Literature DB >> 18591542

Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.

L R Arends1, T H Hamza, J C van Houwelingen, M H Heijenbrok-Kal, M G M Hunink, T Stijnen.   

Abstract

Meta-analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve data is often done with fixed-effects models, which suffer many shortcomings. Some random-effects models have been proposed to execute a meta-analysis of ROC-curve data, but these models are not often used in practice. Straightforward modeling techniques for multivariate random-effects meta-analysis of ROC-curve data are needed. The 1st aim of this article is to present a practical method that addresses the drawbacks of the fixed-effects summary ROC (SROC) method of Littenberg and Moses. Sensitivities and specificities are analyzed simultaneously using a bivariate random-effects model. The 2nd aim is to show that other SROC curves can also be derived from the bivariate model through different characterizations of the estimated bivariate normal distribution. Thereby the authors show that the bivariate random-effects approach not only extends the SROC approach but also provides a unifying framework for other approaches. The authors bring the statistical meta-analysis of ROC-curve data back into a framework of relatively standard multivariate meta-analysis with random effects. The analyses were carried out using the software package SAS (Proc NLMIXED).

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18591542     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08319957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  80 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Chuan Hong; Yang Ning; Xiao Su
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Bayesian meta-analysis of the accuracy of a test for tuberculous pleuritis in the absence of a gold standard reference.

Authors:  Nandini Dendukuri; Ian Schiller; Lawrence Joseph; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  FDG-PET in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Jun-Qiang Chen; Jin-Lu Liu; Xin-Gan Qin; Yuan Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Reliability and validity of depression assessment among persons with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander C Tsai
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 5.  Value of plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels for predicting postoperative atrial fibrillation: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guo-Long Cai; Jin Chen; Cai-Bao Hu; Mo-Lei Yan; Qiang-Hong Xu; Jing Yan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Assessing the dependence of sensitivity and specificity on prevalence in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 7.  Serum procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evridiki K Vouloumanou; Eleni Plessa; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Elpis Mantadakis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of level 3 portable sleep tests versus level 1 polysomnography for sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed El Shayeb; Leigh-Ann Topfer; Tania Stafinski; Lawrence Pawluk; Devidas Menon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten G Thomeer; Cees Gerestein; Sandra Spronk; Helena C van Doorn; Els van der Ham; Myriam G Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Hongfei Guo; Yijie Zhou
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.