Literature DB >> 1549438

Response competition: a major source of interference in a tactile identification task.

P M Evans1, J C Craig.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the ability of subjects to identify a moving, tactile stimulus. In both experiments, the subjects were presented with a target to their left index fingerpad and a nontarget (also moving) to their left middle fingerpad. Subjects were instructed to attend only to the target location and to respond "1" if the stimulus moved either to the left or up the finger, and to respond "2" if the stimulus moved either right or down the finger. The results showed that accuracy was better and reaction times were faster when the target and nontarget moved in the same direction than when they moved in different directions. When the target and nontarget moved in different directions, accuracy was significantly better and reaction times were significantly faster when the two stimuli had the same assigned response than when they had different responses. The results provide support for the conclusion that movement information is processed across adjacent fingers to the level of incipient response activation, even when subjects attempt to focus their attention on one location on the skin.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1549438     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF DOUBLE SIMULTANEOUS STIMULATION OF THE SKIN.

Authors:  C E SHERRICK
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1964-03

2.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Bjork; J Thomas Murray
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Spatial factors in visual attention: some compensatory effects of location and time of arrival of nontargets.

Authors:  S E Gathercole; D E Broadbent
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J D St James
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

5.  In defense of intraperceptual theories of attention.

Authors:  W A Johnston; V J Dark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task.

Authors:  R W Proctor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-05

7.  Effects of noise letters on decisions: discrete or continuous flow of information?

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-03

8.  Task combination and selective intake of information.

Authors:  D E Broadbent
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1982-07

9.  Vibrotactile masking: a comparison of energy and pattern maskers.

Authors:  J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-06

10.  The time course of preparation.

Authors:  P Bertelson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  9 in total

1.  Perceptual processing of adjacent and nonadjacent tactile nontargets.

Authors:  P M Evans; J C Craig; M A Rinker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Tactile selective attention and temporal masking.

Authors:  J C Craig; P M Evans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

3.  Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.

Authors:  L Paquet; G L Craig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-03

5.  You can't ignore what you can't separate: the effect of visually induced target-distractor separation on tactile selection.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

6.  Vision of embodied rubber hands enhances tactile distractor processing.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Vibrotactile masking: the role of response competition.

Authors:  J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

8.  The effect of spatial orientation on the perception of moving tactile stimuli.

Authors:  M A Rinker; J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-09

Review 9.  Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.