Literature DB >> 29706375

Balixafortide plus eribulin in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a phase 1, single-arm, dose-escalation trial.

Sonia Pernas1, Miguel Martin2, Peter A Kaufman3, Marta Gil-Martin1, Patricia Gomez Pardo4, Sara Lopez-Tarruella2, Luis Manso5, Eva Ciruelos5, Jose Alejandro Perez-Fidalgo6, Cristina Hernando6, Foluso O Ademuyiwa7, Katherine Weilbaecher7, Ingrid Mayer8, Timothy J Pluard9, Maria Martinez Garcia10, Linda Vahdat11, Jose Perez-Garcia12, Achim Wach13, Debra Barker13, Samson Fung14, Barbara Romagnoli13, Javier Cortes15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4)-stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) axis regulates function and trafficking of immune cells and the tumour microenvironment. CXCR4 antagonists have been shown to enhance the activity of different anticancer treatments in preclinical models. We assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary phase 1 activity of the CXCR4 antagonist, balixafortide, in combination with eribulin chemotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS: This single-arm, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial enrolled patients at 11 sites in Spain and the USA. Eligible patients were women aged 18 years or older who had histologically confirmed HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, evidence of tumour cell CXCR4 expression, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and who had previously received between one and three chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer, and at least one endocrine therapy if they had hormone receptor-positive disease, unless they were considered unsuitable for endocrine therapy. A standard 3+3 dose-escalation design was used, followed by an expanded cohort at the established maximum tolerated dose or highest dose if no dose-limiting toxicity was observed for the combination. After a treatment-related fatal adverse event in the first cohort who received 21-day cycles of treatment with eribulin and balixafortide, a protocol amendment modified the study design to be done in two parts. Patients enrolled to part 1 received an initial 28-day run-in cycle, with some cohorts receiving de-escalated doses of eribulin plus balixafortide to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of the combination. The evaluation of part 1 did not confirm any dose-limiting toxicities or eribulin-balixafortide interactions, and therefore part 2 started enrolling patients to receive eribulin at the originally planned dose of 1·4 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of a 21-day cycle and balixafortide from a starting dose of 2 mg/kg with dose increments of 0·5 or 1 mg/kg on days 1-3 and 8-10 of the 21-day cycle. Both drugs were administered as intravenous infusions. All patients were to receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events, and the establishment of a maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase 2 dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Safety analysis was done in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. Analysis of antitumour activity was done in all patients who received at least one full cycle of study treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01837095, and is closed to accrual.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 28, 2014, and Oct 4, 2016, 56 patients were enrolled into the trial. No dose-limiting toxicities were confirmed and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The highest dose was established as eribulin 1·4 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9, and balixafortide 5·5 mg/kg on days 1-3 and 8-10 of the 21-day cycle. Objective responses (all partial responses) were observed in 16 (30%; 95% CI 18-44) of 54 patients who were evaluable for antitumour activity. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were fatigue (44 [79%] of 56 patients), neutropenia (32 [57%]), infusion-related reactions (27 [48%]), alopecia (26 [46%]), constipation (26 [46%]), and nausea (25 [45%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 21 (38%) of 56 patients, including febrile neutropenia in five (9%) of 56 patients, neutrophil count decrease in two (4%) patients, constipation in two (4%) patients, pneumonia in two (4%) patients, and urinary tract infection in three (5%) patients. Two (4%) of 56 patients died while receiving study treatment; one from septic shock and one from pneumonia.
INTERPRETATION: The safety and tolerability of balixafortide plus eribulin seems to be similar to that of eribulin or balixafortide monotherapy, and the preliminary activity of the combination seems promising in patients with HER-negative metastatic breast cancer. The results suggest that balixafortide plus eribulin has potential to provide a new therapeutic option in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer and warrants further investigation in randomised trials. FUNDING: Polyphor.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29706375     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30147-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  35 in total

Review 1.  The multifaceted roles of the chemokines CCL2 and CXCL12 in osteophilic metastatic cancers.

Authors:  Élora Midavaine; Jérôme Côté; Philippe Sarret
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 2.  Informing the new developments and future of cancer immunotherapy : Future of cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Atul Kumar; Courtney A Swain; Lalita A Shevde
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 3.  Advances in Research on the Effects and Mechanisms of Chemokines and Their Receptors in Cancer.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Jing-Quan Li; Qi-Lei Chen; Elena A Shestakova; Vsevolod A Misyurin; Vadim S Pokrovsky; Elena M Tchevkina; Hu-Biao Chen; Hang Song; Jian-Ye Zhang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 4.  Harnessing cytokines and chemokines for cancer therapy.

Authors:  David J Propper; Frances R Balkwill
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 65.011

Review 5.  Chemokines orchestrate tumor cells and the microenvironment to achieve metastatic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Sugandha Saxena; Rakesh K Singh
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 6.  Modulation of the chemokine/chemokine receptor axis as a novel approach for glioma therapy.

Authors:  Gregory P Takacs; Joseph A Flores-Toro; Jeffrey K Harrison
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 7.  Immunotherapies targeting stimulatory pathways and beyond.

Authors:  Julian A Marin-Acevedo; ErinMarie O Kimbrough; Rami Manochakian; Yujie Zhao; Yanyan Lou
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 17.388

8.  A C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2-Dominated Cross-talk between Tumor Cells and Macrophages Drives Gastric Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Zhijun Zhou; Guanggai Xia; Zhen Xiang; Mingyang Liu; Zhewei Wei; Jie Yan; Wei Chen; Jintao Zhu; Niranjan Awasthi; Xiaotian Sun; Kar-Ming Fung; Yulong He; Min Li; Changhua Zhang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  At the Bench: Pre-clinical evidence for multiple functions of CXCR4 in cancer.

Authors:  Gary D Luker; Jinming Yang; Ann Richmond; Stefania Scala; Claudio Festuccia; Margret Schottelius; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Johann Zimmermann
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 10.  Cytotoxic and antitumor peptides as novel chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Xin Luan; Ye Wu; Yi-Wen Shen; Hong Zhang; Yu-Dong Zhou; Hong-Zhuan Chen; Dale G Nagle; Wei-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 15.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.