| Literature DB >> 30160048 |
Markus Lenzhofer1,2, Clemens Strohmaier1,2, Melchior Hohensinn1,2, Wolfgang Hitzl1,2, Philipp Sperl1,2, Matthias Gerner1,2, Veit Steiner1,2, Sarah Moussa1,2, Eva Krall1,2, Herbert A Reitsamer1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Like the classic trabeculectomy, the minimally invasive, ab interno XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent (XEN-GGM) creates a filtration bleb in the conjunctiva. The goal of this study was to investigate internal bleb morphology over time with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) after XEN-GGM implantation.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990XENzzm321990; glaucoma; minimally invasive glaucoma surgery; subconjunctival implant; surgical success
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30160048 PMCID: PMC6586011 DOI: 10.1111/aos.13902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Ophthalmol ISSN: 1755-375X Impact factor: 3.761
Figure 1Location of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT) scans for assessment of bleb morphology after XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent (XEN‐GGM) implantation. Slit lamp photograph of a bleb 1 week after XEN‐GGM implantation. The XEN‐GGM is highlighted in blue. One scan was obtained radially to the limbus and through the outer part of the XEN‐GGM (a). A second scan perpendicular to the first one was taken to image the subconjunctival part of the XEN‐GGM close to its exit site (b). A third scan was taken parallel and 1 mm posterior to the outer XEN‐GGM lumen through the site of maximal bleb elevation (c).
Figure 2Bleb morphology in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT) after XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent implantation. Bleb morphology in AS‐OCT was classified into four groups: 1. uniform (no fluid‐filled hyporeflective spaces in subconjunctival space, top left and top right), 2. subconjunctival separation (multiple small spaces in more superficial layers, middle left and middle right), 3. microcystic multiform (multiple cystic hyporeflective areas in deep layer separated by thin septae, which are highlighted with “↓”; their thicker bleb wall makes the bleb appear encapsulated in AS‐OCT, Bottom left) and 4. multiple internal layer (hyporeflective spaces in deep and superficial layers of conjunctiva with channels of fluid parallel to the surface of the sclera; fluid‐filled spaces highlighted with “►”; bottom right).
Figure 3Course of intraocular pressure and number of glaucoma medications after XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent implantation. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP, Top) ranged from 9.2 at day 1 to 15.9 mmHg at month 9 within the first year postoperatively. A significant mean IOP reduction could be achieved after XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent implantation at each postoperative visit (each p < 0.001). A significant reduction in number of IOP lowering medications was also detected postoperatively (each p < 0.001, Bottom). Whiskers indicate 95% confidence intervals for means.
Outcome parameters after XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent implantation in the first year
| IOP (95%CI, mmHg) | Number of glaucoma medications (95%CI) | AS‐OCT morphology | CCT (95%CI, | ACD (95%CI, mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform (IOP ± SD; Meds ± SD) | Microcystic multiform (IOP ± SD; Meds ± SD) | Subconjunctival separation (IOP ± SD; Meds ± SD) | Multiple internal layer (IOP ± SD; Meds ± SD) | |||||
| Baseline | 23.7 (22.1–25.4) | 3.4 (3.2–3.6) | 530.2 (521.0–539.3) | 3.3 (2.8–3.8) | ||||
| Day 1 | 9.2 (8.1–10.3) | 0 (−) | 38% | 12% | 42% | 8% | 3.4 (3.2–3.7) | |
| Week 1 | 14.5 (12.5–16.4) | 0.1 (−0.1–0.3) | 28% | 12% | 40% | 21% | 3.6 (3.3–3.9) | |
| Week 2 | 15.8 (14.1–17.5) | 0.2 (0–0.4) | 48% | 13% | 24% | 15% | 3.5 (3.1–3.8) | |
| Month 1 | 15.5 (14.7–17.2) | 0.3 (0.1–0.6) | 47% | 5% | 32% | 16% | 3.5 (3.3–3.8) | |
| Month 3 | 14.5 (13.0–16.0) | 0.5 (0.2–0.8) | 46% | 9% | 29% | 16% | 3.6 (3.3–3.8) | |
| Month 6 | 15.2 (13.0–17.4) | 0.6 (0.4–0.9) | 52% | 12% | 19% | 16% | 3.6 (3.3–3.8) | |
| Month 9 | 15.9 (14.2–17.7) | 0.7 (0.4–1) | 43% | 24% | 16% | 17% | 3.6 (3.3–3.9) | |
| Month 12 | 15.2 (13.5–16.9) | 0.9 (0.5–1.2) | 27% (18.3 ± 8.0 mmHg; 1.9 ± 1.1) | 24% (16.2 ± 7.0 mmHg; 0.8 ± 1.2) | 22% (14.4 ± 3.5 mmHg; 0.5 ± 0.9) | 27% (14.1 ± 3.6 mmHg; 0.9 ± 1.1) | 3.6 (3.3–3.9) | |
ACD = anterior chamber depth; CCT = central corneal thickness.
Results of outcome parameters in the first year: Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and mean number of glaucoma medications (Meds), 95% confidence interval (CI); anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT) bleb morphology distribution.
Figure 4Stacked histograms of bleb morphology in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT) after XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent implantation over time. Uniform bleb morphology showed at week 1 (p < 0.004) higher mean intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to the other three morphologies in AS‐OCT separately. Comparing uniform bleb morphology against all other morphologies combined, a statistically significant higher mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was detected in uniform blebs at week 1 (p < 0.001), week 2 (p < 0.001), month 1 (p = 0.005) and month 3 (p = 0.04). A strong negative correlation between the timelines of subconjunctival separation morphology prevalence at all visits in the AS‐OCT and the mean IOP could be shown (r = −0.75, p = 0.031). Significant changes of bleb morphology in AS‐OCT between visits are shown in Table 2.
Changes of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT) bleb morphology distribution after XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent implantation in the first year
| Morphology | Early or late change? | Compared visits | Trend | Relative change (OR | 95% confidence intervals | p‐Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform | Early | W1 → W2 | ↑ |
| 1.3–18 | 0.0124 |
| W1 → M1 | ↑ |
| 1.4–37.5 | 0.0075 | ||
| D1 → M6 | ↑ |
| 1.2–32 | 0.0209 | ||
| Late | W2 → M12 | ↓ | 0.33 | 0.12–0.88 | 0.025 | |
| M1 → M12 | ↓ | 0.33 | 0.12–0.88 | 0.0253 | ||
| M3 → M12 | ↓ | 0.36 | 0.1–0.99 | 0.0389 | ||
| M6 → M12 | ↓ | 0.1 | 0.005–0.64 | 0.0067 | ||
| M9 → M12 | ↓ | 0.13 | 0.006–0.8 | 0.0196 | ||
| Subconjunctival separation | Early | W1 → W2 | ↓ | 0.29 | 0.09–0.87 | 0.0184 |
| W1 → M1 | ↓ | 0.29 | 0.09–0.87 | 0.0184 | ||
| W1 → M3 | ↓ | 0.5 | 0.17–1.23 | 0.0184 | ||
| Late | W1 → M6 | ↓ | 0.31 | 0.11–0.84 | 0.0164 | |
| W1 → M9 | ↓ | 0.13 | 0.02–0.51 | 0.0016 | ||
| W1 → M12 | ↓ | 0.31 | 0.11–0.84 | 0.0164 | ||
| M3 → M6 | ↓ | 0.22 | 0.03–1 | 0.0348 | ||
| M3 → M9 | ↓ | 0.29 | 0.09–0.87 | 0.0184 | ||
| M3 → M12 | ↓ | 0.33 | 0.1–1.0 | 0.0455 | ||
| Multiple internal layer | Late | D1 → M12 | ↓ | 0.13 | 0.006–0.8 | 0.0196 |
| W1 → M12 | ↑ |
| 1.3–35 | 0.0126 | ||
| W2 → M12 | ↑ |
| 1.3–35 | 0.0126 | ||
| M1 → M12 | ↑ |
| 1.0–29 | 0.0348 | ||
| M3 → M12 | ↑ |
| 2.8‐infinity | 0.0016 | ||
| M9 → M12 | ↑ |
| 1.0–29 | 0.0348 | ||
| Microcystic multiform | Late | M1 → M9 | ↑ |
| 1.3–17.8 | 0.0124 |
| M1 → M12 | ↑ |
| 1.6–214 | 0.0067 | ||
| M3 → M9 | ↑ |
| 1.3–17.8 | 0.0124 | ||
| M6 → M9 | ↑ |
| 0.79–26.2 | 0.033 |
All visits were compared against all visits. Just statically significant results of changes are shown. Clinically significant results are bolded. ↑ indicating an increase in AS‐OCT morphology, ↓ indicating a decrease in AS‐OCT morphology between shown visits.
Nam score test.
Wald Z test without continuity correction.
Odds ratio.