Literature DB >> 8210827

Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations.

L E Moses1, D Shapiro, B Littenberg.   

Abstract

We consider how to combine several independent studies of the same diagnostic test, where each study reports an estimated false positive rate (FPR) and an estimated true positive rate (TPR). We propose constructing a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve by the following steps. (i) Convert each FPR to its logistic transform U and each TPR to its logistic transform V after increasing each observed frequency by adding 1/2. (ii) For each study calculate D = V - U, which is the log odds ratio of TPR and FPR, and S = V + U, an implied function of test threshold; then plot each study's point (Si, Di). (iii) Fit a robust-resistant regression line to these points (or an equally weighted least-squares regression line), with V - U as the dependent variable. (iv) Back-transform the line to ROC space. To avoid model-dependent extrapolation from irrelevant regions of ROC space we propose defining a priori a value of FPR so large that the test simply would not be used at that FPR, and a value of TPR so low that the test would not be used at that TPR. Then (a) only data points lying in the thus defined north-west rectangle of the unit square are used in the data analysis, and (b) the estimated summary ROC is depicted only within that subregion of the unit square. We illustrate the methods using simulated and real data sets, and we point to ways of comparing different tests and of taking into account the effects of covariates.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8210827     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780121403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  357 in total

1.  Anatomy of a meta-analysis: a critical review of "exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance".

Authors:  S M Kymes; D E Bruns; L J Shaw; K N Gillespie; J W Fletcher
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Marie E Westwood; Steven Kelly; Elizabeth Berry; John M Bamford; Michael J Gough; C Mark Airey; James F M Meaney; Linda M Davies; Jane Cullingworth; Michael A Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-26

Review 3.  Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.

Authors:  J J Deeks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

Review 4.  Diagnostic accuracy of serum 1,3-β-D-glucan for pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, invasive candidiasis, and invasive aspergillosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akira Onishi; Daisuke Sugiyama; Yoshinori Kogata; Jun Saegusa; Takeshi Sugimoto; Seiji Kawano; Akio Morinobu; Kunihiro Nishimura; Shunichi Kumagai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review.

Authors:  Honest Honest; Lucas M Bachmann; Janesh K Gupta; Jos Kleijnen; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

6.  Meta-analysis of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC 460 TB, with or without solid media, for detection of mycobacteria.

Authors:  M Cruciani; C Scarparo; M Malena; O Bosco; G Serpelloni; C Mengoli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brian H Willis; Muireann Quigley
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Laure Champ-Rigot; Rémy Morello; John W Riddell; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan J Deeks; Constantine Gatsonis; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Magnetocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajender Agarwal; Abhimanyu Saini; Tareq Alyousef; Craig A Umscheid
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.