Literature DB >> 9256133

HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas.

M F Press1, L Bernstein, P A Thomas, L F Meisner, J Y Zhou, Y Ma, G Hung, R A Robinson, C Harris, A El-Naggar, D J Slamon, R N Phillips, J S Ross, S R Wolman, K J Flom.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification.
RESULTS: Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied.
CONCLUSION: FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9256133     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.8.2894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  165 in total

Review 1.  New data on adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A C Wolff; N E Davidson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization technologies in molecular diagnostics and disease management.

Authors:  W King; J Proffitt; L Morrison; J Piper; D Lane; S Seelig
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-12

Review 3.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: current and new predictors of metastasis.

Authors:  D F Hayes; C Isaacs; V Stearns
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Gold-facilitated in situ hybridization: a bright-field autometallographic alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of Her-2/neu gene amplification.

Authors:  Raymond Tubbs; James Pettay; Marek Skacel; Richard Powell; Mark Stoler; Patrick Roche; James Hainfeld
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Molecular biology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Overexpression of M68/DcR3 in human gastrointestinal tract tumors independent of gene amplification and its location in a four-gene cluster.

Authors:  C Bai; B Connolly; M L Metzker; C A Hilliard; X Liu; V Sandig; A Soderman; S M Galloway; Q Liu; C P Austin; C T Caskey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Catherine Oakman; Libero Santarpia; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.

Authors:  António Polónia; Dina Leitão; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Phase III, double-blind, randomized study comparing lapatinib plus paclitaxel with placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Angelo Di Leo; Henry L Gomez; Zeba Aziz; Zanete Zvirbule; Jose Bines; Michael C Arbushites; Stephanie F Guerrera; Maria Koehler; Cristina Oliva; Steven H Stein; Lisa S Williams; Judy Dering; Richard S Finn; Michael F Press
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Dual blockade of HER2 in HER2-overexpressing tumor cells does not completely eliminate HER3 function.

Authors:  Joan T Garrett; Cammie R Sutton; María Gabriela Kuba; Rebecca S Cook; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.