Literature DB >> 11568945

A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations.

C M Rutter1, C A Gatsonis.   

Abstract

An important quality of meta-analytic models for research synthesis is their ability to account for both within- and between-study variability. Currently available meta-analytic approaches for studies of diagnostic test accuracy work primarily within a fixed-effects framework. In this paper we describe a hierarchical regression model for meta-analysis of studies reporting estimates of test sensitivity and specificity. The model allows more between- and within-study variability than fixed-effect approaches, by allowing both test stringency and test accuracy to vary across studies. It is also possible to examine the effects of study specific covariates. Estimates are computed using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation with publicly available software (BUGS). This estimation method allows flexibility in the choice of summary statistics. We demonstrate the advantages of this modelling approach using a recently published meta-analysis comparing three tests used to detect nodal metastasis of cervical cancer. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568945     DOI: 10.1002/sim.942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  372 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Louis W Wang; Magid A Fahim; Andrew Hayen; Ruth L Mitchell; Laura Baines; Stephen Lord; Jonathan C Craig; Angela C Webster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 2.  Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review.

Authors:  Honest Honest; Lucas M Bachmann; Janesh K Gupta; Jos Kleijnen; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

Review 3.  The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brian H Willis; Muireann Quigley
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  Does bleach processing increase the accuracy of sputum smear microscopy for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis?

Authors:  A Cattamanchi; J L Davis; M Pai; L Huang; P C Hopewell; K R Steingart
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Effects of duration of glucocorticoid therapy on relapse rate in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Walsh; Peter A Merkel; Alfred Mahr; David Jayne
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Authors:  L L Flores; K R Steingart; N Dendukuri; I Schiller; J Minion; M Pai; A Ramsay; M Henry; S Laal
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-08-10

7.  Effect of Varying Definitions of Hypopnea on the Diagnosis and Clinical Outcomes of Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Meghna P Mansukhani; Bhanu Prakash Kolla; Zhen Wang; Timothy I Morgenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan J Deeks; Constantine Gatsonis; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Serum amylase and lipase and urinary trypsinogen and amylase for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Gianluca Rompianesi; Angus Hann; Oluyemi Komolafe; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Sandro Pasquali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.