| Literature DB >> 34770887 |
Shushan Ge1,2, Jihui Li1, Yu Yu1, Zhengguo Chen2, Yi Yang3, Liqing Zhu2, Shibiao Sang1, Shengming Deng1,2,4.
Abstract
As the most frequently occurring cancer worldwide, breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women. The overexpression of HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is found in about 15% of BC patients, and it is often associated with a poor prognosis due to the effect on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and survival. As a result of the heterogeneity of BC, molecular imaging with HER2 probes can non-invasively, in real time, and quantitatively reflect the expression status of HER2 in tumors. This will provide a new approach for patients to choose treatment options and monitor treatment response. Furthermore, radionuclide molecular imaging has the potential of repetitive measurements, and it can help solve the problem of heterogeneous expression and conversion of HER2 status during disease progression or treatment. Different imaging probes of targeting proteins, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, nanobodies, and affibodies, are currently in preclinical and clinical development. Moreover, in recent years, HER2-specific peptides have been widely developed for molecular imaging techniques for HER2-positive cancers. This article summarized different types of molecular probes targeting HER2 used in current clinical applications and the developmental trend of some HER2-specific peptides.Entities:
Keywords: HER2; breast cancer; clinical trials; molecular imaging; radionuclide molecular probes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34770887 PMCID: PMC8588233 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26216482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Schematic overview of nuclear imaging for Her2 positive BC. Ligands such as antibody, F(ab’)2 fragments, nanobody, affibody, and peptide can be coupled to a chelator. The chelator enables labeling with different radionuclides that can be applied for imaging purposes.
Nuclides used in PET and SPECT imaging.
| Nuclide | T1/2 | Production Method |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclides for SPECT imaging | ||
| 99mTc | 6.01 h | 99Mo/99mTc Generator |
| 123I | 13.3 h | Cyclotron |
| 111In | 2.8 days | Cyclotron |
| Nuclides for PET imaging | ||
| 13N | 9.97 min | Cyclotron |
| 11C | 20.4 min | Cyclotron |
| 68Ga | 67.6 min | 68Ge/68Ga Generator |
| 18F | 109.8 min | Cyclotron |
| 64Cu | 12.7 h | Cyclotron |
| 89Zr | 78.4 h | Cyclotron |
| 124I | 100 h | Cyclotron |
The clinical trials of HER2-targeted monoclonal antibodies.
| Monoclonal | Nuclide/Chelator or Linker | Modality | Condition or Disease | Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab | 89Zr-Df | PET | HER2-Positive Solid Tumor | Phase II |
| Trastuzumab | 89Zr | PET | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Phase II |
| Trastuzumab | 89Zr-Df | PET/MRI | Breast Cancer | Early Phase I |
| Trastuzumab | 89Zr-DFO | PET | Esophagogastric Cancer | NCT02023996 |
| Trastuzumab | 64Cu-DOTA | PET | HER2 Positive Breast Carcinoma | Phase II |
| Trastuzumab | 64Cu | PET | HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer | Phase I |
| Trastuzumab | 111In-DTPA | SPECT | Breast Cancer | Early Phase I |
| Pertuzumab | 89Zr-DFO | PET | HER2-Positive cancer | Phase I |
| Pertuzumab | 89Zr-SS | PET | HER-2 Positive Malignant Carcinoma of Breast | Phase I |
| Pertuzumab | 111In | SPECT | Breast Cancer | Phase I |
Figure 2Representative molecular PET images of a patient with HER2-positive BC were visualized by 18F-FDG (A) and HER2 (B) imaging with 89Zr-trastuzumab. Images are reproduced with permission from [30].
The clinical trials of HER2-targeted nanobodies.
| Nanobodies | Nuclide/Chelator or Linker | Modality | Condition or Disease | Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2Rs15d | 68Ga-NOTA | PET | Breast Carcinoma | Phase II |
| 2Rs15d | 131I | SPECT | Breast Cancer | Phase I |
| NM-02 | 99mTc | SPECT | Breast Cancer | Early Phase I |
| MM-302 | 64Cu | PET | Advanced HER2+ Cancers with Brain Mets | Early Phase I |
The clinical trials of HER2-targeted affibodies.
| Affibodies | Nuclide/Chelator or Linker | Modality | Condition or Disease | Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABY-025 | 68Ga | PET | HER2-Positive Breast Cancer, | Phase I/II |
| ABY-025 | 111In | SPECT | Breast Cancer | Phase I/II |
| ABH2 | 99mTc | SPECT | Breast Cancer | Early Phase I |
| HPark2 | 99mTc | SPECT | Breast Cancer | Early Phase I |
| GE-226 | 18F | PET | Breast Cancer | NCT03827317 |
| ADAPT6 | 99mTc | SPECT | Breast Cancer | NCT03991260 |
Specific HER2-targeted peptides.
| Peptide | Labeling Strategy | Modality | Kd (nM) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCCYSL | 111In-DOTA-GSG | SPECT | 295 ± 56 | [ |
| MEGPSKCCYSLALASH | 111In-DOTA | SPECT | 236 ± 83 | [ |
| GTKSKCCYSLRRSS | 111In-DOTA | SPECT | 289 ± 13 | [ |
| CGGGLTVSPWY | 99mTc | SPECT | 4.3 ± 0.8 | [ |
| CSSSLTVSPWY | 99mTc | SPECT | 33.9 ± 9.7 | [ |
| SSSLTVPWY | 99mTc-HYNIC | SPECT | 2.6 ± 0.5 | [ |
| SSSLTVPWY | 99mTc-HYNIC-EDDA/tricine | SPECT | 3.3 ± 1.0 | [ |
| SSSLTVPWY | 68Ga-DOTA | PET | 2.5 ± 0.6 | [ |
| FCGDFYACYMDV | 111In-DTPA-peptide-PEG | SPECT | 300 | [ |
| H6F | 99mTc-HYNIC | SPECT | 7.48 ± 3.26 | [ |
| H10F | 99mTc-HYNIC | SPECT | NA | [ |
| A9 | 111In-DTPA | SPECT | 4.9/103 | [ |
The advantages and shortcomings of different types of molecular probes.
| Molecular Probes | Advantage | Shortcoming |
|---|---|---|
| Monoclonal antibodies | Identify HER2-positive lesions | Low blood clearance, low sensitivity, terrible tumor specificity, and non-specific uptake, higher radiation dose |
| Antibody fragments | Imaging capabilities within 24 h | Low tumor uptake, low lesion detection rate |
| Nanobodies | Low molecular weight, high stability, nanomole level affinity, better tumor penetration | Higher kidney background, unsuitable for evaluation of her2-positive primary breast lesions |
| Affibodies | Different binding sites from monoclonal antibodies, picomole level affinity | Higher liver and kidney background |
| Peptides | Potentially quicker circulation time, deeper tissue penetration, non-immunogenicity, ease of preparation | Low tumor uptake and tumor-to-organ ratios |