| Literature DB >> 34680959 |
Federica Lamberto1,2, Irene Peral-Sanchez3, Suchitra Muenthaisong1, Melinda Zana1, Sandrine Willaime-Morawek3, András Dinnyés1,2,4,5.
Abstract
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) sauch as diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular diseases are rising rapidly in all countries world-wide. Environmental maternal factors (e.g., diet, oxidative stress, drugs and many others), maternal illnesses and other stressors can predispose the newborn to develop diseases during different stages of life. The connection between environmental factors and NCDs was formulated by David Barker and colleagues as the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis. In this review, we describe the DOHaD concept and the effects of several environmental stressors on the health of the progeny, providing both animal and human evidence. We focus on cardiovascular diseases which represent the leading cause of death worldwide. The purpose of this review is to discuss how in vitro studies with pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), such as embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells (ESC, iPSC), can underpin the research on non-genetic heart conditions. The PSCs could provide a tool to recapitulate aspects of embryonic development "in a dish", studying the effects of environmental exposure during cardiomyocyte (CM) differentiation and maturation, establishing a link to molecular mechanism and epigenetics.Entities:
Keywords: Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD); cardiomyocytes differentiation; cardiovascular diseases (CVDs); environmental factors; epigenetics; pluripotent stem cells (PSCs)
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34680959 PMCID: PMC8536136 DOI: 10.3390/genes12101564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Maternal and paternal exposure to stress factors can perturb the foetal status and predispose to the onset of NCDs, such as cardiovascular diseases. Pregnancy environment contributes significantly to the newborn development, and numerous stressors have long-lasting effects on the health of the progeny. IUGR: intra uterine growth restriction, GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus.
Advantages and disadvantages of the models to study DOHaD and CVD risks.
| Human Studies | Animal Studies | hPSC Models | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small Animals (Rodents) | Large Animals | |||
| PROS | Data supporting DOHAD: | Easier handling/housing and | Similarities with human | Unlimited supply of genetically well-defined material [ |
| CONS | Necessity of long-term data, larger prospective cohorts and expensive longitudinal studies [ | Physiological differences with humans [ | Cost and experimental duration [ | Difficulty to predict in vivo readouts with only in vitro data [ |
Figure 2Comparison of cardiac development during prenatal days with PSC differentiation stages. Key genes are also shown at each time-point. FHF: First Heart Field, SHF: Second Heart Field.
Figure 3Unbalanced exposure to hypoxia and ROS impairs the antioxidant defences (AOD) and causes alterations to foetal CMs. The affected regulation of cardiac-specific genes, epigenetic modifications and the aberrant cardiac remodelling can lead to CVD in the newborn. AOD: antioxidant defences.
Effect of several stressors on pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.
| Model | Condition | Stimulus | Key Phenotype | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hESC-CMs | Hyperglycemia | High-glucose exposure |
➢ CM maturation inhibition ➢ Suppression of | [ |
| hiPSC-CMs (3D microtissues) | Hyperglycemia | High-glucose exposure |
➢ Alteration in self-assemble into 3D model and in calcium handling function | [ |
| hiPSC-CMs | Hyperglycemia | High-glucose exposure |
➢ Pathological hypertrophy ➢ Reduced contractility | [ |
| hiPSC-CMs | Insulin resistance | High-palmitate exposure |
➢ Oxidation capacity of mitochondria overloaded | [ |
| hESC-CMs | Insulin resistance | TNFα and FFA exposure |
➢ Increase of ➢ Inhibition of | [ |
| hESC-CMs | HLHS | Hypoxia for 72 h |
➢ Increase of ➢ DNA damage, senescence, reduced cell proliferation and fewer cardiac progenitors | [ |
| miPSC-CMs | Hypoxia | Hypoxia for 24 h |
➢ Long-term failure contractile phenotype | [ |
| P19 ECC derived CMs | Oxidative stress | Different dose-dependent stimuli (e.g., H2O2) |
➢ Impairment of differentiation and contractile phenotype of CMs | [ |
| hiPSC-CM | Oxidative stress | Ethanol exposure |
➢ Reduction of cell viability, increase of cell loss and overproduction of ROS ➢ Abnormal calcium handling | [ |
| mESC-CMs | Toxicity effects | Ethanol exposure |
➢ Delay of cardiac differentiation and suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway ➢ Suppression of important cardiac transcripts required for the differentiation and maturation | [ |
| mESC-CMs | Oxidative stress | Cigarette smoke |
➢ Impairment of cardiac-specific genes expression ➢ Pathological heart remodelling | [ |
| hESC-CMs | Nicotine toxicity | Nicotine exposure |
➢ Reduced viability of hESC ➢ Ca2+ signalling affected in CMs | [ |
| hiPSC-CMs | Smoke toxicity | Electronic and regular smoke extract |
➢ Slowed beating ➢ Increased ROS and cell death ➢ Genes’ alteration ( | [ |
| hIPSC-CMs | Hormones | Thyroid and glucocorticoids exposure |
➢ Improvement of CMs maturation | [ |
| mESC-CMs | Chemicals | Flusilazole exposure |
➢ Inhibition of cardiac differentiation and changes in CMs gene expression | [ |
| mESC-CMs | Chemicals | Sparfloxacin and Levofloxacin |
➢ Alteration of the frequency and rate of beating of CMs | [ |
| hESC-CMs | Chemicals | Trichloroethylene and Perfluorooctane sulfonate |
➢ Altered expression of cardiac specific genes ➢ Mitochondrial damage | [ |
| mESC-CMs | Organic compounds | BPA exposure |
➢ Altered CMs morphology ➢ Mitochondrial damage | [ |
| hESC-CMs | Organic compounds | BPA exposure |
➢ Altered CMs morphology ➢ Higher expression of ➢ Reduced ATP provision | [ |