Mohd Hafizi Mahmud1, Abdul Jalil Nordin1, Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad1, Ahmad Zaid Fattah Azman1. 1. 1 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2 Centre for Diagnostic Nuclear Imaging, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia ; 3 Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, Selangor, Malaysia ; 4 Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased metabolic activity of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in tissue is not only resulting of pathological uptake, but due to physiological uptake as well. This study aimed to determine the impacts of biological and procedural factors on FDG uptake of liver in whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging. METHODS: Whole body fluorine-18 ((18)F) FDG PET/CT scans of 51 oncology patients have been reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of lesion-free liver was quantified in each patient. Pearson correlation was performed to determine the association between the factors of age, body mass index (BMI), blood glucose level, FDG dose and incubation period and liver SUVmax. Multivariate regression analysis was established to determine the significant factors that best predicted the liver SUVmax. Then the subjects were dichotomised into four BMI groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was established for mean difference of SUVmax of liver between those BMI groups. RESULTS: BMI and incubation period were significantly associated with liver SUVmax. These factors were accounted for 29.6% of the liver SUVmax variance. Statistically significant differences were observed in the mean SUVmax of liver among those BMI groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BMI and incubation period are significant factors affecting physiological FDG uptake of liver. It would be recommended to employ different cut-off value for physiological liver SUVmax as a reference standard for different BMI of patients in PET/CT interpretation and use a standard protocol for incubation period of patient to reduce variation in physiological FDG uptake of liver in PET/CT study.
BACKGROUND: Increased metabolic activity of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in tissue is not only resulting of pathological uptake, but due to physiological uptake as well. This study aimed to determine the impacts of biological and procedural factors on FDG uptake of liver in whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging. METHODS: Whole body fluorine-18 ((18)F) FDG PET/CT scans of 51 oncology patients have been reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of lesion-free liver was quantified in each patient. Pearson correlation was performed to determine the association between the factors of age, body mass index (BMI), blood glucose level, FDG dose and incubation period and liver SUVmax. Multivariate regression analysis was established to determine the significant factors that best predicted the liver SUVmax. Then the subjects were dichotomised into four BMI groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was established for mean difference of SUVmax of liver between those BMI groups. RESULTS: BMI and incubation period were significantly associated with liver SUVmax. These factors were accounted for 29.6% of the liver SUVmax variance. Statistically significant differences were observed in the mean SUVmax of liver among those BMI groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BMI and incubation period are significant factors affecting physiological FDG uptake of liver. It would be recommended to employ different cut-off value for physiological liver SUVmax as a reference standard for different BMI of patients in PET/CT interpretation and use a standard protocol for incubation period of patient to reduce variation in physiological FDG uptake of liver in PET/CT study.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT); body mass index (BMI); incubation period; liver; maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax)
Authors: Albert Dirisamer; Benjamin S Halpern; Wolfgang Schima; Martin Heinisch; Florian Wolf; Mohsen Beheshti; Franz Dirisamer; Michael Weber; Werner Langsteger Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Bennett B Chin; Edward D Green; Timothy G Turkington; Thomas C Hawk; R Edward Coleman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Hyun Bae Son; Chul Ju Han; Beung Il Kim; Jin Kim; Sook-Hyang Jeong; You Cheoul Kim; Jhin Oh Lee; Chang Yun Choi; Sang Mu Im Journal: Taehan Kan Hakhoe Chi Date: 2002-12
Authors: Gerben J C Zwezerijnen; Jakoba J Eertink; Maria C Ferrández; Sanne E Wiegers; Coreline N Burggraaff; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Martijn W Heymans; Henrica C W de Vet; Josée M Zijlstra; Ronald Boellaard Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 10.057