Literature DB >> 9099070

Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.

L Paquet1, G L Craig.   

Abstract

In this article, we demonstrate that selective target processing is possible when the perceptual load of the task is low. We presented a row of three items with two different identities: one identity for the target letter and one for the two flankers (B. A. Eriksen & C. W. Eriksen, 1974). Such stimulus arrays have been defined as low-load displays (Lavie & Tsal, 1994). We investigated whether subjects could ignore the irrelevant flankers, which were never response alternatives, by manipulating the predictive relationship between the flankers and the response (Miller, 1987). In a high-correlation block, the identity of the flankers was highly predictive of the target identity, whereas in a low-correlation block, the predictive value of the flankers was reduced. We varied (1) whether or not the target location was precued, (2) the flanker's category (digit vs. letter), (3) the target-flanker proximity (near = .3 degree vs. far = 5 degrees), and (4) the size of the characters. The results indicate that subjects were influenced by the predictive value of near flankers and that the magnitude of this effect was jointly modulated by the target-flanker categorical overlap and by the size of the characters. In contrast, null flanker effects were obtained for far letter flankers in the precue condition, and for far digit flankers, regardless of attentional cuing. These findings (1) are inconsistent with suggestions (Lavie, 1995) that irrelevant stimuli automatically capture attention, and (2) support the notion that target-flanker distinctiveness plays a role when the perceptual load of the task is low.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9099070     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

2.  Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.

Authors:  L Paquet; C Lortie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

4.  Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.

Authors:  D LaBerge; V Brown; M Carter; D Bash; A Hartley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Boundary conditions on parallel processing in human vision.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Category effects in visual search: a failure to replicate the "oh-zero" phenomenon.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-09

7.  Selective attentional delays and attentional capture among simultaneous visual onset elements.

Authors:  L R Fournier
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

8.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Task combination and selective intake of information.

Authors:  D E Broadbent
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1982-07
View more
  15 in total

1.  Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B J Casey; K M Thomas; T F Welsh; R D Badgaiyan; C H Eccard; J R Jennings; E A Crone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: evidence for early selection.

Authors:  L Paquet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

Review 3.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

4.  Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.

Authors:  Chunhong He; Antao Chen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-08-04

5.  On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task.

Authors:  Carola Lehle; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

6.  Perceptual load in sport and the heuristic value of the perceptual load paradigm in examining expertise-related perceptual-cognitive adaptations.

Authors:  Philip Furley; Daniel Memmert; Simone Schmid
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-10-10

7.  Contributions of human parietal and frontal cortices to attentional control during conflict resolution: a 1-Hz offline rTMS study.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Bettina Olk; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effect of Parkinson's disease on interference control during action selection.

Authors:  S A Wylie; W P M van den Wildenberg; K R Ridderinkhof; T R Bashore; V D Powell; C A Manning; G F Wooten
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies.

Authors:  Adam T Biggs; Bradley S Gibson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-19

10.  Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.