Literature DB >> 20395461

Relationship between radiation dose reduction and image quality change in photostimulable phosphor luminescence X-ray imaging systems.

T Sakurai1, R Kawamata, Y Kozai, Y Kaku, K Nakamura, M Saito, H Wakao, I Kashima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to clarify the change in image quality upon X-ray dose reduction and to re-analyse the possibility of X-ray dose reduction in photostimulable phosphor luminescence (PSPL) X-ray imaging systems. In addition, the study attempted to verify the usefulness of multiobjective frequency processing (MFP) and flexible noise control (FNC) for X-ray dose reduction.
METHODS: Three PSPL X-ray imaging systems were used in this study. Modulation transfer function (MTF), noise equivalent number of quanta (NEQ) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) were evaluated to compare the basic physical performance of each system. Subjective visual evaluation of diagnostic ability for normal anatomical structures was performed. The NEQ, DQE and diagnostic ability were evaluated at base X-ray dose, and 1/3, 1/10 and 1/20 of the base X-ray dose.
RESULTS: The MTF of the systems did not differ significantly. The NEQ and DQE did not necessarily depend on the pixel size of the system. The images from all three systems had a higher diagnostic utility compared with conventional film images at the base and 1/3 X-ray doses. The subjective image quality was better at the base X-ray dose than at 1/3 of the base dose in all systems. The MFP and FNC-processed images had a higher diagnostic utility than the images without MFP and FNC.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSPL imaging systems may allow a reduction in the X-ray dose to one-third of that required for conventional film. It is suggested that MFP and FNC are useful for radiation dose reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20395461      PMCID: PMC3520230          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/44413341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  11 in total

Review 1.  Digital imaging for dental caries.

Authors:  A Wenzel
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2000-04

2.  Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  R H Vandre; J C Pajak; H Abdel-Nabi; T T Farman; A G Farman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Digital imaging modalities for dental practice.

Authors:  M Wakoh; K Kuroyanagi
Journal:  Bull Tokyo Dent Coll       Date:  2001-02

4.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set.

Authors:  Ulrich Neitzel; Susanne Günther-Kohfahl; Giovanni Borasi; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Effectiveness of flexible noise control image processing for digital portal images using computed radiography.

Authors:  S Yamada; K Murase
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.

Authors:  E Borg; H G Gröndahl
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 8.  Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry.

Authors:  C H Versteeg; G C Sanderink; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1997 May-Jul       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Unsharp masking technique using multiresolution analysis for computed radiography image enhancement.

Authors:  M Ogoda; K Hishinuma; M Yamada; K Shimura
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Improvement of lung abnormality detection in computed radiography using multi-objective frequency processing: Evaluation by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tagashira; Kenji Arakawa; Masahiro Yoshimoto; Teruhito Mochizuki; Kenya Murase; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of proximal enamel subsurface demineralization and its relationship with calcium loss and lesion depth.

Authors:  E Onem; B G Baksi; B H Sen; O Sögüt; A Mert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The effect of delayed scanning of storage phosphor plates on occlusal caries detection.

Authors:  E Sogur; B G Baksi; A Mert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Effect of Different Tube Potential Settings on Caries Detection using PSP Plate and Conventional Film.

Authors:  Daniela Pita De Melo; Adriana Dibo Cruz; Saulo Leonardo Sousa Melo; Julyanna Filgueiras GonçAlves De Farias; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Solange Maria De Almeida
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  [Low-dose digital breast tomosynthsis imaging via noise correlation based penalized weighted least-squares algorithm].

Authors:  Meiling Chen; Xi Tao; Huayong Li; Wufan Chen; Hua Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-01-30

5.  Effect of beam quality and readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of photostimulable phosphor systems via the edge method.

Authors:  Shinya Takarabe; Taku Kuramoto; Yusuke Shibayama; Hiroki Tsuru; Masato Tatsumi; Toyoyuki Kato; Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-20

6.  Advances in multiscale image processing and its effects on image quality in skeletal radiography.

Authors:  Susan Notohamiprodjo; K M Roeper; F G Mueck; D Maxien; F Wanninger; B Hoberg; L Verstreepen; K M Treitl; F Fischer; O Peschel; S Wirth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.