Literature DB >> 25730413

Do little embryos make big decisions? How maternal dietary protein restriction can permanently change an embryo's potential, affecting adult health.

Tom P Fleming1, Adam J Watkins1, Congshan Sun1, Miguel A Velazquez1, Neil R Smyth1, Judith J Eckert2.   

Abstract

Periconceptional environment may influence embryo development, ultimately affecting adult health. Here, we review the rodent model of maternal low-protein diet specifically during the preimplantation period (Emb-LPD) with normal nutrition during subsequent gestation and postnatally. This model, studied mainly in the mouse, leads to cardiovascular, metabolic and behavioural disease in adult offspring, with females more susceptible. We evaluate the sequence of events from diet administration that may lead to adult disease. Emb-LPD changes maternal serum and/or uterine fluid metabolite composition, notably with reduced insulin and branched-chain amino acids. This is sensed by blastocysts through reduced mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 signalling. Embryos respond by permanently changing the pattern of development of their extra-embryonic lineages, trophectoderm and primitive endoderm, to enhance maternal nutrient retrieval during subsequent gestation. These compensatory changes include stimulation in proliferation, endocytosis and cellular motility, and epigenetic mechanisms underlying them are being identified. Collectively, these responses act to protect fetal growth and likely contribute to offspring competitive fitness. However, the resulting growth adversely affects long-term health because perinatal weight positively correlates with adult disease risk. We argue that periconception environmental responses reflect developmental plasticity and 'decisions' made by embryos to optimise their own development, but with lasting consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25730413     DOI: 10.1071/RD14455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev        ISSN: 1031-3613            Impact factor:   2.311


  25 in total

1.  Adolescence and the next generation.

Authors:  George C Patton; Craig A Olsson; Vegard Skirbekk; Richard Saffery; Mary E Wlodek; Peter S Azzopardi; Marcin Stonawski; Bruce Rasmussen; Elizabeth Spry; Kate Francis; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Nicholas J Kassebaum; Ali H Mokdad; Christopher J L Murray; Andrew M Prentice; Nicola Reavley; Peter Sheehan; Kim Sweeny; Russell M Viner; Susan M Sawyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Tom P Fleming; Adam J Watkins; Miguel A Velazquez; John C Mathers; Andrew M Prentice; Judith Stephenson; Mary Barker; Richard Saffery; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Judith J Eckert; Mark A Hanson; Terrence Forrester; Peter D Gluckman; Keith M Godfrey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  RW-2018-Research Workshop: The Effect of Nutrition on Epigenetic Status, Growth, and Health.

Authors:  Michael Skinner; L H Lumey; Tom P Fleming; Carmen Sapienza; Cathrine Hoyo; Lucia Aronica; Jeff Thompson; Peter F Nichol
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Preconceptional diet quality is associated with birth outcomes among low socioeconomic status minority women in a high-income country.

Authors:  Kathleen Abu-Saad; Vered Kaufman-Shriqui; Laurence S Freedman; Ilana Belmaker; Drora Fraser
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 5.  A Summary of Pathways or Mechanisms Linking Preconception Maternal Nutrition with Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Janet C King
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Mouse maternal protein restriction during preimplantation alone permanently alters brain neuron proportion and adult short-term memory.

Authors:  Joanna M Gould; Phoebe J Smith; Chris J Airey; Emily J Mort; Lauren E Airey; Frazer D M Warricker; Jennifer E Pearson-Farr; Eleanor C Weston; Philippa J W Gould; Oliver G Semmence; Katie L Restall; Jennifer A Watts; Patrick C McHugh; Stephanie J Smith; Jennifer M Dewing; Tom P Fleming; Sandrine Willaime-Morawek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Maternal recognition of pregnancy in the mare: does it exist and why do we care?

Authors:  Aleona Swegen
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Phenotypic developmental plasticity induced by preincubation egg storage in chicken embryos (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Sylvia R Branum; Hiroshi Tazawa; Warren W Burggren
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2016-02

Review 9.  Deciphering the Role of the Non-Coding Genome in Regulating Gene-Diet Interactions.

Authors:  Pui-Pik Law; Michelle L Holland
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Protein restriction during puberty alters nutritional parameters and affects ovarian and uterine histomorphometry in adulthood in rats.

Authors:  Diego Augusto de Morais Oliveira; Luiz Antonio Lupi; Henrique Spaulonci Silveira; Luiz Gustavo de Almeida Chuffa
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.