Literature DB >> 24434659

Bimatoprost 0.01% vs bimatoprost 0.03%: a 12-month prospective trial of clinical and in vivo confocal microscopy in glaucoma patients.

M Figus1, M Nardi1, P Piaggi2, M Sartini1, G Guidi1, L Martini1, S Lazzeri1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of two commercially available formulations of bimatoprost eye drops: 0.03 and 0.01% ophthalmic solutions.
METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective, parallel-group, open-label, cohort study. A total of 60 glaucoma patients (60 eyes) under bimatoprost 0.03% monotherapy since at least 1 year were enrolled. Selected patients were randomized to receive a single drop of bimatoprost 0.01% (n=30) or bimatoprost 0.03% (n=30) ophthalmic solutions for 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA test.
RESULTS: Global clinical score (the sum of pruritus, stinging/burning, blurred vision, sticky eye sensation, eye dryness sensation, and foreign body sensation) significantly decreased in the bimatoprost 0.01% group from baseline 4.7 ± 3.8 to 2.9 ± 2.3 (P < 0.001) and 2.5 ± 2.0 (P < 0.001) at 6-month and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. Comparison between groups showed differences at both follow-up visits (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). In vivo confocal microscopy revealed a significant increase in goblet cell density in the bimatoprost 0.01% group compared with the bimatoprost 0.03% group (P<0.001 at both follow-up visits). All functional parameters and conjunctival hyperemia improved in the bimatoprost 0.01% group at each follow-up visit (P < 0.05) and in comparison with bimatoprost 0.03% (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The results of this trial suggest that bimatoprost 0.01% eye drops seem to decrease the ocular discomfort with respect to bimatoprost 0.03% eye drops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24434659      PMCID: PMC3983628          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  45 in total

1.  A cost-effectiveness comparison of bimatoprost versus latanoprost in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Gail F Schwartz; Gregory Reardon
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.

Authors:  M Sherwood; J Brandt
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Short-term changes in the optic nerve head and visual field after trabeculectomy.

Authors:  M Figus; S Lazzeri; M Nardi; M P Bartolomei; A Ferreras; P Fogagnolo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Mitochondrial activity and glutathione injury in apoptosis induced by unpreserved and preserved beta-blockers on Chang conjunctival cells.

Authors:  C Debbasch; P J Pisella; M De Saint Jean; P Rat; J M Warnet; C Baudouin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, for glaucoma therapy. Efficacy and safety after 1 year of treatment in 198 patients. Latanoprost Study Groups.

Authors:  C B Camras; A Alm; P Watson; J Stjernschantz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Effects of benzalkonium chloride on growth and survival of Chang conjunctival cells.

Authors:  M De Saint Jean; F Brignole; A F Bringuier; A Bauchet; G Feldmann; C Baudouin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Long-term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for intraocular pressure lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: year 4.

Authors:  R D Williams; J S Cohen; R L Gross; C-C Liu; E Safyan; A L Batoosingh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Impression cytology study of epithelial phenotype of ocular surface reconstructed by preserved human amniotic membrane.

Authors:  P Prabhasawat; S C Tseng
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-11

9.  Evaluation of biomarkers of inflammation in response to benzalkonium chloride on corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells.

Authors:  Seth P Epstein; Dongmei Chen; Penny A Asbell
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Two-year double-masked comparison of bimatoprost with timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  John S Cohen; Ronald L Gross; Janet K Cheetham; Amanda M VanDenburgh; Paula Bernstein; Scott M Whitcup
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.048

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ocular Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL Preservative-Free versus Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with Benzalkonium Chloride or Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL Preservative-Free in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Mariaelena Filippelli; Giuseppe Campagna; Nicola Ciampa; Gaetano Fioretto; Roberta Giannini; Pier Franco Marino; Roberto dell'Omo; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  A combined analysis of four observational studies evaluating the intraocular pressure-lowering ability and tolerability of bimatoprost 0.01% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Annemie Stevens; Milko E Iliev; Leo de Jong; Ioana Grobeiu; Anton Hommer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-06

3.  Tolerability and efficacy of bimatoprost 0.01 % in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension evaluated in the Taiwanese clinical setting: the Asia Pacific Patterns from Early Access of Lumigan 0.01 % (APPEAL Taiwan) study.

Authors:  Ying Ying Chen; Tsing-Hong Wang; Catherine Liu; Kwou-Yeung Wu; Shin-Lin Chiu; Susan Simonyi; Da-Wen Lu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Evaluating intraocular pressure-lowering solutions for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: comparison between bimatoprost 0.03% and bimatoprost 0.01% - an observational switch study.

Authors:  Sarita S Deshpande; Sriram Sonty; Afzal Ahmad
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-27

5.  The Effect of Long-Term Usage of Single-Agent Antiglaucomatous Drops with Different Preservatives on Cornea Biomechanics.

Authors:  Gozde Aksoy Aydemir; Gulizar Demirok; Umit Eksioglu; Mehmet Yakin; Firdevs Ornek
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2021-02-15

6.  Retrospective Analysis of Switching Bimatoprost 0.01% to Bimatoprost 0.03% in Patients with Various Types of Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.

Authors:  Kai Man Xu; Ryan Cho; Toby Yiu Bong Chan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 7.  Confocal Microscopy and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of the Ocular Surface and Bleb Morphology in Medically and Surgically Treated Glaucoma Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Carmela Carnevale; Ivano Riva; Gloria Roberti; Manuele Michelessi; Lucia Tanga; Alice C Verticchio Vercellin; Luca Agnifili; Gianluca Manni; Alon Harris; Luciano Quaranta; Francesco Oddone
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-18

8.  Tear biomarkers in latanoprost and bimatoprost treated eyes.

Authors:  Shweta Reddy; Prity Sahay; Debananda Padhy; Sarada Sarangi; Mrutyunjay Suar; Rahul Modak; Aparna Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ocular pharmacokinetics and tolerability of bimatoprost ophthalmic solutions administered once or twice daily in rabbits, and clinical dosing implications.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Margot L Goodkin; Warren Tong; Mayssa Attar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-28

Review 10.  Ocular Surface Changes in Prostaglandin Analogue-Treated Patients.

Authors:  Wencui Shen; Bingqing Huang; Jin Yang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 1.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.