Literature DB >> 1437490

Perceptual processing of adjacent and nonadjacent tactile nontargets.

P M Evans1, J C Craig, M A Rinker.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that subjects appear unable to restrict processing to a single finger and ignore a stimulus presented to an adjacent finger. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that, at least for moving stimuli, an adjacent nontarget is fully processed to the level of incipient response activation. The present study replicated and expanded upon these original findings. The results of Experiment 1 showed that an equally large response-competition effect occurred when the nontarget was presented to adjacent and nonadjacent fingers (on the same hand). The results of Experiment 2 showed that the effects observed in Experiment 1 (and in previous studies) were also obtained with stationary stimuli. Although small, there was some indication in the results of Experiment 2 that interference may dissipate more rapidly with distance with stationary stimuli. An additional finding was that interference effects were observed in both experiments with temporal separations between the target and nontarget of up to 100 msec. In Experiment 3, target and nontarget stimuli were presented to opposite hands. Although reduced, interference was still evident with target and nontarget stimuli presented to opposite hands. Varying the physical distance between hands did not produce any change in the amount of interference. The results suggest that the focus of attention on the skin extends nearly undiminished across the fingers of one hand and is not dependent upon the physical distance between sites of stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1437490     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  25 in total

1.  Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

2.  Types and tokens in visual letter perception.

Authors:  M C Mozer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Bjork; J Thomas Murray
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Spatial factors in visual attention: some compensatory effects of location and time of arrival of nontargets.

Authors:  S E Gathercole; D E Broadbent
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The capacity of human subjects to process directional information provided at two skin sites.

Authors:  G K Essick; B L Whitsel
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  The cutaneous "rabbit": a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  F A Geldard; C E Sherrick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Effect of bracketing lines on speed of "same"-"different" judgment of two adjacent letters.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-05

8.  A theory of perceptual matching.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The perception of distance and location for dual tactile pressures.

Authors:  B G Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

10.  Response competition effects in same-different judgments.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; W P O'Hara; B Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-09
View more
  11 in total

1.  Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Curvature discrimination in various finger conditions.

Authors:  Bernard J van der Horst; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Tactile selective attention and temporal masking.

Authors:  J C Craig; P M Evans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

4.  The effect of location on the discrimination of spatial vibrotactile patterns.

Authors:  D T Horner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

5.  Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective attention in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Kristjana Hysaj; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Vibrotactile masking: the role of response competition.

Authors:  J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

8.  The effect of spatial orientation on the perception of moving tactile stimuli.

Authors:  M A Rinker; J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-09

9.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Using time to investigate space: a review of tactile temporal order judgments as a window onto spatial processing in touch.

Authors:  Tobias Heed; Elena Azañón
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.