Literature DB >> 34885241

Multifaceted Roles of Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors in Tumor Immunity.

Kazuhiko Matsuo1, Osamu Yoshie2,3,4, Takashi Nakayama1.   

Abstract

Various immune cells are involved in host tumor immune responses. In particular, there are many T cell subsets with different roles in tumor immunity. T-helper (Th) 1 cells are involved in cellular immunity and thus play the major role in host anti-tumor immunity by inducing and activating cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). On the other hand, Th2 cells are involved in humoral immunity and suppressive to Th1 responses. Regulatory T (Treg) cells negatively regulate immune responses and contribute to immune evasion of tumor cells. Th17 cells are involved in inflammatory responses and may play a role in tumor progression. However, recent studies have also shown that Th17 cells are capable of directly inducting CTLs and thus may promote anti-tumor immunity. Besides these T cell subsets, there are many other innate immune cells such as dendritic cells (DCs), natural killer (NK) cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) that are involved in host immune responses to cancer. The migratory properties of various immune cells are critical for their functions and largely regulated by the chemokine superfamily. Thus, chemokines and chemokine receptors play vital roles in the orchestration of host immune responses to cancer. In this review, we overview the various immune cells involved in host responses to cancer and their migratory properties regulated by the chemokine superfamily. Understanding the roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in host immune responses to cancer may provide new therapeutic opportunities for cancer immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Th1; Th17; Th2; chemokine; chemokine receptor; dendritic cell; macrophage; neutrophil; regulatory T; tumor microenvironment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34885241      PMCID: PMC8656932          DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


1. Introduction

Tumor immunity is initiated by the recognition of tumor antigens by the immune system [1]. Antigen priming and effector cell differentiation are regulated by complex processes involving various cell populations, cytokines, and chemokines [1,2,3]. While CD4+ helper T cells are known to orchestrate immune responses, CD4+ T cells are heterogenous and composed of various functional subsets including T-helper (Th) 1 cells, Th2 cells, Th17 cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells [4,5]. These T cell subsets are characterized by the secretion of signature cytokines and differentially involved in tumor immunity [4,5]. Furthermore, CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells play direct roles in the elimination of tumor cells. Tumor tissues are also highly enriched with innate immune cells such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) [6,7]. These various immune cells are known to express characteristic chemokine receptors and are elaborately regulated in their migration and tissue localization by respective chemokine ligands [8,9,10]. Accordingly, some chemokines and their receptors may be involved in the elimination of tumor cells by recruiting anti-tumor effector cells, whereas others may promote tumor progression by attracting immunosuppressive cells. In addition, some chemokines and their receptors are known to play critical roles in the interactions of dendric cells (DCs) and T cells [11,12,13,14]. Thus, the chemokine superfamily has a multifaceted role in host tumor immunity. In this review, we overview the roles of various immune cells and the chemokine superfamily in host immune responses to tumor cells in order to assess the possibility of targeting chemokines and chemokine receptors for cancer immunotherapy.

2. Induction of Tumor-Specific T Cell Responses

T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity is thought to be achieved by a multistep process called the cancer-immunity cycle [1]. It includes the following seven steps: (1) release of cancer antigens, (2) cancer antigen presentation, (3) priming and activation, (4) trafficking of T cells to tumors, (5) infiltration of T cells into tumors, (6) recognition of cancer cells by T cells, and (7) killing of cancer cells. Thus, the cycle is initiated by the uptake of tumor antigens, including tumor-associated antigens and neoantigens, by DCs, the professional antigen-presenting cells. Tumor antigen-captured DCs then migrate into the draining lymph nodes where recirculating naïve T cells and memory T cells scan antigenic peptides presented by DCs in association with class I and class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules (Figure 1). The CCL19/CCL21-CCR7 axis is known to play a pivotal role in the migratory activities of DCs and recirculating T cells [1,15]. While immature DCs in peripheral tissues dominantly express CCR6, the surface expression of CCR7 is upregulated upon antigen-loading and DC maturation [1,15]. Since CCL21 is abundantly produced by lymphatic vessels, CCR7-expressing DCs initiate trans-lymphatic migration and home into T cell areas of the draining lymph nodes where matured DCs start producing CCL19 (Figure 1) [3,16,17]. The lymph nodes also have unique vascular structures called high endothelial venules (HEVs), which produce CCL21 and function as the gateways for recirculating naïve T cells and memory T cells that commonly express CCR7 (Figure 1) [18,19]. In addition, although CCL19 is not produced by HEVs, it is displayed on the luminal surfaces of HEVs by transcytosis [20]. After homing into the lymph nodes, naïve T cells and memory T cells further migrate toward CCL19-producing mature DCs localized in the T cell areas [1,15]. Upon encounter with cognate antigenic peptides presented by mature DCs, antigen-specific naïve T cells proliferate and differentiate into various effector T cell subsets in accordance with the local cytokine milieu, whereas memory T cells start rapid expansions for recall immune responses [21]. Furthermore, conventional DCs have two subtypes known as type 1 (cDC1s) and type 2 (cDC2s) [22]. It is now known that cDC1s preferentially induce the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells into Th1 cells and CTLs, respectively [3,16,17], whereas cDC2s preferentially induce the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th2 cells and Th17 cells (Figure 1) [3,16,17]. Importantly, cDC1s selectively express XCR1 and are the most efficient DCs in the cross-presentation of exogenous antigens to CD8+ T cells [22]. Of note, while cDC1s activate CCR7-expressing naïve CD8+ T cells [22], activated CD8+ T cells in turn produce XCL1, the ligand of XCR1 (Figure 1) [22]. This further promotes the interactions of CD8+ T cells and cDC1s, leading to full differentiation of effector CTLs [22]. In secondary immune responses, mature DCs also produce CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL17, CCL22, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 [22]. Since Th1 cells express CCR5 and CXCR3, while Th2 cells, Th17 cells, and Treg cells express CCR4 [22], these chemokine–chemokine receptor axes contribute to the rapid expansion of effector T cells (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Chemokine-mediated T cell immune responses in the lymph node. In primary immune responses, antigen-captured DCs migrate into the draining lymph nodes via afferent lymphatics using the CCL19/CCL21-CCR7 axis. In the lymph nodes, mature DCs produce CCL19 and interact with recirculating CCR7-expressing naïve CD4+ T cells that home into the lymph nodes via the high endothelial venules (HEVs). If stimulated by cognate antigenic peptides presented by mature DCs, naïve T cells differentiate into Th1 cells, Th2 cells, Th17 cells, and Treg cells according to the local cytokine milieu.

3. Th1 Cell, CTL, and NK Cell

Th1 cells are involved in cellular immunity by secreting Th1-type cytokines such as interferon (IFN)-γ, Interleukin (IL)-2 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [23,24]. Th1-type cytokines promote the differentiation of naïve CD8+ T cells into CTLs [23,24] and also enhance the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells and NK cells [25,26]. CD8+ T cells and NK cells are able to directly eliminate tumor cells by secreting cytotoxic molecules such as perforin and granzyme. NK cells are also able to induce apoptosis in tumor cells via TNF family molecules such as FAS ligand (FASL) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) [27]. Thus, Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells are the major effector cells in anti-tumor immunity. Indeed, infiltration of CD8+ T cells and NK cells correlates with better clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses in various types of cancer [28,29]. In addition, recent studies have revealed the existence of CD8+ T cell subsets such as IFN-γ-expressing Tc1 cells, IL-4-expressing Tc2 cells, IL-9-expressing Tc9 cells, IL-17-expressing Tc17 cells, and IL-22-expressing Tc22 cells [30,31,32,33,34]. Tc1, Tc2, and Tc22 cells produce high levels of perforin and granzyme and have high cytotoxic activity, while Tc9 and Tc17 produce low levels of cytotoxic molecules and have poor cytotoxic activity [35,36]. The respective roles of these various Tc subsets in tumor immunity remain to be seen. Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells commonly express CXCR3 [37,38,39]. Accordingly, these effector cells are recruited into tumor tissues by the CXCR3 ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 [25,26]. Previous studies have shown that intra-tumoral injection of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, or their fusion proteins efficiently induces the recruitment of CD8+ T cells and NK cells via CXCR3 and suppresses tumor growth in various murine cancer models such as lung cancer, colon cancer, kidney cancer, melanoma, and glioma [40,41]. It has also been reported that the expression of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 is upregulated in the tumor tissues of patients with colon cancer, esophageal cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer, and correlates with better clinical outcomes (Table 1) [42,43,44,45]. While CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 are weakly expressed by many types of cells including epithelial cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and monocytes under physiological conditions, their expressions are strongly upregulated by IFN-γ and TNF-α [46,47,48]. CXCL9 is also known to be secreted by cDC1s and promotes the interactions of cDC1s with CXCR3-expressing CD8+ T cells, resulting in cluster formation and expansion of CD8+ T cells in the lymph nodes [11,49]. It has been further reported that T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain containing-3 (TIM-3), a negative regulator of T cell responses, is highly expressed by myeloid cells including cDC1s in the tumor microenvironment, and treatment with anti-TIM-3 monoclonal antibody upregulates the production of CXCL9 by cDC1s, resulting in CD8+ T cell expansion and suppression of tumor growth in a murine breast cancer model [50]. Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells are also the major sources of IFN-γ, which induces the production of CXCL9 and CXCL10 by DCs and other tissue cells in the tumor microenvironment. This further attracts CXCR3-expressing Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells into tumor tissues by a positive feedback mechanism. Collectively, the CXCR3 axis plays vital roles in anti-tumor immunity through expansion and recruitment of Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells.
Table 1

Expression of chemokines and their roles in the tumor microenvironment.

ChemokineReceptorTarget CellTumor TypeFunctionStatusRef
CCL1CCR8Tregbreast cancerImmune suppressionPro-tumor [51]
CCL2CCR2MDSCTAMpancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, endometrial cancerImmune suppression AngiogenesisPro-tumor [52,53,54]
CCL5CCR5CD8+ T cellthyroid cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, melanomaCytotoxic activityAnti-tumor [55,56]
MDSCTAMbreast cancer, pancreatic cancer, renal cancer, gliomaImmune suppressionPro-tumor [57,58,59,60]
CCL17CCL22CCR4Treggastric cancer, breast cancer, oral tongue squamous carcinomaImmune suppressionPro-tumor [61,62,63]
CCL20CCR6Tregcolorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, oral squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinomaImmune suppressionPro-tumor [64,65,66,67]
CCL28CCR10Tregovarian cancer, liver cancerAngiogenesisPro-tumor [68,69]
CXCL8CXCR2TANcolorectal cancerImmune suppressionPro-tumor [70]
CXCL9CXCL10CXCL11CXCR3Th1 cellCD8+ T cellNK cellcolon cancer, esophageal cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancerCytotoxic activityAnti-tumor [42,43,44,45]
CXCL12CXCR4TAMlung cancer, gliomaImmune suppressionPro-tumor [52]
CX3CL1CX3CR1CD8+ T cellNK cellcolon cancer, breast cancer, lung cancerCytotoxic activityAnti-tumor [71,72,73]
Macrophagebreast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, melanomaAngiogenesisPro-tumor [74,75]
XCL1XCR1cDC1melanoma, breast cancer, lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinomaCD8+ T inductionAnti-tumor [76,77,78]
Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells also express CCR5 [37,38,39]. Its ligands CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5 are broadly expressed by a variety of normal cells and tumor cells, and frequently upregulated in tumor tissues of various types of cancer [55,56]. In particular, the increased expression of CCL5 has been shown to correlate with better clinical outcomes in several cancers including thyroid cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and melanoma (Table 1) [55,56]. Consistently, CCL5-overexpressing murine ovarian cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma showed reduced tumor growth by recruiting CCR5-expressing CD8+ T cells [57,58]. However, the increased expression of CCL5 has also been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcomes in breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, renal cancer, and glioma (Table 1) [57,58]. Accordingly, CCL5 is now considered as a marker for poor prognosis for breast cancer [59,60]. In this context, CCR5 is also expressed by immunosuppressive cells such as MDSCs and TAMs [52,79]. Indeed, CCL5-deficiency or CCR5 antagonist treatment suppressed tumor growth by reducing the recruitment of immunosuppressive MDSCs and TAMs into the tumor microenvironment in murine breast cancer models [80,81]. Thus, the CCL5-CCR5 axis may have both anti-tumor and pro-tumor activities depending on the types of responding cells. CX3CR1 is also known to be selectively expressed by cytotoxic effector cells such as CD8+ T cells and NK cells [82,83]. Its ligand CX3CL1 is mainly expressed by epithelial cells, endothelial cells, DCs, and neurons, and upregulated by IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-1β [82,83,84]. CX3CL1 is a membrane-bound molecule and its soluble chemotactic form is produced by the cleavage in the membrane proximal region [46,85]. The production of soluble CX3CL1 by metalloproteinases such as ADAM10, ADAM17, and MMP-2 is enhanced under inflammatory conditions including cancer [84,86,87,88]. It has been reported that the increased expression of CX3CL1 correlates with the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and NK cells and better clinical outcomes in colon cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer (Table 1) [71,72,73]. However, CX3CL1 has also been shown to promote angiogenesis through the recruitment of CX3CR1-expressing macrophages that secrete angiogenic factors in murine breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, and melanoma models [74,75]. The expression levels of CX3CL1 have been shown to correlate with vascular density in the bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients [74]. Furthermore, CX3CL1 has been demonstrated to directly promote cell growth in gastric and pancreatic cancer cell lines via CX3CR1, although the detailed mechanism is unknown [89,90]. Thus, the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis may also have both anti-tumor and pro-tumor activities depending on the types of responding cells. In addition, it has recently been reported that activated CD8+ T cells and NK cells secrete XCL1 and attract XCR1-expressing cDC1s to the tumor microenvironment [76,77]. Recruited cDC1s further activate CD8+ T cells and NK cells by producing IL-12 [76,77,78]. Currently, the XCL1-XCR1 axis has been attracting much attention for its role in induction and activation of antigen-specific CTLs and activation of NK cells [22].

4. Th2 Cell

Th2 cells are involved in humoral immunity by secreting Th2-type cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 [91,92]. Th2 cells are shown to express CCR4, CCR8, and, to a lesser extent, CCR3 [46,85,93]. It has been reported that the expression levels of respective chemokine ligands are upregulated in some types of cancer, and Th2 cells are increased in tumor tissues and the draining lymph nodes [94]. Th2 cytokines inhibit the differentiation and function of Th1 cells, while Th1 cytokines inhibit the differentiation and function of Th2 cells [95]. Thus, Th2 cells may indirectly suppress anti-tumor immunity by negatively regulating Th1 responses. In particular, IL-10 is known to suppress Th1-mediated immune responses [96]. IL-4 has also been reported to enhance tumor growth by inhibiting apoptosis in a murine fibrosarcoma model [97]. On the other hand, it has also been demonstrated that adoptive transfer of tumor-specific Th2 cells protected mice against lethal challenge of murine myeloma and lymphoma through the induction of Th2-type inflammation in tumor tissues. However, Th2-mediated anti-tumor effects did not require B cells, NKT cells or CD8+ T cells and the mechanism was unknown [98]. Of note, Th2 cells are also known to secrete IL-31 [99]. Recently, it has been reported that IL-31-overexpressing murine breast carcinoma shows reduced tumor growth by inhibiting the activity of immunosuppressive cells such as Treg cells, MDSCs, and M2-type macrophages [100]. Collectively, Th2 cells are generally considered to have pro-tumor effects but may also have some anti-tumor activity.

5. Th17 Cell

Th17 cells secrete the IL-17 family cytokines IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Taken together, they play a critical role in immune responses against extracellular bacteria and fungi at mucosal tissues [101,102]. IL-17 is associated with the induction of pro-inflammatory immune responses by increasing the expression of other pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and chemical mediators in various types of cells [103,104]. Accordingly, Th17 cells have been shown to be involved in chronic inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis [105,106]. Th17 cells have also been reported to infiltrate into tumor tissues of various cancers, and the infiltration of Th17 cells is associated with both better and poor clinical outcomes [107,108]. Thus, Th17 cells are now considered to have both pro-tumor and anti-tumor activities (Figure 2) [109].
Figure 2

Roles of Th17 cells in tumor immunity. Th17 cells have both pro-tumor and anti-tumor activities in tumor immunity. IL-17A induces the production of angiogenic factors such as VEGF, PGE2, CXCL1, and NO from tumor cells and fibroblasts, leading to increase in angiogenesis. IL-17A also enhances the infiltration of MDSCs into tumor tissues. On the other hand, Th17 cells can directly induce tumor-specific CTLs via IL-2 production and MHC class I molecule expression in the lymph node. IL-17A also induces NK cells to express natural cytotoxicity receptor, perforin, TNF, and IFN-γ, and macrophages to express IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, and TNF. Furthermore, IL-17A induces the production of CXCL9 and CXCL10 in tumor cells and CCL20 in macrophages. These chemokines recruit CXCR3-expressing CTLs and CCR6-expressing immature DCs, respectively. In addition, IL-17F, IL-21, and IL-22 inhibit angiogenesis.

5.1. Pro-Tumor Activity

A number of studies have shown the involvement of Th17 cells in tumor progression using several murine cancer models [110,111,112]. In humans, the infiltration of Th17 cells into tumor tissues correlates with poor clinical outcomes in cancers such as colon cancer, gastric carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer [113,114,115,116,117]. While IL-17A-overexpressing murine fibrosarcoma and colon adenocarcinoma showed enhanced tumor growth with increased vascular density, IL-17A was shown to induce the production of various angiogenic factors including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), prostaglandin E2, CXCL1, and nitric oxide by tumor cells and fibroblasts [118,119]. Consistently, it has been reported that the expression of IL-17A correlates with vascular density in the tumor tissues of various cancers such as colon cancer, gastric carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer [115]. IL-17A has also been shown to enhance the infiltration of MDSCs into tumor tissues and activate their immunosuppressive activity [120,121]. IL-17 has also been found to directly activate oncogenic pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and activator protein-1 (AP-1) signals, and to promote cell growth in gastric cancer and glioblastoma cell lines via IL-17 receptor [122,123]. In addition, Th17 cells express the cell surface ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 that generate adenosine, a well-known immunosuppressive mediator, from extracellular ATP derived from dying cells [124]. Adenosine inhibits proliferation and function of effector T cells via the adenosine A2A receptor [125]. Th17 cells express CCR4 and CCR6, which are considered to be involved in their recruitment into the tumor microenvironment [46,93,126,127]. Indeed, it has been reported that the expression levels of CCL17 and CCL22 are elevated in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and malignant ascites with increased infiltration of CCR4-expressing Th17 cells [128,129]. In addition, the expression levels of CCL20 have also been reported to be frequently elevated in tumor tissues of various types of cancer and to correlate with Th17 cell infiltration [127].

5.2. Anti-Tumor Activity

Although tumor infiltration of Th17 cells has been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcomes in some cancers [113,114,115,116,117], their infiltration has also been described to correlate with better overall survival in various cancers such as breast cancer, cervical carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, lung cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and small cell lung cancer [130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138]. Conversely, reduced Th17 cells in ascitic fluid have been reported to correlate with poor clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer [139]. Furthermore, IL-17A-deficient mice exhibited enhanced tumor growth and lung metastasis in murine colon cancer and melanoma models [140,141]. Recent studies have further shown that Th17 cells are capable of directly inducing tumor-specific CTLs via IL-2 production and MHC class I expression in a murine melanoma model [141,142]. In adoptive transfer experiments, Th17 cells induced tumor-specific CTLs and suppressed tumor growth more efficiently than Th1 cells in a murine melanoma model [140,141]. Recent studies have also shown that the anti-tumor effect of Th17 cells requires IFN-γ-expressing cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in murine colon cancer, myeloma, and mastocytoma models [140,143]. Thus, Th17 cells may play an important role in the induction of tumor-specific CTL responses in certain types of cancer. It has been reported that IL-17 enhances the expression of natural cytotoxicity receptors, perforin, TNF, and IFN-γ in NK cells and enhances the expression of IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, and TNF in macrophages [144,145,146]. In patients with ovarian cancer, IL-17 derived from Th17 cells has been shown to induce the production of CXCL9 and CXCL10 by tumor cells and tumor infiltrated macrophages, which recruits CXCR3-expressing CTLs and NK cells into tumor tissues [139]. Furthermore, Th17 cells have been shown to induce the production of CCL20 in tumor tissues, which recruits CCR6-expressing immature DCs to tumor tissues in a murine melanoma model. Consequently, tumor antigen-captured DCs migrate to draining lymph nodes and induce tumor-specific T cell responses [141]. While IL-17A promotes angiogenesis by increasing the production of VEGF, other Th17 cell derived cytokines such as IL-17F, IL-21, and IL-22 have been shown to have anti-angiogenic activities [147,148,149]. It has also been reported that IL-17 activates the caspase-dependent apoptosis signal in a breast cancer cell line [150]. As described above, Th17 cells predominantly express CCR4 and CCR6. Previously, we have shown that DCs in regional lymph nodes produce CCL22 and attract CCR4-expressing Th17 to enhance DC-Th17 interactions [46,85]. This promotes the expansion of Th17 cells and subsequent induction of CTLs in murine melanoma and psoriasis models [13,14]. Thus, in certain types of cancer, CCR4 may play a role in anti-tumor immunity not only by recruiting Th17 cells into tumor tissues but also by promoting Th17 cell expansion in the draining lymph nodes with subsequent Th17-mediated CTL induction. On the other hand, although CCR6 is a major trafficking receptor for Th17 cells and Treg cells [46,85], CCR6-deficient mice did not show any abnormalities in Th17 and Treg cell expansions in the same melanoma model [13]. Thus, CCR6 may be primarily involved in the recruitment of Th17 cells and Treg cells into tumor tissues.

6. Treg Cell

Treg cells suppress immune responses under physiological and pathological conditions [151,152,153]. Numerous studies have shown that Treg cells inhibit the activation and proliferation of effector T cells and DCs, and play the major role in tumor escape from host immunosurveillance [151,152,153]. In the tumor microenvironment, infiltrated Treg cells secrete several immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-35, which suppress the induction and activation of tumor-specific effector T cells (Figure 3) [152,153]. Furthermore, IL-10 and IL-35 derived from Treg cells promote the exhaustion of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [154]. Treg cells also express cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), a T cell inhibitory molecule, on their cell surface. CTLA-4 binds to costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 on DCs and thus blocks their binding to CD28 on T cells, resulting in inhibition of the costimulatory signals necessary for the induction of tumor-specific T cell responses [155]. Treg cells also express lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3), which inhibits the induction of tumor-specific T cell responses by suppressing DC activation via interaction with MHC class II [156,157]. Recently, cell metabolism has also been reported to be involved in the immunosuppressive mechanisms of Treg cells. While apoptotic Treg cells are a major source of ATP in the tumor microenvironment [158], Treg cells also express CD39 and CD73 and thus generate a large amount of adenosine from ATP in the tumor microenvironment, which inhibits the function and proliferation of effector T cells via the adenosine A2A receptor [125]. Treg cells also enhance the differentiation and immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs via the production of TGF-β [159]. In turn, MDSCs enhance the proliferation of Treg cells in the draining lymph nodes via the production of TGF-β [160].
Figure 3

Roles of Treg cells in tumor immunity. In the tumor microenvironment, TAMs, TANs, tumor cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts secrete CCL17 and/or CCL22, and recruit CCR4-expressing Treg cells into tumor tissues. Infiltrated Treg cells secret immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-35. These cytokines suppress the activation and induction of tumor-specific T cell responses and induce T cell exhaustion. TGF-β also enhances the differentiation and immunosuppressive function of MDSCs. Furthermore, adenosine is generated from ATP derived from apoptotic Treg cells and inhibits the function and proliferation of effector T cells. Treg cells also inhibit the costimulatory signals of DCs to induce tumor-specific T cell responses by the CTLA-4-CD80/CD86 interaction.

Treg cells are known to express various chemokine receptors, including CCR4, CCR5, CCR6, CCR8, CCR10, and CXCR3 [46,85,93,161]. Among them, CCR4 is the most well characterized trafficking receptor for Treg recruitment to the tumor microenvironment [3,61,161]. Many studies have shown that CCL17 and CCL22 are highly expressed in various tumor tissues including lung cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer [61,162,163]. In the tumor tissues, CCL17 and CCL22 are mainly secreted by macrophages and tumor cells [164,165,166,167,168]. CCL17 is also secreted by immunosuppressive tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts [169,170,171]. Consistently, it has been reported that the increased expression of CCL17 and CCL22 correlates with the infiltration of CCR4-expressing Treg cells and poor clinical outcomes in gastric cancer, breast cancer, and oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (Table 1) [62,162,172]. In this regard, mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody, was recently developed for the treatment of CCR4-expressing adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma [93]. The mogamulizumab treatment was also shown to efficiently deplete CCR4-expressing Treg cells and to increase the number of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in the blood of patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma [173,174]. It was further shown that a CCR4 antagonist CCR4-351 inhibited Treg cell recruitment into tumor tissues in mice bearing murine pancreatic and colon cancers, and augmented tumor-specific immune responses [63]. In addition, the combination treatment of another CCR4 antagonist piperidinyl-azetidines and immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-L1 and CTLA-4 antibodies, efficiently augmented tumor-specific immune responses [175]. We have also shown that co-injection of compound 22, a CCR4 antagonist, with cancer vaccines inhibits Treg cell recruitment into vaccination sites and Treg-mediated DC suppression, resulting in enhanced induction of tumor-specific CTLs in a murine melanoma model [176]. Antigen-captured DCs are known to abundantly secrete CCL22 and CCL17. Furthermore, GM-CSF derived from T cells is a potent inducer of CCL22 expression by DCs in the lymph nodes [177]. Accordingly, the CCR4 axis plays an important role in the expansion of CCR4-expressing T cells by mediating their interactions with DCs [46,178]. Indeed, it has been reported that CCL22 secreted from DCs promotes the interactions of DCs and CCR4-expressing Treg cells, leading to the expansion of Treg cells in the lymph nodes [12]. Thus, the CCR4 axis may be involved in Treg cell expansion in the draining lymph nodes and Treg-mediated DC suppression in the tumor microenvironment. CCR6 is broadly expressed on many types of immune cells, including immature DCs, B cells, effector/memory T cells, NK cells, and NKT cells [46,85]. CCR6 is also highly expressed by a fraction of Treg cells [179]. Its ligand CCL20 is broadly produced by epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and several immune cells such as Th17 cells, B cells, NK cells, and neutrophils [127,180,181]. The expression of CCL20 has been reported to be increased in tumor tissues of many types of cancer including breast cancer, colon cancer, skin cancer, oral cancer, and prostate cancer [127,182]. CCL20 is also frequently expressed by various types of cancer including hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma [127,180,181]. Furthermore, the infiltration of CCR6-expressing Treg cells is confirmed to correlate with poor clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, oral squamous cell carcinoma, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Table 1) [64,65,66,67]. Thus, the CCL20-CCR6 axis may have a pro-tumor activity by recruiting Treg cells to the tumor microenvironment. CCR8 is expressed by a fraction of Treg cells, and its ligand CCL1 is capable of inducing efficient migration of CCR8-expressing Treg cells [183,184]. It was also reported that CCL1 was produced by Treg cells in a murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model [185]. Of note, CCL1 was shown to induce the expression of CCR8, Foxp3, CD39, granzyme B, and IL-10 in Treg cells [185]. Furthermore, the infiltration of CCR8-expressing Treg cells in the tumor microenvironment correlates with poor clinical outcomes in breast cancer (Table 1) [51]. Thus, the CCL1-CCR8 axis may recruit Treg cells and also maintain Treg cell phenotype and function. In addition, it has been reported that hypoxia induces the expression of CCL28, a CCR10 ligand, by tumor cells of ovarian and liver cancers, which recruits CCR10-expressing Treg cells into tumor tissues [68,69]. Furthermore, CCR10-expressing Treg cells secrete VEGF and contribute to angiogenesis. In consistence with these findings, the infiltration of CCR10-expressing Treg cells correlates with poor clinical outcomes in these cancers (Table 1) [68,69]. Thus, the CCL28-CCR10 axis may have significant pro-tumor activities in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment by inducing angiogenesis via VEGF and attracting CCR10-expressing Treg cells.

7. TAM, MDSC, and TAN

TAMs are known to be abundantly present in the tumor microenvironment [6,7]. Many studies have shown that TAMs have a multiple role in tumor progression. TAMs enhance immunosuppression, tumor cell growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis by inducing the expression of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors [186,187]. Consistently, TAM infiltration into the tumor microenvironment correlates with poor prognosis in most solid cancers [188,189]. Although TAMs express various chemokine receptors, the CCL2-CCR2 axis plays a dominant role in their recruitment into tumor tissues [10,52]. In addition, TAMs also utilize CCR5 and CXCR4 for their recruitment in some types of cancer [10,52]. MDSCs are also abundantly present in the tumor microenvironment [6,7]. MDSCs are a heterogenous population of immune cells and can be broadly divided into two categories: monocytic-MDSCs and polymorphonuclear-MDSCs [6,7]. Both MDSCs contribute to tumor progression by enhancing immunosuppression, angiogenesis, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition [6,7]. Monocytic-MDSCs indirectly and nonspecifically inhibit the activity of many types of effector cells by producing immunosuppressive mediators such as reactive nitrogen species, inducible nitric oxide synthase and arginase [190,191]. Furthermore, infiltrated monocytic-MDSCs have been shown to be able to differentiate into TAMs in the tumor microenvironment [190,191]. On the other hand, polymorphonuclear-MDSCs directly interact with CD8+ T cells and inhibit antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses by producing reactive oxygen species in the draining lymph nodes [190,191]. Monocytic-MDSCs and polymorphonuclear-MDSCs utilize similar chemokine receptors as monocytes and neutrophils, respectively. Monocytic-MDSCs express CCR2 and CCR1/CCR5, and can be recruited into tumor tissues by CC chemokines such as CCL2 and CCL5, respectively [79,192]. On the other hand, polymorphonuclear-MDSCs express CXCR2 and can be recruited into tumor tissues by CXC chemokines such as CXCL8 [70,190,193]. MDSCs also express CXCR4 and can be recruited into tumor tissues by CXCL12 [70,190,193]. TANs have the same developmental origin and similar phenotypical features as polymorphonuclear-MDSCs [194,195]. TANs have pro-tumor activity by producing immunosuppressive soluble mediators such as TGF-β and arginase [194,195]. Similar to normal neutrophils, TANs utilize the CXCR2 axis for their recruitment [196]. In addition, TAMs, monocytic-MDSCs, polymorphonuclear-MDSCs, and TANs can produce the CCR4 ligands CCL17 and CCL22 in tumor tissues, contributing to tumor progression by recruiting CCR4-expressing Treg cells [3].

8. The Chemokine Superfamily as Therapeutic Targets in Cancer Immunotherapy

Although the chemokine superfamily have long been regarded as highly promising therapeutic targets for drug development, currently only three drugs are approved: Maraviroc, a small-molecule CCR5 antagonist for blocking infection by CCR5-tropic HIV-1; Plerixafor, a small-molecule CXCR4 antagonist for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells from the bone marrow for transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma; Mogamulizumab, a fully humanized and glyco-engineered monoclonal anti-CCR4 antibody for patients with aggressive/refractory adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) and cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCLs) [93,173,197]. However, the recent impressive therapeutic success of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer immunotherapy have opened the possibility of clinical application of drugs targeting chemokines and chemokine receptors as an adjunct therapeutic drug for cancer immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Indeed, as summarized in a recent review, a number of preclinical studies have shown significant therapeutic effects of drugs targeting chemokine receptors in cancer immunotherapy of various murine cancer models, and some of these approaches are currently being tested in clinical trials [198,199]. Here, we highlight the recent development in preclinical studies (Table 2) and clinical studies (Table 3) involving the chemokine superfamily.
Table 2

Therapeutic effects of chemokine receptor inhibitors in preclinical studies.

TargetInhibitorTumor TypeOutcomeReference
CCR2CCX872 + anti-PD-1Murine glioma modelDecrease MDSCEnhance anti-PD-1 effectAntitumor effect [200]
RS504393 + anti-PD-1Murine breast cancer and melanoma modelsDecrease TAMAntitumor effect [201]
CCR4Mogamulizumab + PiroxicamCanine bladder cancer modelDecrease Treg cellAntitumor effect [202]
CCR4-351 + anti-CTLA-4 or anti-4-1BBMurine pancreatic cancer modelDecrease Treg cellAntitumor effect [63]
CCR5mCCR5–Ig fusion antibodyMurine melanoma modelDecrease MDSCAntitumor effect [203]
CCR8JTX-1811Multiple murine cancer modelsDeplete tumor Treg cell but not normal tissue Treg cellAntitumor effect [204]
SRF114In vitro studyDeplete Treg cell [205]
HBM1022 alone or + PembrolizumabMultiple murine cancer modelsDeplete Treg cellAntitumor effect [206]
FPA157Murine colon cancer modelsDeplete Treg cellAntitumor effect [207]
25B3Multiple murine cancer modelsDeplete Treg cellAntitumor effect [208]
CXCR2SB225002 + CisplatinMurine lung cancer modelDecrease neutrophilEnhance anti-tumor CD8+ T cell activationAntitumor effect [196]

Mogamulizumab (anti-CCR4); Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1).

Table 3

Therapeutic effects of chemokine receptor inhibitors in clinical trials.

TargetInhibitorTumor typeOutcomeReference
CCR2PF-04136309 + nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineUntreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPhase Ib/IIEnhanced pulmonary toxicityNo enhanced antitumor efficacy [209], NCT02732938
CCR4FLX475 + PembrolizumabBreast cancerPhase I/IINCT03674567
Mogamulizumab + UtomilumabAdvanced solid tumorsPhase IbSafe and tolerable [210], NCT02444793
Mogamulizumab + Durvalumab or TremelimumabAdvanced solid tumorsPhase IDepletion of Treg cellsNo enhanced antitumor efficacy [211], NCT02301130
Mogamulizumab + NivolumabAdvanced or metastatic solid tumorsPhase IAcceptable safety profileDepletion of Treg cellsIncreases in CD8+ T cells;Potentially effective [212], NCT02476123
CXCR4AMD3100Microsatellite stable pancreatic or colorectal cancerPhase IImmunosuppression [213], NCT02179970
BL-8040 + Pembrolizumab + ChemotherapyMetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPhase IIDepletion of MDSCs and Treg cellsIncreases in effector CD8+ T cellsEnhanced effect of chemotherapy [214], NCT02826486
Balixafortide + EribulinMetastatic breast cancerPhase ISafe and tolerable [215], NCT01837095
LY2510924 + DurvalumabAdvanced refractory solid tumorPhase IaSafe and tolerable [216], NCT02737072

Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1); Mogamulizumab (anti-CCR4); Utomilumab (anti-4-1BB); Durvalumab (anti-PD-L1); Tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4); Nivolumab (anti-PD-1).

8.1. CXCR3

CXCR3 plays a major role in tissue recruitment of Th1 cells, CTLs, and NK cells. Accordingly, enhanced production of the CXCR3 ligands in tumor tissues is considered to be beneficial in cancer patients [25,26]. As described in Section 3, CXCL9 production by cDC1s is negatively regulated by TIM-3 on their cell surface, and clinical trials are currently being conducted for several anti-TIM-3 monoclonal antibodies such as cobolimab, MBG453, LY3321367, and BMS986258, aiming at the upregulation of CXCL9 expression in the tumor microenvironment [217]. Some clinically available anticancer drugs including ipilimumab (an anti-CTLA-4), doxorubicin, and dacarbazine have also been shown to upregulate the expression levels of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in the tumor tissues of patients with melanoma and breast cancer, possibly contributing to their therapeutic effects [218,219,220].

8.2. CCR4 and CCR8

CCR4 is the major trafficking receptors for Treg cells and has been implicated in their recruitment into the tumor microenvironment [164,165,166,167,168]. In this context, several CCR4-targeted cancer immunotherapies have been performed in both animal and human studies, aiming at inhibiting Treg cell-mediated immune suppression [174,202,221]. In particular, mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody with a potent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity, has been developed and approved for the treatment of CCR4-expressing T cell malignancies such as ATLL and CTCLs with great success [173]. Of note, mogamulizumab treatment has also shown to efficiently deplete Treg cells in patients with ATLL and CTCLs [173] and to increase tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in the blood of patients with ATLL [174,202]. Thus, blocking CCR4 by mogamulizumab has been regarded as a promising strategy to enhance tumor-specific immune responses by depleting Treg cells. Accordingly, several clinical trials have been performed to test the efficacy of combination of mogamulizumab (KW-0761) and one of the immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with solid tumors. Although it has been confirmed that Treg cells in the peripheral blood and tumor tissues are efficiently depleted in patients treated with mogamulizumab, no synergistic enhancement of the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors by the combination with mogamulizumab has been observed so far [173]. Importantly, CCR4 is also expressed by other T cell subsets including Th17 cells. While initial studies have suggested protumor activities of Th17 cells, recent studies have demonstrated an important role of Th17 in the induction of CTLs [140,141,142,143]. Our previous studies have further shown that CCR4 plays an essential role in Th17 expansion and subsequent CTL induction by promoting DC-Th17 interactions in the regional lymph nodes [13,14]. Thus, CCR4 may also substantially contribute to anti-tumor immunity through the expansion of Th17 cells and subsequent induction of tumor-specific CTLs in certain types of cancer. Accordingly, CCR4-targeted cancer immunotherapy aiming at Treg depletion may also suppress anti-tumor immunity by depleting other T cell subsets including Th17 cells. Furthermore, patients treated with mogamulizumab often experience severe adverse events such as skin rashes most probably due to subclinical autoimmune responses unleashed by Treg depletion and also a profound lymphopenia, often resulting in opportunistic infections [173]. Thus, although the highly enhanced ADCC activity of mogamulizumab is valuable for the efficient elimination of CCR4-expressing malignant T cells, such a potent ADCC activity may not be necessary for the functional depletion of Treg cells in patients with solid tumors [173]. Thus, it remains to be seen whether other anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibodies or small molecular CCR4 antagonists may have better effects on Treg suppression in solid tumors [222]. CCR8 is also expressed by Treg cells and its expression is relatively selective for Treg cells and minimal in other immune cells [183,184]. CCR8-expressing Treg cells are also considered to have augmented suppressor activity [185,223]. Indeed, CCR8 has been shown to play a pivotal role in tumor progression by regulating the localization and function of Treg cells in murine cancer models [185]. Recent preclinical studies have further demonstrated that anti-CCR8 antibodies efficiently deplete Treg cells and suppress tumor growth in murine colon cancer and bladder carcinoma models [40,41]. Accordingly, several anti-CCR8 humanized monoclonal antibodies, such as SRF114, HBM1022, and FPA157, have been developed and shown to deplete Treg cells by ADCC [183,184]. Thus, the treatment with anti-CCR8 may provide a new option for Treg depletion in cancer immunotherapy without major side effects.

8.3. CXCR2 and CXCR4

CXCR2 has been shown to play a major role in tumor progression by recruiting polymorphonuclear type MDSCs and TANs into the tumor microenvironment in murine models of cancers such as colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, head and neck cancer, and melanoma [196,224,225,226]. A recent study has shown that inhibition of CXCR2 using SB225002, a CXCR2 inhibitor, significantly decreases infiltration of TANs in tumor tissues and suppresses tumor growth in a murine lung cancer model [196]. However, CXCR2 is a major trafficking receptor for neutrophils and thus blocking CXCR2 may increase susceptibility to bacterial infection. Regarding this, however, it has been reported that in humans, AZD5069, another CXCR2 inhibitor, shows little adverse effect on the mobilization of neutrophils from the bone marrow or on their phagocytosis and oxidative burst in response to bacterial pathogens [227]. Thus, blocking infiltration of polymorphonuclear-MDSCs and TANs in the tumor microenvironment by CXCR2 inhibitors may provide a safe and promising treatment option in cancer immunotherapy. CXCR4 is another major trafficking receptor for MDSCs and several clinical trials of CXCR4 inhibitors have been conducted for the treatment of some cancers [213,214,215,216]. In particular, BL-8040, a CXCR4 inhibitor, in combination with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody or chemotherapy has been shown to efficiently decrease MDSCs and increase CD8+ effector T cells in tumor tissues in patients with pancreatic cancer, resulting in better clinical outcomes [214]. Although CXCR4 is widely expressed not only by immune cells but also various tissue cells including tumor cells and stromal cells [46,85], recent clinical studies have shown that the CXCR4 inhibitors including BL-8040, balixafortide, and LY2510924 are safe and tolerable in humans [214,215,216]. Thus, CXCR4 inhibitors may also provide a promising approach for suppression of MDSCs in cancer immunotherapy.

8.4. CCR2 and CCR5

CCR2 is a major traffic receptor for TAMs. CCR2 blocking has been shown to suppress tumor growth in murine liver cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma models [228]. However, CCR2 is also known to be widely expressed by immune cells and in particular by monocytes and macrophages [229]. Furthermore, a recent clinical study of PF-04136309, a CCR2 inhibitor, in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine has found severe adverse effects by this regimen including pulmonary toxicity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [209]. CCR5 is also expressed by TAMs and MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment [52,79]. Since CCR5 inhibitors are clinically used for prevention of HIV-1 infection, the re-tasking of CCR5 inhibitors for cancer immunotherapy may be an interesting approach [230]. However, since CCR5 is also expressed by Th1 cells, CTLs, and NK cells, CCR5 blockade may also suppress anti-tumor immunity mediated by these effector cells.

8.5. XCR1

cDC1s are now known to be the most efficient DC subset for the induction of CTLs not only to intracellular pathogens but also to extracellular antigens via cross-presentation [3,16,17,19]. Furthermore, cDC1s uniquely express XCR1, while its ligand XCL1 is mainly produced by activated CD8+ T cells and NK cells [22]. Thus, taking advantage of this highly selective expression of XCR1 on cDC1s and their well-known ability for cross-presentation, many research groups have tested target delivery of vaccine antigens by using XCL1-fusion proteins with substantial success [22]. On the other hand, we considered using XCL1 itself as an adjuvant to attract XCR1-expressing cDC1s into the injection site of cancer vaccines for efficient antigen delivery to cDC1s. To test this possibility, we first generated a stabilized form of XCL1 by introducing a second C-C bond, since the natural XCL1 is a weak chemoattractant because of its unstable structure due to the lack of the second and forth cysteine residues conserved in other chemokines [231]. We have shown that the stable form of XCL1 is highly chemotactic and efficiently induces antigen-specific CTL responses by attracting cDC1s when co-injected with cancer vaccines [232,233]. Thus, the XCL1-XCR1 axis may provide a new opportunity for efficient induction of anti-tumor CTLs by cancer vaccines [22].

9. Conclusions

As described in this article, a diverse array of immune cells is now known to be involved in host tumor immunity and infiltrates into tumor tissues, generating a highly complex cell population in the tumor microenvironment [198]. Immune cells can have either anti-tumor or pro-tumor activities depending on their effector functions. These cells also express selective but often overlapping chemokine receptors and infiltrate into tumor tissues via chemokines produced by cells including tumor cells, infiltrating immune cells, and stromal cells [198]. To make matters more complex, tumor cells often express several chemokine receptors, and the corresponding chemokines are potentially involved in tumor cell functions such as proliferation, metastasis, and stemness [10,234]. Furthermore, it is known that some chemokines are positively and others negatively involved in angiogenesis [235]. Thus, targeting chemokines or chemokine receptors for cancer immunotherapy is an attractive but highly challenging task. However, after the recent success of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer immunotherapy, drugs targeting chemokines or chemokine receptors may have a new possibility as an adjunct drug for the main cancer immunotherapy. This is partly because the immune checkpoint inhibitors are beneficial in only a fraction of patients and one of the mechanisms of such primary resistance is considered to be the presence of potent immunosuppressive effector cells such as Treg cells and MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment. Thus, drugs targeting chemokines or chemokine receptors may provide a new tool to functionally suppress immunosuppressive cells. Indeed, some recent preclinical (Table 2) and clinical studies (Table 3) with drugs blocking chemokine receptors, such as CCR4, CCR8, CXCR2, and CXCR4, have shown some promising results and warrant further studies [196,214]. Collectively, it is hoped that drugs targeting the members of the chemokine superfamily may have a successful clinical application in cancer immunotherapy in near future.
  231 in total

1.  High expression of CX3CL1 by tumor cells correlates with a good prognosis and increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Min Ho Park; Ji Shin Lee; Jung Han Yoon
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Fractalkine/CX3CR1 induces apoptosis resistance and proliferation through the activation of the AKT/NF-κB cascade in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Jun Cai; Shaoxia Du; Zhongkui Guo; Beibei Xin; Juan Wang; Wei Wei; Xiaohong Shen
Journal:  Cell Biochem Funct       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.685

3.  CCR4 mediated chemotaxis of regulatory T cells suppress the activation of T cells and NK cells via TGF-β pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Xinyi Wei; Lin Li; Xiaobin Wu; Junli Yan; Hui Yang; Fangzhou Song
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Expression of CCL17 and CCL22 by latent membrane protein 1-positive tumor cells in age-related Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder.

Authors:  Sumio Takegawa; Zhe Jin; Takashi Nakayama; Takashi Oyama; Kunio Hieshima; Daisuke Nagakubo; Aiko-Konno Shirakawa; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Shigeo Nakamura; Osamu Yoshie
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.716

5.  Interleukin 31, a cytokine produced by activated T cells, induces dermatitis in mice.

Authors:  Stacey R Dillon; Cindy Sprecher; Angela Hammond; Janine Bilsborough; Maryland Rosenfeld-Franklin; Scott R Presnell; Harald S Haugen; Mark Maurer; Brandon Harder; Janet Johnston; Susan Bort; Sherri Mudri; Joseph L Kuijper; Tom Bukowski; Pamela Shea; Dennis L Dong; Maria Dasovich; Francis J Grant; Luann Lockwood; Steven D Levin; Cosette LeCiel; Kim Waggie; Heather Day; Stavros Topouzis; Janet Kramer; Rolf Kuestner; Zhi Chen; Don Foster; Julia Parrish-Novak; Jane A Gross
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2004-06-06       Impact factor: 25.606

6.  Bone Marrow CX3CL1/Fractalkine is a New Player of the Pro-Angiogenic Microenvironment in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Authors:  Valentina Marchica; Denise Toscani; Anna Corcione; Marina Bolzoni; Paola Storti; Rosanna Vescovini; Elisa Ferretti; Benedetta Dalla Palma; Emanuela Vicario; Fabrizio Accardi; Cristina Mancini; Eugenia Martella; Domenico Ribatti; Angelo Vacca; Vito Pistoia; Nicola Giuliani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  A phase Ib study of utomilumab (PF-05082566) in combination with mogamulizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Ezra E W Cohen; Michael J Pishvaian; Dale R Shepard; Ding Wang; Jared Weiss; Melissa L Johnson; Christine H Chung; Ying Chen; Bo Huang; Craig B Davis; Francesca Toffalorio; Aron Thall; Steven F Powell
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 8.  Targeting Macrophage-Recruiting Chemokines as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy to Prevent the Progression of Solid Tumors.

Authors:  David Argyle; Takanori Kitamura
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  IL-31 induces antitumor immunity in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Ami Aronheim; Yuval Shaked; Tal Kan; Erik Feldman; Michael Timaner; Ziv Raviv; Shai Shen-Orr
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 13.751

10.  CXCR2 Inhibition Profoundly Suppresses Metastases and Augments Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Colin W Steele; Saadia A Karim; Joshua D G Leach; Peter Bailey; Rosanna Upstill-Goddard; Loveena Rishi; Mona Foth; Sheila Bryson; Karen McDaid; Zena Wilson; Catherine Eberlein; Juliana B Candido; Mairi Clarke; Colin Nixon; John Connelly; Nigel Jamieson; C Ross Carter; Frances Balkwill; David K Chang; T R Jeffry Evans; Douglas Strathdee; Andrew V Biankin; Robert J B Nibbs; Simon T Barry; Owen J Sansom; Jennifer P Morton
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 38.585

View more
  8 in total

1.  Novel Hypoxia-Associated Gene Signature Depicts Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Predicts Prognosis of Colon Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yixin Xu; Can Cao; Ziyan Zhu; Yibo Wang; Yulin Tan; Xuezhong Xu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  CDC25C as a Predictive Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wengang Zhang; Xiaoling Shang; Fei Yang; Wenfei Han; Handai Xia; Ni Liu; Yanguo Liu; Xiuwen Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Advances in the Immunomodulatory Properties of Glycoantigens in Cancer.

Authors:  Valeria da Costa; Teresa Freire
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  DNA Hypermethylation-Regulated CX3CL1 Reducing T Cell Infiltration Indicates Poor Prognosis in Wilms Tumour.

Authors:  Tao Mi; Liming Jin; Zhaoxia Zhang; Jinkui Wang; Mujie Li; Chenghao Zhanghuang; Xiaojun Tan; Zhang Wang; Xiaomao Tian; Bin Xiang; Dawei He
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  CXCL5: A coachman to drive cancer progression.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Rongqi Jiang; Enqing Meng; Hao Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Emerging Roles of Chemokines in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Bernhard Moser
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  PTPRD/PTPRT mutation as a predictive biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple cancer types.

Authors:  Xiaoling Shang; Wengang Zhang; Xun Zhang; Miao Yu; Jingwen Liu; Yufeng Cheng; Bo Cheng
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

8.  Deep learning explains the biology of branched glycans from single-cell sequencing data.

Authors:  Rui Qin; Lara K Mahal; Daniel Bojar
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.