Literature DB >> 34307736

Effect of beam quality and readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of photostimulable phosphor systems via the edge method.

Shinya Takarabe1,2, Taku Kuramoto1, Yusuke Shibayama1, Hiroki Tsuru1, Masato Tatsumi1, Toyoyuki Kato1, Kazutoshi Okamura2, Kazunori Yoshiura2.   

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of (i) the difference in the beam qualities on the presampled modulation transfer function (MTF) using the edge method and (ii) the readout direction of the edge profile for the photostimulable phosphor (PSP) system. Approach: The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) defined a technique using the "radiation qualities based on a phantom made up of an aluminum added filter" (RQA). A general radiographic system with a tube voltage of 50 kV and 9.7 mm of additional aluminum filtration was used to conform the x-ray to the IEC-specified beam quality definition RQA3. Additionally, we employed two different beams with tube voltages of 60 and 70 kV using a dental x-ray unit. The MTF was measured in the readout direction from low-to-high exposure regions and vice versa with respect to the scanning and subscanning directions of the PSP system.
Results: The difference in the 50%MTF value for all directions between 60 and 70 kV averaged less than 0.05 . The 50%MTF of RQA3 was on average 0.2 lower than the value for 60 kV for each direction. For all beam qualities, no difference was observed between the MTFs measured in the readout direction from the low-to-high exposure regions and vice versa. Conclusions: The MTFs, measured using the dental x-ray unit, were unaffected by the tube voltage, and they were slightly higher than those measured using the RQA3. Furthermore, the MTF was unaffected by the differences in the readout directions of the edge profile.
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental equipment; dental radiography; image analysis; modulation transfer function; quality control

Year:  2021        PMID: 34307736      PMCID: PMC8291077          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.4.043501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  30 in total

1.  Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; H C Stamatakis; U Welander; W D McDavid; X Q Shi; S Ban; T Kawazu; M Tatsumi; S Kanda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Performance evaluation of a "dual-side read" dedicated mammography computed radiography system.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fetterly; Beth A Schueler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Relationship between radiation dose reduction and image quality change in photostimulable phosphor luminescence X-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  T Sakurai; R Kawamata; Y Kozai; Y Kaku; K Nakamura; M Saito; H Wakao; I Kashima
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Effect of readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of computed radiographic systems by use of the edge method.

Authors:  Nobukazu Tanaka; Junji Morishita; Norisato Tsuda; Masafumi Ohki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-06-04

5.  The modulation transfer function and signal-to-noise ratio of different digital filters: a technical approach.

Authors:  D D Brüllmann; B d'Hoedt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device.

Authors:  S M Kengyelics; J H Launders; A R Cowen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Series: Practical Evaluation of Clinical Image Quality (2): Image Quality Measurements for Digital Radiography Systems.

Authors:  Reiji Katayama
Journal:  Igaku Butsuri       Date:  2016

8.  Effects of scintillator on the modulation transfer function (MTF) of a digital imaging system.

Authors:  Taeko T Farman; Robert H Vandre; John C Pajak; Stuart R Miller; Alex Lempicki; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-05

9.  Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study.

Authors:  X J Rong; C C Shaw; X Liu; M R Lemacks; S K Thompson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.

Authors:  Taku Kuramoto; Shinya Takarabe; Kazutoshi Okamura; Kenshi Shiotsuki; Yusuke Shibayama; Hiroki Tsuru; Hiroshi Akamine; Masato Tatsumi; Toyoyuki Kato; Junji Morishita; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.