Literature DB >> 23804970

Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.

Xiaoye Ma1, Lei Nie2, Stephen R Cole3, Haitao Chu4.   

Abstract

In this article, we present an overview and tutorial of statistical methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests under two scenarios: (1) when the reference test can be considered a gold standard and (2) when the reference test cannot be considered a gold standard. In the first scenario, we first review the conventional summary receiver operating characteristics approach and a bivariate approach using linear mixed models. Both approaches require direct calculations of study-specific sensitivities and specificities. We next discuss the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve approach for jointly modeling positivity criteria and accuracy parameters, and the bivariate generalized linear mixed models for jointly modeling sensitivities and specificities. We further discuss the trivariate generalized linear mixed models for jointly modeling prevalence, sensitivities and specificities, which allows us to assess the correlations among the three parameters. These approaches are based on the exact binomial distribution and thus do not require an ad hoc continuity correction. Lastly, we discuss a latent class random effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests when the reference test itself is imperfect for the second scenario. A number of case studies with detailed annotated SAS code in MIXED and NLMIXED procedures are presented to facilitate the implementation of these approaches.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; diagnostic test; generalized linear mixed models; gold standard

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804970      PMCID: PMC3883791          DOI: 10.1177/0962280213492588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  37 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards.

Authors:  S D Walter; L Irwig; P P Glasziou
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Fujian Song; Khalid S Khan; Jacqueline Dinnes; Alex J Sutton
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Shoulder ultrasonography versus arthroscopy for the detection of rotator cuff tears: analysis of errors.

Authors:  Kiran Singisetti; Andreas Hinsche
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.118

4.  What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.

Authors:  Michael J Sweeting; Alexander J Sutton; Paul C Lambert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The partial area under the summary ROC curve.

Authors:  S D Walter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; John R Thompson; Keith R Abrams
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Lei Nie; Stephen R Cole; Charles Poole
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Random Effects Models in a Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Two Diagnostic Tests Without a Gold Standard.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Sining Chen; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Assessing the dependence of sensitivity and specificity on prevalence in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy.

Authors:  M T Fahey; L Irwig; P Macaskill
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  24 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Chuan Hong; Yang Ning; Xiao Su
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and ROC Curves with Covariate Adjusted Semiparametric Mixtures.

Authors:  Philipp Doebler; Heinz Holling
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  A Bayesian hierarchical model for network meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Xiaoye Ma; Qinshu Lian; Haitao Chu; Joseph G Ibrahim; Yong Chen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies.

Authors:  Jin Piao; Yulun Liu; Yong Chen; Jing Ning
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Global identifiability of latent class models with applications to diagnostic test accuracy studies: A Gröbner basis approach.

Authors:  Rui Duan; Ming Cao; Yang Ning; Mingfu Zhu; Bin Zhang; Aidan McDermott; Haitao Chu; Xiaohua Zhou; Jason H Moore; Joseph G Ibrahim; Daniel O Scharfstein; Yong Chen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of multiple factors.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.273

7.  A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Yulun Liu; Haitao Chu; Mei-Ling Ting Lee; Christopher H Schmid
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A hybrid Bayesian hierarchical model combining cohort and case-control studies for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: Accounting for partial verification bias.

Authors:  Xiaoye Ma; Yong Chen; Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  A hybrid model for combining case-control and cohort studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Yulun Liu; Jing Ning; Janice Cormier; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 1.864

10.  A Bayesian approach for correcting exposure misclassification in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qinshu Lian; James S Hodges; Richard MacLehose; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.