Literature DB >> 26598545

Molecular imaging as a tool to investigate heterogeneity of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and to predict patient outcome under trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): the ZEPHIR trial.

G Gebhart1, L E Lamberts2, Z Wimana3, C Garcia3, P Emonts3, L Ameye3, S Stroobants4, M Huizing4, P Aftimos3, J Tol5, W J G Oyen5, D J Vugts6, O S Hoekstra6, C P Schröder2, C W Menke-van der Houven van Oordt6, T Guiot3, A H Brouwers2, A Awada3, E G E de Vries2, P Flamen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2 status determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been validated to predict efficacy of HER2-targeting antibody-drug-conjugate trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). We propose molecular imaging to explore intra-/interpatient heterogeneity in HER2 mapping of metastatic disease and to identify patients unlikely to benefit from T-DM1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HER2-positive mBC patients with IHC3+ or FISH ≥ 2.2 scheduled for T-DM1 underwent a pretreatment HER2-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with (89)Zr-trastuzumab. [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT was performed at baseline and before T-DM1 cycle 2. Patients were grouped into four HER2-PET/CT patterns according to the proportion of FDG-avid tumor load showing relevant (89)Zr-trastuzumab uptake (>blood pool activity): patterns A and B were considered positive (>50% or all of the tumor load 'positive'); patterns C and D were considered negative (>50% or all of the tumor load 'negative'). Early FDG-PET/CT was defined as nonresponding when >50% of the tumor load showed no significant reduction of FDG uptake (<15%). Negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) of HER2-PET/CT, early FDG response and their combination were assessed to predict morphological response (RECIST 1.1) after three T-DM1 cycles and time-to-treatment failure (TTF).
RESULTS: In the 56 patients analyzed, 29% had negative HER2-PET/CT while intrapatient heterogeneity (patterns B and C) was found in 46% of patients. Compared with RECIST1.1, respective NPV/PPV for HER2-PET/CT were 88%/72% and 83%/96% for early FDG-PET/CT. Combining HER2-PET/CT and FDG-PET/CT accurately predicted morphological response (PPV and NPV: 100%) and discriminated patients with a median TTF of only 2.8 months [n = 12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-7.6] from those with a TTF of 15 months (n = 25, 95% CI 9.7-not calculable).
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment imaging of HER2 targeting, combined with early metabolic response assessment holds great promise for improving the understanding of tumor heterogeneity in mBC and for selecting patients who will/will not benefit from T-DM1. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01565200.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HER2 imaging; HER2-positive breast cancer; prediction of T-DM1 efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598545     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  110 in total

1.  Response of symptomatic brain metastases from HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer with T-DM1.

Authors:  C L Gorter de Vries; S C Linn; D Brandsma
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Breast cancer in 2015: Academic research sheds light on issues that matter to patients.

Authors:  Martine J Piccart; Isabelle Gingras
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Metastatic breast cancer: The Odyssey of personalization.

Authors:  A Sonnenblick; N Pondé; M Piccart
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, and Radiation Dosimetry for 89Zr-Trastuzumab in Patients with Esophagogastric Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A O'Donoghue; Jason S Lewis; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Stephen E Fleming; Heiko Schöder; Steven M Larson; Volkan Beylergil; Shutian Ruan; Serge K Lyashchenko; Pat B Zanzonico; Wolfgang A Weber; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Yelena Y Janjigian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Tumor Uptake of 64Cu-DOTA-Trastuzumab in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joanne E Mortimer; James R Bading; Jinha M Park; Paul H Frankel; Mary I Carroll; Tri T Tran; Erasmus K Poku; Russell C Rockne; Andrew A Raubitschek; John E Shively; David M Colcher
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: a Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Noam Pondé; Philippe Aftimos; Martine Piccart
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01

7.  Immuno-PET to Optimize the Dose of Monoclonal Antibodies for Cancer Therapy: How Much Is Enough?

Authors:  Raymond M Reilly
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Multifunctional Desferrichrome Analogues as Versatile 89Zr(IV) Chelators for ImmunoPET Probe Development.

Authors:  Casey J Adams; Justin J Wilson; Eszter Boros
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Imaging of HER2 with [89Zr]pertuzumab in Response to T-DM1 Therapy.

Authors:  Adriana V F Massicano; Supum Lee; Bryant K Crenshaw; Tolulope A Aweda; Retta El Sayed; Ian Super; Ron Bose; Bernadette V Marquez-Nostra; Suzanne E Lapi
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.099

10.  Improved Tumor Penetration and Single-Cell Targeting of Antibody-Drug Conjugates Increases Anticancer Efficacy and Host Survival.

Authors:  Cornelius Cilliers; Bruna Menezes; Ian Nessler; Jennifer Linderman; Greg M Thurber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.