| Literature DB >> 34207162 |
Carmela Carnevale1, Ivano Riva2, Gloria Roberti1, Manuele Michelessi1, Lucia Tanga1, Alice C Verticchio Vercellin3, Luca Agnifili4, Gianluca Manni1,5, Alon Harris3, Luciano Quaranta2, Francesco Oddone1.
Abstract
Glaucoma patients often suffer from ocular surface disease (OSD) caused by the chronic administration of topical anti-glaucoma medications, especially in cases of long-term therapy with preserved or multiple drugs. Additionally, glaucoma surgery may determine ocular surface changes related to the formation and location of the filtering bleb, the application of anti-mitotic agents, and the post-operative wound-healing processes within the conjunctiva. Recently, several studies have evaluated the role of advanced diagnostic imaging technologies such as in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detecting microscopic and macroscopic features of glaucoma therapy-related OSD. Their clinical applications are still being explored, with recent particular attention paid to analyzing the effects of new drug formulations and of minimally invasive surgical procedures on the ocular surface status. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the main changes of the ocular surface identified at IVCM and AS-OCT in glaucoma patients under medical therapy, or after surgical treatment.Entities:
Keywords: anterior segment optical coherence tomography; glaucoma; in vivo confocal microscopy; medical treatment; ocular surface; surgical treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34207162 PMCID: PMC8234834 DOI: 10.3390/ph14060581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) of the ocular surface tissues in multi-treated medically controlled glaucoma. (A–E) Confocal frames taken from a patient controlled with a preserved fixed combination of timolol and dorzolamide and a preservative-free prostaglandin analog (PGA) (three eyedrops per day). (A) Goblet cells (GCs). GCs appear as hyper-reflective elements (black arrowhead) dispersed within the epithelium, and often appear scattered with an evident reduction of their density. (B) Inflammatory infiltrates. Inflammatory infiltrates appear as clusters of small hyper-reflective and mono-nucleate elements (presumably lymphocytes) infiltrating the epithelium of the tarsal or bulbar conjunctiva. (C) Epithelial microcysts. These structures (white asterisk) represent hallmarks of aqueous humor outflow stimulation through the uveo-scleral route, rather than detrimental effects induced by medications. (D) Meibomian glands. These glands appear markedly reduced in their dimension, with hyper-reflectivity of acinar wall and interstice; the black arrow indicates a glandular acinus. (E) CALT. Roundish immune follicles (black asterisk) appear infiltrated by numerous small hyper-reflective mono-nucleate cells (presumably lymphocytes). (F–L) Confocal frames taken from a patient controlled with a preserved fixed combination of timolol and dorzolamide, PGA, and brimonidine (five preserved eyedrops per day). (F,L) Limbal transition epithelium. The transition epithelium of the limbus appears irregular with scattered and highly hyper-reflective inflammatory elements (L), and with evident features of cellular polymegathism (undulated white arrow). (G–I) Cornea. The sub-epithelial layer and the Bowman’s membrane (G,H) present infiltration and activation of numerous dendritic cells (white arrowhead), with alterations of sub-basal nerve plexus morphology (white arrow). The corneal epithelium (I) appears markedly irregular with a higher degree of cellular polymorphism and polymegatysm. Bar represents 50 µm.
Summary of clinical studies evaluating the main morphological changes induced by beta-blocker and prostaglandin analogue monotherapy on the ocular surface using IVCM and AS-OCT.
| Ocular Tissue | Authors | Year | Technique | Study Population | Specific Therapy | Main Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ciancaglini M. et al. [ | 2008 | IVCM a | Untreated OH b
| Preserved timolol 0.5% | In glaucoma patients with respect to healthy controls: Evidence of conjunctival EM d in OH b and POAG c groups [ Increase in DCs’e density and SFD f [ Decrease of GCs’ l density [ Increase of GCs’ l density in patients treated with PF h tafluprost [ |
| Preserved levobunolol 0.5% | ||||||
| Latanoprost 0.005% | ||||||
| Travoprost 0.004% | ||||||
| Bimatoprost 0.03% | ||||||
| Ciancaglini M. et al. [ | 2008 | IVCM a, IC g | OH b | Preserved levobunolol | ||
| POAG c | PF h levobunolol | |||||
| Mastropasqua L. et al. [ | 2013 | LSCM k, IC g | POAG c | Preserved latanoprost | ||
| Healthy controls | PF h tafluprost | |||||
| Figus M. et al. [ | 2014 | LSCM k | POAG c | Bimatoprost 0.01% | ||
| Bimatoprost 0.03% | ||||||
| Frezzotti P. et al. [ | 2014 | IVCM a | OH b
| Preserved timolol | ||
| PF h timolol | ||||||
| Zhu W. et al. [ | 2015 | IVCM a | POAG c | Carteolol hydrochloride 2% | ||
| Healthy controls | Travoprost 0.004% | |||||
|
| Baratz K. et al. [ | 2006 | IVCM a | OH b (medication group) OH b (observation group) | timolol 0.5% | In glaucoma patients with respect to healthy controls: Decrease in sub-basal plexus nerve density [ Decrease in endothelial cell density [ Increase in nerve tortuosity [ Increase in keratocyte stromal density [ Increase in stromal reflectivity [ Increase in DCs’ n density [ Decrease of corneal thickness measurements at AS-OCT r [ Less confocal changes of the cornea parameters (epithelial, endothelial, and dendritic cells’ density; sub-basal nerve reflectivity; tortuosity; and beading) in glaucoma patients treated with PF h medications [ At limbus: higher limbal inflammation, irregularity of the transition epithelium, DCs’ n activation, and fibrosis of the Vogt’s palisades in patients receiving BAK q preserved drugs [ |
| betaxolol 0.25% | ||||||
| Latanoprost 0.005% | ||||||
| Unoprostone 0.15% | ||||||
| Martone G. et al. [ | 2009 | IVCM a | OH b
| Preserved timolol 0.5% | ||
| PF h timolol 0.5% | ||||||
| Bergonzi C. et al. [ | 2010 | IVCM a | POAG c | BB i (not specified) | ||
| PGA j (not specified) | ||||||
| Ranno S. et al. [ | 2011 | IVCM a | POAG c | BB i (not specified) | ||
| Healthy controls | PGA j (not specified) | |||||
| Rossi G.C.M. et al. [ | 2013 | IVCM a | OH b
| PF h Tafluprost | ||
| Fogagnolo P. et al. [ | 2015 | IVCM a | OH b
| Unpreserved tafluprost 0.0015% | ||
| Preserved latanoprost 0.005% + | ||||||
| Mastropasqua R. et al. [ | 2015 | LSCM k, IC g | POAG c
| Preserved timolol 0.5% | ||
| PF h timolol 0.5% | ||||||
| Preserved bimatoprost 0.001% | ||||||
| PF h tafluprost 0.015% | ||||||
| Mastropasqua R. et al. [ | 2016 | IVCM a | OAG m
| Preserved timolol 0.5% | ||
| PF h timolol 0.5% | ||||||
| Preserved bimatoprost 0.001% | ||||||
| PF h tafluprost 0.015% | ||||||
| Rolle T. et al. [ | 2017 | IVCM a | OH b
| PF h Timolol 0.1% | ||
| Tafluprost 0.0015% | ||||||
| Rossi G.C.M. et al. [ | 2019 | IVCM a | OH b
| Preserved BB i (not specified) | ||
| PF h Tafluprost | ||||||
| Preserved bimatoprost 0.003% | ||||||
| Preserved travoprost 0.004% | ||||||
| Cennamo G. et al. [ | 2018 | AS-OCT r, SEM s | OAG m
| Preserved monotherapy | ||
| Batawi H. et al. [ | 2018 | AS-OCT r | POAG c | Timolol 0.005% | ||
| Healthy controls | Latanoprost | |||||
| Montorio D. et al. [ | 2020 | AS-OCT r | POAG c | BB i (not specified) | ||
| Healthy controls | PGA j (not specified) | |||||
| Dogan E. et al. [ | 2020 | AS-OCT r | POAG c
| BB i (not specified) | ||
| PGA j (not specified) | ||||||
|
| Agnifili L. et al. [ | 2020 | AS-OCT r | POAG c
| BB i (not specified) | Decrease in TMH v and TMA w in glaucoma patients with respect to healthy subjects |
| PGA j (not specified) | TMH v and TMA w negatively correlated with OSDI x score |
a IVCM = in vivo confocal microscopy; b OH = ocular hypertension; c POAG = primary open angle glaucoma; d EM = epithelial microcysts; e DCs = dendritic cells; f SFD = subepithelial collagen fiber diameter; g IC = impression citology; h PF = preservative free; i BB = beta-blocker; j PGA = prostaglandin analogue; k LSCM = laser scanning confocal microscopy; l GCs = goblet cells; m OAG = open angle glaucoma; n DCs = dendritic cells; o PXG = pseudoesfoliative glaucoma; p NTG = normal tension glaucoma; q BAK = benzalkonium chloride; r AS-OCT = anterior segment optical coherence tomography; s SEM = scanning electron microscopy; t PACG = primary angle closure glaucoma; u EDE = evaporative dry eye; v TMH = tear meniscus height; w TMA = tear meniscus area; x OSDI = ocular surface disease index.
Summary of clinical studies evaluating the main morphological changes induced by combined therapy on the ocular surface using IVCM and AS-OCT.
| Ocular Tissue | Authors | Year | Technique | Study Population | Specific Therapy | Main Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ciancaglini M. et al. [ | 2008 | IVCM a | Untreated OH b | Unfixed CT d: | In the case of multitherapy with respect to monotherapy: Higher EM e density and area [ Higher DCs’ f density [ Greater GCs’ g loss [ |
| latanoprost/timolol | ||||||
| travoprost/timolol | ||||||
| bimatoprost/timolol | ||||||
| Zhu W. et al. [ | 2015 | IVCM a | POAG c | CT d: | ||
| Healthy controls | Two or three drugs (not specified) | |||||
| Di Staso S. et al. [ | 2018 | IVCM a | POAG c | Fixed CT d: | ||
| latanoprost/timolol | ||||||
| travoprost/timolol | ||||||
| bimatoprost/timolol | ||||||
| Unfixed CT d: | ||||||
| bimatoprost/timolol | ||||||
| Agnifili L. et al. [ | 2018 | IVCM a | POAG c | Fixed CT d: | ||
| PXG h | prostaglandin/timolol | |||||
| PG i | Unfixed CT d: | |||||
| Healthy controls | latanoprost + timolol | |||||
|
| Baratz K. et al. [ | 2006 | IVCM a | OH b (medication group) | Fixed CT d: | In the case of multitherapy with respect to healthy controls: Decrease in central corneal sub-basal nerve fiber number, length, and density and increase in basal epithelial cells’ density [ Decrease of corneal thickness measurements at AS-OCT o [ Higher decrease in sub-basal plexus nerve density [ Higher DCs’ f density [ At limbus: higher limbal inflammation, irregularity of the transition epithelium, DCs’ f activation, and fibrosis of the Vogt’s palisades [ Discording results in the corneal thickness parameters at AS-OCT o with regard to the number of drugs used [ |
| OH b (observation group) | Dorzolamide/timolol | |||||
| Mastropasqua R. et al. [ | 2015 | LSCM m | POAG c | Fixed CT d: | ||
| preserved latanoprost/timolol | ||||||
| preserved dorzolamide/timolol | ||||||
| preserved bimatroprost/brimonidine/timolol | ||||||
| preserved latanoprost/dorzolamide/timolol | ||||||
| Unfixed CT d: | ||||||
| preserved bimatoprost/timolol | ||||||
| preserved brimonidine/timolol | ||||||
| Mastropasqua R. et al. [ | 2016 | IVCM a | OAG p | Fixed CT d: | ||
| preserved latanoprost/timolol | ||||||
| preserved dorzolamide/timolol | ||||||
| preserved brimonidine/timolol | ||||||
| preserved bimatroprost/brimonidine/timolol | ||||||
| Unfixed CT d: | ||||||
| preserved bimatoprost/timolol | ||||||
| Saini M. et al. [ | 2017 | IVCM a | OH b | Preserved CT d: | ||
| timolol/brimonidine | ||||||
| timolol/latanoprost | ||||||
| latanoprost/brimonidine | ||||||
| Batawi H. et al. [ | 2018 | AS-OCT o | POAG c | CT d (not specified) | ||
| Montorio D. et al. [ | 2020 | AS-OCT o | POAG c | CT d (not specified) | ||
| Dogan E. et al. [ | 2020 | AS-OCT o | POAG c | CT d (not specified) | ||
|
| Agnifili L. et al. [ | 2020 | AS-OCT o | POAG c | Two or more drugs (not specified) | Smaller TMH u and TMA v in the case of multitherapy with respect to monotherapy |
a IVCM = in vivo confocal microscopy; b OH = ocular hypertension; c POAG = primary open angle glaucoma; d CT = combined therapy; e EM = epithelial microcysts; f DCs = dendritic cells; g GCs = coblet cells; h PXG = pseudoesfoliative glaucoma; i PG = pigmentary glaucoma; j DED = dry eye disease; k MGs = Meibomian glands; l PF = preservative free; m LSCM = laser scanning confocal microscopy; n IC = impression citology; o AS-OCT = anterior segment optical coherence tomography; p OAG = open angle glaucoma; q PACG = primary angle closure glaucoma; r JOAG = juvenile open angle glaucoma; s NTG = normal tension glaucoma; t EDE = evaporative dry eye; u TMH = tear meniscus height; v TMA = tear meniscus area.
Figure 2Anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) of tear meniscus in medically controlled glaucoma. Fluorescein appearance of the tear meniscus and tear film in patients controlled with a preservative-free or preserved PGA mono-therapy (A,B), or with two or more drugs per day (C,D). AS-OCT shows the progressive reduction of the tear meniscus height (arrowhead) with increasing the number of medications, and the cumulative daily dose of preservative, required to control the disease (E–H).
Summary of clinical studies evaluating the main features of functioning glaucoma filtering bleb using IVCM, AS-OCT, and OCT-A.
| Authors | Year | Technique | Study Population | Surgical Procedure | Main Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labbè A. et al. [ | 2005 | IVCM a | OAG b | Trabeculectomy | Functioning filtering bleb at IVCM a: increase in conjunctival EM d density and area [ low density of connective tissue [ trabecular or reticular stromal pattern with high density of stromal cystic spaces [ small diameters and less tortuosity of stromal vessels [ evidence of numerous atypical GCs i with weak or no mucin marker 5AC immunostaining [ less signs of inflammation in the case of XEN 45 gel stent implant with respect to combined procedure, trabeculectomy, or medical therapy [ low reflectivity appearance of the bleb wall [ cystic pattern [ few conjunctival fibrosis [ diffuse distribution of fluid and small, diffuse, and hyporeflective cysts [ Thinner and flatter hypo-reflective bleb wall and fewer intra-bleb cystic cavities in the case of XEN 45 gel stent implant with respect to trabeculectomy bleb [ rarefied vascular network with low vessel density and numerous and large vessel displacement areas within the bleb-wall [ positive correlation between conjunctival vessel density and area and IOP m after surgery [ positive correlation between the colour and brightness densities of the bleb wall after surgery and the conventional vascular score bleb grading systems [ |
| Guthoff R. et al. [ | 2006 | IVCM a | OAG b | Trabeculectomy | |
| Messmer E. et al. [ | 2006 | IVCM a | POAG e | Trabeculectomy | |
| Amar N. et al. [ | 2008 | IVCM a | OAG b | Trabeculectomy | |
| Ciancaglini M. et al. [ | 2008 | IVCM a | POAG e | Trabeculectomy | |
| Sbeity Z. et al. [ | 2009 | IVCM a | POAG e | Trabeculectomy | |
| Ciancaglini M. et al. [ | 2009 | IVCM a | POAG e | Trabeculectomy | |
| Morita K. et al. [ | 2012 | IVCM a | POAG e | Trabeculectomy | |
| Agnifili L. et al. [ | 2016 | IVCM a | OAG b | Trabeculectomy | |
| Fea A. et al. [ | 2017 | IVCM a | POAG e | XEN 45 gel stent implant | |
| Olate-Perez A. et al. [ | 2017 | AS-OCT j | POAG e | XEN 45 gel stent implant + cataract surgery | |
| Yin X. et al. [ | 2018 | OCT-A l | Primary Glaucoma | Trabeculectomy | |
| Hayek S. et al. [ | 2019 | OCT-A l | OAG b | Trabeculectomy | |
| Lenzhofer M. et al. [ | 2019 | AS-OCT j | OAG b | XEN 45 gel stent implant | |
| Teus M.A. et al. [ | 2019 | AS-OCT j | POAG e | XEN 45 gel stent implant | |
| Seo J.H. et al. [ | 2019 | OCT-A l | POAG e | Trabeculectomy | |
| Seo J.H. et al. [ | 2019 | OCT-A l | POAG e | Trabeculectomy | |
| Baiocchi S. et al. [ | 2020 | IVCM a | POAG e | XEN 45 gel stent implant | |
| Sacchi M. et al. [ | 2020 | AS-OCT j | POAG e | XEN 45 gel stent implant | |
| Mastropasqua R. et al. [ | 2020 | OCT-A l | POAG e | XEN gel stent implant |
a IVCM = in vivo confocal microscopy; b OAG = open angle glaucoma; c CACG = chronic angle closure glaucoma; d EM = epithelial microcysts; e POAG = primary open angle glaucoma; f PXG = pseudoesfoliative glaucoma; g NTG = normal tension glaucoma; h IC = impression citology; i GCs = goblet cells; j AS- OCT = anterior segment optical coherence tomography; k UBM = ultrasound biomicroscopy; l OCT-A = optical coherence tomography angiography; m IOP = intraocular pressure; n PACG = primary angle closure glaucoma; o PG = pigmentary glaucoma.
Figure 3AS-OCT and IVCM conjunctival bleb features after glaucoma filtration surgery. (A–D) Filtration bleb imaged by AS-OCT. Diffuse (A) or cystic (B) filtration bleb after completely successful trabeculectomy, showing numerous, differently sized hypo-reflective spaces filled with aqueous humor; incapsulated (C) and flat (D) filtration bleb after a failed trabeculectomy without evidence of hypo-reflective intra-bleb wall spaces. (E–N) Bleb-wall imaged by IVCM. In diffuse (E,F) or cystic (G,H) functioning filtration blebs, the bleb-wall epithelium (E,G) shows several microcysts with a loosely arranged stroma (F,H), indicating a good aqueous humor percolation and a minimal hydraulic resistivity through the bleb-wall layers. Opposite features are present in incapsulated (I,L) or flat (M,N) non-functioning filtration blebs: the bleb-wall epithelium (I,M) shows rare microcysts, whereas the stroma (L,N) appears densely arranged. These features indicate an inefficient aqueous humor percolation through the bleb-wall layers. Bar represents 50 µm.