| Literature DB >> 35530333 |
Tao Mi1,2,3, Liming Jin1,2,3, Zhaoxia Zhang1,2,3, Jinkui Wang1,2,3, Mujie Li1,2,3, Chenghao Zhanghuang1,2,3, Xiaojun Tan1,2,3, Zhang Wang1,2,3, Xiaomao Tian1,2,3, Bin Xiang1,2,3, Dawei He1,2,3.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the role of chemokines in Wilms tumours, especially their chemotaxis to immune cells and the role of DNA methylation in regulating the expression level of chemokines.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; T cells; Wilms tumour; chemokine; immune infiltration
Year: 2022 PMID: 35530333 PMCID: PMC9072742 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Difference analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis of Chemokines: (A) heat map of significantly differentially expressed chemokines. (B–H) KM analysis of chemokines CCL2, CX3CL1,CCL3, CCL8, CCL15, CCL1 z8 and CXCL9.
Figure 2Construction and validation of prognostic model. (A, B) LASSO Cox regression analysis based on OS. (C) Forest plots presenting the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of prognostic chemokines in OS. (D) Time-dependent ROC curves. (E) DCA curves based on 4 Chemokines of 3 and 5 years. (F) Calibration curves for predicting the fitness of the model in 5 years. (G) Nomogram shows that the risk scores of the model is independent of clinical data. ** represents P value less than 0.01, *** represents P < 0.001.
Figure 3The infiltration of immune cells in Wilms tumors and para-tumors. (A, B) The infiltration of immune cells in each sample and Immune cells difference between tumors and para-tumors evaluate by Cibersort algorithm. (C, D) The infiltration of immune cells evaluate by MCPcounter. * represents P < 0.05, ** represents P value less than 0.01, *** represents P < 0.001, **** represents P < 0.0001, ns represents P > 0.05.
Figure 4Heat map of correlation between immune cells and chemokines. (A) Heat map of correlation between immune cells and chemokines estimated by MCPcounter. (B) Heat map of correlation between immune cells and chemokines estimated by Cibersort algorithm.
Figure 5DNA methylation in wilms tumor. (A) Heat map of significantly Differential methylation chemokines. (B) Correlation between gene expression and DNA methylation.
Figure 6The differential expression of CX3CL1 and CD3, CD4, CD8+ T cells in tumor and para-tumor tissues. (A) The WB image of CX3CL1 and CD3, CD4, CD8+ T cells in tumor and para-tumor tissues. (B) The summary graph of the expression level of CX3CL1 and CD3, CD4, CD8+ T cells in tumor and para-tumor tissues. ** represents P value less than 0.01, *** represents P < 0.001, **** represents P < 0.0001.
Figure 7Immunofluorescence of CX3CL1, CD3, CD8 and CD4 positive T cells in high- T cells and low-T cells infiltration tumor tissues and para-tumor tissues. (A) The Immunofluorescence of CX3CL1 and CD3+ T cells. (B) The Immunofluorescence of CX3CL1 and CD4+ T cells. (C) The Immunofluorescence of CX3CL1 and CD8+ T cells. (D) The summary graph of the expression level of CX3CL1 and CD3, CD4, CD8+ T cells in tumor and para-tumor tissues [(A–C) the scale bar:100μm]. * represents P < 0.05, ** represents P value less than 0.01.