Literature DB >> 29519399

Significant dose reduction is feasible in FDG PET/CT protocols without compromising diagnostic quality.

Elena Prieto1, María José García-Velloso1, Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile1, Verónica Morán2, Berta García-García2, Fernando Guillén2, María Isabel Morales2, Lidia Sancho2, Iván Peñuelas1, José Ángel Richter1, Josep María Martí-Climent3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To reduce the radiation dose to patients by optimizing oncological FDG PET/CT protocols.
METHODS: The baseline PET/CT protocol in our institution for oncological PET/CT examinations consisted of the administration of 5.18 MBq/kg of FDG and a CT acquisition with a reference current-time product of 120 mAs. In 2016, FDG activity was reduced to 4.44 and 3.70 MBq/kg and reference CT current-time-product was reduced to 100 and 80 mAs. 322 patients scanned with different protocols were retrospectively evaluated. For each patient, effective dose was calculated. The overall image quality was subjectively rated by the referring physician on a 4-point scale (IQ score: 1 excellent, 2 good, 3 poor but interpretable, 4 poor not interpretable). Image quality was quantitatively evaluated measuring noise in the liver.
RESULTS: CT
Results: Effective dose was progressively reduced from 9.5 ± 2.8 to 8.0 ± 2.3 and 6.2 ± 1.5 mSv (p < 0.001). A mean dose reduction of 34.9% was achieved. There was a significant degradation of IQ score (p < 0.05) and noise (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, the number of poor quality studies (IQ score >2) did not increase. PET
Results: Effective dose was gradually reduced from 6.5 ± 1.4 to 5.7 ± 1.3 and 5.0 ± 1.0 mSv (p < 0.001). Average dose reduction was 23.4%. IQ score (p < 0.05) and noise (p < 0.001) significantly degraded for lower activity protocols. However, all images with reduced activity were scored as interpretable (IQ score ≤ 3).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant radiation dose reduction of 28.7% was reached. Despite a slight reduction in image quality, the new regime was successfully implemented with readers reporting unchanged clinical confidence.
Copyright © 2018 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose; Image quality; Optimization; PET-CT; Radiation protection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29519399     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  6 in total

Review 1.  Imaging Metabolically Active Fat: A Literature Review and Mechanistic Insights.

Authors:  Joseph Frankl; Amber Sherwood; Deborah J Clegg; Philipp E Scherer; Orhan K Öz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  The role of activity, scan duration and patient's body mass index in the optimization of FDG imaging protocols on a TOF-PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Roberta Matheoud; Naema Al-Maymani; Alessia Oldani; Gian Mauro Sacchetti; Marco Brambilla; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-04-06

3.  [18F] Sodium Fluoride Dose Reduction Enabled by Digital Photon Counting PET/CT for Evaluation of Osteoblastic Activity.

Authors:  Maria I Menendez; Richard R Moore; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Chadwick L Wright; Soledad Fernandez; Rebecca D Jackson; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-12

4.  Radiobiological risks in terms of effective dose and organ dose from 18F-FDG whole-body PET/CT procedures.

Authors:  Suhaib Alameen; Nissren Tamam; Sami Awadain; Abdelmoneim Sulieman; Latifa Alkhaldi; Amira Ben Hmed
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Reconstruction of positron emission tomography images using adaptive sliced remeshing strategy.

Authors:  Ramiro R Colmeiro; Claudio Verrastro; Daniel Minsky; Thomas Grosges
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 6.  Cumulative radiation doses from recurrent PET-CT examinations.

Authors:  Makoto Hosono; Mamoru Takenaka; Hajime Monzen; Mikoto Tamura; Masatoshi Kudo; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.