Literature DB >> 34746539

A proof-of-concept study of an in-situ partial-ring time-of-flight PET scanner for proton beam verification.

Srilalan Krishnamoorthy1, Boon-Keng K Teo2, Wei Zou2, James McDonough2, Joel S Karp3, Suleman Surti1.   

Abstract

Development of a PET system capable of in-situ imaging requires a design that can accommodate the proton treatment beam nozzle. Among the several PET instrumentation approaches developed thus far, the dual-panel PET scanner is often used as it is simpler to develop and integrate within the proton therapy gantry. Partial-angle coverage of these systems can however lead to limited-angle artefacts in the reconstructed PET image. We have previously demonstrated via simulations that time-of-flight (TOF) reconstruction reduces the artifacts accompanying limited-angle data, and permits proton range measurement with 1-2 mm accuracy and precision. In this work we show measured results from a small proof-of-concept dual-panel PET system that uses TOF information to reconstruct PET data acquired after proton irradiation. The PET scanner comprises of two detector modules, each comprised of an array of 4×4×30 mm3 lanthanum bromide scintillator. Measurements are performed with an oxygen-rich gel-water, an adipose tissue equivalent material, and in vitro tissue phantoms. For each phantom measurement, 2 Gy dose was deposited using 54 - 100 MeV proton beams. For each phantom, a Monte Carlo simulation generating the expected distribution of PET isotope from the corresponding proton irradiation was also performed. Proton range was calculated by drawing multiple depth-profiles over a central region encompassing the proton dose deposition. For each profile, proton range was calculated using two techniques (a) 50% pick-off from the distal edge of the profile, and (b) comparing the measured and Monte Carlo profile to minimize the absolute sum of differences over the entire profile. A 10 min PET acquisition acquired with minimal delay post proton-irradiation is compared with a 10 min PET scan acquired after a 20 min delay. Measurements show that PET acquisition with minimal delay is necessary to collect 15O signal, and maximize 11C signal collection with a short PET acquisition. In comparison with the 50% pick-off technique, the shift technique is more robust and offers better precision in measuring the proton range for the different phantoms. Range measurements from PET images acquired with minimal delay, and the shift technique demonstrate the ability to achieve <1.5 mm accuracy and precision in estimating proton range.

Entities:  

Keywords:  in-room; in-situ; lanthanum bromide; partial-ring scanner; positron emission tomography (PET); proton range monitoring; proton therapy; time-of-flight (TOF)

Year:  2020        PMID: 34746539      PMCID: PMC8570535          DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2020.3044326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci        ISSN: 2469-7303


  41 in total

1.  Clinical CT-based calculations of dose and positron emitter distributions in proton therapy using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code.

Authors:  K Parodi; A Ferrari; F Sommerer; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Prompt gamma-ray emission from biological tissues during proton irradiation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J C Polf; S Peterson; G Ciangaru; M Gillin; S Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  In-beam PET measurements of beta+ radioactivity induced by proton beams.

Authors:  K Parodi; W Enghardt; T Haberer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Proton dose monitoring with PET: quantitative studies in Lucite.

Authors:  U Oelfke; G K Lam; M S Atkins
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Range assessment in particle therapy based on prompt γ-ray timing measurements.

Authors:  Christian Golnik; Fernando Hueso-González; Andreas Müller; Peter Dendooven; Wolfgang Enghardt; Fine Fiedler; Thomas Kormoll; Katja Roemer; Johannes Petzoldt; Andreas Wagner; Guntram Pausch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Mapping (15)O production rate for proton therapy verification.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Nathaniel M Alpert; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Mauro Testa; Brian Winey; Marc D Normandin; Helen A Shih; Harald Paganetti; Thomas Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The development and clinical use of a beam ON-LINE PET system mounted on a rotating gantry port in proton therapy.

Authors:  Teiji Nishio; Aya Miyatake; Takashi Ogino; Keiichi Nakagawa; Nagahiro Saijo; Hiroyasu Esumi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Brian Winey; Thomas Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Susan Michaud; Jay S Loeffler; Thomas F DeLaney; Norbert J Liebsch; John E Munzenrider; Alan J Fischman; Antje Knopf; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  New Digital Plug and Imaging Sensor for a Proton Therapy Monitoring System Based on Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Nicola D'Ascenzo; Min Gao; Emanuele Antonecchia; Paolo Gnudi; Hsien-Hsin Chen; Fang-Hsin Chen; Ji-Hong Hong; Ing-Tsung Hsiao; Tzu-Chen Yen; Weidong Wang; Daoming Xi; Bo Zhang; Qingguo Xie
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.