref (44)).
Copyright 2017 Wiley. (c) Schematic of a solid-state nanopore with
an integrated bowtie-antenna structure and the simulated electromagnetic
field intensity. Reproduced from Integrating Sub-3 nm Plasmonic Gaps
into Solid-State Nanopores, Shi, X.; Verschueren, D.; Pud, S.; Dekker,
C. Small, Vol. 14, Issue 18 (ref (64)). Copyright 2018 Wiley.
(d) Electromagnetic field distribution with a disk with a MoS2 monolayer on top of the pillar. Reproduced from Garoli, D.;
Mosconi, D.; Miele, E.; Maccaferri, N.; Ardini, M.; Giovannini, G.;
Dipalo, M.; Agnoli, S.; De Angelis, F. Nanoscale2018, 10 (36), 17105–17111 (ref (67)), with permission of The
Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) Optical trapping and stepwise movement
of DNA segment in a plasmonic nanopore. Reproduced from Belkin, M.;
Chao, S.; Jonsson, M. P.; Dekker, C.; Aksimentiev, A. ACS
Nano2015, 9 (11), 10598–10611
(ref (68)). Copyright
2015 American Chemical Society.One of the key aspect related to plasmonic nanopores is the potential
implementation of both electrical and enhanced optical read-out in
the same platform. Several pioneer works have been reported on the
use of plasmonic nanopores to detect single molecules during the translocation
and compared the optical signals with the current blockade obtained
during the simultaneous read-out. An example of electro-optical measurements
performed by using a plasmonic nanopore has been reported by Assad
et al. (Figure b).[44] This simple plasmonic platform demonstrated
to offer a high signal-to-background ratio for single-molecule detection
at low excitation laser intensity while maintaining an extremely high
temporal bandwidth for single-DNA sensing. The detection of photons
emitted from the fluorescent tags linked to the DNA molecule and of
current blockade obtained during the translocation demonstrated the
complementary nature of this methodology. Many other examples of simultaneous
electro-optical detection by means of a plasmonic nanopore have been
reported.[44,56,62,63] In particular, the most explored platform used paired
nanoantennas to generate strong EM field enhancement at the nanogap
where the nanopore can be prepared with a diameter comparable with
that of typical biological pores (i.e., <3 nm) (Figure c).[64] Different configurations have been proposed and demonstrated for
single-molecule detection eventually combining electrical and optical
read-outs: nanorods,[63] bow-tie,[64] inverted bow-tie,[65] rectangular apertures,[66] and paired-nanoholes.[6]The rationale behind the investigation
of several metallic nanostructure
designs is to optimize the EM confinement and enhancement at the nanopore
interface. This is the main parameter to obtain a gain in photon excitation
and/or emission processes, such as fluorescence, FRET, and SERS being
the major spectroscopic techniques used in plasmonic nanopores. The
optimization of the EM field confinement is a key aspect related to
the properties of space dependency of the signal intensity in optical
spectroscopies. For example, SERS is effective within about 1 nm from
the plasmonic nanostructure,[69] and FRET
is sensitive to the distance between donor and acceptor dyes with
nanometer resolution.[47,48,70] Therefore, in a plasmonic nanopore, biomolecules like DNA and protein
produce strong FRET emission or SERS spectra only from the segments
in the hot spot. Other parts not in close proximity to the hot spot
can hardly give comparable signal, which makes optical read-out highly
competitive with the electrical method once high spatial resolution
in EM field confinement can be achieved.[71] With this aim, high spatial resolution can be obtained by improving
the design and fabrication process of the plasmonic nanopores, in
particular the integration with 2D materials, such as MoS2 and others,[67,72,73] which enables confining the EM field in a very narrow volume comparable
with the thickness of the 2D layer (<1 nm) (Figure d). Worthy of being mentioned, solid-state
nanopores prepared in 2D materials have been proved to be a potentially
valuable solution toward protein and DNA sequencing.[74]The spatial resolution is not the only important
limitation to
be overcome in solid-state nanopores. One of the major differences
between solid-state and biological nanopores is the control over molecular
translocation. While molecular motors in biological nanopores have
been proved to be a powerful tool, in solid-state nanopores, the control
of translocation speed is still a major challenge. In this framework,
plasmonic nanopores have been recently explored as a multifunctional
platform to enable not only enhanced optical spectroscopy but also
translocation control. Two main phenomena can be exploited and engineered
in plasmonic nanopores, i.e., optical tweezing/trapping and localized
optical heating.[75−77] Plasmonic nanostructures have been extensively used
to trap and control the dynamics of molecules and particles with sizes
down to 10 nm. Nanostructures like nanopillars,[77] double nanopillars,[78] double
nanopyramids,[78] and coaxial and double
nanohole apertures[79] have been reported,
and the reader can find an updated review on the topic in Kolbow et
al.[80] In the field of plasmonic nanopores,
the pioneering paper of Belkin et al.[68] demonstrated that it could be theoretically possible to control
the steplike translocation of a polynucleotide molecule (Figure e) thanks to the
highly localized field at the tip of a gold nanoantenna, and now the
fabrication of nanoantennas with a narrow gap in correspondence to
the solid-state nanopore is an established procedure.[64,81] Different designs ensure extremely localized EM field intensity
(|E|2) enhancements (up to 104) and the confinement of such an optical field can be engineered
in order to fit with a single molecule. Simulations showed that a
controlled translocation is possible, but the duration of interaction
between the fragments of the molecule (i.e., k-mer of nucleic acids)
is on the order of tens of nanoseconds, and up to now it has not been
possible to demonstrate this approach in a real experiment. Moreover,
a single polypeptide or polynucleotide is still very challenging to
be trapped in a solid-state nanopore. On the contrary, trapping of
larger entities, such as whole proteins or nanoparticles, has been
reported also for plasmonic nanopores.[79] In particular, two major platform configurations have been used
during the recent years, i.e., double pore and metallic nanoparticles
trapped in relatively large (>50 nm) pores. In the double pore
configuration,
the very narrow gap between two adjacent pores in a metallic film
enables one to produce a huge EM field confinement, and the gradient
of the EM field can stably trap single molecules or nanoparticles
(Figure a).[82,79,76,77] The second configuration, where a metallic nanoparticle is trapped
inside a nanoslit or a nanopore has been reported in several papers.[83,46] Most recently, it has been demonstrated that the use of a gold nanostar
can enable the trapping of the particle up to minutes thanks to multiple
effects, such as optical forces and electrodynamic effects.[49,50] The significant advantage in using a nanostar is related to the
sharp protrusion with a radius of curvature of about 1 nm. The forces
generated in the system can push this “nanotips” in
close contact to the nanopore (Figure b), hence generating a nanogap with a volume comparable
with a nanocavity,[4] i.e., close to 1 nm3. In this extremely narrow region, it can be possible to perform
enhanced spectroscopy with unprecedented spatial resolution. Experimental
results demonstrated that this platform enables nucleotide resolution
in DNA analysis, while single amino-acid resolution could be achieved
in spectroscopic investigation of short peptides.[49,50] Unfortunately, this approach can be very useful only for single-molecule
detection and analysis, while it can be hardly translated to real
sequencing applications. More research is needed to make plasmonic
nanopore trapping the tool to control molecular translocation in a
comparable way as in biological nanopores.
Figure 3
(a) Optical trapping
of a single protein using a double-nanohole
in an Au film. Reproduced from Pang, Y.; Gordon, R. Nano Lett.2012, 12, 402–406 (ref (76)). Copyright 2012 American
Chemical Society. (b) The trapping due to a balance between the electrophoretic
(FEP), electroosmotic (FEO), and optical (FOF) forces leads to a plasmonic
hot spot between the Au nanostar tip and the nanohole sidewall that
allows single-molecule SERS. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan
Publishers Ltd.: NATURE, Huang, J.; Mousavi, M. Z.; Zhao, Y.; Hubarevich,
A.; Omeis, F.; Giovannini, G.; Schütte, M.; Garoli, D.; De
Angelis, F.Nat. Commun.2019, 10 (1), 5321 (ref (50)). Copyright 2019 under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). (c) The temperature map of a plasmonic nanopore. Reproduced with
permission from Belkin, M.; Chao, S.-H.; Giannetti, G.; Aksimentiev,
A. Modeling Thermophoretic Effects in Solid-State Nanopores. J. Comput. Electron., 2014, 13 (4), 826–838 (ref (21)). Copyright 2014 Springer Nature. (d) Schematic illustration
of a DNA molecule translocating through a plasmonic nanopore that
consists of a gold bowtie antenna with a 10 nm nanopore at the gap
center and the event rate enhancement by localized plasmonic heating.
Reproduced from Nicoli, F.; Verschueren, D.; Klein, M.; Dekker, C.;
Jonsson, M. P. Nano Lett.2014, 14, 6917–6925 (ref (88)). Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
(e) Schematic illustration of the plasmonic nanopore configuration
for FRET between donor (D) and acceptor (A). Reprinted figure with
permission from Zambrana-Puyalto, X.; Ponzellini, P.; Maccaferri,
N.; Garoli, D. Förster-Resonance Energy Transfer between Diffusing
Molecules and a Functionalized Plasmonic Nanopore. Phys. Rev.
Appl.2020, 14 (5), 054065
(ref (45)). Copyright
2020 by the American Physical Society.
(a) Optical trapping
of a single protein using a double-nanohole
in an Au film. Reproduced from Pang, Y.; Gordon, R. Nano Lett.2012, 12, 402–406 (ref (76)). Copyright 2012 American
Chemical Society. (b) The trapping due to a balance between the electrophoretic
(FEP), electroosmotic (FEO), and optical (FOF) forces leads to a plasmonic
hot spot between the Au nanostar tip and the nanohole sidewall that
allows single-molecule SERS. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan
Publishers Ltd.: NATURE, Huang, J.; Mousavi, M. Z.; Zhao, Y.; Hubarevich,
A.; Omeis, F.; Giovannini, G.; Schütte, M.; Garoli, D.; De
Angelis, F.Nat. Commun.2019, 10 (1), 5321 (ref (50)). Copyright 2019 under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). (c) The temperature map of a plasmonic nanopore. Reproduced with
permission from Belkin, M.; Chao, S.-H.; Giannetti, G.; Aksimentiev,
A. Modeling Thermophoretic Effects in Solid-State Nanopores. J. Comput. Electron., 2014, 13 (4), 826–838 (ref (21)). Copyright 2014 Springer Nature. (d) Schematic illustration
of a DNA molecule translocating through a plasmonic nanopore that
consists of a gold bowtie antenna with a 10 nm nanopore at the gap
center and the event rate enhancement by localized plasmonic heating.
Reproduced from Nicoli, F.; Verschueren, D.; Klein, M.; Dekker, C.;
Jonsson, M. P. Nano Lett.2014, 14, 6917–6925 (ref (88)). Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
(e) Schematic illustration of the plasmonic nanopore configuration
for FRET between donor (D) and acceptor (A). Reprinted figure with
permission from Zambrana-Puyalto, X.; Ponzellini, P.; Maccaferri,
N.; Garoli, D. Förster-Resonance Energy Transfer between Diffusing
Molecules and a Functionalized Plasmonic Nanopore. Phys. Rev.
Appl.2020, 14 (5), 054065
(ref (45)). Copyright
2020 by the American Physical Society.Hence, optical tweezing is one of the explored approaches to reduce
the DNA molecule translocation speed through nanopores. The translocation
time of a polymer chain is dependent on the free-energy landscape
and diffusion coefficient of the polymer chain.[84] The tuning of the translocation time can be done by playing
with the free-energy landscape and diffusion coefficient. As discussed
by Luo et al.,[84] the free-energy depends
on many factors, such as the solvent properties, driving force, pore
size, and others. Several parameters have been investigated both in
biological and solid-state nanopores. For example, the solvent used
and the value of the pH can significantly impact the translocation
velocity.[85] The translocation time can
also be tuned by acting on the interaction between the biomolecule
and the nanopore, for instance, by coating the nanopore surface with
a specific functional coating.[86,87] These and other methods
can be also used in plasmonic nanopores, but they do not use the enhanced
functionality provided by the metallic nanostructure. On the contrary,
one of the most interesting functionalities offered by plasmonic nanopores
is the local heat generation (Figure c).[21] The translocation
time also depends on the temperature of the system, and this could
be used to act on the biomolecule diffusion. Both the conformational
entropy and the diffusion coefficient of a polynucleotide or a polypeptide
are dependent on the temperature. In particular, in solid-state nanopores,
it has been demonstrated that the translocation time can be decreased
by increasing the temperature.[88,23] A localized optical
heating produced by a plasmonic nanopore[89] can induce a temperature gradient with the consequent increment
of electrolyte conductivity and thermal diffusion of ions, the so-called
thermophoresis effect.[21,90] By using this approach, it is
possible to enhance the ion current and modify the molecular capture
rates (Figure d).
The nanopore temperature control can be used for studying single-molecule
thermal kinetics with submicrosecond time scale resolution but also
to modify the capturing of a target molecule, which can be measured
in order to obtain information from its sequence and so on.
Toward
Sequencing by Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Plasmonic
Nanopores
Historically, DNA sequencing had been built on
chemical methods and fluorescence spectroscopy of the four nucleotide
letters to be decoded from the genome. Sanger sequencing and Illumina
next generation sequencing are both based on four colors discrimination
and demonstrated to be very precise and powerful methods to obtain
the sequence from DNA or RNA.[55] The use
of fluorescence in single-molecule sequencing was first demonstrated
in the ZMW platform, which later became the starting point of the
Pacific Bioscience technology.[52] Also in
this case, a four-colors code is used to read the sequence from a
ssDNA in a sequencing by synthesis method. Being a spectroscopic technique,
single-molecule sequencing based on fluorescence has been extensively
explored by using optimized plasmonic platforms. In particular, ZMW
prepared with different geometries and materials improved the fluorescence
intensities by a factor between a few tens up to 104.[91−96] Although these results were significant for single-molecule fluorescence
experiments, they can hardly be translated to nanopore sequencing
where no real-time synthesis of DNA is typically performed. As in
other plasmonic platforms, in a plasmonic nanopore it is relatively
easy to engineer the EM field in order to obtain high fluorescence
enhancement at specific wavelengths. It has been demonstrated that
sequential fluorescence signals can be detected during DNA translocation.
To date, single-molecule detection has been performed in plasmonic
nanopores by modifying one or two of the nucleobases with a fluorescent
dye.[44] This enabled to detect the molecule
and to explore multiple optimization methods in nanopore design.[7] Moreover, the use of one of two dyes linked to
a specific position along a biomolecule can be used to investigate
chemical modifications also at single residue resolution, an application
that is now extensively investigated in solid-state nanopores by using
an electrical read-out scheme.[97−99,57] In order to move from single-molecule detection to sequencing, a
four color discrimination should be implemented. Unfortunately, although
it can be technically possible to decorate the different nucleotides
with different dyes, to date, a DNA strand fully decorated with fluorescent
modified nucleotides has not been reported. If such a modification
to a single DNA molecule could be done, a plasmonic nanopore with
a high enough EM field confinement combined with a very fast detector
could be able to perform real-time single-molecule sequencing. Anyway,
there are several major challenges to be overcome to achieve this
goal. First of all, as previously mentioned, a control on the translocation
velocity should be introduced. In a solid-state nanopore, a biomolecule
interacts with the pore in a time scale of microseconds, making it
extremely challenging to collect spectroscopic signals from thousands
of sequential elements. Second, a typical geometry used in plasmonic
nanopore technology[7] enables one to confine
the electromagnetic field in a volume comparable to tens of nucleotides
(i.e., >10 nm3). Consequently the fluorescence enhancement
is not limited to a single nucleotide, but multiples of them will
be detected simultaneously. Third, the need to use fully decorated
molecules can be in principle applied to DNA and RNA, but it is close
to impossible for proteins where 20 different spectrally separated
colors (dyes) simply do not exist.While the use of 2D materials
integrated with plasmonic nanopores demonstrated to enable field confinement
down to 1 nm (comparable with the 2D material thickness),[67] the detection of different colors emitted at
a high rate (hundreds of kHz, considering an interaction between the
dyes and the nanopore around 1 μs) is yet to be demonstrated.
For these reasons, alternative approaches have been explored in order
to use fluorescence for DNA and protein sequencing both in biological
and solid-state nanopores.In the search of novel methods for
the use of fluorescence in single-molecule
sequencing, the nanoscale energy transfer between fluorescent molecules,
i.e., FRET, has been recently explored. When the distance between
an excited donor molecule (D) to the ground-state acceptor molecule
(A) is in the range of 1–20 nm, the energy transfer is described
by formalism, which accounts for a near-field nonradiative dipole–dipole
interaction. FRET is extensively used in multiple bioassays,[70] while its use in single-molecule sequencing
has been reported in some recent seminal works. In particular, Van
Ginkel et al.[100] used FRET in a first experimental
demonstration of a single-molecule protein fingerprint. FRET has also
been explored in plasmonic nanocavities and in nanopores. Zambrana-Puyalto
et al. have recently reported on the enhancement of FRET efficiency
in gold nanopores,[101] while the same authors
demonstrated how FRET can be used in a plasmonic nanopore to detect
single dyes translocation (Figure e).[45] As discussed in ref (7), the FRET efficiency is
related to the probability of an energy-transfer event occurring per
donor excitation event. As well, it depends on (i) the radiative decay
rates of the donor and the acceptor, and (ii) on the rates of any
other de-excitation pathways excluding energy transfers to other acceptors.
Beyond the distance between the donor and the acceptor, the FRET efficiency
depends on many factors, such as (i) the overlap between the donor
emission and the acceptor absorption spectra and (ii) the relative
orientation of the donor–acceptor dipole momenta. In this framework,
plasmonics can play an additional role in enhancing the FRET by increasing
the decay rate of D, A, or both.More interesting, FRET phenomena
enables a significant multiplexing
in the fluorescence based read-out. In fact, depending on the distance
between D and A and on the other parameters involved in FRET efficiency,
the intensity and lifetime of the emission can be extensively modulated.[47,70,102,103] This means that a single color can be in principle used to discriminate
between different entities (such as different amino acids or nucleotides)
interacting with a nanopore. FRET multiplexing has been recently proposed
and theoretically demonstrated to be able to achieve 9 amino-acid
discrimination in a protein translocating through a nanopore chemically
functionalized with multiple couples of D and A.[104] The label free peptide that translocates through the pore
induces slight changes in the distance between the D/A couples depending
on the different amino-acid inside the pore at a specific moment.
In this way, the FRET emission resulted to be dependent on the single
amino-acid with a high level of fidelity in the recognition. Although
this method can be challenging to be implemented, it demonstrates
how FRET represents a plus with respect to the standard few colors
fluorescence spectroscopy in single-molecule sequencing development.
Toward Sequencing by Using SERS Spectroscopy in Plasmonic Nanopores
SERS contains the information on the characteristic vibrations
of molecules, thereby enabling unambiguous identification of most
biomolecules without the need for specific labeling. In addition to
distinguishing 4 DNA bases and 20 amino acids,[105,106] the SERS spectrum could provide comprehensive information on molecules
including oxidation state, methylation, phosphorylation, and deprotonation.[107−110] Combination of SERS read-out with plasmonic nanopore were first
performed on silicon nanoslit–cavity fabricated by MEMS (microelectromechanical
systems). In this case, the hot spot can be spatially localized at
the center of the nanoslit (Figure a).[111] Moreover, in order
to further enhance the EM field intensity in the hot spot, Bragg mirror
grooves can be arranged on both sides of the nanoslit.[112] This improved configuration enabled one to
achieve subnanometer spatial resolution and single-molecule SERS detection
of four nucleobase adsorbed inside nanoslits.[66] These pioneering works demonstrated that single-molecule SERS sensitivity
could be reached by a rational engineering of the nanopore configuration.
However, due to stochastic adsorption of the molecule into the nanocavity,
it seems not possible to achieve sequential reads of the DNA strand
or protein. Therefore, extra strategies to enable controllable translocation
are needed for plasmonic nanopore sequencing.
Figure 4
(a) Schematic illustration
of the plasmonic nanoslit structure
and its FDTD-simulated optical field enhancement distribution. Reprinted
from Direct Evidence of High Spatial Localization of Hot Spots in
Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Chen, C.; Hutchison, J. A.; Clemente,
F.; Kox, R.; Uji-I, H.; Hofkens, J.; Lagae, L.; Maes, G.; Borghs,
G.; Van Dorpe, P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Vol. 48, Issue 52 (ref (113)). Copyright 2009 Wiley. (b) Schematic illustration of a
silver nanotriangle-based nanopore system for detecting molecule translocation
using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Reproduced from Cao, J.;
Liu, H. L.; Yang, J. M.; Li, Z. Q.; Yang, D. R.; Ji, L. N.; Wang,
K.; Xia, X. H. ACS Sens.2020, 5, 7, 2198–2204 (ref (114)). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
(c) SERS and ionic current measurement in an Au nanoplate assembled
glass nanopipet. Reprinted from J. Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 894, Shen, Q.; Zhou, P. L.; Huang, B. T.;
Zhou, J.; Liu, H. L.; Ahmed, S. A.; Ding, X. L.; Li, J.; Zhai, Y.
M.; Wang, K. Mass transport through a sub-10 nm single gold nanopore:
SERS and ionic current measurement, pp 115373 (ref (115)). Copyright 2021, with
permission from Elsevier.
(a) Schematic illustration
of the plasmonic nanoslit structure
and its FDTD-simulated optical field enhancement distribution. Reprinted
from Direct Evidence of High Spatial Localization of Hot Spots in
Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Chen, C.; Hutchison, J. A.; Clemente,
F.; Kox, R.; Uji-I, H.; Hofkens, J.; Lagae, L.; Maes, G.; Borghs,
G.; Van Dorpe, P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Vol. 48, Issue 52 (ref (113)). Copyright 2009 Wiley. (b) Schematic illustration of a
silver nanotriangle-based nanopore system for detecting molecule translocation
using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Reproduced from Cao, J.;
Liu, H. L.; Yang, J. M.; Li, Z. Q.; Yang, D. R.; Ji, L. N.; Wang,
K.; Xia, X. H. ACS Sens.2020, 5, 7, 2198–2204 (ref (114)). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
(c) SERS and ionic current measurement in an Au nanoplate assembled
glass nanopipet. Reprinted from J. Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 894, Shen, Q.; Zhou, P. L.; Huang, B. T.;
Zhou, J.; Liu, H. L.; Ahmed, S. A.; Ding, X. L.; Li, J.; Zhai, Y.
M.; Wang, K. Mass transport through a sub-10 nm single gold nanopore:
SERS and ionic current measurement, pp 115373 (ref (115)). Copyright 2021, with
permission from Elsevier.As discussed in the previous sections, recent works theoretically
predicted the utilization of optical gradient forces to achieve stepwise
movement of DNA segments in a plasmonic nanopore.[68] Moreover, it has been experimentally demonstrated that
optical and electrophoretic forces can be combined to stably trap
nano-objects inside a nanopore and to perform single-molecule SERS
there with extreme spatial resolution.[49,50] Anyway, to
date, the experimental demonstration of SERS sequencing has not been
possible. In order to achieve sequential SERS readout, the biomolecule
should translocate through a small plasmonic nanopore, and the duration
of the interaction between the molecule and hot-spot should be large
enough to ensure a high signal-to-noise ratio. Two technical routes
have been practiced to fabricate small plasmonic nanopores. The first
route is direct fabrication of a single small plasmonic nanopore.
Nanopores drilled in a Si3N4/Au membrane by
a focused ionic beam have been frequently reported,[116,88] but only a few studies employed SERS detection,[46] probably because the pore size is still large (mostly larger
than 20 nm) and the used plasmonic pore configurations enable weak
Raman enhancement. Conversely, a glass/quartz nanopipet decorated
with plasmonic metal has provided a much smaller pore size and higher
SERS activity. Wang’s group fabricated 30 nm and sub-10 nm
nanopores by assembling Ag nanotriangles[104] and Au nanoplates[105] at the orifice of
the nanopipets, respectively (Figure b,c). The nanopore allows detecting DNA bases during
direct translocation by SERS. Further development of a cone-shaped
Au nanopore with sub-10 nm pore size showed that the orientation of
single Rhodamine 6G and oxygenated/deoxygenated states of single hemoglobin
during translocation can be observed by SERS (Figure a,b).[117]
Figure 5
(a,b) Schematic
graph of single proteins detected by SERS when
transporting the gold conical nanopore. The shift in SERS spectra
indicates the oxy- and deoxy-state of proteins. Reproduced from Zhou,
J.; Zhou, P. L.; Shen, Q.; Ahmed, S. A.; Pan, X. T.; Liu, H. L.; Ding,
X. L.; Li, J.; Wang, K.; Xia, X. H. Anal. Chem.2021, 93 (34), 11679–11685 (ref (117)). Copyright 2021 American
Chemical Society. (c) Nanoporous gold nanoparticle assembled on the
nanopipet for SERS detection under a bias potential. Reproduced from
Yang, J. M.; Jin, L.; Pan, Z. Q.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H. L.; Ji, L. N.;
Xia, X. H.; Wang, K. Anal. Chem.2019, 91 (9), 6275–6280 (ref (51)). Copyright 2019 American
Chemical Society. (d) A plasmonic nanopore prepared in a thick nanoporous
film supported by a Si3N4 membrane. Reproduced
from Hubarevich, A.; Huang, J. A.; Giovannini, G.; Schirato, A.; Zhao,
Y.; Maccaferri, N.; De Angelis, F.; Alabastri, A.; Garoli, D. J. Phys. Chem. C2020, 124 (41), 22663–22670 (ref (119)). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
(e) A plasmonic nanopore surrounded by bullseye structure with a localized
heating spot inside the nanopore. Reproduced from Crick, C. R.; Albella,
P.; Kim, H. J.; Ivanov, A. P.; Kim, K. B.; Maier, S. A.; Edel, J.
B. ACS Photonics2017, 4, 11, 2835–2842 (ref (120)). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (f) Side views
of the cone-shaped plasmonic nanopore and the FDTD simulation results
showed that the enhanced e.m. field was at the bottom and much stronger
than conventional cylindrical plasmonic. Reprinted from Matsuda, R.;
Ryuzaki, S.; Okamoto, K.; Arima, Y.; Tsutsui, M.; Taniguchi, M.; Tamada,
K. Finite-Difference Time-Domain Simulations of Inverted Cone-Shaped
Plasmonic Nanopore Structures. J. Appl. Phys.2020, 127 (24), 243109 (ref (121)), with the permission
of AIP Publishing.
(a,b) Schematic
graph of single proteins detected by SERS when
transporting the gold conical nanopore. The shift in SERS spectra
indicates the oxy- and deoxy-state of proteins. Reproduced from Zhou,
J.; Zhou, P. L.; Shen, Q.; Ahmed, S. A.; Pan, X. T.; Liu, H. L.; Ding,
X. L.; Li, J.; Wang, K.; Xia, X. H. Anal. Chem.2021, 93 (34), 11679–11685 (ref (117)). Copyright 2021 American
Chemical Society. (c) Nanoporous gold nanoparticle assembled on the
nanopipet for SERS detection under a bias potential. Reproduced from
Yang, J. M.; Jin, L.; Pan, Z. Q.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H. L.; Ji, L. N.;
Xia, X. H.; Wang, K. Anal. Chem.2019, 91 (9), 6275–6280 (ref (51)). Copyright 2019 American
Chemical Society. (d) A plasmonic nanopore prepared in a thick nanoporous
film supported by a Si3N4 membrane. Reproduced
from Hubarevich, A.; Huang, J. A.; Giovannini, G.; Schirato, A.; Zhao,
Y.; Maccaferri, N.; De Angelis, F.; Alabastri, A.; Garoli, D. J. Phys. Chem. C2020, 124 (41), 22663–22670 (ref (119)). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
(e) A plasmonic nanopore surrounded by bullseye structure with a localized
heating spot inside the nanopore. Reproduced from Crick, C. R.; Albella,
P.; Kim, H. J.; Ivanov, A. P.; Kim, K. B.; Maier, S. A.; Edel, J.
B. ACS Photonics2017, 4, 11, 2835–2842 (ref (120)). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (f) Side views
of the cone-shaped plasmonic nanopore and the FDTD simulation results
showed that the enhanced e.m. field was at the bottom and much stronger
than conventional cylindrical plasmonic. Reprinted from Matsuda, R.;
Ryuzaki, S.; Okamoto, K.; Arima, Y.; Tsutsui, M.; Taniguchi, M.; Tamada,
K. Finite-Difference Time-Domain Simulations of Inverted Cone-Shaped
Plasmonic Nanopore Structures. J. Appl. Phys.2020, 127 (24), 243109 (ref (121)), with the permission
of AIP Publishing.The second technical
route is to combine the single nanopore with
nanoporous plasmonic structure (Figure c,d).[118,119] With application of the bias
potential, molecules can pass through the nanoporous plasmonic structure
and provide a strong SERS signal.[51] Both
technical routes can provide single molecule SERS sensitivity, but
several challenges are still there. More importantly, the fabrication
of plasmonic nanopores with controlled and reproducible pore sizes
is still difficult. Although chemical synthesis of pores containing
gold nanoplates with controllable pore size has been reported, manipulation
and assembly of these nanoplates to form nanopore devices with good
performance as single molecule SERS sensors still need a lot of effort.[115]Second, different orientations of a single
molecule inside the
nanopore provides multiple chemical information on the biomolecule
and complicates the analysis of sequencing as well. Various orientations
of molecules usually cause the fluctuation of SERS spectra, causing
peak shifts, appearances and disappearances, or intensity changes.
Therefore, the mixed SERS signal need to be decoded by comprehensive
algorithms.Several common problems should also be solved before
meaningful
SERS-nanopore sequencing signal could be observed. First, slowing
down the translocation speed of molecules and improving temporal resolution
of the spectra collection are two important prerequisites to achieve
plasmonic nanopore-based SERS sequencing. Typical translocation of
a DNA base or an amino acid residual through solid-state nanopores
takes nano- to microseconds, which is too fast compared with the millisecond
per frame in SERS spectra acquisition.[109] Improving temporal resolution of spectra collection is a key issue.
Ultrafast Raman spectrometer equipped with a nanosecond pulse laser
could be a good choice. Optical trapping, controlled steplike movement,
and optical spectroscopy by plasmonic field pulses have been theoretically
demonstrated to be feasible in SERS sequencing of DNA.[70] Therefore, developing Raman spectrometer qualified
for plasmonic nanopore sequencing is promising and feasible.Except for collecting spectra at high speed, improving the detection
sensitivity of SERS to a submolecular level is also fundamental for
DNA and protein sequencing. Although present SERS nanopores have reached
a single-molecule sensitivity, significant improvements are required
to ensure precise spectroscopic differentiation of different segments
in biomolecules. Three aspects need to be considered for improving
the detection sensitivity. The first aspect is to further improve
the Raman signal enhancement in the plasmonic nanopore. Both nanostructure
configuration and the material used would influence the intensity
and distribution of the electromagnetic field. Well-designed structures
have been proved to greatly enhance the local electromagnetic field
intensity inside the nanopore. For example, a plasmonic nanopore showed
a higher enhancement factor in the presence of a surrounding bullseye
structure (Figure e).[120] The SERS enhancement factor in
a gold bowtie[88] or cone-shaped plasmonic
nanopore[121] (Figure f) was 1000 times stronger than that of a
conventional cylindrical one. Besides, selection of the plasmonic
metal for nanopore fabrication is also critical for obtaining a superhigh
local EM field. Silver nanostructures usually show a stronger enhancement
than gold, and research has found that DNA bases can be identified
using a silver nanopore.[114] Therefore,
the silver nanopore is a good alternative if it can be protected from
oxidation. Another important aspect to consider for SERS-nanopore
sequencing regards the molecules adsorbed on the interface around
the plasmonic nanopore. These no-translocating molecules can be the
source of interference signals. Interference signals caused by the
adsorbed biomolecule outside the plasmonic nanopore can be reduced
by decreasing the total area of the plasmonic nanopore exposed to
the objective focus. In light of this consideration, conical/pyramidal
plasmonic nanopores with locally modified metal nanopore structure
(instead of bulk sputtering) would be preferable. Besides, covering
inert inorganic thin layer of SiO2, Al2O3[122] using atomic layer deposition
technique or adsorbing a monolayer of halide ions[123] on the plasmonic nanopore may also hinder unwanted adsorption.Finally, the combination of standard SERS with nonlinear Raman
scattering-based techniques, such as surface enhanced hyperRaman scattering
(SERRS)[124] and surface enhanced anti-Stokes
Raman scattering,[125] can provide complementary
spectroscopic information because these process obey different surface
selection rules.[125,126]
Outlook and Conclusions
The application of plasmonic platforms for sensing down to single-molecule
sensitivity is an active research field that enables more and more
advances toward different applications. Plasmonic nanopores, as members
of the large family of solid-state nanopores, are now investigated
to improve the functionality offered by semiconductor-based nanopores.
The engineering of the electromagnetic field confinements and the
consequent effects, such as localized optical forces, thermal effects,
and enhanced spectroscopies make it possible to detect and control
single molecules in a volume close to 1 nm3. As underlined
in this paper, the key aspect in the use of plasmonic nanopores is
the possibility to integrate high-sensitivity optical sensing with
electrical read-out schemes. As previously discussed,[7] this approach can be used in several experiments at single-molecule
levels, with the huge advantage of applying multiple methods such
as fluorescence, FRET, and SERS to further enhance the amount of information
that comes from a single-molecule experiment. In this review, we tried
to discuss the major limitations in the development of sequencing
of DNA and protein by means of plasmonic nanopore platforms. Besides
the additional functionalities that can enable one to a better control
the single molecule translocation velocity, the goal of a full control
of linearized DNA and protein molecules movement appears to be far
achieved. The combination of optical, thermal, and electro-osmotic
forces can help in this direction as they demonstrated a good control
in nanoparticles translocation.[50] Alternative
methods could be explored, for example, the use of magnetic fields[127,128] or the functionalization of the nanopore with functional coatings/molecules.[86,129] Another approach to overcome the not-controlled translocation could
be to investigate integrated designs, where the plasmonic solid-state
pore is finalized with a biological pore so realizing a hybrid structure.
It has been already demonstrated that a biological nanopore can be
aligned and integrated into a solid-state pore,[33,130] also in the case of a plasmonic platform.[131,7] The obvious advantage of this very challenging to fabricate system
is the combination of the functionality offered by the biological
pore, such as the function of a molecular motor, and the enhanced
field generated by the plasmonic nanostructures that can be, for example,
used to facilitate the unfolding and capture in protein sequencing
experiments. The second important issue that has been discussed is
in regards to the optimization of the field confinement. With respect
to biological nanopores where the pore thickness is typically on the
order of 1 or 2 nm,[13,15] solid-state nanopores are really
challenging to have a thickness below 5 nm. This is also true for
plasmonic nanopores, where metallic nanostructures need to be included
in the design. The solution could be to use 2D materials integrated
with plasmonic pores. In this case, the field can be confined down
to a thickness comparable to the atomic thickness of the 2D material
used, with a consequent huge improvement in spatial resolution.[67] The final and most important issue regards the
choice of the spectroscopic technology to be used to decode the complex
information inside a DNA or a protein molecule. While fluorescence
have been the most explored technique, it is clear that the major
limitation in the small number of different colors that can be discriminated
(without spectral overlap) in the visible range cannot be overcome.
On the contrary, FRET multiplexing could enable one to read more signals
even if the data analysis in terms of lifetime and intensity could
be nontrivial. We believe that the most suitable spectroscopic technique
could be SERS. Being a label free method with ease of multiplexing,
SERS could be able to discriminate also among 20 amino-acids in a
single protein. For example, by using an approach similar to the one
reported in ref (49), it could be possible to obtain significant information about a
protein’s amino-acid sequence by measuring, sequentially, the
subfraction of the whole protein separated by means of specific peptidases.
In this way, the few amino-acid resolution of the plasmonic nanopore
can be used to reconstruct the whole sequence, even if a relatively
large number of experiments are needed. In general, for SERS sequencing,
a huge technical problem needs to be solved, i.e., the long integration
time required to collect the spectra. As proposed here, ultrafast
detection based on single photon detectors coupled with filters tuned
to well separated wavenumbers can be explored as a potential solution
to this limit.To conclude, we want to briefly discuss potential
future directions
in the field of plasmonic nanopores. Two examples worthy to be mentioned,
i.e., in situ single cells sequencing and DNA data storage. In situ
single cells analysis is a promising direction for the application
of plasmonic nanopores because the local DNA or protein sequencing
can provide valuable biological information that no other techniques
can acquire. To achieve this target, plasmonic nanopores combined
with nanopipets or nanotubes in the patch clamp technique are feasible
configurations to reduce possible interferences in the highly complexed
intracellular environment. Nanopipets can insert into a cell easily
without causing extra cell damage.[117] Combining
the plasmonic nanopore with theta or a multichannel nanopipet, one
can deliver catabolic enzymes or denaturing reagents to decompose
the chromosome or denature the protein in situ. Despite the many challenges,
single molecule analysis or even single-molecule sequencing in the
single cell is promising to be achieved using a SERS-plasmonic nanopore.
The second example is in regards to the use of solid-state nanopores
and plasmonic nanopores, in particular, to perform “sequencing”
of modified DNA strands where binary information can be stored. DNA
data storage is now an extremely interesting topic of research that
is developed in parallel with single-molecule sequencing.[132−135] In this field, solid-state nanopores are now used to retrieve the
information stored in synthetic DNA,[132,136] and it is
possible to foresee the use of optical spectroscopies to improve the
degree of freedom in the binary encoding, with a primary role of plasmonic
nanopores in reading the information with electro-optical read-out
methods.
Authors: Ossama N Assad; Tal Gilboa; Joshua Spitzberg; Matyas Juhasz; Elmar Weinhold; Amit Meller Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: John Eid; Adrian Fehr; Jeremy Gray; Khai Luong; John Lyle; Geoff Otto; Paul Peluso; David Rank; Primo Baybayan; Brad Bettman; Arkadiusz Bibillo; Keith Bjornson; Bidhan Chaudhuri; Frederick Christians; Ronald Cicero; Sonya Clark; Ravindra Dalal; Alex Dewinter; John Dixon; Mathieu Foquet; Alfred Gaertner; Paul Hardenbol; Cheryl Heiner; Kevin Hester; David Holden; Gregory Kearns; Xiangxu Kong; Ronald Kuse; Yves Lacroix; Steven Lin; Paul Lundquist; Congcong Ma; Patrick Marks; Mark Maxham; Devon Murphy; Insil Park; Thang Pham; Michael Phillips; Joy Roy; Robert Sebra; Gene Shen; Jon Sorenson; Austin Tomaney; Kevin Travers; Mark Trulson; John Vieceli; Jeffrey Wegener; Dawn Wu; Alicia Yang; Denis Zaccarin; Peter Zhao; Frank Zhong; Jonas Korlach; Stephen Turner Journal: Science Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Erik C Yusko; Jay M Johnson; Sheereen Majd; Panchika Prangkio; Ryan C Rollings; Jiali Li; Jerry Yang; Michael Mayer Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2011-02-20 Impact factor: 39.213