| Literature DB >> 34685518 |
Vineeta Sharma1, Sanat Kumar Dash2, Kavitha Govarthanan1, Rekha Gahtori3, Nidhi Negi4, Mahmood Barani5, Richa Tomar6, Sudip Chakraborty7, Santosh Mathapati8, Dillip Kumar Bishi9, Poonam Negi10, Kamal Dua11,12, Sachin Kumar Singh13, Rohit Gundamaraju14, Abhijit Dey15, Janne Ruokolainen16, Vijay Kumar Thakur17,18, Kavindra Kumar Kesari16,19, Niraj Kumar Jha20, Piyush Kumar Gupta21, Shreesh Ojha22.
Abstract
Myocardium Infarction (MI) is one of the foremost cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) causing death worldwide, and its case numbers are expected to continuously increase in the coming years. Pharmacological interventions have not been at the forefront in ameliorating MI-related morbidity and mortality. Stem cell-based tissue engineering approaches have been extensively explored for their regenerative potential in the infarcted myocardium. Recent studies on microfluidic devices employing stem cells under laboratory set-up have revealed meticulous events pertaining to the pathophysiology of MI occurring at the infarcted site. This discovery also underpins the appropriate conditions in the niche for differentiating stem cells into mature cardiomyocyte-like cells and leads to engineering of the scaffold via mimicking of native cardiac physiological conditions. However, the mode of stem cell-loaded engineered scaffolds delivered to the site of infarction is still a challenging mission, and yet to be translated to the clinical setting. In this review, we have elucidated the various strategies developed using a hydrogel-based system both as encapsulated stem cells and as biocompatible patches loaded with cells and applied at the site of infarction.Entities:
Keywords: biomaterial; cardiomyocytes; myocardial infarction; regeneration; stem cells; tissue engineering
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34685518 PMCID: PMC8533887 DOI: 10.3390/cells10102538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Schematic representation of various tissue engineering approaches for MI treatment. These approaches include hydrogel-based cell delivery (left hand corner), patch-based cell delivery (middle panel), and microfluidics-based drug screening (right corner) during the regenerative therapy of damaged heart tissue.
Figure 2Illustration of stem cell-based regenerative medicine in MI treatment. Various stem cells like MSCs, ESCs, and iPSCs have been employed in MI treatment. Stem cells are delivered through engineered novel biomaterials (via encapsulation) that mimic the native niche. The stem cell-based regenerative therapy is beneficial to either replace the injured area or the whole organ.
Figure 3Distinct cells of different origins which are used in the regenerative medicine depicted herein. Depending on the pluripotency, the transplanted cell types can differentiate into various other cells such as skeletal myoblasts, endothelial progenitor cells, chondrocytes, adipocytes, or cardiomyocytes.
Description of the cells delivered to the heart by injection. This cell delivery approach has used various cell types including ESCs, iPSCs, MSCs, and CSCs.
| Initial Cell Type | Target Cell Type | Composition of Delivery Vehicle | Mode of Delivery | Animal Models | Outcomes | Limitations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iPSCs | CMs | Polyethylene glycol hydrogel | Trans-epicardial | MI in nude rats | Increased infarct thickness and improved muscle content | No donor cell engraftment was observed | [ |
| Mouse ESCs | CMs | PA-RGDS based gel | Trans-epicardial | Mice | Engraftment and integration of mESC-CMs into host myocardium | No information available on cardiac remodelling | [ |
| iPSCs | CMs | PBS solution | Trans-epicardial | Post-infarcted swine | Enhanced angiogenesis, reduced apoptosis, and blunted cardiac remodelling | No detailed information available on the engraftment of donor cell | [ |
| MSCs | **** | Self-assembling peptide hydrogels (3-D Matrix, Ltd.) | Surface immobilization by spreading | Lewis rats | Augmented microvascular formation and reduced interstitial fibrosis | No detailed information available on the engraftment of donor cell and CMs differentiation from MSC | [ |
| MSCs | **** | Si-HPMC | Trans-epicardial | Lewis rats | Short-term recovery of ventricular function and attenuated mid-term remodelling | No detailed information available on the engraftment of donor cell and CMs differentiation from MSC | [ |
| c-Kit overexpressing CSCs | **** | PBS solution | Intracoronary | Fischer 344 rats | Preserved LV function and structure | Increased cell dose was found to be harmful. Cell tracing or engraftment were not available in detail | [ |
| CSCs | **** | Matrigel and dimethylpolysiloxane mixture gel | Trans-epicardial | NOD-SCID mice | Improved long-term retention of CSCs, cardiac structure and function | Cell tracing or engraftment were not available | [ |
**** Studies were carried out to observe the improvement in cardiac function. The available report did not present specifics on the engraftment and in situ differentiation of delivered cells to mature CMs.
Figure 4Patch-based cell therapy development started with the fabrication of different patches made up of carbon nanostructures, conductive or non-conductive polymers, hydrogel, etc. followed by patch-based stem cell delivery for MI disease treatment.
Types of natural and synthetic polymers used during cardiac tissue engineering.
| Natural Polymers | |
|---|---|
| Chitosan | Hyaluronic acid |
|
|
|
| Alginate | Fibrin |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Poly(glycolic acid) | Poly(ε-caprolactone) |
|
|
|
| Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) | Poly(ethylene glycol) |
|
| |
|
| Poly(lactic acid) |
|
| |
| Gelatin methacryloyl | |
Figure 5Steps in microfluidic cardiac model generation—(a) Selection of cells and extracellular matrix are performed based on the physiology to be studied; (b) this is followed by design of the chip through different computational software to achieve the desired flow contours; (c) based on the design, the device is fabricated by various microfabrication procedures (the most common being photolithography; the steps of which are 1. spin coating of clean silicon wafer, 2. UV exposure with a mask, 3. dissolution of unwanted resist with developer solution to generate the master pattern, 4. PDMS mold creation from the master pattern, 5. punching of required inlet and outlet holes in the PDMS mold, and 6. bonding of the PDMS mold with a glass plate or another PDMS slab to close the device); (d) introduction of cell-laden hydrogel into the device for 3D culture (its selection is based on the mechanical properties needed for the micro tissue under study; (e) completion of the electrical circuit required for stimulation of the cardiac cells; (f) integration of the device with external circuitry and pumping mechanism for seamless operation of the chip [176,177,178,179].
Use of microfluidics platforms in the study of various aspects of CVD, and applications in cardiac tissue engineering.
| Device Function | Cell Source | Techniques Used | Chemical or Physical Cues Studied | Scaffold Used | Fabrication Technique | Important Observations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Differentiation to CMs | ESCs | External motor for stretching the microfluidic device | Uniaxial cyclic mechanical stretch | 2D culture | Lithography | Reduction in cardiogenesis | [ |
| hESCs | Micropatterned surface generation through direct micro contact printing | ------ | Micropatterned fibronectin hydrogel | ------ | Display of beating foci earlier than non-patterned substrates | [ | |
| Drug toxicity testing | Human iPSC-CBs | Micro niches to trap CBs in microchannel, | Veparamil, Quinidine, Doxorubicin | No external scaffold | Standard photo lithography | 3D environment showed different effect on beating frequency of cells | [ |
| Human CMs | Micropillar based system to prohibit direct contact between 3D cell matrix from media flow, diffusion-based transport | Isoproterenol | Puramatrix hydrogel | PMMA micromilling | Cell viability appeared better in 3D culture | [ | |
| Contractile stress measurement | Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes and human iPSC derived CMs | Electronic quantification of stress through Cantilever deflection measurement | Isoproterenol | 3D printed matrix of PDMS with polyamide electrical network | Multimaterial 3D printing | Positive chronotropic response to drug similar to engineered NRVM microtissues and ESC-derived CM tissue | [ |
| Neonatal mouse CMs | Stress measurement by use of PIV technique to capture nanoparticle displacement coupled with finite element method. | Epinephrine | Sandwich of GelMA hydrogel and polyacrylamide hydrogels | 3D patterning | Increased frequency and amplitude of contraction cycles | [ | |
| Generation of in vitro constructs for tissue engineering application | Neonatal rat CMs | Coaxial needle extrusion system | ------ | GelMA | 3D printing | Generated complex heterogenous structures with single bioink extruder | [ |
| Hydraulic pressure and mechanical strain condition generation | H9c2 cells | Use of peristaltic pump coupled with pneumatically actuated valve to generate pathological heart conditions | ------ | ------ | PDMS molding | Organized F actin alignment similar to in vivo | [ |
| Neonatal rat CM | Pneumatic deflection of thin PDMS membrane to generate stretch | Uniaxial cyclic stretch | Cell laden gel | Lithography | Superior cardiac differentiation with better electrical and mechanical coupling | [ | |
| Effect of electrical field on proliferation and differentiation | Neonatal rat CM | ------ | Square monophasic electrical pulses | 2D cell culture on collagen coated matrix | Laser ablation of ITO coated glass slides to generate electrodes | Cell aligned in the direction perpendicular to the electric field | [ |
| 3D environment mimicking shear protection from endothelial barrier | hiPSC derived CMs | ------ | Verapamil, | ------ | Two step photolithography process | IC50 and EC50 values were more consistent with the data on tissue-scale references | [ |