| Literature DB >> 34345640 |
Thorsten Gehrke1, Mustafa Citak1, Hussein Abdelaziz1.
Abstract
Catastrophic failure of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty is still occasionally described. We report on a new case of complete atraumatic penetration of an intact ceramic head through the titanium cup in a cementless total hip arthroplasty due to dramatic polyethylene and metal wear. We reviewed the literature for similar cases and analyzed potential risk factors. Most importantly, revision of radiologically worn liners should not be postponed, especially in young and active patients with conventional liners, because the time to dramatic failure could be shorter than expected.Entities:
Keywords: Catastrophic failure; Metallosis; Penetration; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Wear
Year: 2021 PMID: 34345640 PMCID: PMC8319508 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.06.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthroplast Today ISSN: 2352-3441
Figure 1Radiographs from April 2019 (a), November 2020 (b), and January 2021 (c) showing the progression of the massive polyethylene and metal wear leading to penetration of the ceramic head through the superolateral part of the cementless titanium cup. The bubble sign of sever metallosis can be seen in Figure 1c.
Figure 2The explanted prosthesis components showing the extensive wear of both the conventional liner and the cementless titanium cup. The penetrated ceramic head shows only black-metallic discoloration without fracture.
Figure 3Postoperative radiograph showing the reconstruction of the left acetabulum with a revision tantalum shell. A dual mobility cup was cemented inside it. Eccentric head position can be noted on the right side with the same failed components on the left side; therefore, a future revision was scheduled.
Retrieved cases from the literature with penetration of an intact ceramic femoral head through a metal cup due to massive wear of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.
| Author year | Gender | Age (revision/implantation) | Body mass index | Complaint | Time to failure (y) | Year of implantation | Location of penetration | Cup/diameter | Liner thickness | Head | Stem revised | Manufacturer | Possible risk factor by author |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon/1998 [ | F | 35/29 | Groin pain for 18 mo | 6 | <1992 | Lateral | OptiFox 46 mm | 3 mm | 28 alumina | No | Smith & Nephew Richards, Memphis, TN (cup). Depuy, Warsaw, IN (head) | Thin liner, wear at metal-polythylene interface, young and active patient | |
| Simon/1998 [ | M | 65/58 | Squeaking | 7 | 1989 | Lateral | OptiFox 54 mm | 3 mm | 32 alumina | No | Smith & Nephew Richards, Memphis, TN | Thin liner, wear at metal-polythylene interface, high demand of young and active patient | |
| Tsarouhas/2008 [ | F | 72/69 | Pain for 4 mo, squeaking | 3 | <2005 | Lateral | Press-fit 46 mm | 28 alumina | Plus Orthopedics, Switzerland | ||||
| Needham/2008 [ | F | 49/33 | Instability and discomfort for 3 wk | 16 | <1992 | Lateral | OptiFix 56 mm | 3.7 mm | 32 alumina Biolox forte | Yes | Smith & Nephew Richards, Memphis, TN (cup). Plochingen, Germany (Biolox forte head) | Thin liner, wear at metal-polythylene interface, high demand of young and active patient, foreign body debris, incresed cup inclination angle | |
| Sathappan/2009 [ | F | 85/72 | 23 | Pain for 3 mo, inability to bear | 13 | <1996 | Lateral | 56 mm | No | Depuy, Leeds, United Kingdom | |||
| Knox/2009 [ | F | 51/42 | Increasing pain over about 2 y | 9 | <2000 | Lateral | Furlong cup | 10 mm | 28 mm | No | JRI, London, UK | ||
| Malizos/2009 [ | M | 38/24 | 14 | <1995 | Lateral | OptiFix 54 mm | 3 mm | 32 mm alumina Biolox | No | Smith & Nephew Richards, Memphis, Tennessee | |||
| Mariconda/2010 [ | F | 50/39 | 27 | Increasing pain for 6 mo | 11 | 1995 | Lateral | Expansion cup 50 mm | Conventional | 32 mm alumina | No | Center pulse, Sulzer/Winterthur, Switzerland | Increased cup inclination angle, expansion cup design |
| Yoon/2012 [ | M | 53/37 | Increasing pain | 16 | 1991 | Lateral | Optifix | 9 mm, conventional | 32 mm alumina | No | Smith & Nephew Richards, Memphis, Tennessee | Inclination angle, bilateral affection | |
| Manzano/2014 [ | M | 57/47 | Increasing pain over months | 10 | 1994-1995 | Central | 54 mm | Conventional | 28 mm | No | Wright Technologies, Arlington, TN | Conventional liner | |
| Joyce/2017 [ | M | 50/47 | Pain for >1 mo | 3 | 2009 | Central | No | Cup positioning, patient activity | |||||
| Malahias/ 2019 [ | F | 74/53 | 20 | Pain, limping | 21 | 1996 | Central | REFLECTION 48 mm | Conventional | 28 mm | Yes | Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA | Young and active patient, Conventional liner |
| Current case | F | 69/47 | 27 | Limp, squeaking, mild pain for few months | 22 | 1998 | Lateral | SL cup | Conventional | 28 mm | No | Protek/Zimmer | Young and active patient, conventional linear, increased cup inclination, cup design with multiple holes, multiple joint replacement |