Literature DB >> 25516002

There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.

Cody C Wyles1, Jose H Jimenez-Almonte, Mohammad H Murad, German A Norambuena-Morales, Miguel E Cabanela, Rafael J Sierra, Robert T Trousdale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly being performed in patients with long life expectancies and active lifestyles. Newer implant bearing surfaces, with superior wear characteristics, often are used in this cohort with the goal of improving longevity of the prosthesis, but comparisons across the numerous available bearing surfaces are limited, so the surgeon and patient may have difficulty deciding which implants to use. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to answer the following question: Is there a short- to mid-term survivorship difference between common THA bearings used in patients younger than age 65 years?
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published after 2000 that reported survivorship of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), ceramic-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene (CoPxl), or metal-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene (MoPxl) bearings. To qualify for our review, RCTs had to have a minimum 2-year followup and study patients were required to have an average age younger than 65 years. Direct-comparison meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed to combine direct and indirect evidence.
RESULTS: Direct-comparison meta-analysis found no differences among the bearing surfaces in terms of the risk of revision; this approach demonstrated a risk ratio for revision of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-2.23; p = 0.50) between CoC and CoPxl and a risk ratio for revision of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.06-2.63; p = 0.34) between CoC and MoPxl. Network meta-analysis (with post hoc modification) likewise found no differences in survivorship across the three implant types, demonstrating the following probabilities of most effective implant with 95% credible intervals (CrI): CoC = 64.6% (0%-100%); CoPxl = 24.9% (0%-100%); and MoPxl = 9.9% (0%-100%). The CrIs ranged from 0% to 100% for all three bearing surfaces. Direct-comparison meta-analysis allowed for pooling of five RCTs, including 779 THAs, whereas network meta-analysis (before post hoc analysis) enabled pooling of 18 RCTs, including 2599 THAs.
CONCLUSIONS: Current published evidence does not support survivorship differences among commonly used bearing surfaces in patients younger than age 65 years undergoing THA at short- to mid-term followup. Long-term RCT data will be needed to determine if a survivorship benefit is realized in younger, more active patients over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25516002      PMCID: PMC4419002          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-4065-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  50 in total

1.  A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing three alternative bearing surfaces in primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  V S Nikolaou; M R Edwards; E Bogoch; E H Schemitsch; J P Waddell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  The case of the misleading funnel plot.

Authors:  Joseph Lau; John P A Ioannidis; Norma Terrin; Christopher H Schmid; Ingram Olkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-16

3.  A double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  George T Calvert; Peter A Devane; Jan Fielden; Kathryn Adams; J Geoffrey Horne
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Optimal bearing surfaces for total hip replacement in the young patient: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vijay Shetty; Bhushan Shitole; Gautam Shetty; Harshad Thakur; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute minimally displaced and undisplaced scaphoid waist fractures: pairwise and network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Talal Ibrahim; Assad Qureshi; Alex J Sutton; Joseph J Dias
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and the Hip Society.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Adolph V Lombardi; Joshua J Jacobs; Thomas K Fehring; Courtland G Lewis; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate new technologies in orthopaedics. The case of alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Saam Morshed; Marc D Silverstein; Harry E Rubash; James G Kahn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  5-year experience of highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets: two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm; Jonas Thanner; Peter Herberts
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; Milo A Puhan; Swaroop S Vedula; Sonal Singh; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers.

Authors:  Jeroen P Jansen; Huseyin Naci
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [Tribology in hip arthroplasty : Benefits of different materials].

Authors:  J Philippe Kretzer; Maximilian Uhler; Sebastian Jäger; Therese Bormann; Robert Sonntag; Mareike Schonhoff; Stefan Schröder
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Polyethylene Wear Increases in Liners Articulating With Scratched Oxidized Zirconium Femoral Heads.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Effect of Bearing Surface on Survival of Cementless and Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty: Study of Data in the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

Authors:  Edward T Davis; Joseph Pagkalos; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 4.  Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo; Emmanuel Gibon; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.166

5.  Outcome in design-specific comparisons between highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Per-Erik Johanson; Ove Furnes; Leif Ivar Havelin; Anne Marie Fenstad; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Keijo Mäkelä; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: what is justified?

Authors:  Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11

7.  Bearing surfaces in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luigi Zagra; Enrico Gallazzi
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

Review 8.  Choice of implant combinations in total hip replacement: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  José A López-López; Rachel L Humphriss; Andrew D Beswick; Howard H Z Thom; Linda P Hunt; Amanda Burston; Christopher G Fawsitt; William Hollingworth; Julian P T Higgins; Nicky J Welton; Ashley W Blom; Elsa M R Marques
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-11-02

9.  Comparison of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing vs ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene-bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head: a prospective cohort study with a mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Bin Feng; Yi Ren; Shiliang Cao; Jin Lin; Jin Jin; Wenwei Qian; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  The effect of bearing type on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rinne M Peters; Liza N Van Steenbergen; Martin Stevens; Paul C Rijk; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Wierd P Zijlstra
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.