Literature DB >> 14615004

The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Afina S Glas1, Jeroen G Lijmer, Martin H Prins, Gouke J Bonsel, Patrick M M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

Diagnostic testing can be used to discriminate subjects with a target disorder from subjects without it. Several indicators of diagnostic performance have been proposed, such as sensitivity and specificity. Using paired indicators can be a disadvantage in comparing the performance of competing tests, especially if one test does not outperform the other on both indicators. Here we propose the use of the odds ratio as a single indicator of diagnostic performance. The diagnostic odds ratio is closely linked to existing indicators, it facilitates formal meta-analysis of studies on diagnostic test performance, and it is derived from logistic models, which allow for the inclusion of additional variables to correct for heterogeneity. A disadvantage is the impossibility of weighing the true positive and false positive rate separately. In this article the application of the diagnostic odds ratio in test evaluation is illustrated.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14615004     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  648 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Audit and improve! Evaluation of a real-time probe-based PCR assay with internal control for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.

Authors:  M Inoue; W Y Tang; S Y Wee; T Barkham
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Evaluation of nonstructural 1 antigen assays for the diagnosis and surveillance of dengue in Singapore.

Authors:  Kwoon-Yong Pok; Yee-Ling Lai; Joshua Sng; Lee-Ching Ng
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.133

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography and CT perfusion for cerebral vasospasm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E D Greenberg; R Gold; M Reichman; M John; J Ivanidze; A M Edwards; C E Johnson; J P Comunale; P Sanelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Diagnostic value of IMP3 in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qianqian Wang; Tao Wang; Zhu Wang; Hong Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

6.  Accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Birger Michael Breum; Bo Rud; Thomas Kirkegaard; Tyge Nordentoft
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Performance Assessment of a Trypanosoma cruzi Chimeric Antigen in Multiplex Liquid Microarray Assays.

Authors:  Fred Luciano Neves Santos; Paola Alejandra Fiorani Celedon; Nilson Ivo Tonin Zanchin; Amanda Leitolis; Sandra Crestani; Leonardo Foti; Wayner Vieira de Souza; Yara de Miranda Gomes; Marco Aurélio Krieger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs for lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongchun Shen; Tao Wang; Ting Yang; Qianjing Hu; Chun Wan; Lei Chen; Fuqiang Wen
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-02-06

9.  Screening for depression in medical settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simon Gilbody; David Richards; Stephen Brealey; Catherine Hewitt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires.

Authors:  R Christopher Sheldrick; Susan Marakovitz; Daryl Garfinkel; Alice S Carter; Ellen C Perrin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.