Literature DB >> 34550591

Meta-Analysis Methods of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.

Niki Dimou1, Pantelis Bagos2.   

Abstract

Meta-analytic techniques are used to combine the results of different studies that have evaluated the accuracy of diagnostic tests. In this article, we present univariate and multivariate meta-analysis methods for a single test and we provide an extensive description of methods for meta-analysis and comparison of multiple diagnostic tests. We close with a practical example of a meta-analysis that aimed to determine whether Rheumatoid Factor identifies patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic test; Meta-analysis; Multivariate methods; SROC method

Mesh：

Year:  2022        PMID： 34550591     DOI： 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN： 1064-3745


  32 in total

1.  A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations.

Authors:  C M Rutter; C A Gatsonis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment.

Authors:  Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Roger M Harbord; Jonathan J Deeks; Matthias Egger; Penny Whiting; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  Petra Macaskill
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  L R Arends; T H Hamza; J C van Houwelingen; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; T Stijnen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 8.  Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.

Authors:  Xiaoye Ma; Lei Nie; Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method.

Authors:  B Littenberg; L E Moses
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations.

Authors:  L E Moses; D Shapiro; B Littenberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.