Arne Sunde1, Daniel Brison2, John Dumoulin3, Joyce Harper4, Kersti Lundin5, M Cristina Magli6, Etienne Van den Abbeel7, Anna Veiga8. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Olav's University Hospital in Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway trondheimivf@gmail.com. 2. Department of Reproductive Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IVF Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 4. Embryology, IVF and reproductive genetics group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK. 5. Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 6. SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Bologna, Italy. 7. Reproductive Medicine, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium. 8. Reproductive Medicine Service, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Is it important that end-users know the composition of human embryo culture media? SUMMARY ANSWER: We argue that there is as strong case for full transparency concerning the composition of embryo culture media intended for human use. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Published data suggest that the composition of embryo culture media may influence the phenotype of the offspring. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A review of the literature was carried out. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data concerning the potential effects on embryo development of culture media were assessed and recommendations for users made. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The safety of ART procedures, especially with respect to the health of the offspring, is of major importance. There are reports from the literature indicating a possible effect of culture conditions, including culture media, on embryo and fetal development. Since the introduction of commercially available culture media, there has been a rapid development of different formulations, often not fully documented, disclosed or justified. There is now evidence that the environment the early embryo is exposed to can cause reprogramming of embryonic growth leading to alterations in fetal growth trajectory, birthweight, childhood growth and long-term disease including Type II diabetes and cardiovascular problems. The mechanism for this is likely to be epigenetic changes during the preimplantation period of development. In the present paper the ESHRE working group on culture media summarizes the present knowledge of potential effects on embryo development related to culture media, and makes recommendations. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There is still a need for large prospective randomized trials to further elucidate the link between the composition of embryo culture media used and the phenotype of the offspring. We do not presently know if the phenotypic changes induced by in vitro embryo culture represent a problem for long-term health of the offspring. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Published data indicate that there is a strong case for demanding full transparency concerning the compositions of and the scientific rationale behind the composition of embryo culture media. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was funded by The European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. No competing interests to declare.
STUDY QUESTION: Is it important that end-users know the composition of human embryo culture media? SUMMARY ANSWER: We argue that there is as strong case for full transparency concerning the composition of embryo culture media intended for human use. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Published data suggest that the composition of embryo culture media may influence the phenotype of the offspring. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A review of the literature was carried out. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data concerning the potential effects on embryo development of culture media were assessed and recommendations for users made. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The safety of ART procedures, especially with respect to the health of the offspring, is of major importance. There are reports from the literature indicating a possible effect of culture conditions, including culture media, on embryo and fetal development. Since the introduction of commercially available culture media, there has been a rapid development of different formulations, often not fully documented, disclosed or justified. There is now evidence that the environment the early embryo is exposed to can cause reprogramming of embryonic growth leading to alterations in fetal growth trajectory, birthweight, childhood growth and long-term disease including Type II diabetes and cardiovascular problems. The mechanism for this is likely to be epigenetic changes during the preimplantation period of development. In the present paper the ESHRE working group on culture media summarizes the present knowledge of potential effects on embryo development related to culture media, and makes recommendations. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There is still a need for large prospective randomized trials to further elucidate the link between the composition of embryo culture media used and the phenotype of the offspring. We do not presently know if the phenotypic changes induced by in vitro embryo culture represent a problem for long-term health of the offspring. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Published data indicate that there is a strong case for demanding full transparency concerning the compositions of and the scientific rationale behind the composition of embryo culture media. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was funded by The European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. No competing interests to declare.
Keywords:
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; assisted reproductive technology; culture media; effect of in vitro culture on human embryos; regulation of culture media; transparency regarding composition of culture media
Authors: Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; George Anifandis; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Maria Lambropoulou; Athanasios Pappas; Efthimios Deligeoroglou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Danilo Cimadomo; C Scarica; R Maggiulli; G Orlando; D Soscia; L Albricci; S Romano; F Sanges; F M Ubaldi; L Rienzi Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Tom P Fleming; Adam J Watkins; Miguel A Velazquez; John C Mathers; Andrew M Prentice; Judith Stephenson; Mary Barker; Richard Saffery; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Judith J Eckert; Mark A Hanson; Terrence Forrester; Peter D Gluckman; Keith M Godfrey Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rebekka M Koeck; Florence Busato; Jorg Tost; Dimitri Consten; Jannie van Echten-Arends; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; Yvonne Wurth; Sylvie Remy; Sabine Langie; Tim S Nawrot; Michelle Plusquin; Rossella Alfano; Esmée M Bijnens; Marij Gielen; Ron van Golde; John C M Dumoulin; Han Brunner; Aafke P A van Montfoort; Masoud Zamani Esteki Journal: NPJ Genom Med Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 6.083
Authors: Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Carol Coughlan; Nicolas Garrido; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 3.357