Literature DB >> 34541866

Physical density estimations of single- and dual-energy CT using material-based forward projection algorithm: a simulation study.

Kai-Wen Li1,2, Daiyu Fujiwara3, Akihiro Haga3, Huisheng Liu1, Li-Sheng Geng1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of physical density prediction in single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) by adapting a fully simulation-based method using a material-based forward projection algorithm (MBFPA).
METHODS: We used biological tissues referenced in ICRU Report 44 and tissue substitutes to prepare three different types of phantoms for calibrating the Hounsfield unit (HU)-to-density curves. Sinograms were first virtually generated by the MBFPA with four representative energy spectra (i.e. 80 kVp, 100 kVp, 120 kVp, and 6 MVp) and then reconstructed to form realistic CT images by adding statistical noise. The HU-to-density curves in each spectrum and their pairwise combinations were derived from the CT images. The accuracy of these curves was validated using the ICRP110 human phantoms.
RESULTS: The relative mean square errors (RMSEs) of the physical density by the HU-to-density curves calibrated with kV SECT nearly presented no phantom size dependence. The kV-kV DECT calibrated curves were also comparable with those from the kV SECT. The phantom size effect became notable when the MV X-ray beams were employed for both SECT and DECT due to beam-hardening effects. The RMSEs were decreased using the biological tissue phantom.
CONCLUSION: Simulation-based density prediction can be useful in the theoretical analysis of SECT and DECT calibrations. The results of this study indicated that the accuracy of SECT calibration is comparable with that of DECT using biological tissues. The size and shape of the calibration phantom could affect the accuracy, especially for MV CT calibrations. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The present study is based on a full simulation environment, which accommodates various situations such as SECT, kV-kV DECT, and even kV-MV DECT. In this paper, we presented the advances pertaining to the accuracy of the physical density prediction when applied to SECT and DECT in the MV X-ray energy range. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to validate the physical density estimation both in SECT and DECT using human-type phantoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34541866      PMCID: PMC8631039          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  26 in total

1.  Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system.

Authors:  K J Ruchala; G H Olivera; E A Schloesser; T R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Functional forms for photon spectra of clinical linacs.

Authors:  E S M Ali; D W O Rogers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Potential of dual-energy subtraction for converting CT numbers to electron density based on a single linear relationship.

Authors:  Masatoshi Saito
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Sensitivity study for CT image use in Monte Carlo treatment planning.

Authors:  Frank Verhaegen; Slobodan Devic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni; A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Does kV-MV dual-energy computed tomography have an advantage in determining proton stopping power ratios in patients?

Authors:  M Yang; G Virshup; J Clayton; X R Zhu; R Mohan; L Dong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A comparison of relative proton stopping power measurements across patient size using dual- and single-energy CT.

Authors:  Gregory Michalak; Vicki Taasti; Bernhard Krauss; Amanda Deisher; Ahmed Halaweish; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations.

Authors:  K M Langen; S L Meeks; D O Poole; T H Wagner; T R Willoughby; P A Kupelian; K J Ruchala; J Haimerl; G H Olivera
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Fast kilovoltage/megavoltage (kVMV) breathhold cone-beam CT for image-guided radiotherapy of lung cancer.

Authors:  Hansjoerg Wertz; Dzmitry Stsepankou; Manuel Blessing; Michael Rossi; Chris Knox; Kevin Brown; Uwe Gros; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Cornelia Walter; Juergen Hesser; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The impact of mass density variations on an electron Monte Carlo algorithm for radiotherapy dose calculations.

Authors:  Raymond Fang; Thomas Mazur; Sasa Mutic; Rao Khan
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.