Literature DB >> 25621858

Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically.

David Dubois1, Derek D Rucker2, Adam D Galinsky3.   

Abstract

Are the rich more unethical than the poor? To answer this question, the current research introduces a key conceptual distinction between selfish and unethical behavior. Based on this distinction, the current article offers 2 novel findings that illuminate the relationship between social class and unethical behavior. First, the effects of social class on unethical behavior are not invariant; rather, the effects of social class are moderated by whether unethical behavior benefits the self or others. Replicating past work, social class positively predicted unethical behavior; however, this relationship was only observed when that behavior was self-beneficial. When unethical behavior was performed to benefit others, social class negatively predicted unethical behavior; lower class individuals were more likely than upper class individuals to engage in unethical behavior. Overall, social class predicts people's tendency to behave selfishly, rather than predicting unethical behavior per se. Second, individuals' sense of power drove the effects of social class on unethical behavior. Evidence for this relationship was provided in three forms. First, income, but not education level, predicted unethical behavior. Second, feelings of power mediated the effect of social class on unethical behavior, but feelings of status did not. Third, two distinct manipulations of power produced the same moderation by self-versus-other beneficiary as was found with social class. The current theoretical framework and data both synthesize and help to explain a range of findings in the social class and power literatures. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25621858     DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  28 in total

1.  The Effects of Social Class on Individuals' Decision-Making Tendencies in a Prestige-Money Game: Social Value or Instrumental Value?

Authors:  Pei Wang; Cheng-Hao Tang
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2019-12

2.  Age differences in the understanding of wealth and power: the mediating role of future time perspective.

Authors:  Tianyuan Li; Vivian Hiu-Ling Tsang
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2016-06-14

3.  Entrepreneurship and Eudaimonic Well-Being: Five Venues for New Science.

Authors:  Carol D Ryff
Journal:  J Bus Ventur       Date:  2018-10-01

4.  Change the things you can: Emotion regulation is more beneficial for people from lower than from higher socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Allison S Troy; Brett Q Ford; Kateri McRae; Pareezad Zarolia; Iris B Mauss
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-08-25

5.  A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.

Authors:  Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff; Stefan C Schmukle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Status, Power, and Intergroup Relations: The Personal Is the Societal.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske; Cydney H Dupree; Gandalf Nicolas; Jillian K Swencionis
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2016-10

7.  Eudaimonic well-being, inequality, and health: Recent findings and future directions.

Authors:  Carol D Ryff
Journal:  Int Rev Econ       Date:  2017-03-30

8.  Study Protocol on Ecological Momentary Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life Using a Smartphone Application.

Authors:  Silvana Mareva; David Thomson; Pietro Marenco; Víctor Estal Muñoz; Caroline V Ott; Barbara Schmidt; Tobias Wingen; Angelos P Kassianos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-18

9.  Higher socioeconomic status does not predict decreased prosocial behavior in a field experiment.

Authors:  James Andreoni; Nikos Nikiforakis; Jan Stoop
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Human pursuance of equality hinges on mental processes of projecting oneself into the perspectives of others and into future situations.

Authors:  Hirofumi Takesue; Carlos Makoto Miyauchi; Shiro Sakaiya; Hongwei Fan; Tetsuya Matsuda; Junko Kato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.