Literature DB >> 30894861

Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors: New Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Valeria Mollica Poeta1,2, Matteo Massara1, Arianna Capucetti1,2, Raffaella Bonecchi1,2.   

Abstract

Immunotherapy is a clinically validated treatment for many cancers to boost the immune system against tumor growth and dissemination. Several strategies are used to harness immune cells: monoclonal antibodies against tumor antigens, immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccination, adoptive cell therapies (e.g., CAR-T cells) and cytokine administration. In the last decades, it is emerging that the chemokine system represents a potential target for immunotherapy. Chemokines, a large family of cytokines with chemotactic activity, and their cognate receptors are expressed by both cancer and stromal cells. Their altered expression in malignancies dictates leukocyte recruitment and activation, angiogenesis, cancer cell proliferation, and metastasis in all the stages of the disease. Here, we review first attempts to inhibit the chemokine system in cancer as a monotherapy or in combination with canonical or immuno-mediated therapies. We also provide recent findings about the role in cancer of atypical chemokine receptors that could become future targets for immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atypical chemokine receptor; cancer related inflammation; chemokine; chemokine receptor; immunotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30894861      PMCID: PMC6414456          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Role of Chemokines in Tumors

Inflammation is an essential component of the tumor microenvironment and one of the hallmarks of cancer (1, 2). Chemokines, are a family of small, secreted, and structurally related cytokines with a crucial role in inflammation and immunity (3). They are also key mediators of cancer related inflammation being present at tumor site for pre-existing chronic inflammatory conditions but also being target of oncogenic pathways (4). Initially identified with a prominent role in determining the composition of tumor stroma, they were found able to directly affect cancer cell proliferation and metastasis (5, 6).

Leukocyte Recruitment

The proper movement of immune cells is orchestrated by the spatial and temporal expression of chemokines. Inflammatory CC (CCL2, CCL3, CCL5) and CXC (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL5, CXCL6, and CXCL8) chemokines recruit at the tumor site CCR2+ monocytes and CXCR2+ neutrophils that differentiate into tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) and tumor associated neutrophils (TANs), exerting pro- or anti-tumoral role (7–10). Some chemokines present at tumor site can modify leukocyte activation, for instance CXCL16 acting on CXCR6 induces macrophage polarization toward a pro-tumoral phenotype in solid tumors (11, 12). CXCL9 and CXCL10 are strongly associated with Th1 immune response by recruiting NK cells, CD4+ Th1 and CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes, which can elicit antitumoral responses (13, 14). Moreover, potent attractant of dendritic cells (DC) are CCL20, CCL5, and CXCL12 (15); CCL21 and CCL19 recruit CCR7+ DC but also regulatory T cells (Tregs) (16, 17). CCL17 and CCL22 acting on CCR4 can directly recruit Tregs and Th2 lymphocytes, that promote tumor growth and proliferation (18).

Angiogenesis

Both CC and CXC chemokines play a critical role in tumor angiogenesis, essential for tumor growth and metastatic spreading (19, 20). CXC chemokines, based on the presence of glutamic-leucine-arginine (ELR) motif at the N-terminal, can be divided in ELR+ chemokines with angiogenic and ELR− chemokines with angiostatic effects. CCL2, CCL11, CCL16, CCL18, and CXCL8 promote tumor angiogenesis and endothelial cell survival (21, 22). Moreover, CXCL16 interacting with CXCR6, acts as a potent angiogenic mediator (23). CXCL12 and CCL2 can promote angiogenesis and inhibit apoptosis of endothelial cells by directly binding their receptor (CXCR4 and CCR2, respectively) expressed on tumor vessels or indirectly promoting the recruitment of leukocytes (24, 25). On the contrary, chemokines, such as CCL21 and ELR− chemokines (CXCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) inhibit angiogenesis and endothelial cell proliferation (26).

Tumor Growth and Proliferation

Chemokines produced by tumor itself, cancer-associated fibroblasts and infiltrating leukocytes (27, 28), through the binding of chemokine receptors expressed by tumor cells, directly promote cancer cell proliferation activating different signaling pathways, such as PI3K/AKT/NF-κB and MAPK/ERK pathway (29–31). Additionally, they can promote tumor cell survival by preventing their apoptosis and regulating the balance between pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules (e.g., downregulation of Bcl-2 expression or inhibition of caspase-3 and caspase-9 activation) (32, 33).

Metastasis

Chemokine receptors expressed by cancer cells promote their migration to metastatic sites (34). Chemokines and chemokine receptors involved in this phenomenon are several: CCR7 mediates the migration of tumor cells to lymph nodes where their ligands, CCL19 and CCL21, are produced (34, 35). The CCR10/CCL27 axis facilitates the adhesion and survival of melanoma cells during metastatic spreading (36). CCL28 promotes breast cancer growth and metastasis spreading through MAPK/ERK pathway (37). Finally the chemokine receptor CXCR5 and its ligand CXCL13 support bone metastases in prostate cancer (38). However, the main player of this process is the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. In several tumors, CXCR4 expression endows cancer cells with the ability to migrate and metastasize into organs secreting high levels of CXCL12 (6, 39).

Chemokines in Cancer Therapy

Targeting the immune system represents a concrete approach against cancer (40–42). Starting from Coley's toxin development in 1893, many strategies have been set to enhance the antitumor activity of leukocytes (42, 43). Given that chemokines and their receptors have been found involved in several aspects of cancer biology, their possible targeting was evaluated in many preclinical studies and clinical trials (Table 1 and Figure 1). Actually, a monoclonal antibody (anti-CCR4 mAb, Mogamulizumab) and a chemokine receptor inhibitor (CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100) are already in the clinical practice for hematological malignancies (see below).
Table 1

Chemokine and chemokine receptor inhibitors in preclinical models and clinical trials.

Preclinical modelsClinical trials
TargetInhibitorTumor modelReferencesInhibitorTumor typeReferences
CCR1CCX721Multiple myeloma(44, 45)
BL5923Colon cancer liver metastasis(46)
CCX9588 + anti-PD-L1Breast cancer(47)
CCR2PF-04136309 + GEMPancreatic cancer(48)PF-04136309+nab- PTX+GEMPancreatic cancerNCT02732938; (49)
CCX872 + anti-PD-1Pancreatic cancer(50)PF-04136309 + FXPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaNCT01413022; (51)
RDC018Hepatocellular carcinoma(52)CCX872 +FXPancreatic cancerNCT02345408; (53)
747 + SorafenibHepatocellular carcinoma(54)
iCCR2Ovarian cancer(55)
CCL2CNTO 888 + radiotherapyBreast cancer(56)CNTO 888Solid tumorsNCT00537368
CNTO 888Metastatic prostate cancerNCT00992186; (57, 58)
CCR4Anti-CCR4 CAR-T cellsT cell malignancies(59)MogamulizumabRelapsed/refractory
Affi 5Renal tumor(61)ATL(60)
AF399/420/1802Melanoma, lung tumor and CRC(62)MogamulizumabCTLNCT01728805; (63)
CCR5MaravirocCRC(64)Maraviroc + chemotherapyCRCNCT01736813; (64)
CCR7siRNAMetastatic CRC and prostate cancer(65, 66)
MSM R707Metastatic T- ALL(67)
CXCR2Cxcr2−/−+ PTXBreast cancer(68)AZD5069Pancreatic cancerNCT02583477
Navarixin + anti-MEKMelanoma(69)Reparixin + PTXBreast cancerNCT02370238; (70)
SB225002 + SorafenibOvarian cancer(71)
Reparixin + 5-fluorouracilHuman gastric cancer(72)
Cxcr2−/−Pancreatic cancer(73)
Cxcr2−/−+ anti-PD-1Pancreatic cancer(74)
SB225002+RS504393+FXPancreatic cancer(75)
SB265610 + DocetaxelProstate cancer(76)
CXCR4AMD3100 + Ara-CAML(77)AMD3100Relapsed AMLNCT00512252; (78)
LY2510924AML(79, 80)LY2510924CRC, lung, breast, prostate cancerNCT02737072; (81)
BKT140 + RituximabNHL(82)BMS-936564AMLNCT01120457; (83)
AMD3465GBM and Medulloblastoma(84)PF-06747143Hematologic malignanciesNCT02954653
POL5551 + anti-VEGFGBM(85, 86)USL311 + LomustineSolid tumors and GBMNCT02765165
AMD3100Ovarian cancer(87)Balixafortide + EribulinHER2 metastatic breast cancerNCT01837095; (88)
AMD3100 + anti-PD-L1Pancreatic cancer(89)AMD3100Recurrent GBMNCI2012-00149;
AMD3100 + VIC-008Mesothelioma(90)NCI2013-02012
PRX177561+Bevacizumab+SunitinibGBM(91)
ACKR2Ackr2 −/−Metastatic breast cancer and melanoma(92, 93)
ACKR3X7Ab + TemozolomideGBM(94)
Figure 1

Chemokine receptor inhibitors in cancer. Inhibitors of CC- and CXC-chemokine receptors tested in different tumor types in preclinical models and clinical trials (*). GEM, Gemcitabine; PTX, Paclitaxel; FX, FOLFIRINOX.

Chemokine and chemokine receptor inhibitors in preclinical models and clinical trials. Chemokine receptor inhibitors in cancer. Inhibitors of CC- and CXC-chemokine receptors tested in different tumor types in preclinical models and clinical trials (*). GEM, Gemcitabine; PTX, Paclitaxel; FX, FOLFIRINOX.

CCR1

Inhibition of CCR1 reduces cancer growth and metastatization mainly by targeting myeloid cells. In mouse models of Multiple Myeloma (MM) the CCR1 antagonist CCX721 reduced tumor growth and osteolysis targeting osteoclasts and their precursors (44, 45). The same effect was also given by blocking the CCR1 ligand CCL3 that is highly produced by MM cells (95). In a murine model of colon cancer liver metastasis, the CCR1 antagonist BL5923 inhibited metastasis by limiting the recruitment of immature myeloid cells (46). The CCR1 receptor antagonist CCX9588 was recently used in combination with anti-PD-L1 in a murine model of breast cancer showing a synergistic antitumoral effect by reducing the myeloid infiltrate (47). Due to the fact that CCR1 antagonists did not show adverse effects when used in autoimmune disease patients (96), they are ideal candidates to modulate the myeloid infiltrate in combination treatments.

CCR2 and CCL2

Interference with the CCL2/CCR2 axis exerts antitumoral activity in many cancers for the reduced recruitment of monocytes with pro-tumorigenic and pro-metastatic activities. Many data are available in the context of pancreatic tumors. In a preclinical model, the oral CCR2 inhibitor PF-04136309 reduced the number of TAMs and exerted a modest effect on tumor growth when used alone, while it acted synergistically with the chemotherapeutic drug Gemcitabine (GEM) (48). Encouraging results of a Phase Ib/II trial with pancreatic cancer patients, in which PF-04136309 is used in combination with nab-Paclitaxel [(PTX), a nanoparticle albumin-bound formulation of PTX able to induce TAM activation toward an M1 like phenotype] (97), and GEM, were recently published (NCT02732938) (49). The same inhibitor was used in another clinical trial (NCT01413022) performed on borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients in combination with the standard chemotherapy FOLFIRINOX (FX). Preliminary results demonstrated that the combination therapy increased the percentage of objective responses (51). Another CCR2 inhibitor, CCX872, is really promising in the context of pancreatic tumors. In a preclinical setting, it improved the efficacy of the anti-PD-1 treatment (50) and positive results were also obtained in a clinical trial (NCT02345408) when used in combination with FX (53). In murine models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), CCR2 targeting with the antagonists RDC018 or 747 in combination with Sorafenib, reduced tumor growth and metastasis with a corresponding decrease in macrophage infiltration (52, 54). In prostate and breast cancer, CCR2 was found expressed by tumor cells and to promote cancer growth and migration (98, 99). However, targeting CCL2 with the humanized monoclonal CCL2 neutralizing antibody CNTO 888 in a phase I trial (NCT00537368) in solid tumors and in a phase II trial (NCT00992186) in metastatic prostate cancer, was unsuccessful due to ineffectiveness of CNTO 888 in reducing CCL2 serum level (57, 58). More recent preclinical data indicated that in breast cancer models inhibition of CCL2 improved the response to radiotherapy (100) and was effective in preventing metastasis (56), but its discontinuation caused a rebound in the number of circulating monocytes increasing metastatic spreading. Finally, in ovarian cancer, a CCR2 inhibitor enhanced peptide vaccination (55). All these data suggest that targeting the CCL2-CCR2 axis could be effective especially in combination therapies but attention has to be given to fluctuations in the number of circulating monocytes that can produce controversial effects (56).

CCR4

CCR4 is overexpressed in many hematologic malignancies such as Adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) and Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTL). The human anti-CCR4 antibody Mogamulizumab eliminates tumor cells via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and is actually in use in Japan for the treatment of relapsed/refractory ATL (60). It is also considered the best therapy for previously treated CTL patients according to an international phase III trial (63). In addition, in preclinical studies, CAR-T cells generated against CCR4, were found effective in the treatment of a wide spectrum of T cell malignancies (59). CCR4 is also considered a promising target for solid tumors for its activity in modulating leukocyte infiltrate, in particular for depleting Tregs. In a preclinical model of renal cancer, Affi 5, a CCR4 blocking mAb, reduced tumor growth affecting the phenotype of myeloid cells and increasing the number of infiltrating NK cells (61). CCR4 is now considered a target for renal carcinoma patients (101). However, there are major concerns about the safety of the use of mAbs against CCR4 especially in patients previously subjected to allogenic bone marrow (BM) transplant. Anti-CCR4 mAbs are also depleting Tregs for few months, increasing the risk of graft-vs-host disease (102). For this reason, small molecule antagonists of CCR4 with less harmful side effects are in development and one of them, AF399/420/1802, considerably improved the efficacy of cancer vaccines in different preclinical tumor models (melanoma, lung, and colon cancer) by preventing Tregs induction (62).

CCR5

The role of CCR5 in cancer remains still controversial; depending on the cell type on which it is expressed it can have a pro- or anti-tumoral role. When expressed by tumor cells it drives their growth and metastatization, while when expressed by T cells potentiates anti-tumoral responses (103). For instance in breast cancer, a dual role of the receptor has been reported in promoting antitumor immune responses, but being also associated with cancer progression and metastasis (104). More recent data indicate that CCR5 induces the mobilization of myeloid cells with pro-tumoral activity (105) and results obtained with preclinical and clinical models of colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate that targeting CCR5 with the negative allosteric inhibitor Maraviroc promoted the polarization of macrophages toward an antitumoral state. Very interestingly, objective partial response was reported in three out of five patients who received a combination of Maraviroc (NCT01736813) and chemotherapy (64). These data suggest that targeting CCR5 could have a major antitumoral effect on tumors that are CCR5 positive and have a prevalent myeloid infiltrate with immunosuppressive activity, while in other tumors CCR5 activity on T cells needs to be preserved for the correct development of the immune response.

CCR7

The therapeutic application of CCR7 inhibitors is also extremely promising. CCR7 is overexpressed by many tumors driving both tumor growth and metastatization. By the use of siRNA technology, CCR7 inhibition resulted in decreased number of metastasis in a model of colon carcinoma (65) and inhibited the growth of prostate cancer (66). Moreover, reduction of CCR7 expression in breast cancer inhibited metastasis (106) and single-chain antibodies blocking CCR7 (MSM R707) were found able to inhibit brain metastasis of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (107).

CXCR2

CXCR2 is expressed by many tumor cells and is involved in the chemotherapy resistance in different preclinical models of cancer. In breast cancer cells, CXCR2 deletion resulted in better response to Paclitaxel (68). In a melanoma model, the CXCR2 inhibitor Navarixin synergized with MEK inhibition (69) whereas, in an ovarian tumor model, the CXCR2 inhibitor SB225002 improved the antiangiogenic therapy Sorafenib (71). Finally, in human gastric cancer, Reparixin, a CXCR1 and CXCR2 inhibitor, enhanced the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (72). CXCR2 targeting inhibits tumor growth also because it affects myeloid cell infiltration. In pancreatic tumors, CXCR2 inhibition prevented the accumulation of neutrophils unleashing the T cell response (73), resulting in inhibition of metastatic spreading and improved response to anti-PD-1 (74). Interestingly, the combined treatment of CXCR2 and CCR2 inhibitors limited the compensatory response of TAMs, increased antitumor immunity and improved response to FX (75). Finally, in a prostate cancer model, CXCR2 inhibition by SB265610, decreased recruitment of myeloid cells and enhanced Docetaxel-induced senescence, limiting tumor growth (76). Following these promising preclinical results, a phase II clinical trial with the CXCR2 inhibitor AZD5069 is ongoing in pancreatic cancer patients (NCT02583477). In addition, the safety of using Reparixin in combination with Paclitaxel was assessed (70) and a double-blind study with these drugs for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is in progress (NCT02370238).

CXCR4

The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 (Plerixafor) is clinically approved for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for transplantation in patients with Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or MM (67). Beside the HSCs mobilization effect, many preclinical data and clinical trials with AMD3100 or other CXCR4 inhibitors are now suggesting their effectiveness in tumors. Referring to hematological malignancies, some CXCR4 antagonists, like AMD3100 and the derivative AMD3465, enhanced the efficacy of conventional therapies inducing the mobilization of cancer cells from the protective environment of the BM. In murine models of AML, AMD3100 improved the efficacy of chemotherapy with Ara-C (77). Similar results were obtained in a phase I/II study in patients with relapsed AML (78). The CXCR4 antagonists LY2510924 was also able to suppress the proliferation and progression of AML used as monotherapy (79). Another CXCR4 antagonist, BKT140 had an anti-leukemic effect in a murine model of NHL and its action was synergic with Rituximab (82). Phase I trials are ongoing to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the anti-CXCR4 mAbs BMS-936564 in AML patients (NCT01120457) and PF-06747143 in hematological malignancies (NCT02954653) (83). CXCR4 inhibitors have strong antitumor and anti-metastatic effects also in solid tumors. In glioblastoma (GBM), CXCR4 expression is higher in more aggressive tumors and is further upregulated by anti-angiogenic therapies (85). AMD3465 reduced the growth of xenografts of glioblastoma multiforme and medulloblastoma cell lines (108) and the CXCR4 antagonist PRX177561, increased the antitumor effects of Bevacizumab and Sunitinib in subcutaneous or orthotopic xenografts of glioblastoma models (91). The CXCR4 antagonist POL5551 inhibited GBM growth and dissemination after anti-VEGF therapy (86). Current clinical trials with AMD3100 in newly diagnosed or recurrent GBM patients are evaluating the safety and efficacy of daily subcutaneous injection (NCI2012-00149) or 2 weeks continuous intravenous infusion (NCI2013-02012). A phase I/II study of the CXCR4 antagonist USL311 alone and in combination with Lomustine is ongoing in patients with advanced solid tumors and relapsed/recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (NCT02765165). In addition to brain tumors, AMD3465 and LY2510924 have been found to inhibit tumor growth and metastatization in many preclinical models (80, 84). LY2510924, tested in a phase I trial (NCT02737072), was found clinically safe and well-tolerated in advanced solid cancers (colorectum, lung, breast, and prostate) (81). A phase I trial (NCT01837095) of the CXCR4 antagonist Balixafortide plus Eribulin in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer has given promising results (88). Notably, CXCR4 inhibition is not only acting on tumor cells but is also promoting antitumoral T cell responses. In a pancreas tumor model, AMD3100, blocking the interaction of CXCR4 positive tumor cells with CXCL12 producing fibroblasts, unleashed a rapid accumulation of T cells and acted synergistically with anti-PD-L1 (89). In a mesothelioma model, AMD3100 increased the efficiency of the vaccine against mesothelin (VIC-008) by inhibiting PD-1 expression on CD8 T cells and by converting Tregs in T helper like cells (90). The inhibition of Tregs infiltration and the promotion of antitumoral T cell response by AMD3100 were also demonstrated in a mouse model of ovarian cancer (87).

The Atypicals in the Immunotherapy Landscape

Atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs) are emerging as crucial regulatory components of the chemokine network in a wide range of homeostatic and pathological conditions (109, 110). In this section, we reported preclinical observations and clinical data that provide evidences on their importance in cancer biology suggesting the possibility to validate them as new targets for innovative immunotherapies. ACKR1 is mainly expressed on post-capillary and small collecting venular endothelial cells (ECs) and red blood cells (111), but also in many tumors such as GBM, hemangiosarcoma, erythroleukemia, breast, and colorectal cancers (112). It is able to bind a broad panel of both CC and CXC inflammatory chemokines acting as chemokine transporter. However, its role remains unclear in cancer because when expressed by ECs promotes tumor growth generating a chemokine gradient that sustains leukocyte infiltration (113). On the contrary, ACKR1 was reducing tumor growth in a model of prostate cancer (114) through the binding of angiogenic ELR+ CXC-chemokines that decreased angiogenesis and in a melanoma lung metastasis model, interacting with the tetraspanin CD82/KAI that induced tumor cells senescence (115). Finally, in breast carcinoma, ACKR1 expression correlated with a more favorable prognosis with less lymph nodes metastasis and better survival (116, 117). ACKR2 plays a non-redundant role in the control of inflammatory response by scavenging and degrading most inflammatory CC chemokines, acting as agonists for receptors from CCR1 to CCR5 (118). It is expressed by trophoblast cells in placenta, lymphatic endothelial cells and at low levels by subsets of leukocytes (92, 119, 120). ACKR2 acts as a tumor extrinsic suppressor gene. Indeed, by dampening inflammation, it has a protective role in different inflammation-driven tumor models (121, 122). ACKR2 prevents tumor growth also when it is expressed by Kaposi's sarcoma cells where it is down-regulated by the oncogenic pathway KRAS/BRAF/MEK/MAPK (123), while in anaplastic thyroid carcinomas ACKR2 expression is downregulated by miR-146a (124). In both tumors ACKR2 downregulation unleashes pro-tumoral leukocyte infiltration. On the contrary, ACKR2 has a tumor promoting role in the Apc-Min model of CRC limiting mast cells infiltration and activation of CD8+ T cells (125) and it has a pro-metastatic function in breast and melanoma cancer models, by limiting neutrophil and NK activity (92, 93). ACKR3, is a high affinity receptor for CXCL12 and CXCL11 expressed by hematopoietic cells, mesenchymal cells, activated ECs, and neurons. ACKR3 negatively regulates CXCL11 and CXCL12 bioavailability and modulates CXCR4 expression and function (126, 127). In cancer, ACKR3 was found expressed on many tumor cells (such as renal carcinoma, breast cancer, and glioblastoma) and by tumoral ECs. It promotes tumor cell growth and metastasis (128, 129) acting on mTOR pathway (130). In lung adenocarcinoma, ACKR3 mediates TGF-ß1 promoted epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and tumor growth (131). ACKR3 is also expressed by aggressive prostate carcinoma cells (132) and in renal carcinoma patients with decreased survival and poor prognosis. In renal cell carcinoma, ACKR3 expressed by endothelial progenitor cells and tumoral ECs exerts a proangiogenic role inducing their migration and survival (133). In a glioblastoma murine model, mice treated with X7Ab against ACKR3 in combination with Temozolomide (TMZ) showed significant tumor reduction and longer survival, enhancing M1 macrophage activation (94). The last member of the family, ACKR4 is a scavenger receptor for CCL19, CCL21, CCL25, and CXCL13. It is expressed by keratinocytes, thymic epithelium and bronchial cells (134). Some papers indicated a protective role of ACKR4 in tumors. In HCC tumors, it impaired chemotactic events associated with CCR7, limiting tumor progression and metastasis (135). ACKR4 down-regulation in human breast and colon cancer correlated with a worse outcome (136, 137). However, in breast carcinoma ACKR4 had a pro-metastatic role regulating EMT (138).

Concluding Remarks

Being chemokines and chemokine receptors expressed by both tumor cells and leukocyte infiltrate they represent an ideal target for immunotherapy. However, better understanding of their roles in different malignancies is still necessary to avoid potential side effects. In hematological malignancies targeting of overexpressed chemokine receptors directly kill tumor cells but can potentially induce unwanted immune reactions (e.g., CCR4). In the context of solid tumors, chemokine receptor inhibitors are giving encouraging results when used in combination with chemotherapy or with antibodies against immune checkpoints. For this reason, it is possible to envisage that chemokine receptor inhibitors will be used in the future to modulate the stromal component, to overcome chemotherapy resistance and to optimize the immune response of the patients.

Author Contributions

VMP wrote the initial draft. AC, MM, and RB made substantial contributions and discussed the content. All authors reviewed and/or edited the manuscript prior submission.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  130 in total

1.  The beta-chemokine receptor D6 is expressed by lymphatic endothelium and a subset of vascular tumors.

Authors:  R J Nibbs; E Kriehuber; P D Ponath; D Parent; S Qin; J D Campbell; A Henderson; D Kerjaschki; D Maurer; G J Graham; A Rot
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Cancer and the chemokine network.

Authors:  Fran Balkwill
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) stimulates tumor cells to release chemokines active in recruiting dendritic cells.

Authors:  S Scarpino; A Stoppacciaro; F Ballerini; M Marchesi; M Prat; M C Stella; S Sozzani; P Allavena; A Mantovani; L P Ruco
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Overexpression of CCR7 mRNA in nonsmall cell lung cancer: correlation with lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Iwao Takanami
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-10       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Dual effects of macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha on osteolysis and tumor burden in the murine 5TGM1 model of myeloma bone disease.

Authors:  Babatunde O Oyajobi; Giovanni Franchin; Paul J Williams; Donna Pulkrabek; Anjana Gupta; Steve Munoz; Barry Grubbs; Ming Zhao; Di Chen; Barbara Sherry; Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  CXCR4 regulates growth of both primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew C P Smith; Kathryn E Luker; Joel R Garbow; Julie L Prior; Erin Jackson; David Piwnica-Worms; Gary D Luker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Role of high expression levels of CXCR4 in tumor growth, vascularization, and metastasis.

Authors:  Merav Darash-Yahana; Eli Pikarsky; Rinat Abramovitch; Evelyne Zeira; Boaz Pal; Rebekah Karplus; Katia Beider; Shani Avniel; Shafika Kasem; Eithan Galun; Amnon Peled
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Differential recognition and scavenging of native and truncated macrophage-derived chemokine (macrophage-derived chemokine/CC chemokine ligand 22) by the D6 decoy receptor.

Authors:  Raffaella Bonecchi; Massimo Locati; Emanuela Galliera; Marisa Vulcano; Marina Sironi; Anna M Fra; Marco Gobbi; Annunciata Vecchi; Silvano Sozzani; Bodduluri Haribabu; Jo Van Damme; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Immune evasion by murine melanoma mediated through CC chemokine receptor-10.

Authors:  Takashi Murakami; Adela R Cardones; Steven E Finkelstein; Nicholas P Restifo; Brenda A Klaunberg; Frank O Nestle; S Sianna Castillo; Phillip A Dennis; Sam T Hwang
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Overexpression of the duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) by NSCLC tumor cells results in increased tumor necrosis.

Authors:  Christina L Addison; John A Belperio; Marie D Burdick; Robert M Strieter
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  147 in total

Review 1.  Chemokine signaling in cancer-stroma communications.

Authors:  Arun J Singh; Joe W Gray
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Identification of the dominant angiogenic CXCL class chemokines associated with non-small cell lung cancer via bioinformatics tools.

Authors:  Nese Unver
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Cytokines and chemokines involved in the defense reaction against HIV-1 and hepatitis B virus: isn't it time to use a standardized nomenclature of the involved mediators?

Authors:  Lutz G Gürtler
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.332

4.  Association of SDF-1 Gene Polymorphism with Increased Risk of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Authors:  Doaa Abd Allah M Aladle; Mayada A Ghannam; Shaimaa El-Ashwah; F E I Ghobrial; Metwaly Ibrahim Mortada
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 5.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Mansi Saxena; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Cornelis J M Melief; Nina Bhardwaj
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Mechanisms of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Pathological Mechanisms, Pharmacological Interventions, and Genetic Mitigations.

Authors:  Kristen Renee McSweeney; Laura Kate Gadanec; Tawar Qaradakhi; Benazir Ashiana Ali; Anthony Zulli; Vasso Apostolopoulos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Immunogenic necroptosis in the anti-tumor photodynamic action of BAM-SiPc, a silicon(IV) phthalocyanine-based photosensitizer.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Ying-Kit Cheung; Dennis K P Ng; Wing-Ping Fong
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 8.  Neutrophil diversity and plasticity in tumour progression and therapy.

Authors:  Sebastien Jaillon; Andrea Ponzetta; Diletta Di Mitri; Angela Santoni; Raffaella Bonecchi; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Current status and future perspectives of immunotherapy in bladder cancer treatment.

Authors:  Zhangsong Wu; Jinjian Liu; Ruixiang Dai; Song Wu
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 6.038

10.  Structure and function of β-arrestins, their emerging role in breast cancer, and potential opportunities for therapeutic manipulation.

Authors:  Arun K Shukla; Hemlata Dwivedi-Agnihotri
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.