Literature DB >> 22160927

A retrospective evaluation of radiation dose associated with low dose FDG protocols in whole-body PET/CT.

Kathy P Willowson1, Elizabeth A Bailey, Dale L Bailey.   

Abstract

The objective of the study is to retrospectively measure patient radiation dose resulting from whole body X-ray CT and FDG PET studies using a low-dose protocol performed on the Siemens Biograph mCT scanner. A total of 483 patient studies were reviewed. For each, the CT dose-length product was used to estimate radiation dose to the patient as a result of the whole body X-ray CT component of the PET/CT study. The net injected FDG dose was used to calculate the whole body effective dose based on ICRP recommendations. Dose calculations were also modified to take into account individual patient weight. The total effective dose received by each patient was taken as the sum of the PET and CT components of the study. The mean effective dose from the CT component of the diagnostic study was found to be 8.2 mSv (3.4-23.4 mSv), for a CT protocol of 120 kV(p) and effective tube current-time product of 80 mAs with automatic exposure control. For an average injected FDG activity of 304 MBq the mean PET effective dose was found to be 6.3 mSv when using the ICRP standard models, or 6.0 mSv when scaling effective dose to individual patient weight or patient blood volume. The average total effective dose across the entire patient cohort for a combined PET/CT study was found to be ~14.5 mSv (9.6-29.8 mSv). Low-dose protocols for whole-body PET/CT scanning result in an effective radiation dose to the patient of approximately 14.5 mSv. Additional reductions through the use of iterative CT reconstruction and optimized low-dose FDG protocols could see total effective doses for whole-body PET/CT fall to below 10 mSv.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22160927     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-011-0119-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  12 in total

1.  PET-CT in oncological patients: analysis of informal care costs in cost-benefit assessment.

Authors:  Antonio Orlacchio; Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Orazio Schillaci; Fabrizio Chegai; Daniela Tosti; Fabrizio D'Alba; Manlio Guazzaroni; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Chest Tuberculosis in Children.

Authors:  Priyanka Naranje; Ashu Seith Bhalla; Poonam Sherwani
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [68Ga]Citrate and [90Y]Microspheres PET Image Reconstructions Using Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm.

Authors:  Youngho Seo; Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Kristen A Wangerin; Timothy W Deller; Yung-Hua Wang; Salma Jivan; Maureen P Kohi; Rahul Aggarwal; Robert R Flavell; Spencer C Behr; Michael J Evans
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Whole-body MRI vs bone scintigraphy in the staging of Ewing sarcoma of bone: a 12-year single-institution review.

Authors:  Sarah Kalus; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Deep learning-based automated segmentation of eight brain anatomical regions using head CT images in PET/CT.

Authors:  Tong Wang; Haiqun Xing; Yige Li; Sicong Wang; Ling Liu; Fang Li; Hongli Jing
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.795

6.  PET/MRI in cancer patients: first experiences and vision from Copenhagen.

Authors:  Andreas Kjær; Annika Loft; Ian Law; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Lise Borgwardt; Johan Löfgren; Camilla Bardram Johnbeck; Adam Espe Hansen; Sune Keller; Søren Holm; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Imaging in childhood cancer: a Society for Pediatric Radiology and Children's Oncology Group Joint Task Force report.

Authors:  Daniel A Weiser; Sue C Kaste; Marilyn J Siegel; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 8.  Dosage optimization in positron emission tomography: state-of-the-art methods and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Eleni Fokou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-12

9.  Level of radiation dose in university hospital noninsured private health screening programs in Korea.

Authors:  Yun-Keun Lee
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-24

10.  A method to assess image quality for Low-dose PET: analysis of SNR, CNR, bias and image noise.

Authors:  Jianhua Yan; Josh Schaefferkoette; Maurizio Conti; David Townsend
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.