Literature DB >> 34588911

Radiobiological risks in terms of effective dose and organ dose from 18F-FDG whole-body PET/CT procedures.

Suhaib Alameen1, Nissren Tamam2, Sami Awadain1, Abdelmoneim Sulieman3, Latifa Alkhaldi4, Amira Ben Hmed4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Integrated Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with Computerized tomography (CT) (PET/CT) are widely used to diagnose, stage and track human diseases during whole body scanning. Multi-modality imaging is an interesting area of research that aims at acquiring united morphological-functional image information for accurate diagnosing and staging of the disease. However, PET/CT procedure accompanied with high radiation dose from CT and administered radioactivity. The aim of the present study was to estimate the patients' dose from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging (18F-FDG) hybrid PET/CT whole body scan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: RADAR (Radiation Dose Assessment Resource) software was used to estimate the effective dose for 156 patients (110 (70.5%)) males and 46 (39.5%) female) examined using Discovery PET/CT 710, GE Medical Systems installed at Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC).
RESULTS: The effective dose results presented in this PET/CT study ranged from (1.56-9.94 mSv). The effective dose was calculated to be 3.88 mSv in females and 3.71 mSv in males. The overall breast (female), lung, liver, kidney and thyroid were 7.4, 7.2, 5.2, 4, 3 and 2.9, respectively.For females, the body mass index (BMI) was 28.49 kg/m2 and for males it was 26.50 kg/m2 which showed overweight values for both genders. Conclusions: The findings indicate that the effective dose of 18F-FDG in both male and female patients was not substantially different. The study suggested that the risk-benefit proportions of any 18F-FDG whole body PET/CT scan should be clarified and carefully weighed. Patient's doses are lower compared with previous studies.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG; Effective dose; Organ dose; PET/CT

Year:  2021        PMID: 34588911      PMCID: PMC8459160          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci        ISSN: 2213-7106            Impact factor:   4.219


Introduction

Multi-modality imaging (Hybrid or fusion imaging) can detect noninvasively the physiological and anatomical disorders. Currently, PET/CT is extensively used for malignant tumors characterization and evaluation of response to therapy (Alkhorayef, 2020). PET scans comprise physiological findings and CT provides the anatomical details. As a result, hybrid PET/CT images provides better diagnostic findings than single CT or PET scans. The glucose analogue 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) has increasingly been used to detect inflammation and infection with positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Infection site 18F-FDG accumulation is dependent on high glucose absorption of inflammatory cells triggered. The potential role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for infection lesion detection and tumor staging has been suggested by published findings (Salah et al., 2020, Alkhorayef, 2020, Salomäki et al., 2020, Liao et al., 2016). The highest standardized uptake value (SUVmax), developed during an integrated 18F-FDG-PET/CT-scan, is an index used to differentiate between malignant lesions and benign lesions. A high SUVmax typically suggests that malignancy is highly probable. The alternative approach is an 18F-FDG dual-phase PET/CT where there is no strong distinction between benign and malignant lesions from the other forms of pre-operative imagery. Early and delayed SUVmax values are therefore essential for malignancy diagnosis (Ishikawa et al., 2020). Alternative to 18F FDG PET/CT for obtaining both anatomic and functional image and radiation free is whole body resonance imaging (WB-MRI), But 18F-FDG PET/CT has been proven to be highly sensitive especially in younger patients. (Wong et al., 2017) Various PSMA types are available now: 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 68 Ga-PSMA-617, 18FDCFPyL, and 18F-PSMA-1007. Various types are available in this group. They have different pharmacokinetic properties, but the same purpose (Evangelista et al., 2020). As traditional gamma-ray source (for example germanium-68), the technology from CT depends on a corrective attenuation of the PET acquisition data. CT is a popular diagnostic method for radiological imaging that is a useful tool for cancer research, localization of infections, inflammatory lesions and treatment response assessment. The capacity of CT to reliably delineate anatomies allows to assess operatively and to stage accurately. In major PET/CT Practice, non-contrast enhanced and low-dose CT (NECT) were appropriate as this provides cost-efficient and lower exposure for patients to radiation. In the case of cancer staging, however, improved CT (CECT) contrast or so-called CT Diagnostics is preferred to NECT. In order to enhance the delineation and position of lesions, contrast administration is required and local invasions of lesions are removed. The characterization of lesions can also be obtained by multi-stage CT analysis in the diagnosis of cancer. When CT has been incorporated into PET, the intensity of the two modalities is combined, using the CT to mitigate PET data. There are in fact, different types of PET/CT image protocols conducted separately with the acquisition of PET, in various centers, for example in low dosage CT, PET, NECT/PET and CECT/PET (Mahmud et al., 2015). PET/CT plays a significant role in clinical applications and provides us more images to reliably diagnose and suggests the care most suitable for the patients received. The most important application of PET is oncology and provides an imagery of the fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose distribution. Recent advances in radiomics have demonstrated the potential added benefit of discriminating and predicting cervical cancer evaluation, a tool that transforms the images into large-scale mineable data compared to certain typical semi-quantitative parameters from patient 18FFDG PET/CT scans, including maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume or complete lesion glycolysis. However most recent PET/CT studies draw picture-derived characteristics separately from PET and CT pictures; or use semiquantitational semi installed descriptors identified by the radiologist to classify PET and CT fusion pictures for the results, and most of the descriptors generally categorize tumors as a whole and rarely take into account the extraction of features from various subregion (Mu et al., 2020). Integrated in the oncology process, 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose is primarily used for follow-up on the patient. Imaging changes in the metabolism of glucoses will lead to a more timely and precise evaluation of reaction than normal morphological imagery. Positron emission high-energy annihilation radiation may lead to a significant exposure to workforce radiation. In comparison, the internal distribution of beta (positron) emitting radiopharmaceutical products could give the patients relative low radiation exposure. Several research on the estimation of the effective dose have been reported with 18FDG PET/CT for both sexes and various organs (Alkhorayef, 2020, Salah et al., 2020, Shiraishi et al., 2010, Marwa et al., 2019, Karakatsanis et al., 2015). In literature, patients reported to receive up to 40 mSv from PET/CT procedures, and was calculated that 82% of the dose resulted from CT scanning (Salah et al., 2020). Therefore, assessment of patients effective and organ dose is recommended to ensure that proper imaging scan is used to provide diagnosable scan with minimal radiation risks. The goal of the present study is to estimate effective and organ doses from the 18FDG PET/CT exams in both males and females for the whole body and the results achieved for the radiological safety of the facility for dose assessment and optimization.

Materials and methods

This study was performed at nuclear medicine department, at Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC). All procedures were carried out using Discovery PET/CT 710, GE Medical Systems (3000 N. Grandview Blvd. Waukesha, WI 53188, USA). A total of 156 patients (110 (70.5%) males and 46 (29.5%) females) (mean age ± SD, 61 ± 11.44 years; age range, 31–85 years) with suspected cancer underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT in the KCCC. General characteristics of the demographic data of the patient (age, gender, weight and height) were reported. The dose parameters and the dose administered for both the left and the right lungs were calculated using the RADAR Medical Procedure Radiation Dose Calculator.

Measurements

The measurement of the effective PET-CT dose consists of both internal and external exposure as shown in ICRP publications 102, 103 and 106. External exposure to radiation due to exposure from radiopharmaceuticals 18F-FDG were calculated from the reported DLP using the below equation and the effective dose per unit dose-length product conversion factors. The 18F-FDG is a 240 keV and 511 keV beta-energy positron emitter. Internal exposure to patients was determined on the basis of the equation as follows (Hussin et al. (2017) where DT is the absorbed doses to a tissue or organ, T, A is the activity (MBq) of 18F-FDG administered to the patient and TTFDG is dose coefficient provided by ICRP 106 for a variety of organs and tissues. The effective dose, E received by patients were evaluated based on equation (2). Where TTFDG = 19µSv/MBq is the dose coefficient for the effective dose F18-FDG (adults˃15y).

Imaging procedure

The patient received 4.4 mCi intravenous injection of 18F-FDG. After an initial uptake period of approximately 65 min, a CT-Scan without oral contrast without Intravenous (IV) contrast, without breathing at low mA level was acquired for attenuation correction and localization purposes only (low CT dose non-enhanced images). The arms were held up. Subsequently, PET images were taken from the vertex to the mid-thigh. CT, PET and fused images were reconstructed in trans-axial, coronal and sagittal projections and interpreted from the workstation. Plasma glucose in the patient was 5.2 mmol/l (Kazimierczyk et al., 2021).

Results

In the present study, the absorbed dose was calculated based on the biokinetic data obtained from a group of 156 patients, after a bolus intravenous injection. For the whole-body review 18F-FDG PET/CT an overview of patient details such as age, BMI and dosage parameters such as administration and efficacy dose. For all patients according to their sex, the average demographic results presented as mean ± standard deviation are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Anthropometric and demographic information for enrolled patients.

VariablesMaleFemaleOverall
Age (Years)61.29 ± 10.4057.28 ± 13.5259.3 ± 12
BMI (Kg/m2)26.69 ± 4.8927.98 ± 6.8127.3 ± 5.9
Anthropometric and demographic information for enrolled patients. Radiation doses parameters, for example, tube potential, tube current, weighted CT dose index CTDIw, volume CTDIvol and the dose length product (DLP, mGy.cm), and table motion parameters for scan length, feeding table and pitch, and table movement parameters. The details of the scan models are presented in Table 2 .It showed CT image acquisition protocol and the movement parameters with the data viewed as medium ± default.
Table 2

List of parameters of scan and the activity doses.

Scan parametersMean ± SDVariables Scan parametersMean ± SD
Tube Potential120 or 140Collimation16 or 32
Tube current93.72 ± 35.81Turn4.9 ± 0.9
Table feed16.43 ± 1.5CTDIw4.43 ± 1.94
Pitch1.02 ± 0.09CTDIv4.17 ± 1.83
Slice thickness2.5 or 5DLP177 ± 71.62
Scan length80.57 ± 14Activity5.35 ± 2.48
List of parameters of scan and the activity doses. The average effective dose was 3.17 mSv for both male and female patients with: 2.89 ± 1.13 and 3.93 ± 1.71 mSv for computed tomography examinations and 3.75 and 3.78 ± 1.79 and 3.71 ± 1.63 for internally administered 18F-FDG for males and females respectively. During the whole-body PET/CT procedure, 6.66 ± 2.38 and 7.64 ± 2.42 mSv 18F-FDG was internally administered for male and female patients. Table 3 reported all the data.
Table 3

Comparison of CT scan and PET in both the male and female subjects.

CT
PET
Total
MaleFemaleTotalMaleFemaleTotalMaleFemaleTotal
2.9 ± 13.9 ± 1.73.2 ± 1.43.8 ± 1.83.7 ± 1.63.8 ± 1.76.66 ± 2.47.64 ± 2.426.93 ± 2.42
Comparison of CT scan and PET in both the male and female subjects. In Table 4, the complete list of human organs in both the male and female subjects were categorized separately. Patients undergoing an 18F-DG PET/CT Whole body examination As the range is from the top of the lungs to the top of the stomach, a large dose was received by the different organs. Table 4 provides a thorough assessment of the distribution of organ dose within the human body within the entire body presented as mean ± standard deviation. The mean dose was found to be high in females when compared to males in breasts, esophagus, lungs, liver, stomach, kidney, gall bladder and Heart.
Table 4

List of dose received by the different organs in male and female patients.

OrgansMale
Female
Total
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Thyroid6.72.93.41.75.82.9
Breasts0.040.477.43.52.03.7
Esophagus6.32.76.93.26.42.8
Lungs6.72.87.23.46.82.9
Liver5.01.95.92.65.32.1
Stomach4.71.65.62.44.91.9
Kidneys4.11.25.12.04.31.5
Gall bladder4.51.85.32.44.71.9
Heart5.82.56.22.95.92.6
List of dose received by the different organs in male and female patients.

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to estimate the patients’ effective and organ doses from 18F-FDG in whole body scan for both male and female patients during PET/CT imaging. The effective dose from PET/CT calculated in this study: 1.56–9.94 mSv was found to be lower than the international commission on radiological protection (ICRP) values (Cantone, 2009). It has been calculated that the effective dose is 3.88 mSv in females and 3.71 mSv in males. However, several studies have been published on absorbed dose of various internal organ 18FDG administered based on the kinetics of the human 18FDG distribution. The overall effective dose of the entire PET/CT procedures is close to previously reported results (15.7 ± 3.1 mSv for the baseline protocol and 11.2 ± 2.4 in the final protocol). The average successful total FDG full-body PET/CT in recent publications has been calculated to be 14 ± 1.3 mSv (Quinn et al., 2016), 14.2 mSv and 17.2 mSv in the male population (Kaushik et al., 2015), 13.6 and 12.7 in both systems (Avramova-Cholakova et al., 2015) and 14.5 mSv using the ICRP calculation (Willowson et al., 2012). However, we did not agree with previous studies in our current research results (Prieto et al., 2018, Quinn et al., 2016, Kaushik et al., 2015, Avramova-Cholakova et al., 2015, Willowson et al., 2012) Table 5. Conversely, very few studies have been carried out that provide the kind of kinetics data of 18FDG distribution in people required for internal dosimetry calculations for both genders (Niven et al., 2001).
Table 5

Summarized comparison with previous studies for whole body diagnostic CT effective dose.

Effective dose(mSv)14 ± 1.317.213.61.56–9.94
Pet/CT studyQuinn et alKaushik et alAvramova-Cholakova et alThis study
Summarized comparison with previous studies for whole body diagnostic CT effective dose. The patient’s doses from the administered radiopharmaceutical for males and females is only made with one study reported by Kaushik et al group, in which a substantial difference in sex was recorded in the residency times and a dose absorbed by the brain in 18FDG. No important difference in the time of residence and absorbed dose to male and female organ except for spleen have been shown in the previous study (Kaushik et al., 2013). In this current study, the mean and standard deviations were found to be strongly associated in females when compared to males as describe the human organs in Table 4. Over recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of imaging procedures for PET/CT. Estimates of the patient's exposure are more important because of the late effects of radiation. The use of 18F-FDG will however in certain respects reduce the exposure to radiation taking into account the key radiation safety principles. Early cancer cells which break off the original tumor can be identified by the 18F-FDG. CT dose reduction is of great significance for the patient as CT is the main contributor to the final efficient PET/CT dosage procedures, but PET dose reduction may have an effect on the patient as well as on the exposure of nuclear medicine personnel and PET/CT facilities. Final dose reduction protocol will be especially useful for patients undergoing recurring PET/CT scans (i.e. treatment monitoring). The final protocol has been in effect since May 2016, and physicians in nuclear medicine are secure in interpreting the PET/CT images. Although the minimum dose for PET or CT could not be reached in this analysis, consolidating the protocol was a priority before reducing more FDG dose (Prieto et al., 2018). Over the past 10 years the number of imaging procedures for PET/CT has greatly increased. Owing to the late results of radiation effects, the estimates of dose absorbed by patients become higher. The use of 18F-FDG will somehow reduce radiation exposure with due regard to the key radiation safety standards. Early cancer cells that break out of the original tumor are identified with the 18F-FDG. There have been never been studies of the effects of a dual-time images scan on the CT effective dose due to the location of the arms in a PET/CT sample and the impact of the second PET/CT. We have shown in this analysis, in connection with the Torso-18FDG protocol, that ED increases by about two when the arms are next to the body relative to the location of the arms above the head. In addition, the overall effective dose of 18% of patients with body protocols in double-time imaging was increased by 3.8 mSv. In brain research there are very few references to patient dosimetry, other than those that include radiopharmaceutical and organ dosimetry records. Possibly because of the lower dose of these protocols relative to oncology trials in 18FDG. Only Ireland had 18FDG brain trials for DRL in 2014 (290 MBq) (Martí-Climent et al., 2017).

Conclusion

In conclusion, imaging using the 18F-FDG PET/CT whole-body scan significantly decreased the patient extremity dose while preserving the image quality. The average dose reported in this study which was conducted in Kuwait Cancer Control Center for 156 patients who were subjected to an 18F-FDG PET-CT whole-body test was 3.76 mSv. The effective dose calculated in this study, 1.56–9.94 mSv was less than the values recorded in ICRP 106, 2009. Our results indicate that the 18F-FDG dose in male and female patients does not vary from the previous findings. Yet, the authors strongly recommended that all the clinical practices should be justified and the risk–benefit proportions should be carefully weighted prior to any 18F-FDG whole-body PET/CT scan. Patient’s doses are lower compared with previous studies, nonetheless optimization of CT dose is necessary since highest portion of patients’ doses is from external exposure, especially from the CT component. Protection of sensitive organ from unjustified exposure is necessary to reduce the risk and maximize the benefit of the procedure.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  21 in total

1.  A retrospective evaluation of radiation dose associated with low dose FDG protocols in whole-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Kathy P Willowson; Elizabeth A Bailey; Dale L Bailey
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 1.430

2.  Prognostic role of PET/MRI hybrid imaging in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Remigiusz Kazimierczyk; Piotr Szumowski; Stephan G Nekolla; Piotr Blaszczak; Lukasz A Malek; Barbara Milosz-Wieczorek; Jolanta Misko; Dorota Jurgilewicz; Marcin Hladunski; Malgorzata Knapp; Bozena Sobkowicz; Janusz Mysliwiec; Ryszard Grzywna; Wlodzimierz J Musial; Karol A Kaminski
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Estimation of patient dose in (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations.

Authors:  Aruna Kaushik; Abhinav Jaimini; Madhavi Tripathi; Maria D'Souza; Rajnish Sharma; Anil K Mishra; Anupam Mondal; Bilikere S Dwarakanath
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.805

4.  The Role of Radiolabeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Renal Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Umberto Basso; Marco Maruzzo; Giacomo Novara
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2018-08-16

5.  Significant dose reduction is feasible in FDG PET/CT protocols without compromising diagnostic quality.

Authors:  Elena Prieto; María José García-Velloso; Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile; Verónica Morán; Berta García-García; Fernando Guillén; María Isabel Morales; Lidia Sancho; Iván Peñuelas; José Ángel Richter; Josep María Martí-Climent
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 6.  18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: Current Status and Potential Future Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Geraldine J Liao; Amy S Clark; Erin K Schubert; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Impacts of biological and procedural factors on semiquantification uptake value of liver in fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Mohd Hafizi Mahmud; Abdul Jalil Nordin; Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad; Ahmad Zaid Fattah Azman
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

8.  Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates.

Authors:  Brian Quinn; Zak Dauer; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Heiko Schoder; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Relationship between Standard Uptake Values of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Salivary Metabolites in Oral Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Shigeo Ishikawa; Toshitada Hiraka; Kazukuni Kirii; Masahiro Sugimoto; Hiroaki Shimamoto; Ayako Sugano; Kenichiro Kitabatake; Yuuki Toyoguchi; Masafumi Kanoto; Kenji Nemoto; Tomoyoshi Soga; Masaru Tomita; Mitsuyoshi Iino
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Effective dose estimation for oncological and neurological PET/CT procedures.

Authors:  Josep M Martí-Climent; Elena Prieto; Verónica Morán; Lidia Sancho; Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile; Javier Arbizu; María J García-Velloso; José A Richter
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dual-tracer positron emission tomography/computed tomography as an imaging probe of de novo lipogenesis in preclinical models of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chin-Ho Tsao; Rong-Hong Jhou; Chien-Chih Ke; Chun-Wei Chang; Chi-Wei Chang; Bang-Hung Yang; Wen-Sheng Huang; Bing-Fu Shih; Ren-Shyan Liu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.