Literature DB >> 28298546

64Cu-MM-302 Positron Emission Tomography Quantifies Variability of Enhanced Permeability and Retention of Nanoparticles in Relation to Treatment Response in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Helen Lee1, Anthony F Shields2, Barry A Siegel3, Kathy D Miller4, Ian Krop5, Cynthia X Ma3, Patricia M LoRusso6, Pamela N Munster7, Karen Campbell8, Daniel F Gaddy8, Shannon C Leonard8, Elena Geretti8, Stephanie J Blocker2, Dmitri B Kirpotin8, Victor Moyo8, Thomas J Wickham8, Bart S Hendriks8.   

Abstract

Purpose: Therapeutic nanoparticles are designed to deliver their drug payloads through enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) in solid tumors. The extent of EPR and its variability in human tumors is highly debated and has been proposed as an explanation for variable responses to therapeutic nanoparticles in clinical studies.Experimental Design: We assessed the EPR effect in patients using a 64Cu-labeled nanoparticle, 64Cu-MM-302 (64Cu-labeled HER2-targeted PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin), and imaging by PET/CT. Nineteen patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer underwent 2 to 3 PET/CT scans postadministration of 64Cu-MM-302 as part of a clinical trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab with and without cyclophosphamide (NCT01304797).
Results: Significant background uptake of 64Cu-MM-302 was observed in liver and spleen. Tumor accumulation of 64Cu-MM-302 at 24 to 48 hours varied 35-fold (0.52-18.5 %ID/kg), including deposition in bone and brain lesions, and was independent of systemic plasma exposure. Computational analysis quantified rates of deposition and washout, indicating peak liposome deposition at 24 to 48 hours. Patients were classified on the basis of 64Cu-MM-302 lesion deposition using a cut-off point that is comparable with a response threshold in preclinical studies. In a retrospective exploratory analysis of patient outcomes relating to drug levels in tumor lesions, high 64Cu-MM-302 deposition was associated with more favorable treatment outcomes (HR = 0.42).Conclusions: These findings provide important evidence and quantification of the EPR effect in human metastatic tumors and support imaging nanoparticle deposition in tumors as a potential means to identify patients well suited for treatment with therapeutic nanoparticles. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4190-202. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28298546      PMCID: PMC6790129          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  47 in total

1.  Liposome-mediated therapy of intracranial brain tumors in a rat model.

Authors:  U S Sharma; A Sharma; R I Chau; R M Straubinger
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Dual HER2 Targeting with Trastuzumab and Liposomal-Encapsulated Doxorubicin (MM-302) Demonstrates Synergistic Antitumor Activity in Breast and Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher W Espelin; Shannon C Leonard; Elena Geretti; Thomas J Wickham; Bart S Hendriks
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility.

Authors:  You Han Bae; Kinam Park
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Positron Emission Tomography Based Elucidation of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect in Dogs with Cancer Using Copper-64 Liposomes.

Authors:  Anders E Hansen; Anncatrine L Petersen; Jonas R Henriksen; Betina Boerresen; Palle Rasmussen; Dennis R Elema; Per Munck af Rosenschöld; Annemarie T Kristensen; Andreas Kjær; Thomas L Andresen
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Cyclophosphamide-Mediated Tumor Priming for Enhanced Delivery and Antitumor Activity of HER2-Targeted Liposomal Doxorubicin (MM-302).

Authors:  Elena Geretti; Shannon Curtis Leonard; Nancy Dumont; Helen Lee; Jinzi Zheng; Raquel De Souza; Daniel F Gaddy; Christopher W Espelin; David A Jaffray; Victor Moyo; Ulrik B Nielsen; Thomas J Wickham; Bart S Hendriks
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Challenges and key considerations of the enhanced permeability and retention effect for nanomedicine drug delivery in oncology.

Authors:  Uma Prabhakar; Hiroshi Maeda; Rakesh K Jain; Eva M Sevick-Muraca; William Zamboni; Omid C Farokhzad; Simon T Barry; Alberto Gabizon; Piotr Grodzinski; David C Blakey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Imaging nanoprobe for prediction of outcome of nanoparticle chemotherapy by using mammography.

Authors:  Efstathios Karathanasis; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Sri R Balusu; Kathleen McNeeley; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Andrew Karellas; Ananth V Annapragada; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Efficient tumor targeting of hydroxycamptothecin loaded PEGylated niosomes modified with transferrin.

Authors:  Minghuang Hong; Saijie Zhu; Yanyan Jiang; Guotao Tang; Yuanying Pei
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  First-line chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin plus cisplatin for patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: phase II trial.

Authors:  Ó Arrieta; L A Medina; E Estrada-Lobato; N Hernández-Pedro; G Villanueva-Rodríguez; L Martínez-Barrera; E O Macedo; V López-Rodríguez; D Motola-Kuba; J F Corona-Cruz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Nanoreporter PET predicts the efficacy of anti-cancer nanotherapy.

Authors:  Carlos Pérez-Medina; Dalya Abdel-Atti; Jun Tang; Yiming Zhao; Zahi A Fayad; Jason S Lewis; Willem J M Mulder; Thomas Reiner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  88 in total

1.  Quantitative Imaging of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Their Response to Therapy Using 64Cu-Labeled Macrin.

Authors:  Hye-Yeong Kim; Ran Li; Thomas S C Ng; Gabriel Courties; Christopher Blake Rodell; Mark Prytyskach; Rainer H Kohler; Mikael J Pittet; Matthias Nahrendorf; Ralph Weissleder; Miles A Miller
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Polymalic acid chlorotoxin nanoconjugate for near-infrared fluorescence guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Rameshwar Patil; Anna Galstyan; Tao Sun; Ekaterina S Shatalova; Pramod Butte; Adam N Mamelak; Christine Carico; David S Kittle; Zachary B Grodzinski; Antonella Chiechi; Hui Ding; Keith L Black; Julia Y Ljubimova; Eggehard Holler
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Delivery technologies for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Rachel S Riley; Carl H June; Robert Langer; Michael J Mitchell
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Clinical Cancer Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Joy Wolfram; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 20.722

Review 5.  Imaging of Nanoparticle Distribution to Assess Treatments That Alter Delivery.

Authors:  Stephanie J Blocker; Anthony F Shields
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  Normalizing Function of Tumor Vessels: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges.

Authors:  John D Martin; Giorgio Seano; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 19.318

7.  The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Mukaddes Izci; Christy Maksoudian; Bella B Manshian; Stefaan J Soenen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Radiolabeling of Theranostic Nanosystems.

Authors:  Sudeep Das; Surachet Imlimthan; Anu J Airaksinen; Mirkka Sarparanta
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 9.  Conditioning neoadjuvant therapies for improved immunotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  Zachary Benson; Saeed H Manjili; Mehran Habibi; Georgi Guruli; Amir A Toor; Kyle K Payne; Masoud H Manjili
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 10.  Tumor targeting via EPR: Strategies to enhance patient responses.

Authors:  Susanne K Golombek; Jan-Niklas May; Benjamin Theek; Lia Appold; Natascha Drude; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.